What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Javon Walker a top 10 fantasy WR this year? (1 Viewer)

Is Javon Walker a top fantasy WR this year if healthy?

  • yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • no

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Curious to know why people feel he will not finish top 10 if he is healthy. This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte. I don't think it matters where he goes as he is that good that he should find a way into the top 10. IMO

 
Curious to know why people feel he will not finish top 10 if he is healthy.  This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte.  I don't think it matters where he goes as he is that good that he should find a way into the top 10.  IMO

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not so sure about him in Denver for 2 reasons. QB situation and the running game.
 
If Walker is healthy I believe he finishes as a top 10 fantasy Wr this year.  Who is with me?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would love to see it (as I have him in my Dynasty team), but I don't think it will happen.He would have been much, much more productive in Philly or even in GB.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Although this is true, it does not mean he won't succeed in Denver. He may well have been predicted as top 5 for those other teams but he still has to be considered as a top 10 guy.
 
Curious to know why people feel he will not finish top 10 if he is healthy.  This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte.  I don't think it matters where he goes as he is that good that he should find a way into the top 10.  IMO

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not so sure about him in Denver for 2 reasons. QB situation and the running game.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Running game is not a bad thing here. I see no reason why Walker won't have 1100-1200 yards recieving and 7 plus TD's.
 
i dont know this off the top of my head but whats the track record on WRS under Plummer have 1200yd 7+TD seasons?

 
i dont know this off the top of my head but whats the track record on WRS under Plummer have 1200yd 7+TD seasons?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't know, but in 2004 in Denver Plummer threw for 4000 yards and 27 TD'sLast season he threw for 3400 yards and 18 TD's.

Given Walker's talent and track record I think he could have 1200 of these yards and at least 7 of these TD's in any of those given years.

 
Who knows, somewhere from 5-15. I love him for this season and the future given they took Cutler. Having Plummer for 2 more seasons and then having Cutler eased in shouldn't hurt his stats that much.

I'd guess 11-1200 yards 7-10 TD's this year.

 
Rod Smith has been the Bronco's top fantasy receiver for 9 years straight now. In that time, he has only been in the top-10 in fantasy scoring three times, and hasn't been close since Plummer showed up. With Smith still there, Walker coming off an ACL and learning a new system, and the general difficulty of WRs adapting to new teams, I would estimate Walker's chances of finishing top-10 as extremely poor.

 
No.....for a few reasons.

1) Injury - he is coming off a very serious injury and will have not played football since September of 2005. A WR that needs to make quick cuts will not be back up to their pre-injury self for a little while.

2) Rod Smith - although he is an aging WR, he still made the Pro Bowl last year and had 80 catches for 1100 yards and 6 TDs. Rod Smith's role in Denver's offense will not change with Walker on the team, so you can expect Rod Smith to get the similar yards and TDs that he has had n the past.

3) Walker is coming from Green Bay, which was a pass happy offense that had the 2nd most pass attempts last season and is going to Denver, which is a run first team and who had the 8th least amount of pass attempts last year. In 2004, Green Bay had the most pass attempts in the entire NFL. Ten less pass attempts per game is a definate downgrade in the situation.

4) Lelie - It remains to be seen if Lelie will be on the team at the start of the season, but as for now, Lelie is a nice 3rd WR in the NFL and will take a nice slice of the pie.

5) Other Top WRs - I am not sure of your Top 10 WRs, but which WRs would you remove out of this Top 10 ist to put Walker in?....Holt, Boldin, Fitz, Owens, Harrison, Moss, Steve Smith, S. Moss, Ward. Now also keep in mind, that this list does not include players such as Jackson, Burress, Chambers, Wayne, etc.

6) Stat projection in Denver.....for Walker to be a Top 10 WR, he would need to get approx 160 FP. That is roughly 1200 yards and 7 TDs.

Lets say Plummer throws for 3500 yards

Rod Smith - 1100 yards receiving

Lelie - 400 yards receiving

Other WRs - 200 yards receiving

Alexander - 350 yards receiving

Other TEs - 50 yards receiving

RBs - 400 yards receiving

That leaves Walker with approx 1000 yards receiving. Unless he gets a high number of TDs, that is not Top 10 numbers. In 2004 Lelie and Smith both had approx 1100 yards and neither was in the Top 10.

