This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Strained groin; expected to play.
Is this a phantom injury that the Patriots always seem to come up with (see T.Brady's arm) or is there something behind this?
no matter how many times i hear this, i still laugh.
Marvin, your team is going to lose Monday night anyway; you should just sit Carson, Chad and TJ so they don't get hurt.- Bill
Maroney is fragile. How do you play this, this weekend? Maroney is playing on Monday night. Lineup's must be in by 1pm Sunday.I just don't trust Belichick. How many times over the last couple of years was C.Dillon thought to be the starter only to be pulled with no warning from coach Belichick?
The Pats ARE providing accurate information as per the rules. Maroney missed time in practice due to a groin injury and that has to appear on the new injury report as such.I'd be more concerned about his status on the Friday injury report (which is the one that people need to be interested in).
If the Browns can put up 50 points on Cinci just imagine what the Patriots are going to do to them.The Patriots will crush them.All the more reason for them to rest Maroney.
Seriously? It's the most annoying shtick next to all the BS cliques.
...getting old fast :X
Why are you surprised? Ron Mexico keeps making the same mistakes; that's why he's wearing the ankle bracelet...
No. The Boston Globe didn't say that. Rotoworld speculated that. Nothing on the Globe site says Maroney will be a GTD.Laurence Maroney (groin) was again listed as having been limited in practice Thursday.Nothing's changed from Wednesday and Maroney seems likely to be listed as questionable on Friday. He's got a great matchup against the Bengals on Monday night, but could be a game-time call. Check back for more on Friday.Source: Boston Globe Local sources indicate he could be game time decision
People keep quoting Rotoworld analysis like it's a source....it's just some loser's opinion and I think half the time he is making crap up to manipulate the fantasy world to benefit himself.No. The Boston Globe didn't say that. Rotoworld speculated that. Nothing on the Globe site says Maroney will be a GTD.Laurence Maroney (groin) was again listed as having been limited in practice Thursday.Nothing's changed from Wednesday and Maroney seems likely to be listed as questionable on Friday. He's got a great matchup against the Bengals on Monday night, but could be a game-time call. Check back for more on Friday.Source: Boston Globe Local sources indicate he could be game time decision
Should also be a good start for sure in Week 5 against Cleveland. Morris appears to be a good bye-week fill-in with a little extra kick given Maroney's stream of minor injury concerns. I suspect Maroney will assume a slightly greater workload as the season progresses -- just a gut feeling -- but Morris should still get a high percentage of goal line carries and a carry or two per quarter to give Laurence a rest.
I left off Brady because we know that one is a joke . . .BB is messing with Mr. Lewis.
If I had to guess, Colvin, Gay, Maroney, Stallworth, Wilfork and Wilson play. Neal, Washington, Wright and Yates sit.
The Bengals can not afford to "guess" so they will have to game plan for all. BB is smart.
I also heard that Faulk was held out of practice - "Team Decision".Interesting...
Or you could just be planning on Morris to score his average FFPPG so far this year, which has been good for RB 24 in FBG's scoring - and maybe hope for a little bit more if things break right for him and/or because he's playing against a lousy defense?Is that a good way to win FF leagues?The lmp said:
agreed . . .
Morris had 2 catches and Faulk had 7. That's a good % of passing to backs.Or you could just be planning on Morris to score his average FFPPG so far this year, which has been good for RB 24 in FBG's scoring - and maybe hope for a little bit more if things break right for him and/or because he's playing against a lousy defense?Is that a good way to win FF leagues?The lmp said:Good call. Let's start Morris just in case NE blows them out, which could happen, but not likely, and in that situation, decides to run the backup RB a ton, which could happen, but is not likely.Two not likelies=good way to win FF leagues.
No it's not. It's fun is watching the responses like yours and others in this thread....getting old fast
that is friggin hilarious.
If this is your way of predicting a CIN victory then good luck. I see a flood of NE points since CIN has no defense. Maroney is certainly slowed by a hammy and therefore Morris playing more is quite likely. So your interpretation of "not likely" is quite unlikely. Good luck though.The lmp said:
I would not go anywhere near an injured Maroney on a Monday night game (must put lineup's in on Sunday) that the Pat's should easily win. There is no reason for the Pat's to rush him back if he is injured.
Just because Morris plays doesn't mean he is 100%
In this case, I believe the Pats followed the new injury report rules as outlined by the league, so I would not take BB to task this time. If people want to suggest that he held people out all week on purpose to mislead the Bengals, so be it, but I find that a little far fetched.
I'm waiting until Sunday though.
