Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
Between Phillips and Zorn for me. Went with Zorn. Little Danny has to have an itchy trigger finger by now.
Huh? The coach who beat the Steelers in the playoffs two years ago? The team who didn't have a healthy body at offensive line last year? They'll make a playoff push this year. I'm going Zorn, because anything less than a divisional playoff game could get the ejection seat.Jack Del Rio has a mediocre to bad team that doesn't like him. That's pretty much a recipe for disaster.
To add to this, financial considerations would dictate otherwise. The Jags aren't exactly flush with cash.Huh? The coach who beat the Steelers in the playoffs two years ago? The team who didn't have a healthy body at offensive line last year? They'll make a playoff push this year. I'm going Zorn, because anything less than a divisional playoff game could get the ejection seat.Jack Del Rio has a mediocre to bad team that doesn't like him. That's pretty much a recipe for disaster.
2 years ago? Wow they'll definitely keep him around now. Two years in the NFL might as well be 20. That means nothing.Huh? The coach who beat the Steelers in the playoffs two years ago?Jack Del Rio has a mediocre to bad team that doesn't like him. That's pretty much a recipe for disaster.
They had a bad offensive line. And a bad defensive line. And a mediocre quarterback. And only one playmaker on offense. This is not a good team.The team who didn't have a healthy body at offensive line last year?
I seriously doubt that.They'll make a playoff push this year.
not to pile on, but Jacksonville is no better than the 4th best team in the division. Phillips is the easy pick here, but I wonder how long Marvin Lewis lasts if the struggles continue.I seriously doubt that.They'll make a playoff push this year.
Yep, I went with Del Rio too.FUBAR said:not to pile on, but Jacksonville is no better than the 4th best team in the division.The Man with the Plan said:I seriously doubt that.They'll make a playoff push this year.
Yeah, since they're the question is first, I think you have to look at a team that doesn't mind burning money. The Jags could go 5-11 but JDR's job might still be safe depending on HOW they lose. I really think they're 7-9 or so and Jack hangs around. Weaver doesn't have the cash to get rid of the rest of JDR's contract (and pay another coach).That's also why I think Marvin Lewis is safe, at least as far as first fired.I think the three options are Zorn and Phillips because the owners have plenty of cash (I'm not believing the Jerruh rumors) and Cable because the owner is nuts.Mr. Brownstone said:To add to this, financial considerations would dictate otherwise. The Jags aren't exactly flush with cash.Cookiemonster said:Huh? The coach who beat the Steelers in the playoffs two years ago? The team who didn't have a healthy body at offensive line last year? They'll make a playoff push this year. I'm going Zorn, because anything less than a divisional playoff game could get the ejection seat.The Man with the Plan said:Jack Del Rio has a mediocre to bad team that doesn't like him. That's pretty much a recipe for disaster.
I hope not. Us Packer fans love Childress.Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?
I wish.Can we fire Childress in OTAs?Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?
Agreed.In Minny you have arguably the best RB in the game right now, with a great offensive line. Their defense last year was tops against the run in the NFL, and they were top 6 in total yards allowed per game. With all that, they went 10-6, winning the division by only 1 game over the Bears. Then got lit up up Philly in Minnesota by a score of 26-14 in the first round. In 2007 (with the same RB, O-line and a defense that once again was #1 in terms of stopping the run) - they went 8-8 and missed the playoffs completely. If the Vikings had a good QB, you could make the argument that they should be the odds on favorite to go all the way - but with Childress at the helm...Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?
That is one way to look at it. The other is in his first year, he dismantled Tice's team and started building his. They went 6-10, but the Bears had a great season (13-3) and went to the Super Bowl. The next season, they went 8-8 and the Packers had a great season (13-3) and should have gone to the Super Bowl. Last season they went 10-6 and won the division. They ran into a hot Eagles team in the playoffs. Childress has improved each of his seasons as a head coach without much from the QB position - some say his commitment to Jackson is the reason so it is his fault. Maybe true, but the team has gotten better each season and I don't really see any reason that it shouldn't get better this season.It is just like your sig says Double G...look at the stats any way you want.Agreed.In Minny you have arguably the best RB in the game right now, with a great offensive line. Their defense last year was tops against the run in the NFL, and they were top 6 in total yards allowed per game. With all that, they went 10-6, winning the division by only 1 game over the Bears. Then got lit up up Philly in Minnesota by a score of 26-14 in the first round. In 2007 (with the same RB, O-line and a defense that once again was #1 in terms of stopping the run) - they went 8-8 and missed the playoffs completely. If the Vikings had a good QB, you could make the argument that they should be the odds on favorite to go all the way - but with Childress at the helm...Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?As a Bear fan I am shocked (and pleased) with Minnesota's amazingly under-achieving teams the last 2 years. Yes, some (if not most) of it can be attributed to the poor QB play, but at some point, the head coach has to answer for alot of the ineptitude.
