What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Moulds looking to play for Philly (2 Viewers)

scratcher

Footballguy
As an Eagles fan, not sure how I feel about this. If he is to be gotten for much less than he wants, then I say go for it.

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/fo...ll/14195503.htm

Agent: Moulds wants to play for Eagles

By PAUL DOMOWITCH

pdomo@aol.com

ORLANDO, Fla. - Eric Moulds has a wish list of five teams he'd like to play for, and guess who's at the tippy-top of it?

That's right. The Eagles.

"Every time I mention Philadelphia, Eric's ears perk up," said Greg Johnson, who represents the 32-year-old Bills wide receiver along with his partner, Harry Henderson. "He wants to go to Philadelphia. He really feels he could help them. He loves the idea of being an Eagle and playing with Donovan [McNabb]."

Moulds wants out of Buffalo, and the Bills, who will have to pay him $7.1 million in salary and bonuses this year if he's on the team, are only too happy to oblige him. They have put the word out that he can be had for a second-day pick in next month's draft.

But don't start visualizing him in an Eagles uniform quite yet.

Johnson said he talked to Eagles president Joe Banner last week. He said there is "some interest" in Moulds by the Eagles, which an organization source also acknowledged.

But as much as Moulds would love to catch passes from McNabb, he is not interested in doing it for free, or anything close to free.

According to a source from one of the five teams on Moulds' wish list, which also includes New Eng-land, Seattle, Kansas City and Denver, the wide receiver is looking for a contract similar to the one Isaac Bruce signed with the St. Louis Rams 2 weeks ago.

Bruce, who is a year older than Moulds, signed a 3-year, $15 million contract with the Rams on March 10. He had been released by the team a few days earlier, before the league agreed to a new labor extension with the players that significantly increased the salary cap.

Moulds has as much chance of getting a $5 million-a-year deal from the Eagles as Saddam Hussein does of getting an acquittal. Whether he'll get it from anyone else remains to be seen.

"Right now, the money aspect is out of whack," said one league general manager. "If he wants to get traded, he's going to have to come to grips that he's not going to get that. Or maybe he will. Maybe there's a team that's willing to pay him that."

One league source indicated that there may be - the Houston Texans. But the Texans won just two games last season, which isn't exactly a great place for a wideout with Super Bowl aspirations and a ticking biological clock to go.

Johnson confirmed that the Texans have expressed interest in Moulds. "They're very interested," he said. "There are other teams in the mix as well. We're going to play it by ear. We'll see what happens."

Since catching 100 passes for 1,292 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2002, Moulds' pass-catching production has dropped off significantly. He has just 10 touchdown catches and has averaged only 77.6 catches per year the last three seasons, though the poor offensive talent around him, particularly at quarterback, has had more than a little to do with that.

Johnson said Moulds has spoken recently with McNabb. He said the two have been friends for 5 or 6 years.

"Eric would like nothing better than to play with Donovan," he said. "He said he was looking forward to going out to Arizona and training with him [if he's traded to the Eagles]."

 
I'd be fine with the Bills outright releasing him as long as he repaid the $5M in bonus money that counts against the cap this season. It makes me feel kind of good though seeing that other teams are telling him that he wants too much money too.

 
I'd be fine with the Bills outright releasing him as long as he repaid the $5M in bonus money that counts against the cap this season. It makes me feel kind of good though seeing that other teams are telling him that he wants too much money too.
That may happen anyway. Teams wont want to give a pick and the 15mill. If he were a FA i think he could get the 15mill...Eric has said he will NOT play for the Bills. If this is really how he feels,his contract demands will start dropping soon.
 
A second day pick for someone that would instantly upgrade 90% of the WR corps in the league?

Maybe I'm higher on him than most, but I think that would be a no brainer, even at the money he's asking for.

 
As an Eagles fan, not sure how I feel about this. If he is to be gotten for much less than he wants, then I say go for it.

