This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Where do we draw the line, Tobi? If I'm a bigot because I don't agree with person choosing to have sex with an animal (which you said was the same as being gay) I guess I'm a bigot. And how you don't see that it's nearly impossible for a gay judge to rule impartially on a case like this is laughable, though not surprising.
Since you're the one who has consistently made this charge, please explain which specific aspect of the judge's decision you feel is biased and would have been decided differently by a heterosexual. TIA
I said no such thing, and stop trying to change the subject.
You might gain the tiniest bit of traction with this argument if you would point us to which part of the written decision shows partiality. I forget who said it, but the point was a great one: it's not as though the judge came out of chambers and said "plaintiffs win!" and that was the end of it. He wrote a 136-page decision explaining his reasoning, and anyone who cares to can read that decision and critique it. Please tell us where the decision is flawed.
The judge was gay? He was gay? So now you are saying he can turn it on and off? Hardly a positive for someone who thinks gayness is genetic. Look, I've already stated I don't believe gays should be considered a race; which is exactly what's going on here. There's nothing that proves that gayness is genetic. Nothing. You've posted links that all say the same exact thing: maybe. Well, maybe isn't good enough for me. The fact that this case was decided by a judge with personal interest in the case, is a pretty clear sign that he's not the only one with an agenda. I'd like to think that the judges in the country were able to rule impartially, but this situation has left me with a significant amount of doubt, frankly.
Every "i" in the 136 page decision was dotted with a little flower.
Should be pretty obvious the distinction between adult homosexuals engaging in a sexual relationship and a man or woman engaging in a sexual relationship with an animal. Animals are not sentient beings and are being abused in the latter, adult homosexuals are sentient and can make the decision for themselves on who they wish to date. You're stretching here. I disagree that constitutes bigotry to disapprove of a predatory relationship, where as disapproving of homosexuality is more likely due to intolerance.The only person trying to draw a relationship between homosexuality and bestiality here is you.
At this point you've pretty much stopped making sense. 1. You realize the past tense "was" can refer to the decision, which was in the past, and not the judge's current/past sexuality, which I honestly don't know about and was discussing as a hypothetical.
You continue to make this claim without any evidence. Twice now you have been asked, by myself and Thorn, to demonstrate in what way you believe the judge's decision was biased based upon his homosexuality. If you can't do that, you have no credibility in making this claim.
Et tu, Brutis?I guess common sense goes out the window...
I expect after the last little beatdown and snit, that you probably won't hear from him until he fires up a new alias. I'm right less often than a coin flip though so take my opinion for what it's worth.
I asked it of Konotay as well, but he was more interested in discussing his interesting relationships.
I think people think the notebook is a joke.It's no joke, people.
Hey, I've been interacting with him since the golddigger days too.
10 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 2 Anonymous Users)4 Members: CBusAlex, Konotay, timschochet, Thorn
When your ready lets talk Chemical Engineering. I have some questions that are easy, but also easy to google so I want you on line.Tell me when you are ready for the test.It's bald-faced lies, and I'm not lying about my job, sorry.
When someone backs up their reasoning with a detailed writing, common sense would dictate that one could find the bias in the writing, if it existed. Wait. Did I just try to argue with peens?
I think I love you, Konotay.When your ready lets talk Chemical Engineering. I have some questions that are easy, but also easy to google so I want you on line.Tell me when you are ready for the test.It's bald-faced lies, and I'm not lying about my job, sorry.
This is kind of pathetic, even for an ifued.When your ready lets talk Chemical Engineering. I have some questions that are easy, but also easy to google so I want you on line.Tell me when you are ready for the test.It's bald-faced lies, and I'm not lying about my job, sorry.
I dont need to mind read the judge, provide links or all this other crap. Its common sense, something they didnt teach you in college....When someone backs up their reasoning with a detailed writing, common sense would dictate that one could find the bias in the writing, if it existed. Wait. Did I just try to argue with peens?
