Thug. This guy doesn't deserve the talent he's been blessed with.If his head was on straight he could challenge Rice's all time records. Now he's gonna be a "what if".
Thug. This guy doesn't deserve the talent he's been blessed with.If his head was on straight he could challenge Rice's all time records. Now he's gonna be a "what if".
THIS is aI dont know about yall, but I sensed a LOT of hard sarcasm there.
Yeah, Randy takes plays off, but the guy was always a competitor. A few screws loose, but Ive seen him play through pain plenty.
It sounds to me like Randy is "beat" - beat by a team and a coach and a franchise that doesnt seem to care that they are losing. Because if the team cared, maybe they wouldnt let ego get in the way of turning a franchise around. Maybe J. Porter wouldnt be an outcast, even if he is a misanthrope.
Maybe Al Davis would actually be willing to hire a decent coach who would stand on his own, rather than a puppet to let the king have final say - over a kingdom that has crumbled, I should add.
The fact is, Randy looks around him and sees ####. And it seemed to me, without knowing the full context of these quotes, that he is sarcastic yet resigned to a reality and like many of us would say "if no one else around me gives a ####, why should I?"
Often you say that as a hypothetical, because you DO give a ####. Sometimes you say it sarastically, hypothetically and medicinally... almost trying to justify to yourself why you shouldnt be miserable because no one around you gives much of a #### about actually winning.
Cause Randy's the one being quoted in this thread.Looks to me like the entire Raiders team has quit, not just Moss...well except maybe Jordan.So why are we only hanging Randy out to dry & giving the rest of that sorry team a mulligan?
I think you're right on about this but a great player looks at the crap around him and says, you know what, I ain't crap and under no circumstance do I play or act like crap. When a great player is served up crap, he makes crap sandwiches!!!!!!I dont know about yall, but I sensed a LOT of hard sarcasm there.Yeah, Randy takes plays off, but the guy was always a competitor. A few screws loose, but Ive seen him play through pain plenty.It sounds to me like Randy is "beat" - beat by a team and a coach and a franchise that doesnt seem to care that they are losing. Because if the team cared, maybe they wouldnt let ego get in the way of turning a franchise around. Maybe J. Porter wouldnt be an outcast, even if he is a misanthrope. Maybe Al Davis would actually be willing to hire a decent coach who would stand on his own, rather than a puppet to let the king have final say - over a kingdom that has crumbled, I should add.The fact is, Randy looks around him and sees ####. And it seemed to me, without knowing the full context of these quotes, that he is sarcastic yet resigned to a reality and like many of us would say "if no one else around me gives a ####, why should I?"Often you say that as a hypothetical, because you DO give a ####. Sometimes you say it sarastically, hypothetically and medicinally... almost trying to justify to yourself why you shouldnt be miserable because no one around you gives much of a #### about actually winning.