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/fo...ll/14195503.htm

Agent: Moulds wants to play for Eagles

By PAUL DOMOWITCH

pdomo@aol.com

ORLANDO, Fla. - Eric Moulds has a wish list of five teams he'd like to play for, and guess who's at the tippy-top of it?

That's right. The Eagles.

"Every time I mention Philadelphia, Eric's ears perk up," said Greg Johnson, who represents the 32-year-old Bills wide receiver along with his partner, Harry Henderson. "He wants to go to Philadelphia. He really feels he could help them. He loves the idea of being an Eagle and playing with Donovan [McNabb]."

Moulds wants out of Buffalo, and the Bills, who will have to pay him $7.1 million in salary and bonuses this year if he's on the team, are only too happy to oblige him. They have put the word out that he can be had for a second-day pick in next month's draft.

But don't start visualizing him in an Eagles uniform quite yet.

Johnson said he talked to Eagles president Joe Banner last week. He said there is "some interest" in Moulds by the Eagles, which an organization source also acknowledged.

But as much as Moulds would love to catch passes from McNabb, he is not interested in doing it for free, or anything close to free.

According to a source from one of the five teams on Moulds' wish list, which also includes New Eng-land, Seattle, Kansas City and Denver, the wide receiver is looking for a contract similar to the one Isaac Bruce signed with the St. Louis Rams 2 weeks ago.

Bruce, who is a year older than Moulds, signed a 3-year, $15 million contract with the Rams on March 10. He had been released by the team a few days earlier, before the league agreed to a new labor extension with the players that significantly increased the salary cap.

Moulds has as much chance of getting a $5 million-a-year deal from the Eagles as Saddam Hussein does of getting an acquittal. Whether he'll get it from anyone else remains to be seen.

"Right now, the money aspect is out of whack," said one league general manager. "If he wants to get traded, he's going to have to come to grips that he's not going to get that. Or maybe he will. Maybe there's a team that's willing to pay him that."

One league source indicated that there may be - the Houston Texans. But the Texans won just two games last season, which isn't exactly a great place for a wideout with Super Bowl aspirations and a ticking biological clock to go.

Johnson confirmed that the Texans have expressed interest in Moulds. "They're very interested," he said. "There are other teams in the mix as well. We're going to play it by ear. We'll see what happens."

Since catching 100 passes for 1,292 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2002, Moulds' pass-catching production has dropped off significantly. He has just 10 touchdown catches and has averaged only 77.6 catches per year the last three seasons, though the poor offensive talent around him, particularly at quarterback, has had more than a little to do with that.

Johnson said Moulds has spoken recently with McNabb. He said the two have been friends for 5 or 6 years.

"Eric would like nothing better than to play with Donovan," he said. "He said he was looking forward to going out to Arizona and training with him [if he's traded to the Eagles]."
Interesting, but i heard on ESPN yesterday from John Clayton, that N.E is the most likely destination for Moulds..
 
As an Eagles fan, not sure how I feel about this.  If he is to be gotten for much less than he wants, then I say go for it.

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/fo...ll/14195503.htm

Agent: Moulds wants to play for Eagles

By PAUL DOMOWITCH

pdomo@aol.com

ORLANDO, Fla. - Eric Moulds has a wish list of five teams he'd like to play for, and guess who's at the tippy-top of it?

That's right. The Eagles.

"Every time I mention Philadelphia, Eric's ears perk up," said Greg Johnson, who represents the 32-year-old Bills wide receiver along with his partner, Harry Henderson. "He wants to go to Philadelphia. He really feels he could help them. He loves the idea of being an Eagle and playing with Donovan [McNabb]."

Moulds wants out of Buffalo, and the Bills, who will have to pay him $7.1 million in salary and bonuses this year if he's on the team, are only too happy to oblige him. They have put the word out that he can be had for a second-day pick in next month's draft.

But don't start visualizing him in an Eagles uniform quite yet.

