What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ben Roethlisberger - first ballot HOFer? (1 Viewer)

1st ballot HOFer?

  • Yes

    Votes: 51 34.7%
  • No, but he eventually gets in

    Votes: 52 35.4%
  • Sorry, sit over there with Kenny Stabler

    Votes: 44 29.9%

  • Total voters
    147
'Ghost Rider said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
That's a ridiculous statement, but typical for a Steelers homer. Has the Steeler fanbase ever met a good Steeler that they didn't overrate?
I think it's reasonable that Louis Lipps has to wait for the veterans committee before he takes his place in Canton, and was not 1st Ballot. :shrug:
 
I think he is close right now, but if his career ended today, IMO he would not make it. However, if he maintains a reasonably good level of play for 5+ more years and/or if he is the QB for another Super Bowl win, I think he'll get in. It would also help if he earned some more honors/awards (MVP, Super Bowl MVP, All Pro selections, Pro Bowl selections).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'David Yudkin said:
I figured we might as well get this off the ground and debate it for 6 years like we've done in the Hines Ward thread. By that time we should know where things stand with Big Ben.
I wouldn't be shocked if he finally has an injury that ends his career in the next 2 seasons. When you're young, you can bounce back. But I doubt he can keep this up.I wonder if Ben is going to be one of those athletes that have slurred speech and can barely walk when he's 50.
 
The three Super Bowl appearances makes it hard to keep him out. If he gets to a 4th, gotta be a lock IMO.

 
I believe every QB in the HOF was inducted in his first year of eligibility. If Roethlisberger gets in, it will be first ballot.

I think he is close right now, but if his career ended today, IMO he would not make it. However, if he maintains a reasonably good level of play for 5+ more years and/or if he is the QB for another Super Bowl win, I think he'll get in. It would also help if he earned some more honors/awards (MVP, Super Bowl MVP, All Pro selections, Pro Bowl selections).
Wow--did not realize the bolded. I think he will get in but for the poll voted not immediately. Dunno how the personal issues might play into it.
 
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
With our OLine over the years, except for possibly Rodgers, these guys would likely be dead. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe every QB in the HOF was inducted in his first year of eligibility.

I think he is close right now, but if his career ended today, IMO he would not make it. However, if he maintains a reasonably good level of play for 5+ more years and/or if he is the QB for another Super Bowl win, I think he'll get in. It would also help if he earned some more honors/awards (MVP, Super Bowl MVP, All Pro selections, Pro Bowl selections).
Wow--did not realize the bolded.
Probably because it's not true.Norm Van Brocklin, Y.A. Tittle, Sonny Jurgensen, Joe Namath, Fran Tarkenton, Len Dawson, and Bob Griese all were inducted after their first year of eligibility.

 
I believe every QB in the HOF was inducted in his first year of eligibility.

I think he is close right now, but if his career ended today, IMO he would not make it. However, if he maintains a reasonably good level of play for 5+ more years and/or if he is the QB for another Super Bowl win, I think he'll get in. It would also help if he earned some more honors/awards (MVP, Super Bowl MVP, All Pro selections, Pro Bowl selections).
Wow--did not realize the bolded.
Probably because it's not true.Norm Van Brocklin, Y.A. Tittle, Sonny Jurgensen, Joe Namath, Fran Tarkenton, Len Dawson, and Bob Griese all were inducted after their first year of eligibility.
I stand corrected. Not sure why I had that impression. However, at a quick glance, it looks like the majority of QBs have made it in their first year of eligibility, including the last 9 QBs inducted. (Wish the HOF site was more user friendly, with sortable lists, positions listed, etc.)
 
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
With our OLine over the years, except for possibly Rodgers, these guys would likely be dead. ;)
I think this point gets overstated. People say the Steelers have a bad offensive line because Roethlisberger gets sacked and hit a lot. But Roethlisberger holds the ball much longer than most other QBs, so he is a big reason for that.
 
I believe every QB in the HOF was inducted in his first year of eligibility.

