What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (2 Viewers)

Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?
Serious question: would the cops would have taken photographs of his injuries?
I have no idea.
Guys, Martin was the victim. All of these people who are telling you that the police would have without a doubt taken pictures of Zimmerman are full of it.
It was a potential homicide with the explanation being self defense. The police would have without a doubt taken pictures if there was something there. You are looking foolish and quite racist in here.
Why insult him? And why call him racist? I may not agree with Christo, but he is no racist. I challenge you to post a single racist thing Christo has ever written in this thread or anywhere else.
 
For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved?
This is a good argument. I'm especially interested in the fire department person- is there separately testimony from that person apart from the second police report? He never checked into the hospital. He never required stitches. Maybe he was slightly injured and exaggerated it, which would save us from having to call the police liars. But there's obviously a discrepancy here.
I took an elbow playing hoops in high school. Broke my nose. Blood coming from both nostrils, but nothing crazy. The athletic director put a locker towel over my face, set my nose, stuffed my nostrils and told me to ice it still it stopped bleeding and go home. When I got home my parents had no idea I had a broken nose. The next morning two black eyes gave it away. :shrug:
Fair enough. Still think it looks awfully suspicious, but who knows?
sooo...no blood dripped onto the front of your shirt?
 
When has it been posted in this thread that he was treated at the scene? According to who?
I will not be responding to you again until you familiarize yourself with the basic facts.
he recieved ''first aid'' in the back of a police car...they must have stitched up the big bad cut that was on the back of his head ...in this video there is NO sign of any wound lmao.http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/trayvon-martin-case-video-zimmerman-16024564?
There's no way to tell if he had a cut on the back of his head or whether he was bleeding from the nose at the scene.
Other than the police report?
I'm just talking about the tape. Apparently, everyone and his uncle has now watched that grainy tape and come to the indisputable conclusion that there couldn't be a cut on the back of Zimmerman's head.
Christo, if he was bleeding badly from the nose or the back of the head dont you think the police would have taken photos?
:goodposting: Pictures, full witness reports, the works given that there's a corpse.
 
The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see. :popcorn:

The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines". :popcorn:
As I stated many times, the lead investigator appears very biased. I think it is inappropriate for an investigator to make such statements. He is playing judge and juror. He should be gathering facts and keeping his opinions to himself.
ummmmm......... :unsure:
I am pretty sure the lead investigator does not have a law licence, so by what basis is he judging the legal defense of the case. He should not be stating legal opinions, all he is doing is making reckless statements which will make him look bad on the witness stand.. Everything out of his mouth shows a clear bias against Zimmerman, and his absolute statements are opinion and not fact. He looks extremely bias and unresonable.
 
I am pretty sure the lead investigator does not have a law licence, so by what basis is he judging the legal defense of the case. He should not be stating legal opinions, all he is doing is making reckless statements which will make him look bad on the witness stand.. Everything out of his mouth shows a clear bias against Zimmerman, and his absolute statements are opinion and not fact. He looks extremely bias and unresonable.
:lmao: Come on Jon, really??? He's the friggin lead investigator!! He's not a judge. If he thinks Zimmerman is guilty, then he's SUPPOSED to be biased against Zimmerman. And he's supposed to give his opinion. That's what lead investigators do.

I think this case has made a lot of people lose their ability to think rationally. I mean, are you kidding me?

 
It all makes sense now. Police can't really photograph injuries that aren't there.
:goodposting:
I have to agree. But what about Chaos Commish's argument? If this is true, must we believe the police is lying, the fire department is lying, the witness named "John" is lying- how do you guys rectify all of this?
Well we havent heard a word from any fire dept emergency personnel and i doubt we will.The cops are under investigation by the FBI for the way this and other cases have been handled. Cant speak for john but all he said was one guy was on top of another guy and the guy on the bottom was screaming. That doesnt mean the guy on the bottom was getting his ### kicked . They could have been wrestling with no real punches being thrown or landed. Maybe they were fighting over the gun, that makes as much sense as anything, and it would explain the screaming, fear will cause that .
 
I am pretty sure the lead investigator does not have a law licence, so by what basis is he judging the legal defense of the case. He should not be stating legal opinions, all he is doing is making reckless statements which will make him look bad on the witness stand.. Everything out of his mouth shows a clear bias against Zimmerman, and his absolute statements are opinion and not fact. He looks extremely bias and unresonable.
:lmao: Come on Jon, really??? He's the friggin lead investigator!! He's not a judge. If he thinks Zimmerman is guilty, then he's SUPPOSED to be biased against Zimmerman. And he's supposed to give his opinion. That's what lead investigators do.