I don't think it is a total excuse of his behavior, but there is a difference in being a disenchanted RB and a disenchanted WR. As the RB, you're going to get the ball 20 times a game no matter what. With Barry's skill, he knew he could bust one at any point. So, even on a team destined to go nowhere, he could give 100% and carry the team. A WR on a team that doesn't have a QB capable of getting him the ball is in a different spot. There are multiple drives in a row where he won't get a ball thrown his way, or if it is, it could be uncatchable.Think about any of our professions where effort = success almost as much as it does in sports. If you take away all possibility of success in the equation, how much effort gets put forth? It's like those comercials where the guy works with a bunch of monkeys. He knows no matter what effort he puts forth, he's not going to succeed. You think he gives 110% every day?Randy Moss now on the Raiders = Barry Sanders with the Lions and why he eventually retired
That is why Moss isnt a great player.He is an unreal talent who has been one of the more productive players at his position during a good stretch of time, but he definately lacks that burning desire and will to out work everyone else on the field.That said, Moss gets more criticism than he deserves. Yes, he isnt getting the most out of his talent - but he is not a terrible guy either. He has acted immaturely, but doesnt go on these planned escapades trying to make division on a team, ala TO. The guy is really good in the community from all I hear... it just seems people want to pile on Moss because he represents a talent that is perhaps the best the game has seen, but his career will never be "that" great. Even so, in this case it sounds like he is being somewhat sarcastic, and I dont think Moss' words here merit much beyond recognizing how lost the Raiders are.A good Raiders team is good for the NFL too, I dont know how Davis is going to get lucky again ala the Gannon years.I think you're right on about this but a great player looks at the crap around him and says, you know what, I ain't crap and under no circumstance do I play or act like crap. When a great player is served up crap, he makes crap sandwiches!!!!!!I dont know about yall, but I sensed a LOT of hard sarcasm there.Yeah, Randy takes plays off, but the guy was always a competitor. A few screws loose, but Ive seen him play through pain plenty.It sounds to me like Randy is "beat" - beat by a team and a coach and a franchise that doesnt seem to care that they are losing. Because if the team cared, maybe they wouldnt let ego get in the way of turning a franchise around. Maybe J. Porter wouldnt be an outcast, even if he is a misanthrope. Maybe Al Davis would actually be willing to hire a decent coach who would stand on his own, rather than a puppet to let the king have final say - over a kingdom that has crumbled, I should add.The fact is, Randy looks around him and sees ####. And it seemed to me, without knowing the full context of these quotes, that he is sarcastic yet resigned to a reality and like many of us would say "if no one else around me gives a ####, why should I?"Often you say that as a hypothetical, because you DO give a ####. Sometimes you say it sarastically, hypothetically and medicinally... almost trying to justify to yourself why you shouldnt be miserable because no one around you gives much of a #### about actually winning.
Silent assassin
Redskins' Moss quietly emerges as elite wide receiver
Posted: Monday October 2, 2006 4:46PM; Updated: Monday October 2, 2006 10:44PM
A rarity amongst the NFL's bold, brash pass catchers, stoic Redskins wideout Santana Moss chooses to let his game do the talking.
Pouya Dianat/US PRESSWIRE
ASHBURN, Va. (AP) -- Santana Moss spoke with his mouth full, munching on two cookies as he spoke with reporters in the parking lot with the television cameras rolling. His cell phone went off four times, providing a rap music soundtrack to his candid comments.
Moss didn't care. He is not about image. He rarely does anything off the field to draw attention to himself. While other receivers get more publicity -- Terrell Owens and Chad Johnson quickly come to mind -- Moss is flashy only when the game is in progress.
But maybe it's about time to put the Washington Redskins receiver near the top of the list when it comes to the league's most exciting wideouts. His three-touchdown performance in Sunday's overtime victory over the Jacksonville Jaguars was enough to give goose bumps to anyone who has played the position.
"Moss is the silent assassin," fullback Mike Sellers said Monday. "He just puts in the work, doesn't say nothing. Even if he burns you, he won't talk trash to you. He'll just walk back to the huddle and run the next play. That's a true professional. I think that's what the NFL is trying to achieve, that type of player where you get rid of all the antics and just play the game."
Moss isn't really silent. In fact, he's one of the most generous when it comes to granting interviews. He's a joy to listen to because he doesn't sugarcoat anything. There are plenty of players who would have boasted ad nauseam about a 68-yard reception to win a game in overtime, but Moss freely acknowledged he wasn't seeking the ball on that play because of the defensive coverage and that he thought he was going to get leveled by oncoming safety Deon Grant.
"I don't think anything I do goes in slow motion," Moss said. "It happened so fast, I didn't even have the chance to think about it. I just reacted. My first reaction was to go up for the ball because I knew I could get hit real hard. ... I remember an old coach of mine told me to think about what you want to do, think about who you want to be, and you can be that person. It was all a visual during the week, and it came true during the game."
Last year, Moss brought life to a dormant Redskins attack with two long touchdown catches in a fourth-quarter rally to beat the Dallas Cowboys. He set a franchise record with 1,483 yards for the year and went to his first Pro Bowl. He is 5-foot-10, incredibly quick and elusive, able to put on a spin move that left Grant grasping at air during a first-quarter, 55-yard touchdown reception Sunday.