I think he is close right now, but if his career ended today, IMO he would not make it. However, if he maintains a reasonably good level of play for 5+ more years and/or if he is the QB for another Super Bowl win, I think he'll get in. It would also help if he earned some more honors/awards (MVP, Super Bowl MVP, All Pro selections, Pro Bowl selections).
Wow--did not realize the bolded.
Probably because it's not true.Norm Van Brocklin, Y.A. Tittle, Sonny Jurgensen, Joe Namath, Fran Tarkenton, Len Dawson, and Bob Griese all were inducted after their first year of eligibility.
I stand corrected. Not sure why I had that impression. However, at a quick glance, it looks like the majority of QBs have made it in their first year of eligibility, including the last 9 QBs inducted. (Wish the HOF site was more user friendly, with sortable lists, positions listed, etc.)
For some reason Otto Graham isn't in that link. He was inducted in 1965. He was mainly caught in the backlog of the first few years, I assume.So, of the 23 Modern Era Quarterbacks in the HOF, 15 were first-timers (16 if you count Graham). And, like you say, there have been 9 straight (our love for the QB grows).

Historically, I'd think Roethlisberger and Griese would be a good comparison? Both were winners on pretty stacked teams that were outshined by a competing dynasty in their day?

 
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
With our OLine over the years, except for possibly Rodgers, these guys would likely be dead. ;)
I think this point gets overstated. People say the Steelers have a bad offensive line because Roethlisberger gets sacked and hit a lot. But Roethlisberger holds the ball much longer than most other QBs, so he is a big reason for that.
:no: Ben for sure holds on too long, but the oline is wretched. He sometimes barely finishes his drop when 2 DEs are on top of him.
 
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..

 
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
With our OLine over the years, except for possibly Rodgers, these guys would likely be dead. ;)
I think this point gets overstated. People say the Steelers have a bad offensive line because Roethlisberger gets sacked and hit a lot. But Roethlisberger holds the ball much longer than most other QBs, so he is a big reason for that.
:no: Ben for sure holds on too long, but the oline is wretched. He sometimes barely finishes his drop when 2 DEs are on top of him.
You could say that about anyone.
 
'FUBAR said:
Oh, and before you ask, yes. Troy Polamalu is also a Hall of Famer.
What about James Harrison and Casey Hampton?
Yes to both. Harrison won DPOY, 4 Pro Bowls, 2 time 1st-team all-Pro and is still a terror. Hampton is a 5-time Pro Bowler and probably the best 3-4 NT of his generation. Both have multiple rings.
 
'Ghost Rider said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
That's a ridiculous statement, but typical for a Steelers homer. Has the Steeler fanbase ever met a good Steeler that they didn't overrate?
I think it's reasonable that Louis Lipps has to wait for the veterans committee before he takes his place in Canton, and was not 1st Ballot. :shrug:
:goodposting:Walter Abercrombie is still waiting and you don't hear me yelling about it, do you?
 
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
With our OLine over the years, except for possibly Rodgers, these guys would likely be dead. ;)
I think this point gets overstated. People say the Steelers have a bad offensive line because Roethlisberger gets sacked and hit a lot. But Roethlisberger holds the ball much longer than most other QBs, so he is a big reason for that.
UNDERstated, 'cuz they win.
 
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..
:no:
 
Historically, I'd think Roethlisberger and Griese would be a good comparison? Both were winners on pretty stacked teams that were outshined by a competing dynasty in their day?
I think Ben is more indespensible to his team nowadays than Griese ever was. Earl Morrall won a lot of big games for Miami when Griese was hurt.
 
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..
Excellent.He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..
Excellent.He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Good god.
 
'FUBAR said:
Oh, and before you ask, yes. Troy Polamalu is also a Hall of Famer.
What about James Harrison and Casey Hampton?
Yes to both. Harrison won DPOY, 4 Pro Bowls, 2 time 1st-team all-Pro and is still a terror. Hampton is a 5-time Pro Bowler and probably the best 3-4 NT of his generation. Both have multiple rings.
Come on. Do you know how many Defensive Tackles have gone into the HOF since Joe Greene in 1987? Dan Hampton, who was also an end, Alan Page, John Randle, and Randy White. That's it.Warren Sapp will probably make it. The all-2000s DTs were Sapp and Richard Seymour (first team) and Kevin Williams and La'Roi Glover. Those last three are longshots and are all ahead of Hampton, as are current contemporaries Wilfork and Ngata. And Suh will soon enter the conversation.

Not every good Steeler is a legit HOF canidate.

 
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..
Pats haven't won a Superbowl since they lost Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel.
 
'FUBAR said:
Oh, and before you ask, yes. Troy Polamalu is also a Hall of Famer.
What about James Harrison and Casey Hampton?
Yes to both. Harrison won DPOY, 4 Pro Bowls, 2 time 1st-team all-Pro and is still a terror. Hampton is a 5-time Pro Bowler and probably the best 3-4 NT of his generation. Both have multiple rings.
Come on. Do you know how many Defensive Tackles have gone into the HOF since Joe Greene in 1987? Dan Hampton, who was also an end, Alan Page, John Randle, and Randy White. That's it.Warren Sapp will probably make it. The all-2000s DTs were Sapp and Richard Seymour (first team) and Kevin Williams and La'Roi Glover. Those last three are longshots and are all ahead of Hampton, as are current contemporaries Wilfork and Ngata. And Suh will soon enter the conversation.