Johnson said he talked to Eagles president Joe Banner last week. He said there is "some interest" in Moulds by the Eagles, which an organization source also acknowledged.

But as much as Moulds would love to catch passes from McNabb, he is not interested in doing it for free, or anything close to free.

According to a source from one of the five teams on Moulds' wish list, which also includes New Eng-land, Seattle, Kansas City and Denver, the wide receiver is looking for a contract similar to the one Isaac Bruce signed with the St. Louis Rams 2 weeks ago.

Bruce, who is a year older than Moulds, signed a 3-year, $15 million contract with the Rams on March 10. He had been released by the team a few days earlier, before the league agreed to a new labor extension with the players that significantly increased the salary cap.

Moulds has as much chance of getting a $5 million-a-year deal from the Eagles as Saddam Hussein does of getting an acquittal. Whether he'll get it from anyone else remains to be seen.

"Right now, the money aspect is out of whack," said one league general manager. "If he wants to get traded, he's going to have to come to grips that he's not going to get that. Or maybe he will. Maybe there's a team that's willing to pay him that."

One league source indicated that there may be - the Houston Texans. But the Texans won just two games last season, which isn't exactly a great place for a wideout with Super Bowl aspirations and a ticking biological clock to go.

Johnson confirmed that the Texans have expressed interest in Moulds. "They're very interested," he said. "There are other teams in the mix as well. We're going to play it by ear. We'll see what happens."

Since catching 100 passes for 1,292 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2002, Moulds' pass-catching production has dropped off significantly. He has just 10 touchdown catches and has averaged only 77.6 catches per year the last three seasons, though the poor offensive talent around him, particularly at quarterback, has had more than a little to do with that.

Johnson said Moulds has spoken recently with McNabb. He said the two have been friends for 5 or 6 years.

"Eric would like nothing better than to play with Donovan," he said. "He said he was looking forward to going out to Arizona and training with him [if he's traded to the Eagles]."
Interesting, but i heard on ESPN yesterday from John Clayton, that N.E is the most likely destination for Moulds..
I'm fine with bringing him in under the right terms, but frankly I don't think he's indicated a willingness to play for said terms. I also continue to view this as a one way street in terms of interest until proven otherwise. A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money? That's sort of the blueprint for the kinds of guys Philly avoids, much less signs. :shrug:
 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
In Reid's system? Certainly not in the first year.
 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
In Reid's system? Certainly not in the first year.
I think this system argument applies more to rookies than veteran FAs. I know that T.O. came from a WCO, but I'm pretty sure that Irving Fryar back in the day did not. He seemed to do okay.
 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
In Reid's system? Certainly not in the first year.
I think this system argument applies more to rookies than veteran FAs. I know that T.O. came from a WCO, but I'm pretty sure that Irving Fryar back in the day did not. He seemed to do okay.
Irving Fryar didn't play for Andy Reid. He was an Eagle from 1996-1998, Reid took over in 1999.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
In Reid's system? Certainly not in the first year.
The Bills ran a WCO in 2001. I think the biggest thing is just getting timing and familiarity down between WR and QB.More likely this won't happen because the Eagles aren't going to pay what he wants and I don't think they'll touch a WR with any trace of attitude.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
More likely this won't happen because the Eagles aren't going to pay what he wants and I don't think they'll touch a WR with any trace of attitude.
All the best receivers have attitude otherwise they wouldn't be the best.
 
As an Eagles fan, not sure how I feel about this.  If he is to be gotten for much less than he wants, then I say go for it.

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/fo...ll/14195503.htm

Agent: Moulds wants to play for Eagles

By PAUL DOMOWITCH

pdomo@aol.com

ORLANDO, Fla. - Eric Moulds has a wish list of five teams he'd like to play for, and guess who's at the tippy-top of it?

That's right. The Eagles.

"Every time I mention Philadelphia, Eric's ears perk up," said Greg Johnson, who represents the 32-year-old Bills wide receiver along with his partner, Harry Henderson. "He wants to go to Philadelphia. He really feels he could help them. He loves the idea of being an Eagle and playing with Donovan [McNabb]."

