What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

World's Greatest Draft (2 Viewers)

Kind of shocked this guy hasn't gone yet, but I just checked the first page, and he's not there.

6.14 Alexander Graham Bell, Inventor

Alexander Graham Bell (3 March 1847 – 2 August 1922) was an eminent scientist, inventor and innovator who is credited with inventing the first practical telephone.

Bell's father, grandfather, and brother had all been associated with work on elocution and speech, and both his mother and wife were deaf, profoundly influencing Bell's life's work.[1] His research on hearing and speech further led him to experiment with hearing devices which eventually culminated in Bell being awarded the first U.S. patent for the telephone in 1876.[2] In retrospect, Bell considered his most famous invention an intrusion on his real work as a scientist and refused to have a telephone in his study.[3] Upon Bell's death, all telephones throughout the United States "stilled their ringing for a silent minute in tribute to the man whose yearning to communicate made them possible".[4]

Many other inventions marked Bell's later life, including groundbreaking work in hydrofoils and aeronautics. In 1888, Alexander Graham Bell became one of the founding members of the National Geographic Society.[5]
 
Andy D should get a kick out of this pick. I'm going recent old school. Antiquity is great, but let's not forget about the recent 300 years or so.

I am selecting, as my intellectual, a statesman, theorist, philosopher and political giant that is considered, in keeping with theme of "father of," the Father of Modern Conservatism.

In May 1778 he supported a motion in Parliament to revise the restrictions on Irish trade. However his constituents in Bristol, a great trading city, urged him to oppose free trade with Ireland. he resisted these demands and said: "If, from this conduct, I shall forfeit their suffrages at an ensuing election, it will stand on record an example to future representatives of the Commons of England, that one man at least had dared to resist the desires of his constituents when his judgment assured him they were wrong". He supported America in its colonial dispute with the King, saying (of the tea duty which we all have come to understand resulted in the Boston Tea Party) :

Again and again, revert to your old principles—seek peace and ensue it; leave America, if she has taxable matter in her, to tax herself. I am not here going into the distinctions of rights, nor attempting to mark their boundaries. I do not enter into these metaphysical distinctions; I hate the very sound of them. Leave the Americans as they anciently stood, and these distinctions, born of our unhappy contest, will die along with it...Be content to bind America by laws of trade; you have always done it...Do not burthen them with taxes...But if intemperately, unwisely, fatally, you sophisticate and poison the very source of government by urging subtle deductions, and consequences odious to those you govern, from the unlimited and illimitable nature of supreme sovereignty, you will teach them by these means to call that sovereignty itself in question...If that sovereignty and their freedom cannot be reconciled, which will they take? They will cast your sovereignty in your face. No body of men will be argued into slavery. Sir, let the gentlemen on the other side...tell me, what one character of liberty the Americans have, and what one brand of slavery they are free from, if they are bound in their property and industry by all the restraints you can imagine on commerce, and at the same time are made pack-horses of every tax you choose to impose, without the least share in granting them. When they bear the burthens of unlimited monopoly, will you bring them to bear the burthens of unlimited revenue too? The Englishman in America will feel that this is slavery; that it is legal slavery, will be no compensation either to his feelings or to his understandings.

His, "Reflections on the Revolution in France" was controversial at the time of its publication. But after his death, it was to become his best-known and most influential work. It is understood to be the manifesto in Conservative thought. In the English-speaking world, he is regarded by most political experts as the father of modern anglo-conservatism. His 'liberal' conservatism, which opposed governing based on abstract ideas to 'organic' reform, can be contrasted with the autocratic conservatism of Continental figures such as several not to be named for spotlighting purposes. His intellectual gifts to political thought ensured that an important framework for what was to become the United States of America, and indeed most of the yet to be born countries searching for liberty and freedom. He is a heavyweight in political thought, and deserves to be honored here.

I select Edmund Burke the great political mind of the 18th century, and the Father of Conservative political thought.

