What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Week 1 WW pick ups? (1 Viewer)

Byron Leftwich is available in a lot of leagues

Brodie Croyle is worth a flier in deep leagues

Cadillac available in a TON of leagues

Chansi Stuckey deserves some decent sized FA bids

Devery Henderson and Robert Meachem are available in a lot of shallow leagues

Michael Clayton looked solid (and made some great catches in traffic)

Jeremy Shockey is available in a lot of 10-team leagues, particularly Yahoo and ESPN public leagues

Todd Heap available in plenty of leagues

Bids for Vick will be plentiful

 
Garcon ended up with 3 receptions after A-Gonz left, didn't get to actually see the game so not sure if Collie was targeted often, but I rolled with Garcon.
From what I saw of Garcon in the preseason he drops too many passes and Manning won't put up with that if it continues. Collie is sure handed and the one to have long term IMO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is Flacco a legitimate fantasy starter? (I solicit opinions because I'm stuck with Garrard. And I played the Brees owner! :boxing: )

 
If you're going to roll with one of these guys, then I'd roll with Garcon. Collie will see less snaps because he's a slot WR and will only be used in three WR sets even if Gonzo is out long term (hope not).
What about after he drops a bunch, which he will? I was pro-Garcon to begin training camp, but IMO Collie is the better WR. You might be right about playing time early, but I expect that if AG is out for a long period of time that Collie's talent will win out over Garcon eventually.
 
Flacco, ray rice, cadillac
which one of these guys are sitting on anybodies WW?
:no:
:hifive: :goodposting:
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: It never fails that somebody has to make some stupid crack that it's basically ridiculous to suggest that Player X or Y might actually be available on the WW. Give me a break. In bigger, deeper leagues (which includes most of my own leagues) where all of these guys are obviously gone, you can't get these guys on the WW, so just MOVE ON TO THE NEXT POST to look for possible WW pickups for YOUR league. But NOT ALL LEAGUES ARE THE SAME. Some leagues have a lot fewer teams than a typical league or much shallower benches, or both. None of these guys are available in any of the leagues I'm in this year, but so what? I'd rather let people throw out names they think might be helpful to the rest of us (even if many of them aren't available in most of my leagues), rather than have a poster be discouraged from posting about someone who might actually be a good WW pickup for me simply because the poster thinks he might be hassled with some silly post about how none of the suggested players are available in any real league, or something similar.
 
Manning to Manningham is looking very intriguing.

Eli is reading his way pretty often, and his open field moves have looked rather dazzling. He definitely has talent, as he was one of THE top college WRs of his class IIRC

 
Flacco, ray rice, cadillac
which one of these guys are sitting on anybodies WW?
:confused:
:excited: :excited:
:excited: :thumbdown: It never fails that somebody has to make some stupid crack that it's basically ridiculous to suggest that Player X or Y might actually be available on the WW. Give me a break. In bigger, deeper leagues (which includes most of my own leagues) where all of these guys are obviously gone, you can't get these guys on the WW, so just MOVE ON TO THE NEXT POST to look for possible WW pickups for YOUR league. But NOT ALL LEAGUES ARE THE SAME. Some leagues have a lot fewer teams than a typical league or much shallower benches, or both. None of these guys are available in any of the leagues I'm in this year, but so what? I'd rather let people throw out names they think might be helpful to the rest of us (even if many of them aren't available in most of my leagues), rather than have a poster be discouraged from posting about someone who might actually be a good WW pickup for me simply because the poster thinks he might be hassled with some silly post about how none of the suggested players are available in any real league, or something similar.
So tell us what percentage of leagues do you think Ray Rice is still on the waiver wire? Then let us know about Flacco and C. Williams. We all know that leagues are different but to suggest Ray Rice is a free agent is laughable.
 
In a redraft league, Michael Clayton looked really good, and just posted the highest yardage he's had in a single game since he was rookie (and his last game last year is the second most yards he's had since he was a rookie).In dynasty leagues, Mike Wallace and Andre Caldwell have both looked pretty good for young guys.