Moulds wants out of Buffalo, and the Bills, who will have to pay him $7.1 million in salary and bonuses this year if he's on the team, are only too happy to oblige him. They have put the word out that he can be had for a second-day pick in next month's draft.

But don't start visualizing him in an Eagles uniform quite yet.

Johnson said he talked to Eagles president Joe Banner last week. He said there is "some interest" in Moulds by the Eagles, which an organization source also acknowledged.

But as much as Moulds would love to catch passes from McNabb, he is not interested in doing it for free, or anything close to free.

According to a source from one of the five teams on Moulds' wish list, which also includes New Eng-land, Seattle, Kansas City and Denver, the wide receiver is looking for a contract similar to the one Isaac Bruce signed with the St. Louis Rams 2 weeks ago.

Bruce, who is a year older than Moulds, signed a 3-year, $15 million contract with the Rams on March 10. He had been released by the team a few days earlier, before the league agreed to a new labor extension with the players that significantly increased the salary cap.

Moulds has as much chance of getting a $5 million-a-year deal from the Eagles as Saddam Hussein does of getting an acquittal. Whether he'll get it from anyone else remains to be seen.

"Right now, the money aspect is out of whack," said one league general manager. "If he wants to get traded, he's going to have to come to grips that he's not going to get that. Or maybe he will. Maybe there's a team that's willing to pay him that."

One league source indicated that there may be - the Houston Texans. But the Texans won just two games last season, which isn't exactly a great place for a wideout with Super Bowl aspirations and a ticking biological clock to go.

Johnson confirmed that the Texans have expressed interest in Moulds. "They're very interested," he said. "There are other teams in the mix as well. We're going to play it by ear. We'll see what happens."

Since catching 100 passes for 1,292 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2002, Moulds' pass-catching production has dropped off significantly. He has just 10 touchdown catches and has averaged only 77.6 catches per year the last three seasons, though the poor offensive talent around him, particularly at quarterback, has had more than a little to do with that.

Johnson said Moulds has spoken recently with McNabb. He said the two have been friends for 5 or 6 years.

"Eric would like nothing better than to play with Donovan," he said. "He said he was looking forward to going out to Arizona and training with him [if he's traded to the Eagles]."
Interesting, but i heard on ESPN yesterday from John Clayton, that N.E is the most likely destination for Moulds..
I'm fine with bringing him in under the right terms, but frankly I don't think he's indicated a willingness to play for said terms. I also continue to view this as a one way street in terms of interest until proven otherwise. A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money? That's sort of the blueprint for the kinds of guys Philly avoids, much less signs. :shrug:
So it's just the money to you then?? I just don't understand how Moulds could not be considered an immeadiate upgrade to Pinkston/Lewis and who ever else they bring in for a camp body. At the very least Moulds should be at his best towards the end of next season which is when the Eagles will need him the most anyways....assuming they make the playoffs that is.Going into the offseason, he might not have been your first choice, but considering what's left out there, and what the Eagles currently have on thier roster I'd say it's a no brainer.

 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money? That's sort of the blueprint for the kinds of guys Philly avoids, much less signs. :shrug:
Aside from Bledsoe in 2002, has there ever been a good QB throwing to Moulds in a solid-all around offense in Buffalo? Moulds marketability has been hurt by the team he's played for. It's frankly amazing that he's put up the numbers he has under the circumstances.

 
A second day pick for someone that would instantly upgrade 90% of the WR corps in the league?

Maybe I'm higher on him than most, but I think that would be a no brainer, even at the money he's asking for.
Exactly what came to mind for me, too!
 