I would like to see HOW you think Walker will get into the Top 10.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Code:
YR      G       TRG     REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK2002    15      50      23      319     13.9    1       39      942003    16      74      41      716     17.5    9       126     212004    16      138     89      1382    15.5    12      210     22005    1       5       4       27      6.8     0       3       155
Maybe I have a different definition of "proven", but I do not think 1 good season out of his 4 years in the NFL means he is a "proven" elite talent.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No.....for a few reasons. 

1) Injury - he is coming off a very serious injury and will have not played football since September of 2005.  A WR that needs to make quick cuts will not be back up to their pre-injury self for a little while. 

2) Rod Smith - although he is an aging WR, he still made the Pro Bowl last year and had 80 catches for 1100 yards and 6 TDs.  Rod Smith's role in Denver's offense will not change with Walker on the team.

3) Walker is coming from Green Bay, which was a pass happy offense that had the 2nd most pass attempts last season and is going to Denver, which is a run first team and who had the 8th least amount of pass attempts last year.  In 2004, Green Bay had the most pass attempts in the entire NFL.  Ten less pass attempts per game is a definate downgrade in the situation.

4) Lelie - It remains to be seen if Lelie will be on the team at the start of the season, but as for now, Lelie is a nice 3rd WR in the NFL and will take a nice slice of the pie.

5) Other Top WRs - I am not sure of your Top 10 WRs, but which WRs would you remove out of this Top 10 ist to put Walker in?....Holt, Boldin, Fitz, Owens, Harrison, Moss, Steve Smith, S. Moss, Ward.  Now also keep in mind, that this list does not include players such as Jackson, Burress, Chambers, Wayne, etc. 

6) Stat projection in Denver.....for Walker to be a Top 10 WR, he would need to get approx 160 FP.  That is roughly 1200 yards and 7 TDs. 

Lets say Plummer throws for 3500 yards

Rod Smith - 1100 yards receiving

Lelie - 400 yards receiving

Other WRs - 200 yards receiving

Alexander - 350 yards receiving

Other TEs - 50 yards receiving

RBs - 400 yards receiving

That leaves Walker with approx 1000 yards receiving.  Unless he gets a high number of TDs, that is not Top 10 numbers.  in 2004 Lelie and Smith both had approx 1100 yards and neither was in the Top 10.

I would like to see HOW you think Walker will get into the Top 10.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So you have him at 1000 yards, 5-6 tds? It's not hard to see how he could get 1,200 and 7 tds, putting him in the top 10. Or more.

First off, the Denver RBs took a hit without MA. If Bell gets hurt, and it's just Ron Dayne? Ouch.

Walker is a better WR, giving them more options in the passing game. He'd clearly be the most talented WR. And would probably steal some of Smiths 1,100 yards you have going to him. With Denver now having 2 legit WRs, Lelie giving some matchup problems from the slot, the Denver offense could very easily open up.

The running game is great, but it hasn't helped them in the playoffs. Like Indy going back to the run last year, I could see Denver going more to the pass this year (better WRs, weaker RBs).

I'm not saying he's a lock for the top 10, but from your own post, you pretty much make a case for it. Again two key factors will be the healthy, and if Bell really steps up. But Shanny has wanted a big time WR for awhile, so I do see them having more of an air attack this year.

Regardless, if he's healthy, he's in that top 8-15 range which makes him a great #2 WR.

 
So you have him at 1000 yards, 5-6 tds?

It's not hard to see how he could get 1,200 and 7 tds, putting him in the top 10. Or more.

First off, the Denver RBs took a hit without MA. If Bell gets hurt, and it's just Ron Dayne? Ouch.

Walker is a better WR, giving them more options in the passing game. He'd clearly be the most talented WR. And would probably steal some of Smiths 1,100 yards you have going to him. With Denver now having 2 legit WRs, Lelie giving some matchup problems from the slot, the Denver offense could very easily open up.