Fair enough. My points were with the assumption that the Vikings start slow (2-4 or 3-3 or even if they're only 4-4 by the bye). If that happens, I could easily see them launching Childress. Certainly, if the they start off 5-1 or 6-2 at the break, with their only losses being to Pit and maybe one of the two to GB, then sure - Childress stays on.That is one way to look at it. The other is in his first year, he dismantled Tice's team and started building his. They went 6-10, but the Bears had a great season (13-3) and went to the Super Bowl. The next season, they went 8-8 and the Packers had a great season (13-3) and should have gone to the Super Bowl. Last season they went 10-6 and won the division. They ran into a hot Eagles team in the playoffs. Childress has improved each of his seasons as a head coach without much from the QB position - some say his commitment to Jackson is the reason so it is his fault. Maybe true, but the team has gotten better each season and I don't really see any reason that it shouldn't get better this season.It is just like your sig says Double G...look at the stats any way you want.Agreed.In Minny you have arguably the best RB in the game right now, with a great offensive line. Their defense last year was tops against the run in the NFL, and they were top 6 in total yards allowed per game. With all that, they went 10-6, winning the division by only 1 game over the Bears. Then got lit up up Philly in Minnesota by a score of 26-14 in the first round. In 2007 (with the same RB, O-line and a defense that once again was #1 in terms of stopping the run) - they went 8-8 and missed the playoffs completely. If the Vikings had a good QB, you could make the argument that they should be the odds on favorite to go all the way - but with Childress at the helm...Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?As a Bear fan I am shocked (and pleased) with Minnesota's amazingly under-achieving teams the last 2 years. Yes, some (if not most) of it can be attributed to the poor QB play, but at some point, the head coach has to answer for alot of the ineptitude.
The question was who will be fired first? I don't see the point in multiple choices.Any way to change the poll to pick more than one?
Forget about the fact that the Giants got lit up by an identical margin. Philly looked unstopable in the playoffs last year. Everybody wants to bury Travaris Jackson for his play in the playoffs but say nothing about Eli who played equally as bad against Philly. Philly was on a roll and I was really surprised when they got beat by Arizona. Great game plan by Hailey and awesome execution of the plan by Warner. As a Viking fan, I am shocked with the Bears's amazing under-achieving last year. All they have to do to get in the playoffs is beat Houston and they blew it. I am so glad the Bears are the favorite to win the NFC North this season.Agreed.In Minny you have arguably the best RB in the game right now, with a great offensive line. Their defense last year was tops against the run in the NFL, and they were top 6 in total yards allowed per game. With all that, they went 10-6, winning the division by only 1 game over the Bears. Then got lit up up Philly in Minnesota by a score of 26-14 in the first round. In 2007 (with the same RB, O-line and a defense that once again was #1 in terms of stopping the run) - they went 8-8 and missed the playoffs completely. If the Vikings had a good QB, you could make the argument that they should be the odds on favorite to go all the way - but with Childress at the helm...Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?![]()
As a Bear fan I am shocked (and pleased) with Minnesota's amazingly under-achieving teams the last 2 years. Yes, some (if not most) of it can be attributed to the poor QB play, but at some point, the head coach has to answer for alot of the ineptitude.
According to whom?My sportsbook has the following odds to win the NFC North:As a Viking fan, I am shocked with the Bears's amazing under-achieving last year. All they have to do to get in the playoffs is beat Houston and they blew it. I am so glad the Bears are the favorite to win the NFC North this season.
I listen to Sirius NFL radio. Many of the so-called experts have the Vikings third in the division. I personally like it if the Vikings are considered the underdog.According to whom?My sportsbook has the following odds to win the NFC North:As a Viking fan, I am shocked with the Bears's amazing under-achieving last year. All they have to do to get in the playoffs is beat Houston and they blew it. I am so glad the Bears are the favorite to win the NFC North this season.
Minnesota +165
Chicago +185
Green Bay +245
Detroit +1215
I hear ya, but other than Tim & Pat, most of the hosts on Sirius are boneheads.If you want a real representation of how things figure to shake out, listen to Vegas. They get paid to make tight lines.I listen to Sirius NFL radio. Many of the so-called experts have the Vikings third in the division. I personally like it if the Vikings are considered the underdog.According to whom?My sportsbook has the following odds to win the NFC North:As a Viking fan, I am shocked with the Bears's amazing under-achieving last year. All they have to do to get in the playoffs is beat Houston and they blew it. I am so glad the Bears are the favorite to win the NFC North this season.