Not every good Steeler is a legit HOF canidate.
I'm going to "make a case" for anyone they throw out there, just for fun. I don't really think either guy will make the HOF
 
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..
Excellent.He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Brady's most memorable playoff moment? got to be the tuck rulePeyton's?? Good lord.. any number of chokes but probably his pick 6 in the Super Bowl.

..interesting contrasts

 
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..
Excellent.He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
:lmao: :lmao:
 
'GridironMenace said:
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls.
Not only that, he hasn'y even been in a Super Bowl since the 2010 season.
 
Historically, I'd think Roethlisberger and Griese would be a good comparison? Both were winners on pretty stacked teams that were outshined by a competing dynasty in their day?
I think Ben is more indespensible to his team nowadays than Griese ever was. Earl Morrall won a lot of big games for Miami when Griese was hurt.
That could just be more of an argument that Morrall > Pitt backup QBs rather than Ben > Griese.Ben's regular season winning %: 0.708Without Ben: 0.600Griese's regular season winning %: 0.619Without Griese: 0.627Griese through the age of 29: 0.639Without Griese: 0.591Interestingly, the Without Griese numbers are skewed with a 9-0 record by Morrall in 1972. I think it can be argued that most competent QBs might have led that team to a really good record that season. Other than that season, Griese's replacements were 23-19 over his career and only 4-9 through the age of 29. Now compare that to Ben being skewed by a 13-0 record in his favor in his rookie year. He definitely posted some nice numbers for a rookie, but I believe the general thought is that he didn't get a lot of the credit for that record.I'm not clear to me that Ben > Griese.ETA: Keep in mind that Griese joined a Dolphins team that was in its second year of existence and Roethlisberger joined one of the more consistent winners of his time. It took the Dolphins a couple years to surround Griese with talent. Roethlisberger had that immediately.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Chase Stuart said:
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Brady never won a superbowl when his defense wasn't ranked within the top 6 (profootballreference)Brady hasn't won a Superbowl post spygate, either..say what you want about the cheating, but the fact remains, since BB was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, NE has not won a Superbowl..

Ben ranks 8th All-Time in post season wins ( 10-3 record), and his .769 winning percentage is higher than Brady's ( .737) Johnny Unitas ( .750), Thiesmann(.750), Aikman ( .733), Joe Montana ( .696), John Elway ( .667), Kurt Warner ( .692), to name a few.

If not for a costly Mendenhall fumble late in last year's SB, we're talking about a 3-time SB winning QB..
Excellent.He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
I've honestly never heard of either of these plays. Immaculate reception yes. The catch, yes. Never heard of either of these.
 
He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Those aren't even the biggest postseason plays by that franchise, much less all of the others.
Please tell me what could be bigger than a pinpoint TD pass that wins a Super Bowl in the final minute.
Throwing a pick to Jarret Bush when Heath Miller isn't even covered, or a pick 6 to Nick Collins to put your team into a huge hole against the best offense in the NFL.
 
'GridironMenace said:
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls.
Was this written from the future? If so, please let us know when the Steelers' defense stopped being elite and how many SBs they won before that happened.
:goodposting:
:goodposting:
 
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
Tough to have a #1 defense and a really good pass protecting line & great weapons on offense all at the same time... its rare... at best teams may get 2 out of 3 of those at a time. Not saying they wouldn't obviously benefit from better defenses but part of what makes Ben work for the Steelers is that he is able to extend plays when protection breaks down. There is always the argument that he holds the ball too long and that is fair at times but I also see an awful lot of protection screw ups and immediate pressure as well (especially when Kemoeatu is starting at LG).QB pressure in the playoffs is even more paramount and I have ALOT more confidence in Ben than anyone else as far as getting things done despite getting knocked around and harassed all day long.Here's how I rank them if the D is banging them around all day long...Ben (bring it on)Rodgers (can still kill ya)Brees (surprisingly more agile and athletic than most think)Brady (starts to press and get frustrated... see playoffs since NE vs. NYG superbowl season)Manning (seriously rarely gets hurt because he falls down before they get there)I feel like THAT is what makes him an elite QB... He is accurate enough (behind the other 4 for sure)... I like to call it "Fathleticism" and u can see a big difference when he TRULY can't break tackles because of his ankle against SF and the Brownies.He's big and Fat and a pig as a human but he also is an enigma in this league and IS a HOFer. If he gets to another SB and wins he will be 1st ballot.
 
