What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Rankings (2 Viewers)

Sounds like both (F&L and SSOG) of you have moved Wayne to #5 WR and the end of the first round in a startup dynasty. Which RB's would you take over him? ADP, MJD, CJ are givens. What about Jackson? Gore? Rice? D Williams? Turner? Stewart? Forte? Thanks
Rice and Stewart for sure. After that, I think it depends on team needs. Rice's value probably takes a small hit in standard leagues. He's a beast in PPR leagues.
 
SSOG, how high are you on Brandon Tate? Is he worth rostering over guys like Mike Thomas, Louis Murphy, Chaz Schilens and James Jones?
James JonesChaz Schilens

Brandon Tate

Mike Thomas

Louis Murphy

I don't know how you find time (in SSOG case I guess, since F & L is a writer) to generate all this material.
Funny, I always wonder how F&L and EBF find the time. Actually producing complete sets of rankings on a weekly or bi-weekly basis is a lot of work, in addition to all of his Rotoworld stuff and his day job. And I remain thoroughly convinced that EBF has college tape on every single player in the NFL (and quite a few who aren't but who are potential free agent additions should injuries strike). His scouting work is borderline encyclopedic.
Right now I am thinking that another RB or a QB would solidify my title run a little but the cost is probably going to be pretty high (QB's are hard to come by in our league, four guys have the majority).
If it were me, I'd be looking to move CJ3 for a stud QB. It'd hurt to get rid of him, but of your three RBs, I think he's the best one to shop (MJD is a better dynasty RB, and while I have SJax slightly ahead of Johnson in my rankings, I'd imagine Johnson would command significantly more on the open market. The ideal would be to move Johnson for a Roethlisberger/Rivers/Rodgers type, or Johnson+Stafford for a Drew Brees. Heck, if I were getting Brees in return, I'd even move Johnson, Stafford, and one of those 1sts and count it a bargain.
What do you guys think of Cadillac Williams going forward? I know he's pretty low on the latest RB rankings from F & L so I'm a bit reluctant to do this trade I was offered: Cadillac for a high second rounder. I picked up the second rounder from the guy in last place so there's a good chance it will be pick 2.1 (13th overall). I'm in desperate need of a RB this week in a big game against the division leader.

I'm pretty thin at RB overall and I could use a RB3. Is cadillac a viable flex option going into next year? Here are my RBs:

Frank Gore

Adrian Peterson (bye)

Chester Taylor (bye)

Jerious Norwood

Justin Fargas (bye)

Sammy Morris

I've already traded away my first round draft pick for next year so that second rounder is pretty important for me. I also don't have my own second round pick.
There was actually a ton of discussion about Caddy right before the season started. If you want to go back and read it for some really in-depth analysis, it starts here and spans several pages. If you'd rather have a summery of my thoughts on the subject... I never thought he was that good, even as a rookie (he feasted on bad defenses and stunk against good ones). After the litany of injuries, he's no longer the back that he once was, and the back that he once was was never as good as the hype in the first place. He's flotsam, roster junk, the kind of guy you might burn waiver priority on... provided it's not a top-3 waiver priority. I seriously doubt his ability to ever be a quality FF contributor. Save your 2nd rounder, you'd be better off just taking a zero this week if it came down to it.
Sounds like both (F&L and SSOG) of you have moved Wayne to #5 WR and the end of the first round in a startup dynasty. Which RB's would you take over him? ADP, MJD, CJ are givens. What about Jackson? Gore? Rice? D Williams? Turner? Stewart? Forte?

Thanks
Actually, I've moved him down to WR6. I bumped Roddy over him, too. I'd take ADP and MJD over him for sure, but I don't think CJ3 is necessarily a given. I'd probably take SJax and CJ over Wayne, but those three are close enough that I'm sure my answer would change from day to day or even from hour to hour. No other RBs over Wayne.
 
What do you guys think of Cadillac Williams going forward? I know he's pretty low on the latest RB rankings from F & L so I'm a bit reluctant to do this trade I was offered: Cadillac for a high second rounder. I picked up the second rounder from the guy in last place so there's a good chance it will be pick 2.1 (13th overall). I'm in desperate need of a RB this week in a big game against the division leader. I'm pretty thin at RB overall and I could use a RB3. Is cadillac a viable flex option going into next year? Here are my RBs:Frank GoreAdrian Peterson (bye)Chester Taylor (bye)Jerious NorwoodJustin Fargas (bye)Sammy MorrisI've already traded away my first round draft pick for next year so that second rounder is pretty important for me. I also don't have my own second round pick.
I'm a little higher on him then SSOG, but I do doubt he'll ever be a guy you could rely on as an every week starter. If you're a contender this year, then I could see doing it. If you're not, then I'd be tempted to hold that pick.
 
Obviously a big fan of the blog F&L, but I have to question the ranking of Moreno (#8) so highly. I know your point has been that Buckhalter has gotten the ball in space, and thus has had more big play opportunities. SSOG (a Bronco fan) despite paying a hefty price for Moreno himself, contends that's not always the case. The statistics between the two aren't pretty for Moreno. A game by game breakdown shows Buckhalter faring better in YPC in every game except the Baltimore game. The average is now 6.0/carry for Buckhalter and 3.9/carry for Moreno. Buckhalter has also had a better receiving game every week both have played. My point is not that Buckhalter is better. The point is that its bad for Moreno that its even close. Buckhalter has been a respectable player throughout his career, but never was considered special by any means. SSOG has been selling the Broncos offensive line as the reason to buy on Moreno. I would buy that if I thought Moreno would get enough touches to make that payoff down the road. I just don't see Moreno as good enough to ever keep the Buckhalters of the world on the bench, and after Buckhalter is gone, there will be another guy just like him. Right now there are 45 RBs in the NFL with more than 50 carries. Moreno's average (3.9) puts him at #30. All while running behind that Bronco line. I would honestly rather have two guys you have rated much lower than him more than Moreno. Give me Pierre Thomas or Rashard Mendenhall. While PT is in a time share too, he's on the most dynamic offense in the league. He may not be consistent enough with Mike Bell there, but I think over the next few years, there will be plenty of games like Monday nights 100 yard/2 TD performance. Mendenhall meanwhile, has seized the #1 job in Pittsburgh. While the oline in Pitt may not be what it once was, the offense looks like it will remain good for years to come. Mendenhall should be putting away some of those games for them, and should hold on to the goal line carries there to boot. I understand that I am going up against one of your guys on this one. (Both F&L and SSOG). I also admittedly haven't seen every Broncos game. But I have seen them play quite a bit, and just don't see special talent in this rookie. I would say every RB ahead of him (ADP, MJD, CJ, SJax, Rice, Gore, DWill) are all special talents. I'd also say Ronnie Brown (#9) qualifies as a special talent too. Every one of those other players had produced explosive plays by this point in their careers, most of them had plenty. Moreno's biggest play to date is a 27 yard reception in the flat, where he went straight ahead 25 yards untouched. No other play in his first 120 touches has gone for more than 17 yards. I think Moreno will be a fine player, and fantasy relevant throughout his career. He does have NFL ability. IMO he just doesn't belong with the elite RBs.
While Moreno hasn't looked special so far, neither had Mendenhall to this point. Moreno can't hold off Buckhalter, Mendenhall couldn't beat out FWP- both are equally damning, imo. Mendenhall's had some big games, but people are overlooking who they came against. There's San Diego, ranked 27th in rushing yards allowed (and actually worse than that, because they had Jamal Williams at the beginning of the season). There's Detroit, ranked 21st in yards allowed and 30th in ypa allowed. There's Cleveland, ranked an abysmal 31st in yards allowed AND in ypa allowed. The only decent run defense he's faced is Minnesota, and he only put up 69 yards rushing (with no TD) against them. Mendenhall's looked great against the dregs of the NFL. I hear next week Pittsburgh is playing Vanderbilt- I bet Mendenhall manages to put up 120 yards and a pair of scores against them, too. Moreno hasn't been a special player so far... but neither has Mendenhall. Moreno hasn't been able to hold off Correll Buckhalter, but CBuck was actually a big signing this past offseason- Pierre Thomas has been fighting tooth and nail for his job with a guy who was a street free agent just a couple of weeks before the season kicked off.In the end, that's what it gets down to. Is Moreno a special dynasty player? F&L thinks so, but I don't. I still have Moreno ranked relatively high, though, because there's a massive dearth of special RBs today. I think there are 9 special talents in the league right now- MJD, ADP, SJax, CJ3, Rice, Gore, Williams, Stewart, and Ronnie. Which means, no matter how you slice it, you've got to put an unspecial RB in the top 10, and the back half of the top 20 is just filthy with good-but-not-great RBs. There's a definite down-cycle on quality RBs right now. So when I have Moreno in my top 12, it's not because I think he's some amazing stud, it's just because... who else am I going to put above him?Regarding your concern of him holding off the Buckhalters of the future... I don't think it'll be any greater problem than Mendenhall holding off the future FWPs. The Broncos have invested a LOT of money and reputation in Moreno. He'll be given every chance to succeed. In the end, short of special talent, that might be the most valuable trait for a dynasty RB- every opportunity to succeed.
SSOG-Have you ever mentioned what that refers to? SSOG?I think we are roughly on the same page here. I didn't mention PT and Mendenhall because I felt they were special. I think they are tier 3/4 talents in a great situation going forward. I think Moreno is in much the same boat, but his situation isn't as good right now as either PT or Mendenhall. Regarding your point with the dearth of special RB talent in the league, from what EBF and some of the others are saying with the 2010 class, it isn't getting any better anytime soon. Ungood.I'd like to mention I'm also on board with your acquire young stud WRs at all costs mentality. RBs come and go, injuries ruin half their careers, and all but the greatest don't last very long. However, as a Steve Smith (CAR) owner, I have to admit that this theory isn't perfect. Steve Smith helped me to a dynasty title in 2006, but was barely startable for much of 2007. He's in the same boat in 2009. It really has nothing to do with Steve Smith's talent. He's elite. He went through Matt Moore, Vinny Testaverde, Jake Delhomme and David Carr in 2007. Delhomme blows in 2009. So two of the last three years, he's barely startable, yet you almost have to start him due to his talent. The worst scenario really. As great of a talent that Fitzgerald is, how do we know he'll do anything consistent past Warner? Leinart really has done nothing on the big stage. He looked solid this past preseason, but so did Glenn Coffee, and a hundreds of others who couldn't cut it. I'm on board with the theory. I just think you need to view the QB/WR tandem as equally as important. i.e. VJax and Jennings get a boost due to young stud QBs. Wayne and Fitz take a hit due to older QBs with more limited windows.
 