The running game is great, but it hasn't helped them in the playoffs. Like Indy going back to the run last year, I could see Denver going more to the pass this year (better WRs, weaker RBs).

I'm not saying he's a lock for the top 10, but from your own post, you pretty much make a case for it. Again two key factors will be the healthy, and if Bell really steps up. But Shanny has wanted a big time WR for awhile, so I do see them having more of an air attack this year.

Regardless, if he's healthy, he's in that top 8-15 range which makes him a great #2 WR.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The difference between 1000 yards and 6 TDs, and 1200 yards and 7 TDs is the difference from 10th rank and the 20th rank. Keep in mind that 1200 and 7 TDs is the MINIMUM Walker will need to get into the Top 10. That means that you have to think Walker will be a "LOCK" for 1200 yards and 7 TDs. I don't think thats a lock by any means.Of course Walker could be in the Top 10, but I am not betting on it for the many reasons I pointed out.

Pitt did pretty good last year with a running game and a burner like Bell.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you have him at 1000 yards, 5-6 tds?

It's not hard to see how he could get 1,200 and 7 tds, putting him in the top 10. Or more.

First off, the Denver RBs took a hit without MA. If Bell gets hurt, and it's just Ron Dayne? Ouch.

Walker is a better WR, giving them more options in the passing game. He'd clearly be the most talented WR. And would probably steal some of Smiths 1,100 yards you have going to him. With Denver now having 2 legit WRs, Lelie giving some matchup problems from the slot, the Denver offense could very easily open up.

The running game is great, but it hasn't helped them in the playoffs. Like Indy going back to the run last year, I could see Denver going more to the pass this year (better WRs, weaker RBs).

I'm not saying he's a lock for the top 10, but from your own post, you pretty much make a case for it. Again two key factors will be the healthy, and if Bell really steps up. But Shanny has wanted a big time WR for awhile, so I do see them having more of an air attack this year.

Regardless, if he's healthy, he's in that top 8-15 range which makes him a great #2 WR.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The difference between 1000 yards and 6 TDs, and 1200 yards and 7 TDs is the difference from 10th rank and the 20th rank. Keep in mind that 1200 and 7 TDs is the MINIMUM Walker will need to get into the Top 10. That means that you have to think Walker will be a "LOCK" for 1200 yards and 7 TDs. I don't think thats a lock by any means.Of course Walker could be in the Top 10, but I am not betting on it for the many reasons I pointed out.

Pitt did pretty good last year with a running game and a burner like Bell.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
By "hasn't helped them in the playoffs" I meant Denver, not the entire NFL. I'm not sure what Pittsburg has to do with Walkers projections.And yes, I understand the difference. I used your own assumptions, and added in the weaker RB core and improved WR core to make up the difference. Along with DENVERs playoff struggles, we might see more of an air attack this year (and weaker RBs/TEs). Some of MAs TDs will go to Plummer, and in turn will probably go to Walker. Plummer was 27-20, 18-8 in 04/05, I see him going about 24-12 this year. Walker should be a lock for 8 tds, and might top out around 11.

Walker is just a great fit for Plummer. He's used to wildman Favre chucking it all over the place. He reacts well to the ball, and goes after it with some aggression. This will help Plummer, and Plummer should have a very good rapport with Walker. Lelie quit on a number of balls last year, and Plummer just didn't trust him. Walker is going to be a huge upgrade for Denvers WRs.

 
If Walker is healthy I believe he finishes as a top 10 fantasy Wr this year.  Who is with me?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Here's your problem.The guy is coming off of an ACL injury. How many WRs recovering from that kind of injury was as productive the year after the injury as the year before?

Top 30 at best for 2006, but could be a stud in 2007.

 
Favre has a way of making slightly above receivers look great (Freeman, Robert Brooks) and average receivers look above average (Schroeder).

I need to see Walker outside of Green Bay before I'm claiming him to be a top ten talent.