Teams that could use Moulds:

Browns

Broncos

Texans

Jaguars

Chiefs

Dolphins

Patriots

Jets

Chargers

Titans

Seahawks (pending Jackson's knee surgery)

49ers

Eagles

Vikings

Packers

Bears

Falcons

 
moulds is allight but I doubt the eagles or many other teams are willing to give much when he is going to be released sooner or later

moulds is good but his numbers and average yards per catch have been going down for a while now, and he isn't worth WR1 money i think

 
Moulds would be a great fit in Philly, and it would be a shame that the contract would hold that up. That's business in the NFL.

Reggie Brown as the #1 / deep threat whilst possession receiver Moulds lined up opposite of him (yes I know he can go deep too) would be a nice 1-2 in Philly. Puts Pinkston and Lewis down at the 3/4 line where they belong, competing with newcomer Gaffney.

Hopefully the FO can get a contract together that would work for both parties.

 
More likely this won't happen because the Eagles aren't going to pay what he wants and I don't think they'll touch a WR with any trace of attitude.
All the best receivers have attitude otherwise they wouldn't be the best.
Really? I can't remember the last time I heard Marvin Harrison, Hines Ward, Derrick Mason, Rod Smith or Tory Holt run their mouths and cause lockerroom problems.
 
More likely this won't happen because the Eagles aren't going to pay what he wants and I don't think they'll touch a WR with any trace of attitude.
All the best receivers have attitude otherwise they wouldn't be the best.
Really? I can't remember the last time I heard Marvin Harrison, Hines Ward, Derrick Mason, Rod Smith or Tory Holt run their mouths and cause lockerroom problems.
I guess we're talking about degrees of "attitude". I think that situation in Buffalo was as much the coach's fault as Moulds'. To put EM in the same category, attitude-wise, as T.O. or Randy Moss is erroneous IMO.
 
I would much rather have Todd Skinkston as my #2 than Moulds. Can anyone honestly say this? I can't. I for one have seen Pinkston play and he stinks. The day that finally did it for me was the Eagles/Carolina NFC Championship game, i was there 2 rows back on the 40 yd line behind Carolina's bench. Pinkston is terrible, dont know why he hasn't been cut yet.

Moulds is a great WR even at 32, he would be welcomed with open arms...

and so would Javon Walker, :football:

 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money? That's sort of the blueprint for the kinds of guys Philly avoids, much less signs. :shrug:
Aside from Bledsoe in 2002, has there ever been a good QB throwing to Moulds in a solid-all around offense in Buffalo? Moulds marketability has been hurt by the team he's played for. It's frankly amazing that he's put up the numbers he has under the circumstances.
If the Eagles can get him for a 6th round pick for $15M/3 years with a $5M bonus and a low 1st year salary, then it's an easy call. There aren't a lot of guys like Moulds out there who would instantly improve the passing game. A $6M cap number this year wouldn't break the Eagles bank.
 
More likely this won't happen because the Eagles aren't going to pay what he wants and I don't think they'll touch a WR with any trace of attitude.
All the best receivers have attitude otherwise they wouldn't be the best.
Really? I can't remember the last time I heard Marvin Harrison, Hines Ward, Derrick Mason, Rod Smith or Tory Holt run their mouths and cause lockerroom problems.
I guess we're talking about degrees of "attitude". I think that situation in Buffalo was as much the coach's fault as Moulds'. To put EM in the same category, attitude-wise, as T.O. or Randy Moss is erroneous IMO.
I wouldn't either, but this past year wasn't exactly the first time that Moulds has created some issues. He's nowhere near the level of Moss or T.O., but he's not afraid to voice his displeasure when things aren't going well.
 
Just heard on Sirius that Mould's agent and the Texans are negotiating a deal as we speak....
guess he has no interest in contending for a Super Bowl.
Super Bowl and Philly? :excited: Now that's funny.
I never said anything about winning a SB. I merely said contend, something Philly has done and Houston has very little chance of doing before Moulds joins AARP.
 
He has 5 teams on his wishlist - Philly, NE, and who?
In the article:
As an Eagles fan, not sure how I feel about this. If he is to be gotten for much less than he wants, then I say go for it.