The deal I mentioned on the previous page (Holmes straight up for Maclin) has changed in an offer for a 3 player deal...I give Matt Ryan, Brandon Marshall and I get Tony Romo, Santonio Holmes and Nate Washington.

This league has a 3 player rookie keeper rule (RK), which basically means that players that are drafted as rookies can be kept in future years in lieu of a 23rd, 22nd or 21st round draft pick (depending on how many RK's you decide to keep). In this deal Ryan, Holmes and Maclin are rookie keepers.

I'm sitting at 3-5 and I felt I had to drastically improve my team's firepower to still have a shot at making the playoffs. I'm also last in the league in points.

My starting lineup before the trade;

Ryan

DeSean

Marshall

Driver

Portis

D. Brown

Carlson

Collie

Scobee

Eagles

After the trade;

Romo

DeSean

Driver

Holmes

Portis

D. Brown

Carlson

Collie

Scobee

Eagles

I think I've definitely upgraded my QB for this season as I wasn't planning on keeping Ryan anyway (QBs have far less value). Marshall is definitely a solid WR1, but without keeper value I felt I could afford to lose him since I still have Driver and now that I've dealt Maclin for Holmes I still get to play Holmes as a starter along with DeSean and Driver.

I feel I upgraded my team and still have 3 solid rookie keepers for next year and beyond in DeSean, Santonio Holmes and Donald Brown. Thoughts?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
By the way, I mentioned earlier in the thread that I really transformed my primary dynasty league over the past 2 years, going from one of the worst teams in the league to one of the best.

I thought it might be a worthwhile exercise to walk through these moves and how they ultimately led to that transformation. One key that really helped me in some of these moves is moving players that I considered overvalued and targeting guys who, at the time, were grossly undervalued. In retrospect, many of these deals look somewhat lopsided, but at the time it was a situation where the player's perceived value was, for me, a lot higher than I thought it should have been.

Also, on the trading front, I have a pretty good reptuation for making fair offers. I found it particularly important to really learn what each owner values, and negotiate accordingly. (E.g., some of the guys were willing to part with vets on the cheap, others didn't put too much stock in draft picks since they haven't drafted well in the past, etc).

League Overview

This is a 16 team, non-PPR league with full contract/salary cap. All players except those on rookie contracts get a 5% increase each year, and there are also performance increases of up to 15% depending on position and how they finished. You can extend contracts, but raises their base salary by 25%. Rookie salaries are tied to draft position, with 1.01 being 3m, 2.01 being just under 2m, etc. UFA is done with full auction bidding, and tied to the total value of the contract (so you can raise a $3m/1yr bid with a $1.1m/3yr bid).

My team, circa Jan 2007

QB: Croyle (1.15m/3), Trent Green (3.7m/1), Damon Huard (2.64m/5), Chad Pennington (1.59/2), Jake Plummer (3.7m/2), Bledsoe as RFA (4m)

RB: Portis (4m/4), Dunn (3.7m/2), Betts (950k/1)

WR/TE: Marty Booker (540k/2), Malcom FLoyd (445k/2), Santonio (2.2m/2), TJ Housh (2.2m/2, Travis Taylor (400k/1), Desmond Clark (750k/2), Rd Smith RFA at 2m

PK: Longwell (850k/3), Morten Andersen (500k/1)

DL: KGB (1.7m/2), James Hall (2m/4), Kerney (1.9m/2)

LB: Shaun Phillips (3m/4), Bruschi (1.8m/1), David Pollack (1.3m/2), Adalius Thomas (3.2m/2), Odell Thurman (3m/3), Al Wilson (500k/2)

DB: Dunta Robinson (2.1m/1), Charles Woodson (350k/2), Dexter Jackson (364k/1), Donovin Darius (364k/1) Deltha Oneal 2.1m/1

My team today

QB: Ryan (2.5m/4), Jamarcus (2.7m/3)

RB: Chris Johnson (2.5m/3), Thomas Jones (5.7m/1), Beanie Wells (2.92/5), Donald Brown 2.76m/5, Bernard Scott (1.2m/4)

WR: Holmes (2.9m/2), Avery (1.5m/4), Driver (2.1m/2), Sidney Rice (2.2m/3), Floyd (550k/2), Maclin (2.2m/5), COok (350k/2), Keller (455k/2)

PK: Longwell (940k/1)

DL: Allen (350k/3), Tuck (500k/3), Avril (350k/3)

LB: Harrison (1.1m/4), Lofton (1.9m/3), TImmons (1.8m/5), Crowder (1.3/5), Barton (390k/1), Dobbins (350k/2), Levy (725k/3)

DB: Troy (2.8m/1), Hope (364k/1), Yeremiah Bell (490k/2), Finnegan (350k/2)

I did have two 1sts to play with in 2007 (1.04 and 1.12), but otherwise didn't have too much in the way of picks (e.g., no mid round picks, no 1st in 2009).

How did I get there?