 
Lets say Plummer throws for 3500 yards

Rod Smith - 1100 yards receiving

Lelie - 400 yards receiving

Other WRs - 200 yards receiving

Alexander - 350 yards receiving

Other TEs - 50 yards receiving

RBs - 400 yards receiving

That leaves Walker with approx 1000 yards receiving.  Unless he gets a high number of TDs, that is not Top 10 numbers.  In 2004 Lelie and Smith both had approx 1100 yards and neither was in the Top 10.

I would like to see HOW you think Walker will get into the Top 10.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have two issues with your analysis. Number one is that you are assuming that Rod Smith will maintan his production from the last four years. You might be right but at the same time you could easily have Rod not getting open as much, hitting the wall.I am not saying that he will - I don't know one way or another, but he is now 36 and although he is a fitness freak of almost Rice'esque proportions he has declined from his best years '98-01. It is not inconceivable that he will take a further step back and that is the first risk factor of your analysis.

Number two is that Shanahan has been reported to be concerned about the lack of credible threats in the passing game. I believe it was reported here yday that the Borncos passed 47% of the time in 2005. From 2004 to 2005 the Broncos passed 70 times less and got 700 yards less. Adding Javon Walker is a clear sign that they a re about to do somethig about it. Also they have not gotten rid of Lelie yet which means that they have a credible #3 WR - as a burner there is nothing much wrong with Lelie. If they do not actually trade Lelie (and not for another WR that could be a credible#3) - big if, I know - they have the possibility for Plummer to get more yards than 3,500 and if there is another 300 yards out there is it not likely that Javon Walker will be the main beneficiary?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Favre has a way of making slightly above receivers look great (Freeman, Robert Brooks) and average receivers look above average (Schroeder).

I need to see Walker outside of Green Bay before I'm claiming him to be a top ten talent.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:goodposting: Wouldn't surprise me a bit to see Walker play down a bit after leaving Green Bay.....

 
Rod Smith has been the Bronco's top fantasy receiver for 9 years straight now.  In that time, he has only been in the top-10 in fantasy scoring three times, and hasn't been close since Plummer showed up.  With Smith still there, Walker coming off an ACL and learning a new system, and the general difficulty of WRs adapting to new teams, I would estimate Walker's chances of finishing top-10 as extremely poor.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Very :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would not be surprised if Walker were injured again. I know, injuries are a hard thing to predict...but I would not discount that possibility.

 
5) Other Top WRs - I am not sure of your Top 10 WRs, but which WRs would you remove out of this Top 10 ist to put Walker in?....Holt, Boldin, Fitz, Owens, Harrison, Moss, Steve Smith, S. Moss, Ward.  Now also keep in mind, that this list does not include players such as Jackson, Burress, Chambers, Wayne, etc. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Chad Johnson down?
 
I would not be surprised if Walker were injured again. I know, injuries are a hard thing to predict...but I would not discount that possibility.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As you said, injuries are nearly impossibloe to predict. What are you basing this on? Does he have an injury history? (other than last year's)
 
Favre has a way of making slightly above receivers look great (Freeman, Robert Brooks) and average receivers look above average (Schroeder).

I need to see Walker outside of Green Bay before I'm claiming him to be a top ten talent.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:goodposting: In 2 of the last 4 yrs Driver was the #10 fantasy WR (and 13 in last yr's debacle). Yet I never see his name listed among the elite. Unless Denver starts losing RBs like GB did last year, I do not see how Walker finishes top 10.
 
5) Other Top WRs - I am not sure of your Top 10 WRs, but which WRs would you remove out of this Top 10 ist to put Walker in?....Holt, Boldin, Fitz, Owens, Harrison, Moss, Steve Smith, S. Moss, Ward.  Now also keep in mind, that this list does not include players such as Jackson, Burress, Chambers, Wayne, etc. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Chad Johnson down?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Must be.....I would like to hear from those who have Walker in the Top 10. If you have Walker in the Top 10, what player from this list do you remove.

Owens

Holt

Boldin

Fitz

Johnson

Harrison

Steve Smith

S. Moss

Ward

Moss

.....

Jackson

Chambers

Burress

Wayne

 
I have two issues with your analysis. Number one is that you are assuming that Rod Smith will maintan his production from the last four years. You might be right but at the same time you could easily have Rod not getting open as much, hitting the wall.