I think this case has made a lot of people lose their ability to think rationally. I mean, are you kidding me?
Okay, you defended my honor :thumbup: so I guess I should respond. He's supposed to give his opinion to his bosses and the prosecutors but not the mother of a witness.

 
I am pretty sure the lead investigator does not have a law licence, so by what basis is he judging the legal defense of the case. He should not be stating legal opinions, all he is doing is making reckless statements which will make him look bad on the witness stand.. Everything out of his mouth shows a clear bias against Zimmerman, and his absolute statements are opinion and not fact. He looks extremely bias and unresonable.
:lmao: Come on Jon, really??? He's the friggin lead investigator!! He's not a judge. If he thinks Zimmerman is guilty, then he's SUPPOSED to be biased against Zimmerman. And he's supposed to give his opinion. That's what lead investigators do.

I think this case has made a lot of people lose their ability to think rationally. I mean, are you kidding me?
Okay, you defended my honor :thumbup: so I guess I should respond. He's supposed to give his opinion to his bosses and the prosecutors but not the mother of a witness.
Yes I agree with you. That may very well have been unethical. But jon thinks that because of this we should dismiss everything he says as "biased and unreasonable". And that's ridiculous. He's the guy with the most information, and whatever he says is vital.
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am pretty sure the lead investigator does not have a law licence, so by what basis is he judging the legal defense of the case. He should not be stating legal opinions, all he is doing is making reckless statements which will make him look bad on the witness stand.. Everything out of his mouth shows a clear bias against Zimmerman, and his absolute statements are opinion and not fact. He looks extremely bias and unresonable.
:lmao: Come on Jon, really??? He's the friggin lead investigator!! He's not a judge. If he thinks Zimmerman is guilty, then he's SUPPOSED to be biased against Zimmerman. And he's supposed to give his opinion. That's what lead investigators do.

I think this case has made a lot of people lose their ability to think rationally. I mean, are you kidding me?
How can he make absolute statements that so and so is lying and so and so has absolutely no defense. Obviously there are conflicting accounts, and the investigator can have an opinion, but his statements are absolutes. His superiors did not think the case was so cut and dry. The facts that are coming out do not seem so cut and dry. If there were injuries, why did he leave that detail out. The guy is a loose canon and it hurts his credibility whether you think so or not. An investigator should be seeking truth and not an agenda.

I'll make this prediction right now, the lead investigator will be a major stumbling block if this ever goes to court.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
My point was I don't believe he said it to her.
 
Nope. Heard all this on TV. For all I know, it might be total BS.

Unlike several people here, I am not claiming to be sure of ANYTHING in this case. What the CNN experts are saying make a lot more sense to me than Christo's various arguments here. But that's just me, and it's entirely subjective.
Less than 30 minutes earlier -
Come on you guys. Why can't you just admit it? This guy's story is total BS. Yes, it's still going to be extremely difficult to convict him, but it's obvious he's lying.
Respectfully, take a step back and just stop posting for a day or so.
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
He can have doubts and he can explain what facts seem in doubt based on the evidence. But sayin there is no defense and Zimmerman is lying are over generalized opinions which show he is prejudiced against the defendant. Investigators need to stick to facts, and not color the facts.
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
Has the lead investigator publicly said that he thinks Zimmerman was lying? Has he said that there were no injuries?
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
My point was I don't believe he said it to her.
well the fact that shes on record some time ago saying he said what he said, and then NOW it comes to light that hes saying on the record that he thought zimmerman should have been arrested and charged, makes me think she`s telling the truth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now, I won't be responding to you again.
Don't be rude. I am only repeating what I am watching. There are prosecutors and medical experts on TV right now and they are all ridiculing the injuries defense. And BTW, per every one of these guys, Zimmerman was never medically treated, either at the scene or otherwise. So apparently they are all as ignorant as I am of your "basic facts of the case."
His friend claims he went to a doctor the next day for his broken nose. I'm sure the doctor will be called in as a witness.
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
He can have doubts and he can explain what facts seem in doubt based on the evidence. But sayin there is no defense and Zimmerman is lying are over generalized opinions which show he is prejudiced against the defendant. Investigators need to stick to facts, and not color the facts.
Maybe hes distancing himself from the other cops at the scene that night, seeing the FBI is investigating them.
 