In 2007, notable moves:

I drafted Jamarcus at 1.04 and Sidney Rice at 1.12. Obviously Jamarcus hasn't panned out, but in a 16 team league with 6pts per pass TD, and my other QB situation, I needed a QB badly.... and more importantly I wasn't sold on Chris Henry or Brandon Jackson who were otherwise going at 1.04.
I traded Adalius THomas (this is the year he left Baltimore) and Chad Pennington for Eric Barton, Elvis Dumervil, a 2009 1st, two 2008 2nds, a 2009 3rd, and two 5ths :mellow:
I traded Warrick Dunn and 3rd rounder for what should have been late 2008 1st but ended up being 1.07
I traded Trent Green and Sabby PIscatelli (who I drafted in the 5th) for Channing Crowder, Josh Bullocks , an early 2008 2nd, an early 2009 3rd, and a 2010 5th
I traded one of those 2008 2nds and a 2008 5th rounder for Timmons.
Notably, dropped most of the dead weight on the team and acquired James Harrison for $1.1m (low for a LB) and Justin Tuck for 350k (league min)2008:

I had a pretty solid draft in 2008: Kevin Smith (1.04), Chris Johnson (1.07), Curtis Lofton (2.01), Donnie Avery (2.10), Adibi (4.04)
Desperate for a QB, I traded that 1st rounder I got from the previous year's trade, my 2011 1st, a 2010 3rd and Curtis Lofton for Matt Ryan
I traded TJ Housh for a 1st rounder which ended up being 1.04 (his team was better than that originally)
When Portis was rolling, with Kevin Smith and Chris Johnson playing well, I traded him for what ended up being 1.02
I traded Shaun Phillips to someone for a mid-second
Throughout the year, picked up Keller and Avril for league min and Malcolm Kelly for 1.1m/5yrs when he wasn't signed because of cap space / injury concerns2009 is where i got really active :)

I REALLy wanted to get Lofton back, and managed to pry him away with Adibi (who was much cheaper) plus 2.04 for Lofton and a 3rd.
Picked up Jared Allen in RFA - got him for league min ( :excited: ) by giving up my 1.13 pick, who would have otherwise cost me 2.2m anyway
Picked up Donald Driver in RFA, getting him for 2.1m/2yrs and giving up 3.13 in the process
Traded Malcolm Kelly and Cromartie (who I picked up in 2007 for league min) for 2.02
Traded Dumervil (who was a big ? then... argh!) and 3.05 for Troy and two future 3rds (in part because I didn't have the roster space to sign 3.05, and those others should both be early)
Traded 2.01, 2.11, and my 2010 2nd rounder for 1.11
Traded Kevin Smith to a bad team who was desperate at RB for - get this - their 2010 1st, 2010 2nd, 2011 1st, 2011 2nd, and 2011 3rd. This team had no 2009 picks and really wanted a RB, and no one else was willing/had the depth to part with a young guy. He offered similar deals for Smith or CJ3 - just wanted a good young RB - but I refused to give up CJ3 (who I have in about every league I could get near him in)
Thomas Jones had a very high price tag and owner had some major cap issues... plus this was right after the NFL draft when they grabbed Shonne Green, so some had soured on him. I managed to grab him for only a couple of 2011 3rd rounders, in part because I was the only person with the cap space to do so.
Drafted Beanie Wells (1.02), Donald Brown (1.04), Maclin (1.11), Bernard Scott (3.03)I think my main lessons for rebuilding a dynasty roster are as follows:

Know the owners in your league and what they value. First, you can pull of great trades if you know this. Second, you can find serious value in both the draft and UFA/RFA. E.g., most people thought I was crazy at the time to give up a 1st for a DL - even the best DL. The thing is, it wasn't just trading 1.13 for Allen straight up - it was getting him at 350k instead of $3m. But I knew the league overlooked that position compared to others.
If you use salary/contract yr cap, a well-managed team with a lot of room is a big advantage... and can create value in and of itself (e.g., worth a pick, taking the penalty, etc).
If you draft well, you can always have a backlog of players who can grow into a starter's role.
Cash in on players when their value is high and you have that depth
Don't be afraid to blow up a bad team. Sometimes cutting everyone, selling anything of value, is better than being middling forever. I sold guys who would have made me more competitive, but I was better off in the long run for selling those guys to competitive teams that paid somewhat of a premium to fill holes on a playoff-caliber team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jamarcus (2.7m/3)
I don't mean this in a bad way at all, but what is JaMarcus (still) doing on your roster? Wouldn't you be better off spending that money on other players, or is there a penalty if you drop him now? Thanks for sharing tho, was an interesting read. :thumbdown:
 
Thanks SSOG and F&L...you guys are rock stars.

I sctrached the F. Jones for Gates offer. I think I can get more for Jones if he strings 2 or 3 good games together...

I am thinking about trading Grant and Keller for Gates and LeSean McCoy. I like McCoy's upside more than Grant.

Any thoughts?

Cheers.

 
SSOG-Have you ever mentioned what that refers to? SSOG?I think we are roughly on the same page here. I didn't mention PT and Mendenhall because I felt they were special. I think they are tier 3/4 talents in a great situation going forward. I think Moreno is in much the same boat, but his situation isn't as good right now as either PT or Mendenhall. Regarding your point with the dearth of special RB talent in the league, from what EBF and some of the others are saying with the 2010 class, it isn't getting any better anytime soon. Ungood.I'd like to mention I'm also on board with your acquire young stud WRs at all costs mentality. RBs come and go, injuries ruin half their careers, and all but the greatest don't last very long. However, as a Steve Smith (CAR) owner, I have to admit that this theory isn't perfect. Steve Smith helped me to a dynasty title in 2006, but was barely startable for much of 2007. He's in the same boat in 2009. It really has nothing to do with Steve Smith's talent. He's elite. He went through Matt Moore, Vinny Testaverde, Jake Delhomme and David Carr in 2007. Delhomme blows in 2009. So two of the last three years, he's barely startable, yet you almost have to start him due to his talent. The worst scenario really. As great of a talent that Fitzgerald is, how do we know he'll do anything consistent past Warner? Leinart really has done nothing on the big stage. He looked solid this past preseason, but so did Glenn Coffee, and a hundreds of others who couldn't cut it. I'm on board with the theory. I just think you need to view the QB/WR tandem as equally as important. i.e. VJax and Jennings get a boost due to young stud QBs. Wayne and Fitz take a hit due to older QBs with more limited windows.
I may have mentioned what SSoG stands for, I may not. In reality, it doesn't stand for anything (or, more accurately, it stands for a lot of things). Once upon a time, I had an AIM screen name with the initials SSoG. After a while, I changed my AIM s/n (because the whole purpose of having an AIM s/n is using it for 3 months and then changing it to something else), and the new s/n had the initials SSoG, too. I created a hotmail account that was a different name that had the initials SSoG. Eventually, after a couple of iterations, I decided to ditch all of the different names and just go by the initials. Basically, it stands for whatever you want it to stand for. :thumbup:Anyway, your Fitzgerald question is easy enough to answer. In '04, Josh McCown started 4 games. In those 4 games, Fitzgerald averaged 5.8 grabs for 86.3 yards and .83 TDs- that's 93/1380/13 over a full season. With Josh McCown. Perhaps even more applicable, Leinart started 5 games in 2007, and Fitzgerald averaged 6.8 grabs for 89.6 yards and .2 scores (prorates to 109/1433/3). Those TD numbers are a little low, but TDs are very volatile and we're talking about a 5 game sample, so that doesn't really worry me. The important thing is that, even without Warner, Fitz is a 100/1400 kind of guy.As for the dearth of special RBs... if history is any indication, even if next year's RB class is relatively lightly regarded, it'll still increase the number of special RBs in the league. Nobody really thought that Ray Rice or MJD were going to light the league on fire like they have so far, either.
Thanks SSOG and F&L...you guys are rock stars.I sctrached the F. Jones for Gates offer. I think I can get more for Jones if he strings 2 or 3 good games together...I am thinking about trading Grant and Keller for Gates and LeSean McCoy. I like McCoy's upside more than Grant.Any thoughts?Cheers.
It's not a bad trade, but I would have been more excited about the Felix-for-Gates trade. I'm very high on Keller (I've mentioned a couple of times that I had him at TE4 or 5 coming into the season, and although I've cooled on him somewhat, have him hovering around TE6/7 in my rankings). With that said, Grant/McCoy is basically a wash, and Gates is a definite upgrade over Keller. You didn't want to trade Felix for Gates because it'd be selling low on Felix, but I question whether this isn't selling low on Keller, instead.
 