I lived next to a polygamous community in Utah. My next door neighbors were polygamous and we became friends. One of the daughters baby sat my daughter. I live in one of his houses as part of one of our business relationships. He did travel a lot but got very sick in India on a humanitarian mission about 2 years ago.
its a matter of degrees and of definitions. if the research says that genetics and environment both play a role and that the interplay of both is what ultimately determines your sexuality, the using the argument that gayness is genetic is false under current knowledge. For example you say that "homosexuality is strongly influenced by genetic factors" but in substance its no different than you claiming that "sense of humor is strongly influenced by genetic factors" and both are factually accurate but lacking the context that what is unsaid here is that both are strongly influenced by non-genetic environmental factors as well. Being a scientist i'm sure you know what I mean.
I'm sure that someone will be along shortly to show substantively, quoting from the 130 whatever page document, that the judge has let his gay cooties bias the judgment, all the while showing in detail how this blatant legislating from the bench and overturning the will of millions of people was unconstitutional.
I am not hiding behind any alias.
From what I've read, you seem to think that genetics play no role in homosexuality. Is this correct?I believe that environment and genetics have roles in human sexuality. However, the role of genetics is the dominant influence. We also know that environmental influences can alter the expression of certain genetic traits. At the heart of homosexuality is genetics, and that's basically indisputable today. Admitting that environment plays a role does not lessen that conclusion.. and it certainly doesn't imply that genetics have zero role.
The irony here is terrific! You don't need to read the judge's mind, because he wrote it all out for you to see!Yo couch, peens!
Did you live in the compound or on the outskirts?
Last time I asked a statistical thermodynamic question you answered it with a bizarre quantum mechanics one liner. It was way off base.They I put some biochemical videos and you stated that they would be great to show in class. Biochemistry is used in Biochemical engineering but they have an entirely different take than does the biology side. Again it was way off base.When discussing Chemistry and biochemistry you were completely silent on the issues.If you want to talk about reactor design, heterogeneous catalyst and numerical modeling including CFD I am game. That was the world I lived in.I think I love you, Konotay.When your ready lets talk Chemical Engineering. I have some questions that are easy, but also easy to google so I want you on line.Tell me when you are ready for the test.It's bald-faced lies, and I'm not lying about my job, sorry.
He leaves the room every time I as this question.
Go ahead and list your questions! I for one want to see what they are. Maybe you'll trap him.He leaves the room every time I as this question.
This is some good stuff. Keep it coming.Last time I asked a statistical thermodynamic question you answered it with a bizarre quantum mechanics one liner. It was way off base.They I put some biochemical videos and you stated that they would be great to show in class. Biochemistry is used in Biochemical engineering but they have an entirely different take than does the biology side. Again it was way off base.When discussing Chemistry and biochemistry you were completely silent on the issues.If you want to talk about reactor design, heterogeneous catalyst and numerical modeling including CFD I am game. That was the world I lived in.I think I love you, Konotay.When your ready lets talk Chemical Engineering. I have some questions that are easy, but also easy to google so I want you on line.Tell me when you are ready for the test.It's bald-faced lies, and I'm not lying about my job, sorry.
Pipe down, you.
Mr. Golddigger,I have a proposition for you. Read carefully.I will wager you $10,000 (or any amount of our choosing) that I hold the academic position that I've claimed to hold. If you agree, I will present irrefutable evidence of this and allow Joe Bryant (or any other person we both agree to be fair) to be the impartial judge.Please agree. I like money.MPHe leaves the room every time I as this question.
A combination of:
Well this just took an interesting turn.Mr. Golddigger,I have a proposition for you. Read carefully.I will wager you $10,000 (or any amount of our choosing) that I hold the academic position that I've claimed to hold. If you agree, I will present irrefutable evidence of this and allow Joe Bryant (or any other person we both agree to be fair) to be the impartial judge.Please agree. I like money.MPHe leaves the room every time I as this question.