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/sports/fo...ll/14195503.htm

Agent: Moulds wants to play for Eagles

By PAUL DOMOWITCH

pdomo@aol.com

ORLANDO, Fla. - Eric Moulds has a wish list of five teams he'd like to play for, and guess who's at the tippy-top of it?

That's right. The Eagles.

[...]

According to a source from one of the five teams on Moulds' wish list, which also includes New Eng-land, Seattle, Kansas City and Denver, the wide receiver is looking for a contract similar to the one Isaac Bruce signed with the St. Louis Rams 2 weeks ago.

[...]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
In Reid's system? Certainly not in the first year.
I think this system argument applies more to rookies than veteran FAs. I know that T.O. came from a WCO, but I'm pretty sure that Irving Fryar back in the day did not. He seemed to do okay.
Irving Fryar didn't play for Andy Reid. He was an Eagle from 1996-1998, Reid took over in 1999.
they still ran the wco under rhodes though. i think that we as eagles fans are thinking in terms of the fact that we know reid would rather have an average joe that knows his system then a super star that does not. can moulds be the #1 option? sure he could. the system can be 'dumbed' down, but then again, why would reid want to limit his play calling at this point? my guess is he would not.

i agree with you 100% that this would not be a typical eagles move, but maybe it's more so the money moulds will demand at his age then reid not wanting him because he does not know the system. i believe, it is a combination of both, but with age and money being truely the deciding factor.
The TO move (and the concurrent Kearse signing) was not a typical Eagles move; Corey Dillon wasn't a typical move for the Pats whose philosophy is often compared to the Eagles. I mention this because teams sensing that a window of opportunity is closing take more risks than those who feel they have the luxury of time. McNabb's in his prime and the offensive players around him will only remain together as a unit for so long. In addition, the Eagles had a taste of the Super Bowl and are going to be itching to prove that they don't need TO to get back there after a nightmarish 2005 season.

I can see them taking a risk here.

 
Philly was one of the teams that I thought Moulds should go to awhile back. I think Philly should make every effort to try and grab him. He would be a huge addition to that lackluster WR corps...

 
The Bills ran the WCO under Mike Sheppard in 2001 when they went 3-13 in Gregg Williams' first year as head coach. Sheppard came over from Seattle, where he had learned under Mike Holmgren, so I wonder if that system was somewhat similar to the one in Philly?

Anyway, it was a miserable season with Alex Van Pelt at QB for most of the year, and Moulds finished with 67 receptions for 904 yards and 5 TDs. No matter where he ends up, I'm pretty certain that Moulds will have better numbers in 2006 than any WR currently on the Eagles roster.

 
The Bills ran the WCO under Mike Sheppard in 2001 when they went 3-13 in Gregg Williams' first year as head coach. Sheppard came over from Seattle, where he had learned under Mike Holmgren, so I wonder if that system was somewhat similar to the one in Philly?

Anyway, it was a miserable season with Alex Van Pelt at QB for most of the year, and Moulds finished with 67 receptions for 904 yards and 5 TDs. No matter where he ends up, I'm pretty certain that Moulds will have better numbers in 2006 than any WR currently on the Eagles roster.
That's a fair point Ruds. Sheppard is another Holmgren disciple, to be sure, although from what I understand few if any coaches in the league have as detailed a playbook as Andy.
 
I'll gladly take Moulds in Houston. We have so many needs in the short term, the more we can fill before the draft, the more freedom we'll have to get the most value at our picks. I was worried we'd end up reaching at WR. With AJ, Moulds potentially, and Putzier, plus the possibility of bolstering the LB with Cowart, that should be good enough the 2nd and 3rd round picks can be used to address the O-line and safety or cornerback.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just heard on Sirius that Mould's agent and the Texans are negotiating a deal as we speak....
guess he has no interest in contending for a Super Bowl.
Super Bowl and Philly? :excited: Now that's funny.
I never said anything about winning a SB. I merely said contend, something Philly has done and Houston has very little chance of doing before Moulds joins AARP.
Just starting a little crap. Point taken.....
 