Anyway, your Fitzgerald question is easy enough to answer. In '04, Josh McCown started 4 games. In those 4 games, Fitzgerald averaged 5.8 grabs for 86.3 yards and .83 TDs- that's 93/1380/13 over a full season. With Josh McCown. Perhaps even more applicable, Leinart started 5 games in 2007, and Fitzgerald averaged 6.8 grabs for 89.6 yards and .2 scores (prorates to 109/1433/3). Those TD numbers are a little low, but TDs are very volatile and we're talking about a 5 game sample, so that doesn't really worry me. The important thing is that, even without Warner, Fitz is a 100/1400 kind of guy.
:thumbup:I think we're missing a pretty big point here, though. Kurt Warner of 2009 isn't very good, and he's certainly nowhere near the Kurt Warner of 2007-2008. In fact, it's probable that Matt Leinart would be better for Fitz's value right now. Fitz is on pace for 100 catches, but he's also on pace for about 350 less passing yards this year, and his yards per catch is down 4.1 from last season.Warner can't throw the ball beyond 20 yards right now, and he's turned into Capt. Checkdown (much to the delight of Tim Hightower owners in PPR leagues). Fitz can catch the ball within 20 yards, but his big plays come down the field. He needs a new QB because Warner is hurting him right now.
 
Love reading this stuff. In my contract keeper league, I had a trade materialize very quickly today (deadline every Wed. night).

I traded away Sanchez and Donald Brown to get Roethlisberger, A Caldwell, and J. Harrison.

Caldwell and Harrison are throw-ins for me. I really wanted to get Ben because we're moving to 2 QB start lineup next season and Ben was cheap. I'll have Ben and McNabb now.

I used to hoard young and cheap (cap space) RBs, but after reading this thread, I've come around to use them as chips to acquire "core" players.

Lineup now:

QB: McNabb, Ben

RB: AP, MJD, McFadden, Harrison

WR: Colston, Jennings, Boldin, Holmes, Caldwell

TE: Gates, Boss

K: Kaeding

D: Gates

I need to bring home the championship this year as MJD is a free agent next year and I would have to pay a lot to "franchise" AP to keep him for one more season. I'm hoping I'll be able to unearth some RB values next season.

Now if I can just unload McFadden on someone.

 
Hey F&L

I love your site and your opinions, but could you PLEASE change the look of your site? Trying to read black names on a dark blue background is difficult for us old guys.

Thanks.

 
Obviously a big fan of the blog F&L, but I have to question the ranking of Moreno (#8) so highly.

I know your point has been that Buckhalter has gotten the ball in space, and thus has had more big play opportunities. SSOG (a Bronco fan) despite paying a hefty price for Moreno himself, contends that's not always the case.

The statistics between the two aren't pretty for Moreno. A game by game breakdown shows Buckhalter faring better in YPC in every game except the Baltimore game. The average is now 6.0/carry for Buckhalter and 3.9/carry for Moreno.

Buckhalter has also had a better receiving game every week both have played.

My point is not that Buckhalter is better. The point is that its bad for Moreno that its even close. Buckhalter has been a respectable player throughout his career, but never was considered special by any means.

SSOG has been selling the Broncos offensive line as the reason to buy on Moreno. I would buy that if I thought Moreno would get enough touches to make that payoff down the road. I just don't see Moreno as good enough to ever keep the Buckhalters of the world on the bench, and after Buckhalter is gone, there will be another guy just like him.

Right now there are 45 RBs in the NFL with more than 50 carries. Moreno's average (3.9) puts him at #30. All while running behind that Bronco line.

I would honestly rather have two guys you have rated much lower than him more than Moreno. Give me Pierre Thomas or Rashard Mendenhall. While PT is in a time share too, he's on the most dynamic offense in the league. He may not be consistent enough with Mike Bell there, but I think over the next few years, there will be plenty of games like Monday nights 100 yard/2 TD performance. Mendenhall meanwhile, has seized the #1 job in Pittsburgh. While the oline in Pitt may not be what it once was, the offense looks like it will remain good for years to come. Mendenhall should be putting away some of those games for them, and should hold on to the goal line carries there to boot.

I understand that I am going up against one of your guys on this one. (Both F&L and SSOG). I also admittedly haven't seen every Broncos game. But I have seen them play quite a bit, and just don't see special talent in this rookie. I would say every RB ahead of him (ADP, MJD, CJ, SJax, Rice, Gore, DWill) are all special talents. I'd also say Ronnie Brown (#9) qualifies as a special talent too. Every one of those other players had produced explosive plays by this point in their careers, most of them had plenty. Moreno's biggest play to date is a 27 yard reception in the flat, where he went straight ahead 25 yards untouched. No other play in his first 120 touches has gone for more than 17 yards.

I think Moreno will be a fine player, and fantasy relevant throughout his career. He does have NFL ability. IMO he just doesn't belong with the elite RBs.
While Moreno hasn't looked special so far, neither had Mendenhall to this point. Moreno can't hold off Buckhalter, Mendenhall couldn't beat out FWP- both are equally damning, imo. Mendenhall's had some big games, but people are overlooking who they came against. There's San Diego, ranked 27th in rushing yards allowed (and actually worse than that, because they had Jamal Williams at the beginning of the season). There's Detroit, ranked 21st in yards allowed and 30th in ypa allowed. There's Cleveland, ranked an abysmal 31st in yards allowed AND in ypa allowed. The only decent run defense he's faced is Minnesota, and he only put up 69 yards rushing (with no TD) against them. Mendenhall's looked great against the dregs of the NFL. I hear next week Pittsburgh is playing Vanderbilt- I bet Mendenhall manages to put up 120 yards and a pair of scores against them, too. Moreno hasn't been a special player so far... but neither has Mendenhall. Moreno hasn't been able to hold off Correll Buckhalter, but CBuck was actually a big signing this past offseason- Pierre Thomas has been fighting tooth and nail for his job with a guy who was a street free agent just a couple of weeks before the season kicked off.In the end, that's what it gets down to. Is Moreno a special dynasty player? F&L thinks so, but I don't. I still have Moreno ranked relatively high, though, because there's a massive dearth of special RBs today. I think there are 9 special talents in the league right now- MJD, ADP, SJax, CJ3, Rice, Gore, Williams, Stewart, and Ronnie. Which means, no matter how you slice it, you've got to put an unspecial RB in the top 10, and the back half of the top 20 is just filthy with good-but-not-great RBs. There's a definite down-cycle on quality RBs right now. So when I have Moreno in my top 12, it's not because I think he's some amazing stud, it's just because... who else am I going to put above him?

Regarding your concern of him holding off the Buckhalters of the future... I don't think it'll be any greater problem than Mendenhall holding off the future FWPs. The Broncos have invested a LOT of money and reputation in Moreno. He'll be given every chance to succeed. In the end, short of special talent, that might be the most valuable trait for a dynasty RB- every opportunity to succeed.
We've touched on Moreno quite a bit, but I guess it's been several weeks since we last discussed him. After covering the Broncos in four out of the seven games this season, my opinion on his value has not changed. I'm very comfortable with where he's ranked.Furthermore, I don't see Correll Buckhalter as any concern whatsoever for his long-term value, and I couldn't disagree more that he'll have a hard time keeping the Buckhalters of the world on the bench in the future. Rookie backs often split time with veterans, and Moreno has almost doubled Buckhalter's touches this season.

You're right that I've talked about the way both backs have been used, and this is not a small point. First of all, Buckhalter's percentage numbers are the result of a small sample size. By the end of the year, they will likely be right in line with his Philly numbers -- which are very impressive in rate stats. I couldn't tell you how many times Buckhalter would enter a game and bust off a big run when Brian Westbrook had been struggling. It's what Buckhalter does -- he's a very good role player. Secondly, it's absolutely true that Moreno is being used as the between-the-tackles runner, and it's keeping his numbers artificially low.

Football Outsiders shows Moreno as the 7th best back in the NFL in success rate. More impressive, he leads all NFL backs, period, in fewest negative plays.

Knowshon's offensive coordinator even admits that his usage is affecting his numbers: "No. 1, you've got to get him out in space," offensive coordinator Mike McCoy said. "You get him out in space, I'm sure he's going to make the next guy miss more often that not."

We're also talking about a player with off-the-charts intangibles. He was drafted No. 12 overall because he doesn't really have a weakness. He's an excellent pass-blocker, a terrific receiver, can run inside, and can make plays outside. One of his coaches earlier this year called him the best team leader he's ever seen in a young player.

He's obviously no burner in the open field, but his short-area burst is fantastic. Here's a sampling from Rotoworld's game charters this season (found in Season Pass).