I am not saying that he will - I don't know one way or another, but he is now 36 and although he is a fitness freak of almost Rice'esque proportions he has declined from his best years '98-01. It is not inconceivable that he will take a further step back and that is the first risk factor of your analysis.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rod Smith made the Pro Bowl last year.Of course he could hit the wall, but you could make a case that he may try even harder now with the Broncos going out and getting a WR.

Projecting Rod Smith to hit the wall is going against the norm, not only of the last few years, but from his Pro Bowl year last season.

 
5) Other Top WRs - I am not sure of your Top 10 WRs, but which WRs would you remove out of this Top 10 ist to put Walker in?....Holt, Boldin, Fitz, Owens, Harrison, Moss, Steve Smith, S. Moss, Ward.  Now also keep in mind, that this list does not include players such as Jackson, Burress, Chambers, Wayne, etc. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Chad Johnson down?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Must be.....I would like to hear from those who have Walker in the Top 10. If you have Walker in the Top 10, what player from this list do you remove.

Owens

Holt

Boldin

Fitz

Johnson

Harrison

Steve Smith

S. Moss

Ward

Moss

.....

Jackson

Chambers

Burress

Wayne

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I am not saying you have to draft Javon Walker ahead of any of these guys but he has a chance to be a top 10 fantasy WR this year. Obviously get the best value you can out of Walker, but I see no reason why he can't finish ahead of S. Moss and one of the lesser from Fitz/Boldin. One of the Fitz/Boldin tandems will come down a bit with the addition of E. James. I think the only concern for Walker as I pointed out was health. If he is healthy it does not matter if he is in Denver or any other place as he is the type of skilled player that can produce. Health is the biggest concern, not so much the change of location.

And using new systems as a negative is not true. Just ask S. Moss.

 
5) Other Top WRs - I am not sure of your Top 10 WRs, but which WRs would you remove out of this Top 10 ist to put Walker in?....Holt, Boldin, Fitz, Owens, Harrison, Moss, Steve Smith, S. Moss, Ward.  Now also keep in mind, that this list does not include players such as Jackson, Burress, Chambers, Wayne, etc. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Chad Johnson down?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Must be.....I would like to hear from those who have Walker in the Top 10. If you have Walker in the Top 10, what player from this list do you remove.

Owens

Holt

Boldin

Fitz

Johnson

Harrison

Steve Smith

S. Moss

Ward

Moss

.....

Jackson

Chambers

Burress

Wayne

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I am not saying you have to draft Javon Walker ahead of any of these guys but he has a chance to be a top 10 fantasy WR this year. Obviously get the best value you can out of Walker, but I see no reason why he can't finish ahead of S. Moss and one of the lesser from Fitz/Boldin. One of the Fitz/Boldin tandems will come down a bit with the addition of E. James. I think the only concern for Walker as I pointed out was health. If he is healthy it does not matter if he is in Denver or any other place as he is the type of skilled player that can produce. Health is the biggest concern, not so much the change of location.

And using new systems as a negative is not true. Just ask S. Moss.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Moss played for the Jets before. How was the change in scenery for Muhammad, Mason, Moss, Price, etc.?I am not talking where you would draft them, but where they will finish. Lets hear your top 10 as they will finish if you think Walker should be in there.

Of course Walker has a "CHANCE"...every player has a chance to finsh in the Top 10, the discussion is if you think he will.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have two issues with your analysis. Number one is that you are assuming that Rod Smith will maintan his production from the last four years. You might be right but at the same time you could easily have Rod not getting open as much, hitting the wall.

I am not saying that he will - I don't know one way or another, but he is now 36 and although he is a fitness freak of almost Rice'esque proportions he has declined from his best years '98-01. It is not inconceivable that he will take a further step back and that is the first risk factor of your analysis.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rod Smith made the Pro Bowl last year.Of course he could hit the wall, but you could make a case that he may try even harder now with the Broncos going out and getting a WR.