 
Yankee, I believe you have 6 minutes left. I will be picking at 11.:00am eastern standard time

Someone correct me if I am wrong on the clock

 
I can not let this pick slide any longer. I do not know where I am going to slot him right now because he can fall into a few categories. I dont want to wait to take him and have someone else select him so here goes.

This man wrote what is arguably one of the greatest documents ever to be written. You can argue that he was a hypocrite and it didnt mean that much because not all believed in it, but it doesnt take away from the actual document itself. You guys can argue that point.

6.16 Thomas Jefferson

From Wiki:

Thomas Jefferson (April 13, 1743 – July 4, 1826)[1] was the third President of the United States (1801–1809), the principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), and one of the most influential Founding Fathers for his promotion of the ideals of republicanism in the United States. Major events during his presidency include the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and the XXXX(1804–1806).

As a political philosopher, Jefferson was a man of the Enlightenment and knew many intellectual leaders in Britain and France. He idealized the independent yeoman farmer as exemplar of republican virtues, distrusted cities and financiers, and favored states' rights and a strictly limited federal government. Jefferson supported the separation of church and state[2] and was the author of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (1779, 1786). He was the eponym of Jeffersonian democracy and the co-founder and leader of the Democratic-Republican Party, which dominated American politics for a quarter-century. Jefferson served as the wartime Governor of Virginia (1779–1781), first United States Secretary of State (1789–1793) and second Vice President (1797–1801).

A polymath, Jefferson achieved distinction as, among other things, a horticulturist, statesman, architect, archaeologist, inventor, and founder of the University of Virginia. When President XXXX welcomed forty-nine Nobel Prize winners to the White House in XXXX he said, "I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent and of human knowledge that has ever been gathered together at the White House – with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."[3] To date, Jefferson is the only president to serve two full terms in office to veto no bill of Congress. Jefferson has been consistently ranked by scholars as one of the greatest U.S. presidents.

Wen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Several pages behind right now, but:

I wholeheartedly disapprove of the use of Biblical figures (other than Jesus, of course) in this draft.
really? Why?
Because they're mythological. And I'm being serious.
I was looking at the Wiki description of Judas. There is no historical evidence that he lived, despite the fact that a Gospel by Judas was discovered (which many Christians appear to be skeptical of.)

But Andy may have a point about people that we have no evidence that they ever existed. How much emphasis to put on this will be up to the various judges.
16. Religious figures Separate from philosophy, though there may be some overlap here. These are people throughout the centuries who helped shape the faith of mankind. For the purposes of this category, all Biblical characters are to be treated as real people. I don't want to get into any debates as to whether Jesus or Moses actually lived. We'll assume they did in this draft.
So, are Biblical characters valid in other categories? I guess the question is this rule for the category or the draft?
 
I'm out for the day with limited access, but access nonetheless. I'll pick when I get a PM for my turn being up. I think there are some auto skips before me so I don't know who'll be PMing. Thanks.

 
I can not let this pick slide any longer. I do not know where I am going to slot him right now because he can fall into a few categories. I dont want to wait to take him and have someone else select him so here goes.

This man wrote what is arguably one of the greatest documents ever to be written. You can argue that he was a hypocrite and it didnt mean that much because not all believed in it, but it doesnt take away from the actual document itself. You guys can argue that point.

6.16 Thomas Jefferson
I'd be happy to argue the point.His pen "wrote" the Declaration of Independence, but that's it. The important 'document' and action in achieving American soveriegnty from the crown in 1776 wasn't the DoI but the Lee Resolution, entered into Congress but Representative Lee at the behest and after the tireless work of another man who led the congressional debate and the fire of revolution in that body. After the introduction of the resolution and its passage on July 2, 1776 - the real date of importance - it was agreed that a document stating why the vote was made should be given as part of the act. 5 men were chosen to as a committe to write the document. Jefferson was one of the five.

He was a great lyrical writer and it was agreed that this talent plus the fact that he was Virginian made him the better choice to write it, instead of the man everyone thought would. The overriding ideals of the document are not Jefferson's but the ideals and work of others. The act of independence was not the work of Jefferson, but of others. There is very little, if any, substance to Thomas Jefferson at all and history puts him in an ivory tower that has a rotten foundation that few ever care to look at.