* Knowshon Moreno showed no signs of a groin injury that had him questionable going into the game. He looked explosive and powerful, showing a nice burst and always falling forward for extra yardage. Correll Buckhalter isn't going anywhere as the change of pace back, but Moreno's showing will keep him in the feature back role.

* Showing where they stood on their backfield committee, the Broncos introduced both Knowshon Moreno and Correll Buckhalter with the starting offense. Buckhalter has been used as the receiving back and outside runner, helping to boost his yards per touch. Though Moreno is running very well, he's handling all of the tougher, high-traffic inside runs.

* Knowshon Moreno’s numbers weren’t eye-popping, but he played very tough. He had to come out of the game twice while gimpy, but immediately went back in the game. He picked up the blitz well and got more yards than what was blocked. He’s the real deal.

* Moreno was the only effective offensive player for the Broncos against the stout Ravens defense, but his carries were limited with Denver playing from behind in the second half ... This was a low scoring defensive battle until the fourth quarter. Both teams hit hard, and the yards accrued by Ray Rice and Knowshon Moreno were well earned.

 
Jamarcus (2.7m/3)
I don't mean this in a bad way at all, but what is JaMarcus (still) doing on your roster? Wouldn't you be better off spending that money on other players, or is there a penalty if you drop him now? Thanks for sharing tho, was an interesting read. :thumbup:
Yeah, there's a penalty for dropping players - you pay 50% the first year, 40% the second year, etc, for the life of the contract. So, cutting Jamarcus would still cost me 1.4m or so a year for the next few years, but since I have plenty of cap space it doesn't buy me anything but roster space. More importantly, with 16 teams, relatively deep rosters and where QBs score 6 pts per TD, there are a LOT of QBs rostered. Specifically, there are 46 QBs on active rosters right now, and 4 more on taxi squads.
 
Hey F&LI love your site and your opinions, but could you PLEASE change the look of your site? Trying to read black names on a dark blue background is difficult for us old guys. Thanks.
Torn between two quotes as a response:
Pete: Hell, at least it woulda washed away the stink of that pomade.Everett: Join you two ignorant fools in a ridiculous superstition? Thank you anyway. And I like the smell of my hair treatment - the pleasing odor is half the point. (He shakes his head and laughs.)
KRAMER: How can I possibly thank you?SOUP NAZI: You are the only one who understands me.KRAMER: You suffer for your soup. SOUP NAZI: Yes. That is right.KRAMER: You demand perfection from yourself, from your soup.SOUP NAZI: How can I tolerate any less from my customer?
Seriously, my girlfriend picked out that color to match the photo at the top of the page. Back when I had time to do Quote of the Day, music posts, game notes, baseball posts, etc., then I would tinker with the layout more often. What I really need is a techie who will volunteer to revamp the whole shebang on a website. Lord knows I'm clueless on that end.
 
Jamarcus (2.7m/3)
I don't mean this in a bad way at all, but what is JaMarcus (still) doing on your roster? Wouldn't you be better off spending that money on other players, or is there a penalty if you drop him now? Thanks for sharing tho, was an interesting read. :thumbup:
Yeah, there's a penalty for dropping players - you pay 50% the first year, 40% the second year, etc, for the life of the contract. So, cutting Jamarcus would still cost me 1.4m or so a year for the next few years, but since I have plenty of cap space it doesn't buy me anything but roster space. More importantly, with 16 teams, relatively deep rosters and where QBs score 6 pts per TD, there are a LOT of QBs rostered. Specifically, there are 46 QBs on active rosters right now, and 4 more on taxi squads.
Gotcha. :hifive: And thanks, F&L for the Soup Nazi quote.... :lmao:
 
I may have mentioned what SSoG stands for, I may not. In reality, it doesn't stand for anything (or, more accurately, it stands for a lot of things). Once upon a time, I had an AIM screen name with the initials SSoG. After a while, I changed my AIM s/n (because the whole purpose of having an AIM s/n is using it for 3 months and then changing it to something else), and the new s/n had the initials SSoG, too. I created a hotmail account that was a different name that had the initials SSoG. Eventually, after a couple of iterations, I decided to ditch all of the different names and just go by the initials. Basically, it stands for whatever you want it to stand for. :banned:
I prefer to think it stands for Steve Slaton? Oh Great....
 
I know there was a thread somewhere about starting a dynasty with links to a bunch of rules and setup, etc.

Maybe I'm just searching wrong but does anyone know where that thread is?

 
Let's talk Tier 2 Dynasty QB's!!

Roethleisberger - PIT seems to be leaning on the pass more. He's looking good!

Ryan - Needs more weapons to be effective. I watched the game Mon night and w/o Roddy + Gonzo who would he throw to. I'm sure they will address this in the draft next year. For a guy previously ranked in Tier 1 I am just not that impressed with him. He could be the next Peyton though but I think it's a year or two out.

Rivers - I've always liked him and with VJax emerging as a stud WR he's looking even better. I look forward to seeing how Floyd will be utilized.

Romo - Finally has a WR that can catch the ball and isn't a distraction. Wondering what happened to Witten though. Will he choke again down the stretch or is he finally living up to his expectations?

Flacco - (See Ryan) needs additional young targets to throw to. I like his poise and leadership qualities. Some days I'd prefer him over Ryan.

Schaub - I think he's finally going to beat the "injury-prone" rap and finish as a top-5 QB. Losing OD hurts a bit though.

Cutler - You bust his mouth up and he still plays as well as he can behind an O-line that leaves much to be desired. I'm not so sure Lovie & Co are the best group of coaches to further his development. He is still very inconsistent but has a ton of options to throw to contrary to pre-season thoughts.

Very interested to hear your comments regarding these guys in dynasty format.

In my league the top-tier of QB's are untouchable so for the forseeable future this is all I have to choose from. I currently own Cutler, Warner and Stafford and we start 1 QB each week.

 
Let's talk Tier 2 Dynasty QB's!! Roethleisberger - PIT seems to be leaning on the pass more. He's looking good!Ryan - Needs more weapons to be effective. I watched the game Mon night and w/o Roddy + Gonzo who would he throw to. I'm sure they will address this in the draft next year. For a guy previously ranked in Tier 1 I am just not that impressed with him. He could be the next Peyton though but I think it's a year or two out.Rivers - I've always liked him and with VJax emerging as a stud WR he's looking even better. I look forward to seeing how Floyd will be utilized.Romo - Finally has a WR that can catch the ball and isn't a distraction. Wondering what happened to Witten though. Will he choke again down the stretch or is he finally living up to his expectations?Flacco - (See Ryan) needs additional young targets to throw to. I like his poise and leadership qualities. Some days I'd prefer him over Ryan.Schaub - I think he's finally going to beat the "injury-prone" rap and finish as a top-5 QB. Losing OD hurts a bit though.Cutler - You bust his mouth up and he still plays as well as he can behind an O-line that leaves much to be desired. I'm not so sure Lovie & Co are the best group of coaches to further his development. He is still very inconsistent but has a ton of options to throw to contrary to pre-season thoughts. Very interested to hear your comments regarding these guys in dynasty format. In my league the top-tier of QB's are untouchable so for the forseeable future this is all I have to choose from. I currently own Cutler, Warner and Stafford and we start 1 QB each week.
Big Ben - One of the best QBs in the game, period. The Steelers' best offense clearly revolves around keeping the ball in his hands in an uptempo style.Ryan - You just saw his worst game of the year. He's fine for now and gold in the future. Return of slot receiver Harry Douglass next year will help too.Rivers - What's not to like? Not a superstar, but should be Top-10 for years.Romo - As Magaw said, Austin has "weaponized" him once again. He's a good bet for 30 TDs in any year where he has a legit No. 1 receiver.Flacco - Would love to see him with more talent at wide receiver, but he's a young Big Ben and making good with what he has. His arm strength, decision-making, and intangibles are off the charts.Schaub - Let's see how he handles the loss of Daniels. Still believe he's a better fantasy QB than NFL QB.Cutler - I got a good idea about that 10-cent head of his. Still think he's Jeff George Jr. He's a doucher.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Love the material.