:confused: :excited: It never fails that somebody has to make some stupid crack that it's basically ridiculous to suggest that Player X or Y might actually be available on the WW. Give me a break. In bigger, deeper leagues (which includes most of my own leagues) where all of these guys are obviously gone, you can't get these guys on the WW, so just MOVE ON TO THE NEXT POST to look for possible WW pickups for YOUR league. But NOT ALL LEAGUES ARE THE SAME. Some leagues have a lot fewer teams than a typical league or much shallower benches, or both. None of these guys are available in any of the leagues I'm in this year, but so what? I'd rather let people throw out names they think might be helpful to the rest of us (even if many of them aren't available in most of my leagues), rather than have a poster be discouraged from posting about someone who might actually be a good WW pickup for me simply because the poster thinks he might be hassled with some silly post about how none of the suggested players are available in any real league, or something similar.
Flacco and Caddy, sure... but Ray Rice? His ADP was the 6th round!!! Might as well suggest Jonathan Stewart and Kellen Winslow while you're at it (both players had a later ADP than Rice). Maybe even Jerricho Cotchery and Pittsburgh's defense.
 
Flacco, ray rice, cadillac
Ray Rice put up 17 pts in my league vs 23 pts by McGahee who was drafted 6-8 rounds later. Now I'll have to wonder who to start in 1 PPR league where I have both.
Good matchups you may want to start both. Rice is the starter and will get most of the carries, but McGahee gets enough that he is startable too. Although Rice didn't score I think a 108 yards is a pretty good day for him and I don't see how his role is diminished.
 
My roster opens itself up to WW pickups at WR and TE; so here's a list I've put together of guys available in some of my leagues 170-200 players deep...

WR

Justin Gage

Kenny Britt

Michael Clayton

Patrick Crayton

Robert Meachem

Devery Henderson

Chansi Stucky

Josh Cribbs

Andre Caldwell

Muhsin Muhammed

Mark Bradley

Mario Manningham

Davone Bess

Nate Burleson

Isaac Bruce

TE

Heath Miller

Brent Celek

Todd Heap

Robert Royal

Hope this helps.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My roster opens itself up to WW pickups at WR and TE; so here's a list I've put together of guys available in some of my leagues 170-200 players deep...

WR

Justin Gage

Kenny Britt

Michael Clayton

Patrick Crayton

Robert Meachem

Devery Henderson

Chansi Stucky

Josh Cribbs

Andre Caldwell

Muhsin Muhammed

Mark Bradley

Mario Manningham

Davone Bess

Nate Burleson

Isaac Bruce

TE

Heath Miller

Brent Celek

Todd Heap

Robert Royal

Hope this helps.
Burleson is looking real good, Seahawks offense is moving the ball well and Hass is locking onto him.
 
Haven't seen any highlights (was a the Colts game) so not recommending any of these guys, but here are some stat lines from the early games of guys who might be on the waiver wire.