Ok, my usual stuff is done. It was a given he was going to be taken. Just a question of when.

 
I've been waiting patiently to make this pick, but I'm not going to chance letting him slide any farther. We've had many fine scientists picked so far, but I'm not sure that any, including Newton, have a stronger case for the top spot than my pick. His work and advances in the fields of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy alone would place in the top tier. What sets him apart for me is his pioneering of the Scientific Method, which is absolutely foundational to modern science and has contributed to virtually every major scientific advance for the past millennium. It's hard to even do a full write up of his legacy without massive spotlighting, but I did my best to clean up a brief section of the article below. Just visit the wiki page to be fully blown away by the scope of his accomplishments.

Alhazen - Scientist

Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham (Arabic: ابو علی، حسن بن حسن بن الهيثم, Persian: ابن هیثم, Latinized: Alhacen or (deprecated) Alhazen) (965 in Basra - c. 1039 in Cairo), was an Arab[2] or Persian[3] polymath.[4] He made significant contributions to the principles of optics, as well as to anatomy, astronomy, engineering, mathematics, medicine, ophthalmology, philosophy, physics, psychology, visual perception, and to science in general with his introduction of the scientific method. He is sometimes called al-Basri (Arabic: البصري), after his birthplace in the city of Basra.[5]

Born circa 965, in Basra, Iraq and part of Buyid Persia at that time,[1] he lived mainly in Cairo, Egypt, dying there at age 76.[6] Over-confident about practical application of his mathematical knowledge, he assumed that he could regulate the floods of the Nile.[8] After being ordered by Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, the sixth ruler of the Fatimid caliphate, to carry out this operation, he quickly perceived the impossibility of what he was attempting to do, and retired from engineering. Fearing for his life, he feigned madness[1][9] and was placed under house arrest, during and after which he devoted himself to his scientific work until his death.[6]

Ibn al-Haytham is regarded as the "father of modern optics"[10] for his influential Book of Optics (written while he was under house arrest), which proved the intromission theory of vision and refined it into essentially its modern form. He is also recognized so for his experiments on optics, including experiments on lenses, mirrors, refraction, reflection, and the dispersion of light into its constituent colours.[11] He studied binocular vision and the Moon illusion, described the finite speed[12][13] of light, and argued that it is made of particles[14] travelling in straight lines.[13][15] Due to his formulation of a modern quantitative and empirical approach to physics and science, he is considered the pioneer of the modern scientific method[16][17] and the originator of the experimental nature of physics[18] and science.[19] Author Bradley Steffens describes him as the "first scientist".[20] He is also considered by A. I. Sabra to be the founder of experimental psychology[21] for his approach to visual perception and optical illusions,[22] and a pioneer of the philosophical field of phenomenology or the study of consciousness from a first-person perspective. His Book of Optics has been ranked with Isaac Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica as one of the most influential books in the history of physics,[23] for starting a revolution in optics[24] and visual perception.[25]

Ibn al-Haytham's achievements include many advances in physics and mathematics. He gave the first clear description[26] and correct analysis[27] of the camera obscura. He enunciated xxxxxxx's principle of least time and the concept of inertia (Newton's first law of motion),[28] and developed the concept of momentum.[29] He described the attraction between masses and was aware of the magnitude of acceleration due to gravity at-a-distance.[30] He stated that the heavenly bodies were accountable to the laws of physics and also presented a critique and reform of xxxxxxxx astronomy. He was the first to state xxxxxxxx's theorem in number theory, and he formulated the xxxxxxxxx quadrilateral[31] and a concept similar to xxxxxxxx's axiom[32] now used in non-Euclidean geometry. Moreover, he formulated and solved Alhazen's problem geometrically using early ideas related to calculus and mathematical induction.[33]

