Hipple Long Ware & Peete
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
While this may be true, if the Pats brought back Caotes for this game, he would likely put up 6-67 against the Jets. We can shut down WRs, but TEs is a whole different ballgame. i would not be surprised if hernandez ans Gronkowski combine for 150 yards and the WRs walked away with 100...
to be fair he didn't say gronk wouldn't get his, just that the man to man plays into Herndos game and thus favors him for a nice matchup.While this may be true, if the Pats brought back Caotes for this game, he would likely put up 6-67 against the Jets. We can shut down WRs, but TEs is a whole different ballgame. i would not be surprised if hernandez ans Gronkowski combine for 150 yards and the WRs walked away with 100...
I hope this is right. It seems that Gronk is now catching alot of the intermediate stuff that Hernandez had during the beginning of the season. Right now, it doesn't seem that Hernandez does anything that Gronk can't. And remember, this offense goes through Brady, and the ability to keep him upright. Go Gronk!The bottom line in all of this is that things have changed since they first played early on in this season. Hernandez was in the game a lot more, he was the TE to play because he was in on most of the plays.That's not the case as the season has developed. Hernandez is in on less than half the plays and Brady just doesn't look his way. Gronkowski has proven to be a reliable blocker and can catch the ball. He's way better than Hernandez as a TE, he does the job.
one of the main truisms behinds the belly-chick fantasy legend is that Bill has no ego when it comes to winning football games. He just wants to win. He doesn't want to 'dominate' you, 'outfinesse' you, by 'winning his way'. The patriots have no 'way'. They are a swiss army knife team, that can beat you in many ways. The only thing we truly have to go on, is what the other teams perceived weaknesses are as a 'template' of what the will do. But much like playing poison drinking with the scicilian in the princess bride, he is always capable of sensing that you would 'expect him to do that', so he instead does a near variation of that designed to feign that attack, but exploit a different weakness or vulnerability that is exposed by trying to guess what he is gonna do.So this is all we got.I think Gronkowski will have much better matchups this week vs the Jets. It may be Hernandez 'week' going in to the game, but Im sure the Pats realize the Jets dont have anyone who's a real good matchup for Gronk this week, either. Hernandez has said he's looking forward to a team that covers man-to-man, but if its Revis doing the covering, I dont think that bodes real well for him. Gronkowski's the player here. jmho
Chicago plays less man to man so it's Gronk's turn.Anything on this weekend? I have both NE tight ends (and Heap) so I have to figure out which one to start until Heap comes back from the hammy.
Think I'll roll with Gronk this weekend. I'll trust this guy until his theory proves incorrect.Ramos said:Chicago plays less man to man so it's Gronk's turn.Evilgrin 72 said:Anything on this weekend? I have both NE tight ends (and Heap) so I have to figure out which one to start until Heap comes back from the hammy.
Don't skip week 15... :sheesh:What about the juicy week 16 BUF matchup? Anybody know if Buffalo would be more likely to go zone or man-to-man against NE?
Lex already mentioned that GB uses more zone:Don't skip week 15... :sheesh:What about the juicy week 16 BUF matchup? Anybody know if Buffalo would be more likely to go zone or man-to-man against NE?
This article nailed it sayn it would be hernandez for monday night. In another thread it was suggested someone look at previous games to see if this holds true. Someone mentioned bears use zone more so does gb
if it isnt right all that means is BB knew that the other team was expecting gronkowski and pulled a fast one and threw hernandez in the mix for the slam dunk! or maybe BB knows that he was going to fake out the defense when they would be expecting gronk and play hernandez in zone but threw a curve ball and played gronk cuz they wouldn't see it coming and psyched them out! or maybe ...Benching Hernandez. Hope its right.
You should subscribe to my blog.Fullback Fro said:I wish I would have read this last weekend.
Im benching them both for Ed Dickson this week.Anything on this weekend? I have both NE tight ends (and Heap) so I have to figure out which one to start until Heap comes back from the hammy.
Ed Dickson is expected to start against the Texans Monday night with Todd Heap (hamstring) considered unlikely to play.Here's your sleeper for the first round of the fantasy playoffs. Dickson's seven targets against the Steelers were second on the team, and the Texans surrender the most points to opposing fantasy tight ends. Dickson will be a top-12 option in Week 14.