I'm looking for thoughts about two WRs:

Kenny McKinley

Legedu Nannee

McKinley - Highly touted WR coming out of South Carolina. I seem to remember reading somewhere that Spurier said McKinley was the most talented WR he'd ever coached. Brandon Marshall is a free agent come 2010. During the off season debacale, it looked as though Marshall was as good as gone in 2010 (if not sooner). But now that the Broncos are winning, it appears as though tensions have calmed. Does McKinley get an opportunity in 2010?

Nannee - Chambers will likely not be resigned in 2010, leaving an open spot opposite VJax. Malcolm Floyd seems to be waiting in the wings. Will Nannee be a factor in the competion for WR2 in San Diego? Will he win the job?

 
Love the material.I'm looking for thoughts about two WRs:Kenny McKinley Legedu NanneeMcKinley - Highly touted WR coming out of South Carolina. I seem to remember reading somewhere that Spurier said McKinley was the most talented WR he'd ever coached. Brandon Marshall is a free agent come 2010. During the off season debacale, it looked as though Marshall was as good as gone in 2010 (if not sooner). But now that the Broncos are winning, it appears as though tensions have calmed. Does McKinley get an opportunity in 2010?Nannee - Chambers will likely not be resigned in 2010, leaving an open spot opposite VJax. Malcolm Floyd seems to be waiting in the wings. Will Nannee be a factor in the competion for WR2 in San Diego? Will he win the job?
Chambers was already released
 
I never posts my trades in this thread for my dynasty league but I just made a big trade and I need alittle feedbackRemember that this is a keeper league. I will leave the year they are signed into behind their name.Thanks for any feedbackI received: DeAngelo Williams 1st year, James Stewart 2nd year, Jerome Harrison 1st year and Matthew Stafford 1st yearforRay Rice 2nd year, Pierre Thomas 2nd year, Clinton Portis last year (3rd) and Antonio Bryant last year (3rd)I'm under the belief that DeAngelo is by far and away the best talent in this trade and if he ever got hurt Stewart would probably put up better #'s due to more touches. I also really like Stafford. He has great talent and plays on a bad team with a star at wr. I struggled to trade R. Rice. I think he might be very good but I prefer DeAngelo's talent in the long term. I might have traded Pierre alittle low but I don't know if I can ever trust him. Without even talking about how they fling the ball around down in New Orleans there is also alot of competition in the backfield.Portis and Bryant meant nothing to me.It was also nice to get Williams and Stafford in the first year of a three year deal.Any feedback would be aprreciated.F&L....love reading your updates.
Any thoughts on this deal trade F&L?
 
I never posts my trades in this thread for my dynasty league but I just made a big trade and I need alittle feedbackRemember that this is a keeper league. I will leave the year they are signed into behind their name.Thanks for any feedbackI received: DeAngelo Williams 1st year, James Stewart 2nd year, Jerome Harrison 1st year and Matthew Stafford 1st yearforRay Rice 2nd year, Pierre Thomas 2nd year, Clinton Portis last year (3rd) and Antonio Bryant last year (3rd)I'm under the belief that DeAngelo is by far and away the best talent in this trade and if he ever got hurt Stewart would probably put up better #'s due to more touches. I also really like Stafford. He has great talent and plays on a bad team with a star at wr. I struggled to trade R. Rice. I think he might be very good but I prefer DeAngelo's talent in the long term. I might have traded Pierre alittle low but I don't know if I can ever trust him. Without even talking about how they fling the ball around down in New Orleans there is also alot of competition in the backfield.Portis and Bryant meant nothing to me.It was also nice to get Williams and Stafford in the first year of a three year deal.Any feedback would be aprreciated.F&L....love reading your updates.
Any thoughts on this deal trade F&L?
Unfortunately, not many. I'm no help on these contract year trades in keeper leagues because I no idea what any of it means.I think Jonathan Stewart was the best talent in the trade, but he and Williams will continue to hurt each other's numbers.I think Ray Rice will be the most productive fantasy player in the deal, and I do think you sold low on Pierre Thomas. You're higher on Stafford than I am, though I agree that Portis and Bryant are basically throw-ins at this point. Jerome Harrison is practically valueless.
 
I'm in major rebuilding mode in a Zealots league (53 man IDP).

I've been offered: McFadden, James Davis, Kenny Phillips, and a '10 1st (hard to say where this'll be - he's got a losing record but leads his division).

for: Barber/Choice

My thoughts......I'm not the biggest McFadden fan, though I'm a little higher on him than some like EBF. I like McFadden's situation going forward more than Barber's unless Dallas dumps Choice - which I don't see happening anytime soon given Barber's tendency to get nicked up. I like Davis, though I recognize he's not elite. Phillips is a definite bonus & should be an anchor for me for several years. Knowing that I won't get the use of Davis & Phillips til next season doesn't bother me that much.

He also sent me another offer with Moats in place of McFadden.

Thoughts?

 
While Moreno hasn't looked special so far, neither had Mendenhall to this point. Moreno can't hold off Buckhalter, Mendenhall couldn't beat out FWP- both are equally damning, imo. Mendenhall's had some big games, but people are overlooking who they came against. There's San Diego, ranked 27th in rushing yards allowed (and actually worse than that, because they had Jamal Williams at the beginning of the season). There's Detroit, ranked 21st in yards allowed and 30th in ypa allowed. There's Cleveland, ranked an abysmal 31st in yards allowed AND in ypa allowed. The only decent run defense he's faced is Minnesota, and he only put up 69 yards rushing (with no TD) against them. Mendenhall's looked great against the dregs of the NFL. I hear next week Pittsburgh is playing Vanderbilt- I bet Mendenhall manages to put up 120 yards and a pair of scores against them, too. Moreno hasn't been a special player so far... but neither has Mendenhall. Moreno hasn't been able to hold off Correll Buckhalter, but CBuck was actually a big signing this past offseason- Pierre Thomas has been fighting tooth and nail for his job with a guy who was a street free agent just a couple of weeks before the season kicked off.

In the end, that's what it gets down to. Is Moreno a special dynasty player? F&L thinks so, but I don't. I still have Moreno ranked relatively high, though, because there's a massive dearth of special RBs today. I think there are 9 special talents in the league right now- MJD, ADP, SJax, CJ3, Rice, Gore, Williams, Stewart, and Ronnie. Which means, no matter how you slice it, you've got to put an unspecial RB in the top 10, and the back half of the top 20 is just filthy with good-but-not-great RBs. There's a definite down-cycle on quality RBs right now. So when I have Moreno in my top 12, it's not because I think he's some amazing stud, it's just because... who else am I going to put above him?

Regarding your concern of him holding off the Buckhalters of the future... I don't think it'll be any greater problem than Mendenhall holding off the future FWPs. The Broncos have invested a LOT of money and reputation in Moreno. He'll be given every chance to succeed. In the end, short of special talent, that might be the most valuable trait for a dynasty RB- every opportunity to succeed.
I disagree with your comparison between Moreno and Mendenhall for the following reasons:1. Mendenhall was not afforded the same opportunity as Moreno at the same stage of his career. Mendenhall had a total of 19

carries for his entire rookie season. Moreno has two games with over 20 carries, neither game did he manage to break 100

yards.

2. You mention that Mendenhall was able to exploit a lowly SD defense but Moreno played the same SD team and only

managed to gain 44 yards on 18 carries (ypc 2.4). Furthermore you point out that Mendenhall was held to only 69 yards

against the Vikings but it was on 10 carries (ypc 6.9).

3. You have already admitted that Moreno plays behind one of the best offensive lines in football, while Pittsburgh's line can be

described as average at best.

You admit that Moreno is not an elite back, I contend that he is just a guy. He isnt explosive, powerful, or elusive. Mendenhall is the back deserving of a top 10 dynasty ranking.

 
Thanks SSOG and F&L...you guys are rock stars.I sctrached the F. Jones for Gates offer. I think I can get more for Jones if he strings 2 or 3 good games together...I am thinking about trading Grant and Keller for Gates and LeSean McCoy. I like McCoy's upside more than Grant.Any thoughts?Cheers.
It's not a bad trade, but I would have been more excited about the Felix-for-Gates trade. I'm very high on Keller (I've mentioned a couple of times that I had him at TE4 or 5 coming into the season, and although I've cooled on him somewhat, have him hovering around TE6/7 in my rankings). With that said, Grant/McCoy is basically a wash, and Gates is a definite upgrade over Keller. You didn't want to trade Felix for Gates because it'd be selling low on Felix, but I question whether this isn't selling low on Keller, instead.
I went back and forth...traded Jones for Gates straight up. Thanks for the feedback!Cheers.
 