Projecting Rod Smith to hit the wall is going against the norm, not only of the last few years, but from his Pro Bowl year last season.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The risk is that he could. Even disconsidering that - if they improve on the passing game, ypa, yards overall - how would you distribute the addtl yards and keep Walker at 1000/6? Rod Smith returning to 1998-2001 form is a lot less likely than the chief beneficiary of the extra yards will be the new WR
 
This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
YR      G       TRG     REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK2002    15      50      23      319     13.9    1       39      942003    16      74      41      716     17.5    9       126     212004    16      138     89      1382    15.5    12      210     22005    1       5       4       27      6.8     0       3       155Maybe I have a different definition of "proven", but I do not think 1 good season out of his 4 years in the NFL means he is a "proven" elite talent.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would not use 2005 as any indication as to how good he was going to be last year. Walker would have easily exceeded the 1000 yard mark total and probably been a double digit TD guy again last season.2004 was his breakout year building on a successful sophmore season with 716 yards and 9 TD's. He has proven he is more then a legitmate threat in the red zone and has big play ability. He also had great hands whereas his coaches had him for only 1 dropped catchable ball in 2004.

Walker in my eyes when healthy is a proven commodity and teh Broncos and Shanny believe this as well by trading for Walker and are in the middle of giving him a big contract.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To answer the question - No, I do not see Javon Walker as a lock for top 10 - but I see him a lot closer to WR#10 than to WR#20

 
To answer the question - No, I do not see Javon Walker as a lock for top 10 - but I see him a lot closer to WR#10 than to WR#20

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If Walker cracks the top 15 I'll be surprised. I don't question his ability to be a top 10 WR but Denver doesn't need him to put up big numbers and will go to the running game to run out the clock. Walker is somewhat a product of the Packers' system and having Favre at QB. Favre has a license to make plays which is why Walker had 9 TD's in 2003. In 2004 when Walker had his Pro Bowl year, the Packers were #1 in passing attempts, I don't see that happening with the Broncos. Rod Smith will still be the possession guy and will take a lot of opportunities away from Walker.Walker's forecast: 1100 yards, 6 TD's.

 
This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
YR      G       TRG     REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK2002    15      50      23      319     13.9    1       39      942003    16      74      41      716     17.5    9       126     212004    16      138     89      1382    15.5    12      210     22005    1       5       4       27      6.8     0       3       155Maybe I have a different definition of "proven", but I do not think 1 good season out of his 4 years in the NFL means he is a "proven" elite talent.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would not use 2005 as any indication as to how good he was going to be last year. Walker would have easily exceeded the 1000 yard mark total and probably been a double digit TD guy again last season.2004 was his breakout year building on a successful sophmore season with 716 yards and 9 TD's. He has proven he is more then a legitmate threat in the red zone and has big play ability. He also had great hands whereas his coaches had him for only 1 dropped catchable ball in 2004.

Walker in my eyes when healthy is a proven commodity and teh Broncos and Shanny believe this as well by trading for Walker and are in the middle of giving him a big contract.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is Walker a good WR....yes. Is Walker a proven commodity...not by any means. They are two different things. Regardless of Walker got hurt or not, he has had ONE good season out of four. That does not meet any sort of qualification to be deemed a proven elite talent.

Do you consider these stats as a proven elite talent?

Code:
 G       REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK16      31      393     12.7    3       57      7016      52      762     14.7    3       97      4116      55      895     16.3    7       141     2116      94      1252    13.3    9       178     7
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not hard to see how he could get 1,200 and 7 tds, putting him in the top 10. Or more.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
1200 and 7 TDs would not have been top 10 in any of the past three years.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Would have had him virtually tied for WR10 in 2005 with Ward/Burress. 2004 he would have been tied for 12th with Bruce. 2003 he would have been tied for 10th with Mccardell, TO, Chambers.So in gerenal, 160 points is where WR10 ends up.