From a FF perspective, my first reaction to Moulds in HOU was unfavorable, but if Kubiak can get that offense going like DEN's, Moulds could put up some nice numbers.

 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
Actualyy the Eagles have 1 ( 3rd receiver Brown )have 1 ( 4th receiver Lewis )

have 1 ( 5th or 6th receiver Pinkston )

They have zero NFL receiver on their roster. Either number 1 or 2 .

So Moulds would be number one they would still need to find a second WR.

 
A non-elite, non-WCO veteran receiver past the age of 30 asking for WR1 money?
You don't think that Moulds could be a #1? I think there's about a dozen teams in the league that have #1's way worse than Moulds and the Eagles are one of them.
Actualyy the Eagles have 1 ( 3rd receiver Brown )have 1 ( 4th receiver Lewis )

have 1 ( 5th or 6th receiver Pinkston )

They have zero NFL receiver on their roster. Either number 1 or 2 .

So Moulds would be number one they would still need to find a second WR.
Watch the games. Brown is easily a 2 with 1 potential. Gaffney will probably be a great 2 in a real O. With Moulds, Brown and Gaffney they would have a pretty good 3 set.
 
All this bad mouthing Moulds now? The guy is an awesome WR. Philly fans, you really want to pass on a great WR you could get for next to nothing or complain about the next BUST WR pick the Birds take in the draft? Incidentally, probably same pick. The 7 Mill salary is a lot but it seems he would renegotiate with a semi decent team, aka, the Birds. You could pencil Moulds in as a receiving building block and work the other guys around him instead of hoping for a breakout year from Billy McMullen. Just think if one of your current "awesome" wideouts goes down. Complain about the 7 Mil salary and fitting it in under the cap but not Eric Moulds. Not with the crap you currently have at WR.

(BTW, I believe your best WR is Reggie Brown, a second year guy.... he has potential, but he's in year 2! Don't build a WRing core around a guy like that!)

 
Just heard Moulds' agent on the local sports station. He said there was great interest from both Moulds and Philly. He said he wouldn't be going out on a limb much by saying they will probably work something out. Sounded like it was almost a done deal but I've heard that with Bentley. :unsure:

 
Just heard Moulds' agent on the local sports station. He said there was great interest from both Moulds and Philly. He said he wouldn't be going out on a limb much by saying they will probably work something out. Sounded like it was almost a done deal but I've heard that with Bentley. :unsure:
he could just be playing games to try and get the Texans to offer up more loot :shrug:

getting Moulds for a 4th round pick at $5 mil/year is going to be a steal for some lucky team.

 
All this bad mouthing Moulds now? The guy is an awesome WR. Philly fans, you really want to pass on a great WR you could get for next to nothing or complain about the next BUST WR pick the Birds take in the draft? Incidentally, probably same pick. The 7 Mill salary is a lot but it seems he would renegotiate with a semi decent team, aka, the Birds. You could pencil Moulds in as a receiving building block and work the other guys around him instead of hoping for a breakout year from Billy McMullen. Just think if one of your current "awesome" wideouts goes down. Complain about the 7 Mil salary and fitting it in under the cap but not Eric Moulds. Not with the crap you currently have at WR.

(BTW, I believe your best WR is Reggie Brown, a second year guy.... he has potential, but he's in year 2! Don't build a WRing core around a guy like that!)
I've been badmouthing him for over a year now. He's lost a step and is too much of a ME person. He's not that good anymore and wherever he ends up at, he'll be only the #2 WR which is practically what he was last year except the Bills didn't have a QB. Word from the local paper here is that Houston appears to be the front runner for his services.
 
I have liked Eric Moulds for several years now. He is always in great physical condition. He was a solid locker room leader for years in Buff. Philly has leaders in Hugh Douglas and McNabb. He is friends with McNabb. They have been friends for years now. McNabb made a push to get TO in Philly. We all know how that turned out. McNabb could be reluctant to make another stand for a specific player to acquire.