Romo - Finally has a WR that can catch the ball and isn't a distraction. Wondering what happened to Witten though. Will he choke again down the stretch or is he finally living up to his expectations?
Not sure what you mean by "choke." Witten is still one of the best TEs in the league.
 
Thanks SSOG and F&L...you guys are rock stars.I sctrached the F. Jones for Gates offer. I think I can get more for Jones if he strings 2 or 3 good games together...I am thinking about trading Grant and Keller for Gates and LeSean McCoy. I like McCoy's upside more than Grant.Any thoughts?Cheers.
It's not a bad trade, but I would have been more excited about the Felix-for-Gates trade. I'm very high on Keller (I've mentioned a couple of times that I had him at TE4 or 5 coming into the season, and although I've cooled on him somewhat, have him hovering around TE6/7 in my rankings). With that said, Grant/McCoy is basically a wash, and Gates is a definite upgrade over Keller. You didn't want to trade Felix for Gates because it'd be selling low on Felix, but I question whether this isn't selling low on Keller, instead.
I went back and forth...traded Jones for Gates straight up. Thanks for the feedback!Cheers.
I have Finley, Keller, and Cook also and think you made a wise decision. None of them are quite ready to be an every week starter, so Gates can carry you until then.
 
Thanks again for the rankings, Fear and Loathing.

I think your ranking of Darren McFadden over LeSean McCoy is a bit off, though. I own McCoy, and I wouldn't trade him for McFadden. I know that McFadden has the pedigree of a great dynasty RB. But unless Oakland gets a real QB or McFadden moves to another team, I think McCoy's situation is far more favorable and thus makes him a more valuable dynasty prospect.

 
Thanks again for the rankings, Fear and Loathing.I think your ranking of Darren McFadden over LeSean McCoy is a bit off, though. I own McCoy, and I wouldn't trade him for McFadden. I know that McFadden has the pedigree of a great dynasty RB. But unless Oakland gets a real QB or McFadden moves to another team, I think McCoy's situation is far more favorable and thus makes him a more valuable dynasty prospect.
I just don't think McCoy is that good.
 
Thanks again for the rankings, Fear and Loathing.I think your ranking of Darren McFadden over LeSean McCoy is a bit off, though. I own McCoy, and I wouldn't trade him for McFadden. I know that McFadden has the pedigree of a great dynasty RB. But unless Oakland gets a real QB or McFadden moves to another team, I think McCoy's situation is far more favorable and thus makes him a more valuable dynasty prospect.
I just don't think McCoy is that good.
I dig. I think this is the debate between talent vs. opportunity. I don't see how McFadden has the opportunity to succeed in Oakland. And McFadden doesn't have that transcendental talent like Adrian Peterson or Walter Payton to be dominant on a mediocre team.
 
SSOG is a very smart guy and he knows it. Therefore, I always thoughts SSOG stood for "Some Sort of Genius". I'm pretty sure this is correct, but I don't think SSOG will ever really admit it. I asked him once before, and he was very vague.

 
I may have mentioned what SSoG stands for, I may not. In reality, it doesn't stand for anything (or, more accurately, it stands for a lot of things). Once upon a time, I had an AIM screen name with the initials SSoG. After a while, I changed my AIM s/n (because the whole purpose of having an AIM s/n is using it for 3 months and then changing it to something else), and the new s/n had the initials SSoG, too. I created a hotmail account that was a different name that had the initials SSoG. Eventually, after a couple of iterations, I decided to ditch all of the different names and just go by the initials. Basically, it stands for whatever you want it to stand for. :lmao:
I prefer to think it stands for Steve Slaton? Oh Great....
That, or Steve Smith Oughta Getouttacarolina. :lmao:
I know there was a thread somewhere about starting a dynasty with links to a bunch of rules and setup, etc.

Maybe I'm just searching wrong but does anyone know where that thread is?
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...t=0&start=0IIRC, It used to be pinned once upon a time. No clue why it isn't anymore, very useful thread.

I saw some discussion earlier about S Rice and Hester. Who would you rather have in a dynasty?
Hester, although I also really like Rice. I was a big fan of his coming out, and when a receiver I originally liked starts putting things together, I'm quick to move him up. I have Hester higher because he has the potential to be a more dominant receiver, both in NFL terms and in fantasy terms (Jay Cutler WR1s are not to be trifled with).
 
SSOG is a very smart guy and he knows it. Therefore, I always thoughts SSOG stood for "Some Sort of Genius". I'm pretty sure this is correct, but I don't think SSOG will ever really admit it. I asked him once before, and he was very vague.
That was, in fact, the very first iteration. In my defense, I was 16, and I changed it upon realizing, on second thought, that it was a borderline toolish thing to name oneself. :grad: Although, if I'm being perfectly honest with myself, "borderline toolish" is actually somewhat apt. :thumbdown:

I'm in major rebuilding mode in a Zealots league (53 man IDP).

I've been offered: McFadden, James Davis, Kenny Phillips, and a '10 1st (hard to say where this'll be - he's got a losing record but leads his division).

for: Barber/Choice

My thoughts......I'm not the biggest McFadden fan, though I'm a little higher on him than some like EBF. I like McFadden's situation going forward more than Barber's unless Dallas dumps Choice - which I don't see happening anytime soon given Barber's tendency to get nicked up. I like Davis, though I recognize he's not elite. Phillips is a definite bonus & should be an anchor for me for several years. Knowing that I won't get the use of Davis & Phillips til next season doesn't bother me that much.

He also sent me another offer with Moats in place of McFadden.

Thoughts?
I view Barber as an asset in decline, so getting a first for him when you're rebuilding is a solid move- not great, not terrible. I view Choice as a potential starter going forward, but McFadden trumps him as a dynasty asset. Getting Davis and Phillips in the bargain is just gravy. From my armchair, that looks like a very good trade for a team in major rebuilding mode. You're not raking him over the coals, but you're definitely improving your squad for the long term.
I disagree with your comparison between Moreno and Mendenhall for the following reasons:

1. Mendenhall was not afforded the same opportunity as Moreno at the same stage of his career. Mendenhall had a total of 19

carries for his entire rookie season. Moreno has two games with over 20 carries, neither game did he manage to break 100

yards.

2. You mention that Mendenhall was able to exploit a lowly SD defense but Moreno played the same SD team and only

managed to gain 44 yards on 18 carries (ypc 2.4). Furthermore you point out that Mendenhall was held to only 69 yards

against the Vikings but it was on 10 carries (ypc 6.9).

3. You have already admitted that Moreno plays behind one of the best offensive lines in football, while Pittsburgh's line can be

described as average at best.

You admit that Moreno is not an elite back, I contend that he is just a guy. He isnt explosive, powerful, or elusive. Mendenhall is the back deserving of a top 10 dynasty ranking.
1. The fact that Mendenhall had a total of 19 carries for his entire rookie season is pretty damning in and of itself. He was stuck behind Willie Freaking Parker. Jon Stewart was stuck behind The Renaissance of DeAngelo Williams and he still got 184. When Steven Jackson was stuck behind The Man, The Myth, The Faulk, he still got 134. Besides, it's not as if those 19 carries are all we've seen of him. He got extended action in his first preseason, and was pretty awful during that, as well. It was so bad that one prominent member around here was claiming several weeks into this season that Rashard Mendenhall had not once during a single even borderline-competitive carry (actual season or preseason) made so much as a single positive play. The Mendenhall owners were getting psyched up because he had one good play in week 2 or 3, so they now had SOMETHING positive to point to.2. None of this changes the fact that Mendenhall has had three good games, and they've all come against three of the worst run defenses in the league. It's shades of Cadillac Williams over here. You point out how poorly Moreno did against SD... allow me to point you to the dozen times I've said that I don't think Moreno is a special talent. That has no bearing on the argument that Mendenhall is not a special talent, either.

3. Yes, I have. All the more reason to like him more going forward. When faced with two unspecial talents, give me the one with the better situation (and with more opportunity to prove me wrong).