Moss' description of that play was matter-of-fact, with maybe just a hint of bravado: "He was slowing down. You can tell a guy is cautious about the speed, and I kind of noticed that. You can be cautious of my speed and you can be cautious of the move, but you can't be cautious of both of them, and I just gave him a little of both."
Uncharacteristically, Moss was part of a 15-yard penalty for an end zone celebration following the play, even though he was just standing there when fellow receiver Brandon Lloyd picked him up from behind.
"It's bull," Moss said. "We get a lot of those calls, so what the heck."
Washington's performance against the Jaguars could be another kick-start for the Redskins (2-2), who have some legitimacy after a victory over a team other than Houston. The offensive line didn't commit a penalty or allow a sack and opened enough holes for 152 yards rushing. Mark Brunell is back to form two weeks after flirting again with the "washed-up" questions.
Expensive free agent defensive end Andre Carter finally made an impact with a sack and two hurries on the quarterback. The biggest lingering concern is a secondary that continues to allow big plays, but the crisis mode that followed an 0-2 start has dissipated for now.
Moss has 17 catches for 326 yards on the season, an impressive 19.2-yard average. As for the spotlight, he has no problem when Dallas' Owens and Cincinnati's Johnson get more of it because of their antics.
"I like what those guys do," Moss said. "Me and Chad are close friends. T.O., I know of him. I like their game, but that's why there's T.O. and that's why there's Chad Johnson -- because they're their own guy. I'm going to do what I do, and so far it's been getting me along. I'm 27, and I haven't had any problems."
Yes it does look like the entire Raider team has quit which leads me to wonder why the only player Art Shell has hung out to dry is Jerry Porter?Looks to me like the entire Raiders team has quit, not just Moss...well except maybe Jordan.So why are we only hanging Randy out to dry & giving the rest of that sorry team a mulligan?
Hi koya,I think this is the telling paragraph. I don't doubt that's what is happening here. But the great ones don't look around and quit just because everyone else has. That is a HUGE difference.The fact is, Randy looks around him and sees ####. And it seemed to me, without knowing the full context of these quotes, that he is sarcastic yet resigned to a reality and like many of us would say "if no one else around me gives a ####, why should I?"
Hi Swarm,I've long been a detractor of Brooks. I don't think he has what it takes to win. He's a guy that will throw a crucial interception and 15 seconds later be laughing it up on the sidelines. You have to forget the mistakes, but he took blowing it off to a new level. Ryan Leaf after the close loss in the Rose Bowl was the same way.But with that said, I don't pin any of the Raider collapse or Saints resurgence on Brooks. Raiders were a sinking ship already. Shell was a last grasp after all the other coaches took the better jobs. And the Saints have 25 or so new players plus a new staff. That's almost a whole new team.JDoes it strike anyone as coincidence that when Brooks left New Orleans to helm the Raiders, their typical disgruntlement turned to an all-out collapse? And when Brees went to New Orleans -- suddenly the doormat of the NFL (and a team with little willpower) is suddenly looking like a fierce, hungry team playing with pride?
I'm not blaming 100% of either team's change of fortune on the QB. Yet I believe that leadership in the huddle, in the locker room, and on the sidelines is a major contributor to a team's identity.Hi Swarm,I've long been a detractor of Brooks. I don't think he has what it takes to win. He's a guy that will throw a crucial interception and 15 seconds later be laughing it up on the sidelines. You have to forget the mistakes, but he took blowing it off to a new level. Ryan Leaf after the close loss in the Rose Bowl was the same way.But with that said, I don't pin any of the Raider collapse or Saints resurgence on Brooks. Raiders were a sinking ship already. Shell was a last grasp after all the other coaches took the better jobs. And the Saints have 25 or so new players plus a new staff. That's almost a whole new team.JDoes it strike anyone as coincidence that when Brooks left New Orleans to helm the Raiders, their typical disgruntlement turned to an all-out collapse? And when Brees went to New Orleans -- suddenly the doormat of the NFL (and a team with little willpower) is suddenly looking like a fierce, hungry team playing with pride?