Scientific method

Neuroscientist Rosanna Gorini notes that "according to the majority of the historians al-Haytham was the pioneer of the modern scientific method."[16][71] Ibn al-Haytham developed rigorous experimental methods of controlled scientific testing to verify theoretical hypotheses and substantiate inductive conjectures.[30] Ibn al-Haytham's scientific method was very similar to the modern scientific method and consisted of the following procedures:[72]

1. Observation

2. Statement of problem

3. Formulation of hypothesis

4. Testing of hypothesis using experimentation

5. Analysis of experimental results

6. Interpretation of data and formulation of conclusion

7. Publication of findings

Other Important Discoveries/Observations:

Chapters 15–16 of the Book of Optics covered astronomy. Ibn al-Haytham was the first to discover that the celestial spheres do not consist of solid matter. He also discovered that the heavens are less dense than the air.

He built the first camera obscura and pinhole camera [27],

He maintained that a body moves perpetually unless an external force stops it or changes its direction of motion.[30] This was similar to the concept of inertia, but was largely a hypotheses that was not verified by experimentation. The key breakthrough in classical mechanics, the introduction of frictional force, was eventually made centuries later by Galileo Galilei, and then formulated as Newton's first law of motion.

His reformed empirical model was the first to reject the equant[94] and eccentrics,[95] separate natural philosophy from astronomy, free celestial kinematics from cosmology, and reduce physical entities to geometric entities. The model also propounded the Earth's rotation about its axis,[96] and the centres of motion were geometric points without any physical significance.

In geometry, Ibn al-Haytham developed analytical geometry and established a link between algebra and geometry.[106] Ibn al-Haytham also discovered a formula for adding the first 100 natural numbers (which may later have been intuited by Carl Friedrich Gauss as a youth). Ibn al-Haytham used a geometric proof to prove the formula.

His contributions to number theory includes his work on perfect numbers. In his Analysis and Synthesis, Ibn al-Haytham was the first to realize that every even perfect number is of the form 2n−1(2n − 1) where 2n − 1 is prime, but he was not able to prove this result successfully (xxxxxxx later proved it in the 18th century).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been waiting patiently to make this pick, but I'm not going to chance letting him slide any farther. We've had many fine scientists picked so far, but I'm not sure that any, including Newton, have a stronger case for the top spot than my pick. His work and advances in the fields of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy alone would place in the top tier. What sets him apart for me is his pioneering of the Scientific Method, which is absolutely foundational to modern science and has contributed to virtually every major scientific advance for the past millennium. It's hard to even do a full write up of his legacy without massive spotlighting, but I did my best to clean up a brief section of the article below. Just visit the wiki page to be fully blown away by the scope of his accomplishments.

Alhazen - Scientist
I've never heard of the guy before. Now, all I can say is Wow.

 
Attilla the Hun

Attila's Rise to Power

Called the Scourge of God by the Romans, Attila the Hun was king and general of the Hun empire from A.D. 433 to 453. Succeeding his uncle, King Roas, in 433, Attila shared his throne with his brother Bleda. He inherited the Scythian hordes who were disorganized and weakened by internal strife. Attila's first order of affairs was to unite his subjects for the purpose of creating one of the most formidable and feared armies Asia had ever seen.

Peace Treaty Between Rome and Attila the Hun

In 434 East Roman Emperor Theodosius II offered Attila and Bleda 660 pounds of gold annually with hopes of securing an everlasting peace with the Huns. This peace, however, was not long lived. In 441 Attila's Huns attacked the Eastern Roman Empire. The success of this invasion emboldened Attila to continue his westward expansion. Passing unhindered through Austria and Germany, Attila plundered and devastated all in his path.

Attila Attacks Italy

In 451, having suffered a setback on the Plains of Chalons, by the allied Romans and Visigoths, Attila turned his attention to Italy. After having laid waste to Aquileia and many Lombard cities in 452, the Scourge of God met Pope Leo I who dissuaded him from sacking Rome.

Attila's Ignominious Death

Attila's death in 453 wasn't quite what one would have expected from such a fierce barbarian warrior. He died not on the battlefield, but on the night of his marriage. On that night Attila, who, despite common misconceptions, was not a heavy drinker, drank heavily in celebration of his new bride. In his wedding chambers at the end of the event, Attila passed out flat on his back. It was then and there that Attila had a massive nosebleed which caused him to choke on his own blood.
 