 
SSOG is a very smart guy and he knows it. Therefore, I always thoughts SSOG stood for "Some Sort of Genius". I'm pretty sure this is correct, but I don't think SSOG will ever really admit it. I asked him once before, and he was very vague.
That was, in fact, the very first iteration. In my defense, I was 16, and I changed it upon realizing, on second thought, that it was a borderline toolish thing to name oneself. :excited:
Wow, so I've been right all these years. :patsselfonback:I wouldn't really call it toolish, I could see myself doing something similar in my younger years (but, perhaps I'm a tool :P ).In any case, you are definitely no tool.
 
That was, in fact, the very first iteration. In my defense, I was 16, and I changed it upon realizing, on second thought, that it was a borderline toolish thing to name oneself. :excited:Although, if I'm being perfectly honest with myself, "borderline toolish" is actually somewhat apt. :P
:shock: Two years ago or so I had grouped you with LHUCKS and switz as guys that are very hard to listen to, but may be worth it. :lmao:
 
I'm in major rebuilding mode in a Zealots league (53 man IDP).I've been offered: McFadden, James Davis, Kenny Phillips, and a '10 1st (hard to say where this'll be - he's got a losing record but leads his division).for: Barber/ChoiceMy thoughts......I'm not the biggest McFadden fan, though I'm a little higher on him than some like EBF. I like McFadden's situation going forward more than Barber's unless Dallas dumps Choice - which I don't see happening anytime soon given Barber's tendency to get nicked up. I like Davis, though I recognize he's not elite. Phillips is a definite bonus & should be an anchor for me for several years. Knowing that I won't get the use of Davis & Phillips til next season doesn't bother me that much.He also sent me another offer with Moats in place of McFadden.Thoughts?
I view Barber as an asset in decline, so getting a first for him when you're rebuilding is a solid move- not great, not terrible. I view Choice as a potential starter going forward, but McFadden trumps him as a dynasty asset. Getting Davis and Phillips in the bargain is just gravy. From my armchair, that looks like a very good trade for a team in major rebuilding mode. You're not raking him over the coals, but you're definitely improving your squad for the long term.
Thanks for your input, SS. I had already pulled the trigger, but it's nice to have at least some support.Man, this has been a whirlwind few days in that league for me. I both acquired & traded away Barber, so leaving him out since he's a net wash I've:Traded: Frank GoreAntrel RolleCarson PalmerTashard ChoiceGot:Josh FreemanVince YoungJames DavisDarren McFaddenMike ThomasBrian RobiskieKenny Phillips2010 1st round pick2010 2nd round pickI don't have many valuable assets left - Big Ben is by far my best - but I have a few established vets who can fill some depth or last starter spots so I may not be done yet.
 
1. The fact that Mendenhall had a total of 19 carries for his entire rookie season is pretty damning in and of itself. He was stuck behind Willie Freaking Parker. Jon Stewart was stuck behind The Renaissance of DeAngelo Williams and he still got 184. When Steven Jackson was stuck behind The Man, The Myth, The Faulk, he still got 134. Besides, it's not as if those 19 carries are all we've seen of him. He got extended action in his first preseason, and was pretty awful during that, as well. It was so bad that one prominent member around here was claiming several weeks into this season that Rashard Mendenhall had not once during a single even borderline-competitive carry (actual season or preseason) made so much as a single positive play. The Mendenhall owners were getting psyched up because he had one good play in week 2 or 3, so they now had SOMETHING positive to point to.
Didnt Ray Lewis break one of Mendenhall's bones at the start of last season, putting him on IR?
 
Wow, so I've been right all these years. :patsselfonback:I wouldn't really call it toolish, I could see myself doing something similar in my younger years (but, perhaps I'm a tool :unsure: ).In any case, you are definitely no tool.
I may not be a tool, but I have definite toolish tendencies. :shrug:
 
I'm in major rebuilding mode in a Zealots league (53 man IDP).I've been offered: McFadden, James Davis, Kenny Phillips, and a '10 1st (hard to say where this'll be - he's got a losing record but leads his division).for: Barber/ChoiceMy thoughts......I'm not the biggest McFadden fan, though I'm a little higher on him than some like EBF. I like McFadden's situation going forward more than Barber's unless Dallas dumps Choice - which I don't see happening anytime soon given Barber's tendency to get nicked up. I like Davis, though I recognize he's not elite. Phillips is a definite bonus & should be an anchor for me for several years. Knowing that I won't get the use of Davis & Phillips til next season doesn't bother me that much.He also sent me another offer with Moats in place of McFadden.Thoughts?
I view Barber as an asset in decline, so getting a first for him when you're rebuilding is a solid move- not great, not terrible. I view Choice as a potential starter going forward, but McFadden trumps him as a dynasty asset. Getting Davis and Phillips in the bargain is just gravy. From my armchair, that looks like a very good trade for a team in major rebuilding mode. You're not raking him over the coals, but you're definitely improving your squad for the long term.
Thanks for your input, SS. I had already pulled the trigger, but it's nice to have at least some support.Man, this has been a whirlwind few days in that league for me. I both acquired & traded away Barber, so leaving him out since he's a net wash I've:Traded: Frank GoreAntrel RolleCarson PalmerTashard ChoiceGot:Josh FreemanVince YoungJames DavisDarren McFaddenMike ThomasBrian RobiskieKenny Phillips2010 1st round pick2010 2nd round pickI don't have many valuable assets left - Big Ben is by far my best - but I have a few established vets who can fill some depth or last starter spots so I may not be done yet.
I liked your team much better before. It's not like those guys you gave up are ancient. I wish you the best, but I don't think you received near enough in return for what you gave up. I think you'll have a heck of a time recovering from these moves. Good luck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyway, your Fitzgerald question is easy enough to answer. In '04, Josh McCown started 4 games. In those 4 games, Fitzgerald averaged 5.8 grabs for 86.3 yards and .83 TDs- that's 93/1380/13 over a full season. With Josh McCown. Perhaps even more applicable, Leinart started 5 games in 2007, and Fitzgerald averaged 6.8 grabs for 89.6 yards and .2 scores (prorates to 109/1433/3). Those TD numbers are a little low, but TDs are very volatile and we're talking about a 5 game sample, so that doesn't really worry me. The important thing is that, even without Warner, Fitz is a 100/1400 kind of guy.
I think it's worthwhile to look at the entire body of work, not just a few gamesHere are the numbers for Fitz with/without Warner

With Warner:

6.3 rec, 90.3yds, 0.7 TDs per game

Over a 16 game season, that prorates out to 101 rec, 1445 yds, 11 TDs

Without Warner:

4.6 rec, 60.9yds, 0.46 TDs per game

Over a 16 game season, that prorates out to 74 rec, 974 yds, 7 TDs

Even if we throw out his rookie season, he's still down 200+ yards and 5 TDs.

Without Warner (rookie season thrown out):

5.9rec, 77 yds, 0.41 TDs per game

Over a 16 game season, that prorates out to 94 rec, 1230 yds, 6 TDs

Keep in mind I'm posting this as a Fitzgerald dynasty owner.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I liked your team much better before. It's not like those guys you gave up are ancient. I wish you the best, but I don't think you received near enough in return for what you gave up. I think you'll have a heck of a time recovering from these moves. Good luck.
It's all good, man. Different ways of looking at things are what makes dynasty leagues go 'round. I didn't post the rest of my roster, but it's a total rebuild - my entire defensive roster needs to be completely rebuilt from the ground up, as does my WR corps (got a zillion #4s & worse, with the only potential bright spots being Nicks & Stroughter). My RBs are shaky too, but they were beforehand & I was already the worst team in the league. I'm thinking 3-4 years, at which time Gore will probably be heading towards the end. Palmer should still be good, as should Rolle, and I really like Choice but hate his situation. The only players I got that could possibly ever be studs are McFadden, Phillips, and (though I doubt it) Young. But I did get the picks and they give me more felxibility going forward.I dunno....we'll see. I took this team over this year. There were 4 new owners & we had a draft just among the 4 of us including all of the players that had been on the 4 abandoned teams. There's a reason they were abandoned, though my re-drafted team turned out the worst.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top