What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Vincent Jackson update? (1 Viewer)

Buncha Sallys in here. VJax is going to go off. Start him.
That is the kick in the ### I probably needed. Many Thanks.
If you win, send me half your winnings. If you lose, :lmao:
Hehe According to NFL Network's Jason LaCanfora, Vincent Jackson (calf) is "likely" to play against the 49ers Thursday night.There was apparently some concern as to whether V-Jax would be able to play a second straight game on a short week, but he's expected to be good to go. Jackson is not without risk after being limited to just 29 yards against the Chiefs, but he looked perfectly healthy in his return to the lineup. Malcom Floyd will be a safer play in Week 15. Dec. 14 - 2:38 pm et
 
vjax over macline and garcon?
I have to choose between VJax and Garcon as well. Given these next two weeks are the money rounds in my fantasy football season, and that San Diego did not report his injury going into week 12 (causing many of us to start him thinking he was 100%), and his missing week 13 altogether, and his accounting for limited receiving yards in week 14 (and I don't really care how great he looked being targeted a whole three times for <30yds.), I just can't justify benching Garcon.Right now Garcon's got the hot hand in Indy and has looked great while actually scoring TDs and catching several passes per week for the last few weeks. Tough to put him on the bench with $$$ on the line given his recent performances, and knowing that Manning is going to be airing it out at home in a battle against the division leading Jaguars. I know it's tempting to think of what could be and what a healthy motivated VJax is capable of with Rivers throwing to him in a primetime game. However, until I'm abso-freakin'-lutely sure that he's 100% and he proves it by producing WR1 numbers in a game, then I'll play the higher percentages and stick with Garcon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
================================================================================

======

http://www.nctimes.com/sports/football/pro...508bb42ebf.html

By Scott Blair North County Times

CHARGERS: Jackson's return proves profitable for Bolts' offense

SAN DIEGO -- The Kansas City Chiefs never let Vincent Jackson out of their sight. It didn't matter that he hadn't really played in 13 weeks, that he missed all offseason activity and was less than 100 percent while recovering from a calf injury.

They bracketed him on deep routes and double-teamed him on most every snap. The Chiefs were scared of him, and rightly so. The Chargers went to him in one important situation after another, and each time Jackson made a play.

He had three touches against the Chiefs, and each one converted a third down on a drive that resulted in a touchdown. He had a deep catch called back due to a penalty, but it proved that Jackson didn't lose a step while withholding services in protest of his contract status.

"Once you execute at a high level for an extended period, people take notice," Jackson said. "Consistency breeds respect, and I think that showed in how Kansas City chose to play against me. That's a good thing for this team, and it's nice to be able to make an impact whether I have the ball or not."

Jackson is making an impact for a team he has no intentions of playing for without a long-term contract. He reported to the team on the advice of the NFL Players Association, just in time to serve three games on the roster exempt list and six more games to earn an accrued season towards unrestricted free agency.

He has worked hard since he returned, both as a member of the scout team when he couldn't play and the first-team offense when he could. That why, when conspiracy theorists suggested he was faking a calf injury early in the Indianapolis game to avoid playing for a front office that refused to pay him, he deemed it preposterous.

Jackson wouldn't say the talk flustered him, but he found the notion downright offensive.

"It didn't bother me because I knew there was no validity to anything anyone was saying," Jackson said. "I just tuned that out and kept on working. I thought it was crazy that people said I was faking an injury, but I just let it roll off my back. It was garbage and I wasn't going to let it affect me. I know how hard I've been working and how much I put into getting back on the field quickly. The people in this building know that too, and that's the important thing.

"People wanted to say it was convenient and more than a coincidence, but I'd challenge anyone to say that after watching the film of the past five weeks, especially the three weeks where I was practicing but couldn't play. I was on the scout team, trying to help this team in any way I could."

Players rushed to his defense the following day, saying that he hurt himself the Friday before and made things worse while warming up for the Nov. 28 contest.

"I probably pushed it too hard and got hurt as a result," Jackson said. "When I was able to take reps with the offense, I was really pushing myself because I was so excited to get back out there. I overdid it trying to make sure I could hit the ground running on my first game back."

He certainly did on Sunday, with the ball or without. The extra attention paid had a trickle-down effect that benefitted the entire offense.

"I thought Vincent Jackson had a real presence and a real impact on the game," Chargers coach Norv Turner said. "We saw some great looks to run the ball when both our outside receivers were being doubled. It gives you some opportunities to run the ball that you don't see a lot and that we haven't seen. Obviously the big plays he made on third down helped us. It was nice getting him back in the mix."

Kansas City safeties played deep, especially with Jackson and Malcom Floyd playing at the same time. That opened up several options for quarterback Philip Rivers.

"Watching it on tape, it happened more than I even realized," said Rivers, "how many times they were dropping eight (defenders) and rushing three. ... I don't know if that's in direct reaction to having Vincent out there, but certainly it's a positive for us and a bonus any time you get a player of his caliber back."

While Jackson isn't thrilled with his contract status or his current employer, he's been able to compartmentalize his emotions and separate business from sport.

"This is what I love to do. It's more than just a job to me," Jackson said.

"Whenever I do out there, I feel like I'm representing myself and what I'm about as a football player. I always want to put my best foot forward. I feel that I've done that and earned respect from my teammates and coaches and opponents as well."

Injury report

TE Antonio Gates (foot), NT Antonio Garay (ankle), ILB Brandon Siler (ribs), WR Patrick Crayton (wrist) and OLB Larry English (foot) did not participate in Tuesday's practice. WR Malcom Floyd (hamstring) was limited.