 
This guy is an elite talent that has proven he is elilte. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
YR      G       TRG     REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK2002    15      50      23      319     13.9    1       39      942003    16      74      41      716     17.5    9       126     212004    16      138     89      1382    15.5    12      210     22005    1       5       4       27      6.8     0       3       155Maybe I have a different definition of "proven", but I do not think 1 good season out of his 4 years in the NFL means he is a "proven" elite talent.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would not use 2005 as any indication as to how good he was going to be last year. Walker would have easily exceeded the 1000 yard mark total and probably been a double digit TD guy again last season.2004 was his breakout year building on a successful sophmore season with 716 yards and 9 TD's. He has proven he is more then a legitmate threat in the red zone and has big play ability. He also had great hands whereas his coaches had him for only 1 dropped catchable ball in 2004.

Walker in my eyes when healthy is a proven commodity and teh Broncos and Shanny believe this as well by trading for Walker and are in the middle of giving him a big contract.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is Walker a good WR....yes. Is Walker a proven commodity...not by any means. They are two different things. Regardless of Walker got hurt or not, he has had ONE good season out of four. That does not meet any sort of qualification to be deemed a proven elite talent.

Do you consider these stats as a proven elite talent?

 G       REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK16      31      393     12.7    3       57      7016      52      762     14.7    3       97      4116      55      895     16.3    7       141     2116      94      1252    13.3    9       178     7<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Steve Smith had 2 good years out of 5. People have no problem ranking him in the top 3. Steve Smith

And AJ NEVER really had a great year, and was ranked in the top 10 by most FGB staff. People project things based on lots of factors. If you needed 4 good years in a row to get a high ranking, we could juse write a script to spit out rankings. But players change teams, get injuried, come back from injuries, QBs change. Stuff happens.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is Walker a good WR....yes.  Is Walker a proven commodity...not by any means.  They are two different things. 

Regardless of Walker got hurt or not, he has had ONE good season out of four.  That does not meet any sort of qualification to be deemed a proven elite talent.

Do you consider these stats as a proven elite talent?

 G       REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK16      31      393     12.7    3       57      7016      52      762     14.7    3       97      4116      55      895     16.3    7       141     2116      94      1252    13.3    9       178     7<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Whose numbers are those fridayfrenzy? :confused: These are Walker's Receiving numbers;

Year Team        G    GS   No    Yards    Avg     TD 2002 Green Bay   15   2    23    319      13.9    12003 Green Bay   16   3    41    716      17.5    9 2004 Green Bay   16   12   89    1382     15.5    12 2005 Green Bay   1    1    4     27       6.8     0Also, what was the Packer's WR situation in 2002 & 2003 fridayfrenzy?[SIZE=8pt]EDIT: To clarify the Walker numbers in my post, are receiving only[/SIZE]

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is Walker a good WR....yes.  Is Walker a proven commodity...not by any means.  They are two different things. 

Regardless of Walker got hurt or not, he has had ONE good season out of four.  That does not meet any sort of qualification to be deemed a proven elite talent.

Do you consider these stats as a proven elite talent?

 G       REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK16      31      393     12.7    3       57      7016      52      762     14.7    3       97      4116      55      895     16.3    7       141     2116      94      1252    13.3    9       178     7<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Whose numbers are those fridayfrenzy? :confused: These are Walker's Receiving numbers;

Year Team        G    GS   No    Yards    Avg     TD 2002 Green Bay   15   2    23    319      13.9    12003 Green Bay   16   3    41    716      17.5    9 2004 Green Bay   16   12   89    1382     15.5    12 2005 Green Bay   1    1    4     27       6.8     0Also, what was the Packer's WR situation in 2002 & 2003 fridayfrenzy?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I posted Walker's numbers up there, I was just trying to prove my point that Walker does not have numbers to back up that he is a "proven" elite talent.Those stats I posted were from Peerless Price before he went to Atlanta. They are very very similar to Walker's, yet Price can not be considered a "proven elite talent" by any stretch of the imagination. To be a "PROVEN" elite talent in my eyes, you need more than ONE year in the top 20...sorry.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is Walker a good WR....yes.  Is Walker a proven commodity...not by any means.  They are two different things. 

Regardless of Walker got hurt or not, he has had ONE good season out of four.  That does not meet any sort of qualification to be deemed a proven elite talent.

Do you consider these stats as a proven elite talent?