Joe - to clarify, I am not calling Moss a great player. I thought that was clear. He is an IMMENSE talent with a LOT of production... but he does not have the will, drive nor desire to be truly great. That said, he gets a bit too much blame imo. While he doesnt go 100% I dont think he is a bad guy nor a really bad influence on a team (ala TO)Hi koya,I think this is the telling paragraph. I don't doubt that's what is happening here. But the great ones don't look around and quit just because everyone else has. That is a HUGE difference.The fact is, Randy looks around him and sees ####. And it seemed to me, without knowing the full context of these quotes, that he is sarcastic yet resigned to a reality and like many of us would say "if no one else around me gives a ####, why should I?"
J
The change of coaching staff and philosophy, not to mention the cleaning of the house in New Orleans (particularly on defense) I think was primarily responsible for their improvement. Brees is only one aspect of that, albeit an important one. It's frankly the lack of any substantive change in Oakland that has caused a bad team to become a wreck. Jerry Porter was on that team long before Brooks got there, and Moss has always had a suspect spine when the going got rough for his team. Moreover, unlike Payton in New Orleans, Shell does not represent a departure from where the team was heading before. That organization simply went from the soft Norv Turner to the Al Davis-yes man, Art Shell, which is a lot like noting that your plane is in a nose dive and in response lighting it on fire.I'm not blaming 100% of either team's change of fortune on the QB. Yet I believe that leadership in the huddle, in the locker room, and on the sidelines is a major contributor to a team's identity.Hi Swarm,I've long been a detractor of Brooks. I don't think he has what it takes to win. He's a guy that will throw a crucial interception and 15 seconds later be laughing it up on the sidelines. You have to forget the mistakes, but he took blowing it off to a new level. Ryan Leaf after the close loss in the Rose Bowl was the same way.Does it strike anyone as coincidence that when Brooks left New Orleans to helm the Raiders, their typical disgruntlement turned to an all-out collapse? And when Brees went to New Orleans -- suddenly the doormat of the NFL (and a team with little willpower) is suddenly looking like a fierce, hungry team playing with pride?
But with that said, I don't pin any of the Raider collapse or Saints resurgence on Brooks. Raiders were a sinking ship already. Shell was a last grasp after all the other coaches took the better jobs. And the Saints have 25 or so new players plus a new staff. That's almost a whole new team.
J
I'm sold.A unified team can go a long way in the face of most any adversity. Case in point? It worked in the movie MAJOR LEAGUE!
Because he can't hang himself or Al Davis out to dry and won't hang Tom Walsh.Actually, this is a team that has been in rebellion since they lost the Super Bowl to Tampa. The players have had all of the power. It was given to them by Al Davis. He supported the players and not the staff. The players went directly to him. The head coach meant nothing.Now, all of a sudden, he re-hires Art Shell and expects to discipline the players. The Raiders want all of these players that they have brought in to change drastically. Its not a few players, its most of the players and the team leaders. This is a revolt.In the salary cap era, it won't work. They can't get rid of all of the players. The problem starts at the top. I just wish Moss would have told us why? Remember after the game he said: "Tell them why? Tell them why?" We are all left to assume. But all of the players know the answer.Yes it does look like the entire Raider team has quit which leads me to wonder why the only player Art Shell has hung out to dry is Jerry Porter?Looks to me like the entire Raiders team has quit, not just Moss...well except maybe Jordan.So why are we only hanging Randy out to dry & giving the rest of that sorry team a mulligan?
Bad example for two reasons:1) Favre did catch a lot of flak for that.I remember last yr on either MNF or SNF Favre was being interveiwed and he was asked how much advice and help he is giving to Aaron Rogers, Favre simply said he isn't doing anything to help Rogers cos noone helped him when he was a rookie and that if he had to do it tough so should Rogers. If someone like Randy says that it would be all over SportsCentre and these message boards about how selfish he is, when Favre said it it was "oh that's just Favre" or "he's just an old school type of guy". The double standards are sickening.