Minnesota +165
Chicago +185
Green Bay +245
Detroit +1215
Minny, Chicago, and GB all beat each other up all season long and Detroit slips in there and wins it! Yeahhhhh.... one can dream!I listen to Sirius NFL radio. Many of the so-called experts have the Vikings third in the division. I personally like it if the Vikings are considered the underdog.According to whom?My sportsbook has the following odds to win the NFC North:As a Viking fan, I am shocked with the Bears's amazing under-achieving last year. All they have to do to get in the playoffs is beat Houston and they blew it. I am so glad the Bears are the favorite to win the NFC North this season.
Minnesota +165
Chicago +185
Green Bay +245
Detroit +1215
Childress would be made to be the scapegoat much like Mangini was if they fail to make the playoffs, even if the old man tries to play without a throwing arm for the last 5 weeks of the season which just happens to coincide with the team's late season collapse.Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?
Much like Chilly + Favre, if Jauron can't win with TO he'll be the scapegoat.FTR, I am not defending either, I'm with the consensus in that they both suck as head coaches, just saying the writing's on the wall.I went with **** Jauron. I have a friend who is a Bills fan and he can't stand him and says he is awful. I think if the Bills don't do well this season or even start off the season bad with the acquisition of T.O, he will be gone.
Not sure how safe he is.If they tank early I could see them naming Capers as interim to finish the year.Thompson may get another shot at a coach and keep McC as the fall guy.I think he should be on that list.I chose Marvin Lewis. though was torn on Phillips.I hope not. Us Packer fans love Childress.Raider Nation said:If the Vikings do indeed get Favre, would that add more heat to Brad's seat?I'm surprised McCarthy isn't listed. I think he's safe, but thought he would be listed.
This is a shrewd call.I voted Childress because I think he has the greatest expectations and is unlikely to meet them. Oh, and he's a fool.I think these are the front-runners:
Tom Cable - Of all the owners/GMs, I think Davis is most likely to pull the trigger on anybody and would be willing to do so before the year is out.
Wade Phillips - Jerry Jones has felt like he's had the best team in the NFL for two or three years now. Anything short of a strong playoff run should be the end for Wade.
Jim Zorn - If this team only does as good as it should, it won't be enough for Snyder. Holmgren, Cowher, and Shanahan looking for jobs will be WAY too much temptation for Dannny Boy.
Norv Turner - Two slow starts followed up with playoff wins have earned Norv some credibility, but the first year he doesn't have postseason success will be his last.
Josh McDaniels - If he isn't King Midas, nothing will compensate for all the bad blood he has brought to the surface.
I can guarantee you that McDaniels will not be fired this season unless he goes 0-16. Bowlen has seriously been drinking the McDaniels kool-aid. I'll wager he has at least until the end of the 2010 season to prove himself.I think these are the front-runners:Josh McDaniels - If he isn't King Midas, nothing will compensate for all the bad blood he has brought to the surface.
I voted Del Rio as well. Things better improve quickly or he should be a gone. This team is being driven in reverse with Del Rio at the wheel.Jack Del Rio has a mediocre to bad team that doesn't like him. That's pretty much a recipe for disaster.
I went with Jauron, because he sucks, people are getting tired of him sucking, and now he has the TO factor to deal with.
Agreed. Not with a new stadium. He doesn't want to project an image of turmoil this year.The Redskins start 0-6 and get Zorn fired, one of the current coordinators take over. They finish the year at 8-8 and Redskin fans everywhere start calling for Cowher and making SuperBowl predictions for 2010.
Jerry Jones won't fire Phillips mid year no matter how bad they perform imo.
It's not about kissing ###. It's about Jerruh Jones liking to micromanage and play the role of head coach as well as owner and GM. You need someone you can walk all over to do that, and Wade is that person.I wouldn't want to follow Wade Philips across a somewhat busy intersection -- NEVERMIND on a football field! My theory as to why he's even still in Big D is that he just kisses Jerry Jones ### like no one has ever done before or ever will do in the future. Admit it, Jones comes off as a guy who LOVES to get his ### kissed -- even if it's blatantly obvious and sickening like it is below."Hey Mr. Jones! You're looking mighty snazzy in your cowboy hat today. You have such wonderful taste in cowboy hats Mr. Jones. Where have you been all my life!? Can you pick out what you think I should have for lunch today? Actually, no! I want to have whatever YOU'RE having for lunch Mr. Jones! Do you mind if I go wash your car? Would you care for one of these here jellybeans Mr. Jones?"I dunno about you guys, but I can picture him saying that crystal clear in my head. After so many years dealing with Parcells and his crabbily stubborn, no-nonsense attitude, I wouldn't be surprised if you told me Jerry Jone's cares more about having a pushover to order around all throughout the football season than winning the Big One.