I really believe Reggie Brown will develop into a solid WR#1. But he needs a mentor. Moulds could be that mentor. TO was not and never did anything with the rest of the receivering group to help them.

Moulds is making an effort to get what he can now while he has a chance. This is sinlge opportunity to get some cash and help a team. He wants Philly or NE for the winning opportunity. That elusive Ring is his dream. He knows he is not going to play in Buff. Buff also will not trade him to NE. They would rather cut him in late August then allow him to go to NE.

Remember the NFL is a business. Moulds is making his business claim. He will compramize his demands when he has something to work with. Texas offering him (rumors - not reported) a 3 yr package just over $13M with $3.8M signing bonus give him a solid dollar to come back to Philly to let them know what he will accept to play for them. I would expect Philly to offer under the Texas deal, but make him capable to achieve some incentives.

I still think Moulds goes to Philly because that is where he wants to go. He does not have to accept the bigger $ other teams offer if Philly makes a decent offer. Something along the lines of a $3M signing bonus and 3 years at $12M total package would be close enough to say both side met in the middle and everybody would be happy.

The current Philly WR corp is below any other NFL team IMO. Reggie Brown and Gaffney would be the starting receivers unless Moulds joins them. With Moulds, Reggie & Eric with Greg Lewis in the slot. Gaffney in 4 WR sets. Pinkston is a cap cut waiting to happen. I do not understand why he is even on the roster!

 
I have liked Eric Moulds for several years now. He is always in great physical condition. He was a solid locker room leader for years in Buff. Philly has leaders in Hugh Douglas and McNabb. He is friends with McNabb. They have been friends for years now. McNabb made a push to get TO in Philly. We all know how that turned out. McNabb could be reluctant to make another stand for a specific player to acquire.

I really believe Reggie Brown will develop into a solid WR#1. But he needs a mentor. Moulds could be that mentor. TO was not and never did anything with the rest of the receivering group to help them.

Moulds is making an effort to get what he can now while he has a chance. This is sinlge opportunity to get some cash and help a team. He wants Philly or NE for the winning opportunity. That elusive Ring is his dream. He knows he is not going to play in Buff. Buff also will not trade him to NE. They would rather cut him in late August then allow him to go to NE.

Remember the NFL is a business. Moulds is making his business claim. He will compramize his demands when he has something to work with. Texas offering him (rumors - not reported) a 3 yr package just over $13M with $3.8M signing bonus give him a solid dollar to come back to Philly to let them know what he will accept to play for them. I would expect Philly to offer under the Texas deal, but make him capable to achieve some incentives.

I still think Moulds goes to Philly because that is where he wants to go. He does not have to accept the bigger $ other teams offer if Philly makes a decent offer. Something along the lines of a $3M signing bonus and 3 years at $12M total package would be close enough to say both side met in the middle and everybody would be happy.

The current Philly WR corp is below any other NFL team IMO. Reggie Brown and Gaffney would be the starting receivers unless Moulds joins them. With Moulds, Reggie & Eric with Greg Lewis in the slot. Gaffney in 4 WR sets. Pinkston is a cap cut waiting to happen. I do not understand why he is even on the roster!
Hugh Douglas is no longer part of the team. Whether he maintains his ambassador role remains to be seen but he's currently serving as the co-host for the WIP afternoon show with Angelo Cataldi. As to Moulds' character, this is what I would like Bills homers to chime in on. Moulds came into the league as a character question [he had a pizza delivered to practice in college once, and got suspended for it...funny, but it was cause for concern on draft day] but had appeared to be a model citizen for a long time. Then, this year, he was sent home by Mike Mularkey but little more was made of the reasons behind the dismissal. Now, Mularkey is gone and it would be foolish to assume he had no culpability in any issues Moulds experienced.

Bills homers, what's the book on Moulds as a locker room guy and member of the community?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top