'Ghost Rider said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
That's a ridiculous statement, but typical for a Steelers homer. Has the Steeler fanbase ever met a good Steeler that they didn't overrate?
I think it's reasonable that Louis Lipps has to wait for the veterans committee before he takes his place in Canton, and was not 1st Ballot. :shrug:
:goodposting: Walter Abercrombie is still waiting and you don't hear me yelling Fitching about it, do you?
fixed ;)
 
All joking aside, had it not been for "the tackle" or "the catch", Ben and the Steelers don't win those 2 SB's.

 
He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Really? The Tackle

The Catch
Since quoting Wikipedia makes it official.
Get real, man. Ask 99% of football fans (that aren't Steelers homers) what they think of when The Tackle is mentioned, and they'll say Dyson being tackled at the 1. Same thing for Clark and The Catch. The fact that Steelers fans are trying to attach those phrases to important plays in their own history doesn't change that.
All joking aside, had it not been for "the tackle" or "the catch", Ben and the Steelers don't win those 2 SB's.
You can't say that about Holmes' catch. They could have still won that game very easily without that catch. They still would have a 3rd down play to score the winning TD, and possible OT to win it had they had to settle for a FG there at the end of regulation. Still a great catch by Holmes, regardless.
 
He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Really? The Tackle

The Catch
Since quoting Wikipedia makes it official.
Get real, man. Ask 99% of football fans (that aren't Steelers homers) what they think of when The Tackle is mentioned, and they'll say Dyson being tackled at the 1. Same thing for Clark and The Catch. The fact that Steelers fans are trying to attach those phrases to important plays in their own history doesn't change that.
All joking aside, had it not been for "the tackle" or "the catch", Ben and the Steelers don't win those 2 SB's.
You can't say that about Holmes' catch. They could have still won that game very easily without that catch. They still would have a 3rd down play to score the winning TD, and possible OT to win it had they had to settle for a FG there at the end of regulation. Still a great catch by Holmes, regardless.
Uh, guys, he never said "The Catch." He said "The Throw." Although, in the interest of full disclosure, I never heard anyone outside of Steeler fans refer to that play as "The Throw", I've heard many, many national commentators call the play against Indy "The Tackle", more so than I've heard it applied to the St. Louis/Tennessee Super Bowl.
 
He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Really? The Tackle

The Catch
Since quoting Wikipedia makes it official.
Get real, man. Ask 99% of football fans (that aren't Steelers homers) what they think of when The Tackle is mentioned, and they'll say Dyson being tackled at the 1. Same thing for Clark and The Catch. The fact that Steelers fans are trying to attach those phrases to important plays in their own history doesn't change that.
All joking aside, had it not been for "the tackle" or "the catch", Ben and the Steelers don't win those 2 SB's.
You can't say that about Holmes' catch. They could have still won that game very easily without that catch. They still would have a 3rd down play to score the winning TD, and possible OT to win it had they had to settle for a FG there at the end of regulation. Still a great catch by Holmes, regardless.
Sure I can say it. We'll never know what might have happened if that play wasn't made. He could have pulled a Warner-Harrison type interception. But he didn't. He made one of the best/most famous throws ever.
 
He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Really? The Tackle

The Catch
Since quoting Wikipedia makes it official.
Get real, man. Ask 99% of football fans (that aren't Steelers homers) what they think of when The Tackle is mentioned, and they'll say Dyson being tackled at the 1. Same thing for Clark and The Catch. The fact that Steelers fans are trying to attach those phrases to important plays in their own history doesn't change that.
All joking aside, had it not been for "the tackle" or "the catch", Ben and the Steelers don't win those 2 SB's.
You can't say that about Holmes' catch. They could have still won that game very easily without that catch. They still would have a 3rd down play to score the winning TD, and possible OT to win it had they had to settle for a FG there at the end of regulation. Still a great catch by Holmes, regardless.
Call those two plays what you like but questioning their significance is just plain ignorant. Steve Sabol has called the "the SB-winning Roethlisberger-Holmes TD" the greatest TD catch in NFL history.
 