I've been waiting patiently to make this pick, but I'm not going to chance letting him slide any farther. We've had many fine scientists picked so far, but I'm not sure that any, including Newton, have a stronger case for the top spot than my pick. His work and advances in the fields of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy alone would place in the top tier. What sets him apart for me is his pioneering of the Scientific Method, which is absolutely foundational to modern science and has contributed to virtually every major scientific advance for the past millennium. It's hard to even do a full write up of his legacy without massive spotlighting, but I did my best to clean up a brief section of the article below. Just visit the wiki page to be fully blown away by the scope of his accomplishments.

Alhazen - Scientist
I've never heard of the guy before. Now, all I can say is Wow.
Same here, I'm ashamed to say. Fantastic pick.
 
Attilla the Hun

Attila's death in 453 wasn't quite what one would have expected from such a fierce barbarian warrior. He died not on the battlefield, but on the night of his marriage. On that night Attila, who, despite common misconceptions, was not a heavy drinker, drank heavily in celebration of his new bride. In his wedding chambers at the end of the event, Attila passed out flat on his back. It was then and there that Attila had a massive nosebleed which caused him to choke on his own blood.
:lmao: :lmao: Yeah, SURE that's what caused the nosebleed! Or maybe his blushing bride threw a mean right hook.

 
I've been waiting patiently to make this pick, but I'm not going to chance letting him slide any farther. We've had many fine scientists picked so far, but I'm not sure that any, including Newton, have a stronger case for the top spot than my pick. His work and advances in the fields of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy alone would place in the top tier. What sets him apart for me is his pioneering of the Scientific Method, which is absolutely foundational to modern science and has contributed to virtually every major scientific advance for the past millennium. It's hard to even do a full write up of his legacy without massive spotlighting, but I did my best to clean up a brief section of the article below. Just visit the wiki page to be fully blown away by the scope of his accomplishments.

Alhazen - Scientist
I've never heard of the guy before. Now, all I can say is Wow.
Same here, I'm ashamed to say. Fantastic pick.
Being the brother of an advanced number theory mathematician and professor has its dividends. :lmao:
 
I'm also ashamed because I'm sure his name came up in a class I took on Perception in college. I recall learning about the first pinhole camera, and he was very likely credited as being the originator of the idea.

 
I've been waiting patiently to make this pick, but I'm not going to chance letting him slide any farther. We've had many fine scientists picked so far, but I'm not sure that any, including Newton, have a stronger case for the top spot than my pick. His work and advances in the fields of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy alone would place in the top tier. What sets him apart for me is his pioneering of the Scientific Method, which is absolutely foundational to modern science and has contributed to virtually every major scientific advance for the past millennium. It's hard to even do a full write up of his legacy without massive spotlighting, but I did my best to clean up a brief section of the article below. Just visit the wiki page to be fully blown away by the scope of his accomplishments.

Alhazen - Scientist
I've never heard of the guy before. Now, all I can say is Wow.
Same here, I'm ashamed to say. Fantastic pick.
Being the brother of an advanced number theory mathematician and professor has its dividends. :mellow:
How does your brother regard this guy in relation to the other top guys like Newton, Galileo, Copernicus and Einstein, and the more antiquated guys like Archimedes and Euclid?It seems he pioneered many of the ideas, theories, and truths that the likes of Newton, Galileo, and Copernicus later expanded upon. Euclid and Archimedes were both brilliant in their own right and contributed an amazing amount to mathematics, and a thousand years before Alhazen lived.

 
I'm also ashamed because I'm sure his name came up in a class I took on Perception in college. I recall learning about the first pinhole camera, and he was very likely credited as being the originator of the idea.
:mellow:I had him on my list of inventors because of that, but with a different spelling and didn't realize it was the same guy.
 