Same here.Im benching them both for Ed Dickson this week.Anything on this weekend? I have both NE tight ends (and Heap) so I have to figure out which one to start until Heap comes back from the hammy.Ed Dickson is expected to start against the Texans Monday night with Todd Heap (hamstring) considered unlikely to play.Here's your sleeper for the first round of the fantasy playoffs. Dickson's seven targets against the Steelers were second on the team, and the Texans surrender the most points to opposing fantasy tight ends. Dickson will be a top-12 option in Week 14.
Looks like I am going with gronk too. Hey this guys been right so far...Yes, that's what they said - rolling with Gronk again next week.
FAILat least you had lube...Im benching them both for Ed Dickson this week.Anything on this weekend? I have both NE tight ends (and Heap) so I have to figure out which one to start until Heap comes back from the hammy.Ed Dickson is expected to start against the Texans Monday night with Todd Heap (hamstring) considered unlikely to play.Here's your sleeper for the first round of the fantasy playoffs. Dickson's seven targets against the Steelers were second on the team, and the Texans surrender the most points to opposing fantasy tight ends. Dickson will be a top-12 option in Week 14.
EXACTLY my question...got both now on the fence which to start.starting Gronk over Marcedes![]()
I'm in the same boat as you. Currently have Marcedes starting, Daniels on the bench, and considering picking up Gronk now that Hernandez is ill. Absolutely must have strong output from the TE position this week. Any homers willing to expand on how sick Hernandez really is?
Marcedes had a TD against Indy in the first meeting between the Colts and Jags, and everything is pointing toward a total shootout on Sunday. Despite weeks 12 and 13 where he disappeared due to blocking duty, he's been money in the redzone since Garrard constantly looks for a safety valve.Daniels certainly looked impressive in his return to full health this past Monday night, but I worry that he'll have conditioning concerns on Sunday since he's missed most of the season. That being said, you are indeed right about the Titans giving up a lot of points to TEs, however they seem to have quelled those numbers in the past few weeks.This week, it seems like all three (Lewis, Daniels, and Gronk) have equal opportunity to perform well.Just curious why you have Daniels on the bench? He is back and healthy, had a lot of targets last game. Also, the Titans are next to last in the league in giving up points to TE's. I am starting Daniels this week and feeling great about it. I like him a lot more than any of the other guys you have.
Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Aaron pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty seriousI'm in the same boat as you. Currently have Marcedes starting, Daniels on the bench, and considering picking up Gronk now that Hernandez is ill. Absolutely must have strong output from the TE position this week. Any homers willing to expand on how sick Hernandez really is?
I have a marcedes/j graham decision. The only thing that frightens me is this Garrard que + signing todd bouman thing...Marcedes had a TD against Indy in the first meeting between the Colts and Jags, and everything is pointing toward a total shootout on Sunday. Despite weeks 12 and 13 where he disappeared due to blocking duty, he's been money in the redzone since Garrard constantly looks for a safety valve.Daniels certainly looked impressive in his return to full health this past Monday night, but I worry that he'll have conditioning concerns on Sunday since he's missed most of the season. That being said, you are indeed right about the Titans giving up a lot of points to TEs, however they seem to have quelled those numbers in the past few weeks.Just curious why you have Daniels on the bench? He is back and healthy, had a lot of targets last game. Also, the Titans are next to last in the league in giving up points to TE's. I am starting Daniels this week and feeling great about it. I like him a lot more than any of the other guys you have.
This week, it seems like all three (Lewis, Daniels, and Gronk) have equal opportunity to perform well.
HEy everyone... Hipple just got back from the clubs and is drunk!!1!Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Aaron pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty seriousI'm in the same boat as you. Currently have Marcedes starting, Daniels on the bench, and considering picking up Gronk now that Hernandez is ill. Absolutely must have strong output from the TE position this week. Any homers willing to expand on how sick Hernandez really is?
Doesn't this scheme leave a lot of man to man situations?If their corners are locked up on man and there's blitzing in their 3-4 I'd think that leaves Hernandez with man coverage.KYThe Packers tend to run a 3-4 zone blitz defensive scheme led by defensive coordinator Dom Capers. When he was the defensive coordinator for the Steelers, Capers was one of the original architects of the 3-4 zone blitz scheme used by the Steelers over the last 18 years. The same type of 3-4 zone blitz scheme that Gronkowski torched for 5 catches for 72 yards and 3 TDs and that held Hernandez to no catches in the Patriots' Week 10 win over the Steelers.