Davone Bess – 57 yards, 7 receptions

Andre Caldwell – 54 yards, 6 receptions

Devery Henderson – 103 yards, 5 receptions, 1 touchdown

Jeremy Shockey – 31 yards, 4 receptions, 2 touchdowns

Mike Bell – 143 yards on 28 carries

Patrick Crayton – 135 yards, 4 receptions, 1 touchdown

Michael Clayton – 93 yards, 5 receptions

Carnell Williams – 97 yards on 13 carries, 1 touchdown

Pierre Garcon – 24 yards, 3 receptions

Mark Clayton – 77 yards, 5 receptions, 1 touchdown

Kenny Britt, 85 yards, 4 receptions

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Didn't see the game, yahoo showing 20 pts for Crayton?Is he the #2 in Dal?
He and Austin seem to be splitting reps.
Haven't seen any highlights (was a the Colts game) so not recommending any of these guys, but here are some stat lines from the early games of guys who might be on the waiver wire.Davone Bess – 57 yards, 7 receptionsAndre Caldwell – 54 yards, 6 receptionsDevery Henderson – 103 yards, 5 receptions, 1 touchdownJeremy Shockey – 31 yards, 4 receptions, 2 touchdownsMike Bell – 143 yards on 28 carriesPatrick Crayton – 135 yards, 4 receptions, 1 touchdownMichael Clayton – 93 yards, 5 receptionsCarnell Williams – 97 yards on 13 carries, 1 touchdownPierre Garcon – 24 yards, 3 receptionsMichael Clayton – 77 yards, 5 receptions, 1 touchdownKenny Britt, 85 yards, 4 receptions
Second Clayton should be Mark Clayton (Baltimore), not Michael Clayton (Tampa).
 
If you're going to roll with one of these guys, then I'd roll with Garcon. Collie will see less snaps because he's a slot WR and will only be used in three WR sets even if Gonzo is out long term (hope not).
What about after he drops a bunch, which he will? I was pro-Garcon to begin training camp, but IMO Collie is the better WR. You might be right about playing time early, but I expect that if AG is out for a long period of time that Collie's talent will win out over Garcon eventually.
IMHO, Gonzalez being out helps Wayne, Clark & the RB's more than Garcon/Collie.
 
If you're going to roll with one of these guys, then I'd roll with Garcon. Collie will see less snaps because he's a slot WR and will only be used in three WR sets even if Gonzo is out long term (hope not).
What about after he drops a bunch, which he will? I was pro-Garcon to begin training camp, but IMO Collie is the better WR. You might be right about playing time early, but I expect that if AG is out for a long period of time that Collie's talent will win out over Garcon eventually.
IMHO, Gonzalez being out helps Wayne, Clark & the RB's more than Garcon/Collie.
yeah, I basically said that in the AG thread.
 
My roster opens itself up to WW pickups at WR and TE; so here's a list I've put together of guys available in some of my leagues 170-200 players deep...

WR

Justin Gage

Kenny Britt

Michael Clayton

Patrick Crayton

Robert Meachem

Devery Henderson

Chansi Stucky

Josh Cribbs

Andre Caldwell

Muhsin Muhammed

Mark Bradley

Mario Manningham

Davone Bess

Nate Burleson

Isaac Bruce

TE

Heath Miller

Brent Celek

Todd Heap

Robert Royal

Hope this helps.
Burleson is looking real good, Seahawks offense is moving the ball well and Hass is locking onto him.
This.As a McNabb owner, wondering if anyone is picking up Vick? :shrug:

 
If you're going to roll with one of these guys, then I'd roll with Garcon. Collie will see less snaps because he's a slot WR and will only be used in three WR sets even if Gonzo is out long term (hope not).
What about after he drops a bunch, which he will? I was pro-Garcon to begin training camp, but IMO Collie is the better WR. You might be right about playing time early, but I expect that if AG is out for a long period of time that Collie's talent will win out over Garcon eventually.
IMHO, Gonzalez being out helps Wayne, Clark & the RB's more than Garcon/Collie.
Very possible. Gonzalez I believe got hurt on the 1st series of the game (maybe it was the 2nd) and Manning really didn't look Garcon's or Collie's way all that much. I wouldn't pickup Collie at this point unless you think the Colts are going to run a lot of 3 WR sets because Collie is strictly a slot WR. If Gonzo comes back, then there is a decent chance Collie plays more then Garcon, but Collie isn't going to play on the outside over Garcon.
 
Flacco, ray rice, cadillac
Ray Rice put up 17 pts in my league vs 23 pts by McGahee who was drafted 6-8 rounds later. Now I'll have to wonder who to start in 1 PPR league where I have both.
McGahee may have outscored him today but I think it was due to good fortune. His first score was on a broken play in the red zone and his second score was in garbage time. Rice was clearly the #1 back today and did nothing to relinquish that role. Rice had 20+ touches today and did well with them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top