 
Antonio Gates (feet) is officially listed as doubtful for Thursday night's game against San Francisco."Might as well be out," confirms beat writer Kevin Acee. "I always hold out hope with Antonio, but at some point you have to be realistic," said coach Norv Turner after Gates failed to practice on Wednesday. Randy McMichael will start against the 49ers, and qualifies as a low-end TE2 in fantasy leagues. Expect a bump in targets for Vincent Jackson on Thursday Night Football. Gates appears to be targeting Week 16 at Cincinnati to return.
Malcom Floyd (hamstring) is listed as questionable for Thursday night's matchup with the 49ers.Floyd didn't practice Wednesday after being "limited" Tuesday, which makes us concerned that he's suffered another setback. At this point, he's now become the riskier fantasy play in comparison to Vincent Jackson. Floyd may be headed for a game-time decision. We should have at least one or two more updates on Floyd's potential availability before Thursday's kickoff.
:coffee:
 
i'm rolling with vjax over sidney rice..............looks like it's gonna be patrick ramsey on monday nite....just got a tweet the vikes are about to sign him......

 
I was hoping to put VJax into my lineup for the playoffs and was disappointed he was injured in his first game back leaving him little opportunity to regain a comfort level with Rivers or work his way into game shape. I have to decide between Mike Williams against Detroit and Jackson. Williams has been consistent and the match-up may be too sweet to come off of him for Jackson, but it is tempting.
I'm in the same boat. I know if Jackson goes off tomorrow night I'll be kicking myself. I just dont want to be looking down a bad start this early in the week. I think BMW gets the nod for me. But I am going back an forth a bit.
 
Here's the update, he's good. If he happens to stay in SD next year, he is top 5.
I picked him up on the cheap in a keeper league, and would love if that happened, but isn't there essentially zero chance of this occurring? If he was going to stay in SD, then wouldn't they have signed him long term in he off season when they had a chance?
 
:wall: As I stated earlier, I sat him. I thought until he produces in a game it is too much a gamble. My other options of Jennings, T.O. and even Britt have produced when they played so I had to be making the right decision right? @#$% my life!
 
Here's the update, he's good. If he happens to stay in SD next year, he is top 5.
I picked him up on the cheap in a keeper league, and would love if that happened, but isn't there essentially zero chance of this occurring? If he was going to stay in SD, then wouldn't they have signed him long term in he off season when they had a chance?
The announcers in the game last night were making it sound like it was still a possibility. I think they franchise him as one option.
 
I think the name of the thread should be changed, apparently it wasn't foolish and that week alone was well worth the pickup in week 10 to me.

 
Here's the update, he's good.

If he happens to stay in SD next year, he is top 5.
I picked him up on the cheap in a keeper league, and would love if that happened, but isn't there essentially zero chance of this occurring? If he was going to stay in SD, then wouldn't they have signed him long term in he off season when they had a chance?
The announcers in the game last night were making it sound like it was still a possibility. I think they franchise him as one option.
They can't franchise him because he signed and is playing in the seasons final 6 games. He's an unrestricted FA, therefore he can go anywhere he wants. He's going to go to the team that gives him the most money. Period. End of discussion. Could SD be the high bidder? Sure. Would AJ Smith look like a fool if he gives him a huge contract next year and didn't do it this year? Absolutely.
 
...I know it's tempting to think of what could be and what a healthy motivated VJax is capable of with Rivers throwing to him in a primetime game. However, until I'm abso-freakin'-lutely sure that he's 100% and he proves it by producing WR1 numbers in a game, then I'll play the higher percentages and stick with Garcon.
:unsure: Okay... I'm now "abso-freakin'-lutely sure" Grrrr...
 
...I know it's tempting to think of what could be and what a healthy motivated VJax is capable of with Rivers throwing to him in a primetime game. However, until I'm abso-freakin'-lutely sure that he's 100% and he proves it by producing WR1 numbers in a game, then I'll play the higher percentages and stick with Garcon.
:confused: Okay... I'm now "abso-freakin'-lutely sure" Grrrr...
No guts, no glory...
 
Here's the update, he's good.

If he happens to stay in SD next year, he is top 5.
I picked him up on the cheap in a keeper league, and would love if that happened, but isn't there essentially zero chance of this occurring? If he was going to stay in SD, then wouldn't they have signed him long term in he off season when they had a chance?
The announcers in the game last night were making it sound like it was still a possibility. I think they franchise him as one option.
They can't franchise him because he signed and is playing in the seasons final 6 games. He's an unrestricted FA, therefore he can go anywhere he wants. He's going to go to the team that gives him the most money. Period. End of discussion. Could SD be the high bidder? Sure. Would AJ Smith look like a fool if he gives him a huge contract next year and didn't do it this year? Absolutely.
VJax sure was making it sound like he wants to come back to SD.
 
VJax listed as Questionable (Abdomen) for Week 3 v Chiefs .... Does anyone have any further information ?
What?! :shock:Edit: I did see him double over in pain after a play in the last game. But I think he had another td and a bunch of yards after that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vincent Jackson was held out of Thursday's practice with "abdominal soreness."

A member of the Chargers PR team called it an injury, but coach Norv Turner was quick to clarify it as "just soreness." Beat writer Kevin Acee confirms that Jackson "will play" against the Chiefs this week.

In other words... I don't want/need practice, just lemme rest so I can rip KC a new one...

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top