 G       REC     YD      Y/R     TD      FPT     RANK16      31      393     12.7    3       57      7016      52      762     14.7    3       97      4116      55      895     16.3    7       141     2116      94      1252    13.3    9       178     7<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Whose numbers are those fridayfrenzy? :confused: These are Walker's Receiving numbers;

Year Team        G    GS   No    Yards    Avg     TD 2002 Green Bay   15   2    23    319      13.9    12003 Green Bay   16   3    41    716      17.5    9 2004 Green Bay   16   12   89    1382     15.5    12 2005 Green Bay   1    1    4     27       6.8     0Also, what was the Packer's WR situation in 2002 & 2003 fridayfrenzy?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I posted Walker's numbers up there, I was just trying to prove my point that Walker does not have numbers to back up that he is a "proven" elite talent.Those stats I posted were from Peerless Price before he went to Atlanta. They are very very similar to Walker's.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Gotcha :thumbup: Still, I think the Packer's WR situation in 2002 & 2003 needs to be considered, when looking at Walkers numbers from those years.

But that's just me. Others may consider it irrelevant.

 
I think Walker has a good chance at top 15. A couple of months ago in my dynasty league I traded Peyton Manning and Hines Ward for Tom Brady, Javon Walker and a 2nd round pick in this years rookie draft.

I think Walker at least has a chance to match Ward's production.

 
Rod Smith has been the Bronco's top fantasy receiver for 9 years straight now.  In that time, he has only been in the top-10 in fantasy scoring three times, and hasn't been close since Plummer showed up.  With Smith still there, Walker coming off an ACL and learning a new system, and the general difficulty of WRs adapting to new teams, I would estimate Walker's chances of finishing top-10 as extremely poor.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:goodposting: on all points.
 
How about this statement: Walker is an elite talent that has proven when healthy and as a starter that he is "elite."

P. Price going to a M. Vick offense has no relevance in this conversation. 2 years ago Plummer threw for 4000 yards in Denver. It's not as if Walker is going to Chicago or Baltimore's passing game here.

I am not expecting Walker to surpass his 2004 numbers, but I could see him finishing top 10 this year. Call it a hunch. A guy playing for a new organization with a chip on his shoulder wanting to prove to people that he is worth all the money he will be getting.

He is a red zone threat and Plummer can throw the ball. Walker will finish ahead of R. Smith this season and in the top 10.

Friday you ate crow on the L. Jordan saga from last year and you could be set to eat some more crow.

 
I can definitely see Walker getting 60 receptions in Denver this season, but that won't be near enough to put him at the elite level. Among WRs, Rod Smith will still get the lion's share of receptions...budget 50-60 receptions going to RBs, and another 30-50 going to the TEs, and there isn't enough to go around among the Denver WRs.

2005 Denver WRs Receptions:

R. Smith = 85

A. Lelie = 42

C. Adams = 21

2004 Denver WRs Receptions:

R. Smith = 79

A. Lelie = 54

D. Watts = 31

2003 Denver WRs Receptions:

R. Smith = 74

A. Lelie = 37

E. McCaffrey = 19

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about this statement: Walker is an elite talent that has proven when healthy and as a starter that he is "elite."

P. Price going to a M. Vick offense has no relevance in this conversation.  2 years ago Plummer threw for 4000 yards in Denver.  It's not as if Walker is going to Chicago or Baltimore's passing game here.

I am not expecting Walker to surpass his 2004 numbers, but I could see him finishing top 10 this year.  Call it a hunch.  A guy playing for a new organization with a chip on his shoulder wanting to prove to people that he is worth all the money he will be getting.

He is a red zone threat and Plummer can throw the ball.  Walker will finish ahead of R. Smith this season and in the top 10.

Friday you ate crow on the L. Jordan saga from last year and you could be set to eat some more crow.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I was right there with you on Jordan last year, but I disagree on Walker. With Rod Smith and Lelie still there, Denver doesn't run the type of offense to get Walker the ball like Favre did. He's still a top 20 guy, especially in dynasty, but talk of top 10 this year is ridiculous.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top