I'm also ashamed because I'm sure his name came up in a class I took on Perception in college. I recall learning about the first pinhole camera, and he was very likely credited as being the originator of the idea.
:)I had him on my list of inventors because of that, but with a different spelling and didn't realize it was the same guy.
:mellow:The names of the dudes in the draft has been a problem for me. So many variations. so many firsts, seconds, thirds, so many Greats and I'm not sure which one is the Great one. It's hard to keep up.
 
Okay, nevermind, I'm way off. Larry Boy is on the clock. :lmao:

Times out in 7 minutes at 1:15 ET, at which point Mario Kart is up.

If no one is here to post MK's picks, does he get skipped or do we still wait the full hour?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been waiting patiently to make this pick, but I'm not going to chance letting him slide any farther. We've had many fine scientists picked so far, but I'm not sure that any, including Newton, have a stronger case for the top spot than my pick. His work and advances in the fields of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy alone would place in the top tier. What sets him apart for me is his pioneering of the Scientific Method, which is absolutely foundational to modern science and has contributed to virtually every major scientific advance for the past millennium. It's hard to even do a full write up of his legacy without massive spotlighting, but I did my best to clean up a brief section of the article below. Just visit the wiki page to be fully blown away by the scope of his accomplishments.

Alhazen - Scientist
I've never heard of the guy before. Now, all I can say is Wow.
Same here, I'm ashamed to say. Fantastic pick.
Being the brother of an advanced number theory mathematician and professor has its dividends. :lmao:
How does your brother regard this guy in relation to the other top guys like Newton, Galileo, Copernicus and Einstein, and the more antiquated guys like Archimedes and Euclid?It seems he pioneered many of the ideas, theories, and truths that the likes of Newton, Galileo, and Copernicus later expanded upon. Euclid and Archimedes were both brilliant in their own right and contributed an amazing amount to mathematics, and a thousand years before Alhazen lived.
I haven't talked to him about Alhazen specifically in years, we just occasionally talked physics and math and he was someone who came up. I could ask.
 
I'm also ashamed because I'm sure his name came up in a class I took on Perception in college. I recall learning about the first pinhole camera, and he was very likely credited as being the originator of the idea.
:bye:I had him on my list of inventors because of that, but with a different spelling and didn't realize it was the same guy.
:lmao:The names of the dudes in the draft has been a problem for me. So many variations. so many firsts, seconds, thirds, so many Greats and I'm not sure which one is the Great one. It's hard to keep up.
Yep. I've almost drafted Mao Tse Tung 5 times.
 
I'm also ashamed because I'm sure his name came up in a class I took on Perception in college. I recall learning about the first pinhole camera, and he was very likely credited as being the originator of the idea.
:bag:I had him on my list of inventors because of that, but with a different spelling and didn't realize it was the same guy.
:coffee:The names of the dudes in the draft has been a problem for me. So many variations. so many firsts, seconds, thirds, so many Greats and I'm not sure which one is the Great one. It's hard to keep up.
Yep. I've almost drafted Mao Tse Tung 5 times.
Hey you have MK's picks right?
 
OK, sending Mario picks to FUBAR. If he's not around when Mario's up, too bad. We tried.
Not sure if that means too bad as in go on right away or too bad as in if he's not here for 60 minutes. Mario did say no computer access today, so waiting seems pointless, but :coffee:
 
Larry's timed out. Since MK sent a list I guess we can wait the hour for one of the list holders to show up.

ETA: I have my pick ready to go, but I need to write it up and have a meeting in 10 minutes. I'll post when I get back, at which point MK will have timed out anyway.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the others are right in saying that, since neither he nor FUBAR are around, we skip him at this point.

Whoever picks third, I think, can go ahead.

 
Larry's timed out. Since MK sent a list I guess we can wait the hour for one of the list holders to show up.ETA: I have my pick ready to go, but I need to write it up and have a meeting in 10 minutes. I'll post when I get back, at which point MK will have timed out anyway.
Honestly I think you can post it now.
 
Oh, and I guess his 2nd pick would be

John Maynard Keynes

I never would have thought about him, but I did study Keynesian economics in college.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top