He's also the hero in two of the biggest plays in postseason history, The Tackle and The Throw. Both led to Super Bowl victories.
Really? The Tackle

The Catch
Since quoting Wikipedia makes it official.
Get real, man. Ask 99% of football fans (that aren't Steelers homers) what they think of when The Tackle is mentioned, and they'll say Dyson being tackled at the 1. Same thing for Clark and The Catch. The fact that Steelers fans are trying to attach those phrases to important plays in their own history doesn't change that.
All joking aside, had it not been for "the tackle" or "the catch", Ben and the Steelers don't win those 2 SB's.
You can't say that about Holmes' catch. They could have still won that game very easily without that catch. They still would have a 3rd down play to score the winning TD, and possible OT to win it had they had to settle for a FG there at the end of regulation. Still a great catch by Holmes, regardless.
Call those two plays what you like but questioning their significance is just plain ignorant. Steve Sabol has called the "the SB-winning Roethlisberger-Holmes TD" the greatest TD catch in NFL history.
I personally think, and this is said objectively, not as a Steelers fan, that it was both a better throw and a better catch than the Montana-Clark play, plus it won a Super Bowl, while "The Catch" happened in a conference championship.
 
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
Tough to have a #1 defense and a really good pass protecting line & great weapons on offense all at the same time... its rare... at best teams may get 2 out of 3 of those at a time. Not saying they wouldn't obviously benefit from better defenses but part of what makes Ben work for the Steelers is that he is able to extend plays when protection breaks down. There is always the argument that he holds the ball too long and that is fair at times but I also see an awful lot of protection screw ups and immediate pressure as well (especially when Kemoeatu is starting at LG).

QB pressure in the playoffs is even more paramount and I have ALOT more confidence in Ben than anyone else as far as getting things done despite getting knocked around and harassed all day long.

Here's how I rank them if the D is banging them around all day long...

Ben (bring it on)

Rodgers (can still kill ya)

Brees (surprisingly more agile and athletic than most think)

Brady (starts to press and get frustrated... see playoffs since NE vs. NYG superbowl season)

Manning (seriously rarely gets hurt because he falls down before they get there)

I feel like THAT is what makes him an elite QB... He is accurate enough (behind the other 4 for sure)...

I like to call it "Fathleticism" and u can see a big difference when he TRULY can't break tackles because of his ankle against SF and the Brownies.

He's big and Fat and a pig as a human but he also is an enigma in this league and IS a HOFer. If he gets to another SB and wins he will be 1st ballot.
It's possible (but unlikely) that he's in the conversation in 5-10 years when Ben has a similar number of games under his belt as Peyton and Brady. But right now there's no question he's not even in the same class. And the winner comment Brady has more Superbowls and a better overall winning % (although Ben has a better playoff % now). Then again the difference between Brady's playoff numbers and Ben's numbers are Brady is 4-2 with 1 more Superbowl. Brady is also 44-2 in the 46 regular season games he has played more than Ben.
 
It's possible (but unlikely) that he's in the conversation in 5-10 years when Ben has a similar number of games under his belt as Peyton and Brady. But right now there's no question he's not even in the same class. And the winner comment Brady has more Superbowls and a better overall winning % (although Ben has a better playoff % now). Then again the difference between Brady's playoff numbers and Ben's numbers are Brady is 4-2 with 1 more Superbowl. Brady is also 44-2 in the 46 regular season games he has played more than Ben.
Ben is not in Brady's class but very few are. If Ben can win another Super Bowl he probably is a first ballot HoFer. Heck, given his own injuries and the overall health of the Steelers he may deserve HoF consideration if this team even makes the Super Bowl. I don't see it happening though...
 
It's possible (but unlikely) that he's in the conversation in 5-10 years when Ben has a similar number of games under his belt as Peyton and Brady. But right now there's no question he's not even in the same class. And the winner comment Brady has more Superbowls and a better overall winning % (although Ben has a better playoff % now). Then again the difference between Brady's playoff numbers and Ben's numbers are Brady is 4-2 with 1 more Superbowl. Brady is also 44-2 in the 46 regular season games he has played more than Ben.
Ben is not in Brady's class but very few are. If Ben can win another Super Bowl he probably is a first ballot HoFer. Heck, given his own injuries and the overall health of the Steelers he may deserve HoF consideration if this team even makes the Super Bowl. I don't see it happening though...
I wasn't very clear in what I was saying. I do think Ben will be a first ballot guy when it's done. I just was commenting on the comparisons with Peyton or Brady. Maybe when it's all said and done but right now he's not even in the same class.
 
He goes in HOF simply..... being remembered as the toughest QB to ever play the game

END THREAD

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top