Fair enough. I can't remember Favre getting flak for those comments. I just remember the commentators kinda laughing it off.I'm not saying Moss is the perfect citizen, but I think his reputation is largely unwarranted. People put him in the same group as T.O when he hasn't nearly affected teams the way T.O has. Moss has done some stupid things, you mentioned a few, but he doesn't hurt his teams like some of the other guys he's grouped with do. Who cares if he squirted a ref with water? Big deal. Mooning the crowd? That was funny (unless you're Joe Buck or a GB fan) just ask Dungy, i dunno about hurting team chemistry i cant remember too much of that, he was after all voted as a captain for this yr's Raiders team. 99% of WR's take plays off, last season there was a great shot of Harrison completely dogging a play cos he knew it wasn't coming to him, noone cared about that, nor should they, but when Moss does it it's a big deal. Like I said, he's played hurt for two seasons If he wants to take plays off i'm sure he couldve sat out a few weeks to get completely healthy. Instead he suited up since he knows the big effect he has on opposing defenses. Moss isn't perfect, but he isn't the villain many of you make him out to be.Bad example for two reasons:1) Favre did catch a lot of flak for that.I remember last yr on either MNF or SNF Favre was being interveiwed and he was asked how much advice and help he is giving to Aaron Rogers, Favre simply said he isn't doing anything to help Rogers cos noone helped him when he was a rookie and that if he had to do it tough so should Rogers. If someone like Randy says that it would be all over SportsCentre and these message boards about how selfish he is, when Favre said it it was "oh that's just Favre" or "he's just an old school type of guy". The double standards are sickening.
2) Favre doesn't have the boneheaded history of taking plays off, getting caught with drugs (in college) and getting thrown out of school, driving with traffic officers as hood ornaments, squirting refs with water bottles, hurting team chemistry, mooning the crowd, etc., etc., etc. that Randy does.
I wouldn't be happy about being 0-3 either."I'm not concerned about football right now. I'm loving life.""I don't see anybody else having a concern, so why should I?" Moss said. "There are negative things going on now. I'm not the only one unhappy." Ugh.
I like Favre and am not particularly fond of Randy Moss because of effort. Favre guts it out and Moss doesn't, BUT:1) I really do not remember Favre catching too much flak for his Rodger's comments. He also didn't take too much flak for his comments regarding Walker. As much as I like him, you have to admit he is a bit teflon coated.Bad example for two reasons:1) Favre did catch a lot of flak for that.I remember last yr on either MNF or SNF Favre was being interveiwed and he was asked how much advice and help he is giving to Aaron Rogers, Favre simply said he isn't doing anything to help Rogers cos noone helped him when he was a rookie and that if he had to do it tough so should Rogers. If someone like Randy says that it would be all over SportsCentre and these message boards about how selfish he is, when Favre said it it was "oh that's just Favre" or "he's just an old school type of guy". The double standards are sickening.
2) Favre doesn't have the boneheaded history of taking plays off, getting caught with drugs (in college) and getting thrown out of school, driving with traffic officers as hood ornaments, squirting refs with water bottles, hurting team chemistry, mooning the crowd, etc., etc., etc. that Randy does.
We're basically in agreement. Favre certainly wasn't lambasted in the media the way that, for example, Jeff George would have been had he uttered the identical comment. He still got some criticism. The critical difference with Favre's drug problem was that he came forward and addressed it himself first of all, and second it was a problem that was directly related to football (i.e. Vicodin was prescribed for pain from football injuries) rather than an illegal and recreational drug like the marijuana that Randy got caught with.1) I really do not remember Favre catching too much flak for his Rodger's comments. He also didn't take too much flak for his comments regarding Walker. As much as I like him, you have to admit he is a bit teflon coated.2) Actually, Favre did get in trouble with prescription drugs. Since it is the NFLs quiet little secret, it is rarely mentioned. And, I would guess that Favre's comments with Walker last year and Walker's ensuing injury did not assist in team chemistry last year.