They switch back and fourth from the 3-4 to 4-3, Early on this year every TE was going un touched down the middle on us but of recent we have contained pretty well.What's buffalo's scheme? anyone know?
they blitz but its a zone blitz...Doesn't this scheme leave a lot of man to man situations?If their corners are locked up on man and there's blitzing in their 3-4 I'd think that leaves Hernandez with man coverage.The Packers tend to run a 3-4 zone blitz defensive scheme led by defensive coordinator Dom Capers. When he was the defensive coordinator for the Steelers, Capers was one of the original architects of the 3-4 zone blitz scheme used by the Steelers over the last 18 years. The same type of 3-4 zone blitz scheme that Gronkowski torched for 5 catches for 72 yards and 3 TDs and that held Hernandez to no catches in the Patriots' Week 10 win over the Steelers.
KY
I feel like I finally have a formula I can go on with the Patriots' tight ends. Last week I mentioned I was more interested in playing Rob Gronkowski because I feel like he's on the field much more against primarily zone defenses. That bore fruit: Gronk played 71 snaps and Aaron Hernandez played only 20 (including some two-tight end sets). This week, against a very man-to-man-heavy Packers defense (which, by the way, you're advised to bench Sunday), I believe Hernandez will see his snap count increase quite a bit, so much so that I ranked him ahead of Gronkowski. Both are in No. 2 tight end territory, though.
Schaub had 62 attempts last week and Dreesen is still involved. I think last week's production might be a bit of a mirage....or at least skewed and would be hesitant about expecting that from Daniels this week. Of course I could be wrong and Daniels could be back to the #1 again. Would love to see how many snaps each played.Just curious why you have Daniels on the bench? He is back and healthy, had a lot of targets last game. Also, the Titans are next to last in the league in giving up points to TE's. I am starting Daniels this week and feeling great about it. I like him a lot more than any of the other guys you have.
I'm in the same boat as you. Currently have Marcedes starting, Daniels on the bench, and considering picking up Gronk now that Hernandez is ill. Absolutely must have strong output from the TE position this week. Any homers willing to expand on how sick Hernandez really is?
so he stole Ian Rappaports work, is now calling it his theory, and doesn't know what the packers defense is.Saw this on ESPN
I feel like I finally have a formula I can go on with the Patriots' tight ends. Last week I mentioned I was more interested in playing Rob Gronkowski because I feel like he's on the field much more against primarily zone defenses. That bore fruit: Gronk played 71 snaps and Aaron Hernandez played only 20 (including some two-tight end sets). This week, against a very man-to-man-heavy Packers defense (which, by the way, you're advised to bench Sunday), I believe Hernandez will see his snap count increase quite a bit, so much so that I ranked him ahead of Gronkowski. Both are in No. 2 tight end territory, though.![]()
Just glad to know it wasn't your sister who got him sick.Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Aaron pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty seriousI'm in the same boat as you. Currently have Marcedes starting, Daniels on the bench, and considering picking up Gronk now that Hernandez is ill. Absolutely must have strong output from the TE position this week. Any homers willing to expand on how sick Hernandez really is?
That's what makes it so laughable that it's THAT guy that broke the NE TE code, not Rappaport (though Rappsport's was out 2 weeks earlier), i bet this guy is just acting like he came up with it... hilariousTrizzler said:Just glad to know it wasn't your sister who got him sick.Hipple said:Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Aaron pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty seriousI'm in the same boat as you. Currently have Marcedes starting, Daniels on the bench, and considering picking up Gronk now that Hernandez is ill. Absolutely must have strong output from the TE position this week. Any homers willing to expand on how sick Hernandez really is?The whole Bouman thing has me highly concerned. If Garrard is having mobility problems, Lewis will probably be called to block more often, taking away his targets. The Jags will also want to use MJD and Jennings as much as possible to run the clock down. Best option for me might just be dropping Lewis for Gronk, especially since my opponent is starting Brady.As for someone declaring that GB is playing man coverage, they haven't watched a single snap of football this season.
Are the Packers playing zone or did they switch to man-to-man? I'm not watching...The damn formula isnt working![]()