TO is on a whole 'nother planet from anyone. I'm convinced that he has mental/emotional problems. It's a pathology for him and not a persona the way that, for example, it was for Deion. I agree that Moss doesn't fragment his team like Owens did, but I remember him sulking when Culpepper struggled, even to the point that Mice Tice instituted the infamous "Randy Ratio". He's just not a team player, but he's one of the highest paid and greatest players in the NFL. Whether he likes it or not people look to him to see what he's doing, and so when he says or does stupid things it's a negative.Fair enough. I can't remember Favre getting flak for those comments. I just remember the commentators kinda laughing it off.I'm not saying Moss is the perfect citizen, but I think his reputation is largely unwarranted. People put him in the same group as T.O when he hasn't nearly affected teams the way T.O has. Moss has done some stupid things, you mentioned a few, but he doesn't hurt his teams like some of the other guys he's grouped with do. Who cares if he squirted a ref with water? Big deal. Mooning the crowd? That was funny (unless you're Joe Buck or a GB fan) just ask Dungy, i dunno about hurting team chemistry i cant remember too much of that, he was after all voted as a captain for this yr's Raiders team. 99% of WR's take plays off, last season there was a great shot of Harrison completely dogging a play cos he knew it wasn't coming to him, noone cared about that, nor should they, but when Moss does it it's a big deal. Like I said, he's played hurt for two seasons If he wants to take plays off i'm sure he couldve sat out a few weeks to get completely healthy. Instead he suited up since he knows the big effect he has on opposing defenses. Moss isn't perfect, but he isn't the villain many of you make him out to be.Bad example for two reasons:1) Favre did catch a lot of flak for that.I remember last yr on either MNF or SNF Favre was being interveiwed and he was asked how much advice and help he is giving to Aaron Rogers, Favre simply said he isn't doing anything to help Rogers cos noone helped him when he was a rookie and that if he had to do it tough so should Rogers. If someone like Randy says that it would be all over SportsCentre and these message boards about how selfish he is, when Favre said it it was "oh that's just Favre" or "he's just an old school type of guy". The double standards are sickening.
2) Favre doesn't have the boneheaded history of taking plays off, getting caught with drugs (in college) and getting thrown out of school, driving with traffic officers as hood ornaments, squirting refs with water bottles, hurting team chemistry, mooning the crowd, etc., etc., etc. that Randy does.
That was a joke of course.kupcho1 said:I'm sold.A unified team can go a long way in the face of most any adversity. Case in point? It worked in the movie MAJOR LEAGUE!
Basically he's calling out the coach for not motivating the team, saying nobody else around here appears to give a crap, so why not enjoy life?Seems odd, but in some ways, I agree. He should be a leader of the team, but maybe he just realizes there's things more important than football?(then I remembered, this is Randy Moss, not Tomlinson, Rod Smith, Gonzo or other players who contribute to society in other ways)"I'm not concerned about football right now. I'm loving life.""I don't see anybody else having a concern, so why should I?" Moss said. "There are negative things going on now. I'm not the only one unhappy."
umm...I guess you forgot about Inta Juice , Randy Moss' smoothie company, pretty quickly then. Ya know, sometimes people really think too much about the now. Look what he started like 5 months ago!Basically he's calling out the coach for not motivating the team, saying nobody else around here appears to give a crap, so why not enjoy life?Seems odd, but in some ways, I agree. He should be a leader of the team, but maybe he just realizes there's things more important than football?"I'm not concerned about football right now. I'm loving life."
"I don't see anybody else having a concern, so why should I?" Moss said. "There are negative things going on now. I'm not the only one unhappy."
(then I remembered, this is Randy Moss, not Tomlinson, Rod Smith, Gonzo or other players who contribute to society in other ways)
http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htmThere are strong indications coming out of Jacksonville the assistant coach Mike "Meathead" Tice is lobbying aggressively for the team to make a trade with the Raiders for receiver Randy Moss.