For Zim to be full of crap on the issue of injuries then the eye witness named John would have to be lying about seeing him get beat up (unless what he saw caused no injuries), the police would have to be lying in reporting injuries, and the fire department person who treated the injuries at the scene will have to prove bogus. That's tossing quite a few folks into a conspiracy theory. Do you really think the police are stupid enough to lie about something so easily disproved? Further, I corrected cstu somewhere today about this happening on the grass. I was wrong. Martin's body was found feet on the sidewalk, body in the grass.
Thank you, my good man.
 
http://media.cmgdigi...54b2855e904d640

Holy crap....not one drop of blood. Anywhere. Hes wearing a grey t shirt that could easily be have mistaken as a white t shirt . That unzipped red jacket comes off at anytime during the struggle then its a t shirt that women saw , not a grey hoodie.
1) It is a red jacket. Not sure blood would exactly stand out.2) You would have to ignore John's statement that the guy on the bottom was wearing red.
John! Forgot about John!They've shown that video about 20 times in the last half hour. There's no blood. There's no injury at all.
He was treated at the scene.
They also send him to the laundromat?
:goodposting: After looking at that picture am I supposed to believe that they treated him for a broken nose at the scene and there was no blood on his grey t-shirt or blue jeans? Did they let him change clothes before they took him in?

Hell last week at my kids soccer practice a kid got hit in the nose with the ball and his nose bled for almost 5 minutes there was blood all over the kids clothes and his nose wasn’t broken.

 
Nope. Heard all this on TV. For all I know, it might be total BS.

Unlike several people here, I am not claiming to be sure of ANYTHING in this case. What the CNN experts are saying make a lot more sense to me than Christo's various arguments here. But that's just me, and it's entirely subjective.
Less than 30 minutes earlier -
Come on you guys. Why can't you just admit it? This guy's story is total BS. Yes, it's still going to be extremely difficult to convict him, but it's obvious he's lying.
Respectfully, take a step back and just stop posting for a day or so.
He was almost 100% sure about 30 pages ago.
 
Nope. Heard all this on TV. For all I know, it might be total BS.

Unlike several people here, I am not claiming to be sure of ANYTHING in this case. What the CNN experts are saying make a lot more sense to me than Christo's various arguments here. But that's just me, and it's entirely subjective.
Less than 30 minutes earlier -
Come on you guys. Why can't you just admit it? This guy's story is total BS. Yes, it's still going to be extremely difficult to convict him, but it's obvious he's lying.
Respectfully, take a step back and just stop posting for a day or so.
New here. Tim can debate himself endlessly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've gone back and forth over this. At first I thought Zimmerman was guilty because he initiated the contact, then I thought it might actually be self-defense because Trayvon was beating him against the sidewalk but now after seeing him look ok and not covered in blood I'm leaning to Zimmerman being so pissed off at this kid kicking his ### that he shot him in the heat of the moment out of anger.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It all makes sense now. Police can't really photograph injuries that aren't there.
:goodposting:
I have to agree. But what about Chaos Commish's argument? If this is true, must we believe the police is lying, the fire department is lying, the witness named "John" is lying- how do you guys rectify all of this?
John didn't say anything about the extent of Zimmerman's injuries, did he? I don't remember details about his injuries from the fire department either. I believe it's conceivable an officer or someone exaggerated the extent of his injuries when later typing up the report. But we'll see, I guess.
 
I've gone back and forth over this. At first I thought Zimmerman was guilty because he initiated the contact, then I thought it might actually be self-defense because Trayvon was beating him against the sidewalk but now after seeing him look ok and not covered in blood I'm leaning to Zimmerman being so pissed off at this kid kicking his ### that he shot him in the heat of the moment out of anger.
From the accounts I've read, the altercation didn't occur on a sidewalk.
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
My point was I don't believe he said it to her.
My point is I think he absolutely did and is hopelessly biased and incompetent.
 
Honest question: What is Zimmerman's motivation to kill Martin, if not in self defense?
He's nucking futs.
OK. I get the over aggressive neighborhood watch guy, but are you saying he just decided to kill the kid? Or that he got too close and during the struggle killed him and should be jailed on involuntary manslaughter?
Sorry, was being flip.I think he created the situation because he's paranoid and delusional. Then he shot the kid because he got in over his head and believed he was dealing with a hardened gang banger instead of a kid going to the corner store for skittles and iced tea.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The people that are posting about their broken noses and other people's broken noses doesn't mean anything. Who cares if you bleed like a stuck hog when your nose gets bumped? I don't care that a kid took a kick ball to the face and had to have a blood transfusion. What does that have to do with this case? Trayvon probably told Zimmerman "get the #### away from me and #### off!" Zimmerman pushed the issue, ended up getting his ### beat and shot the kid because, 1 he is an idiot, 2 he walks around armed in his neighborhood looking for someone to shoot, 3 he was told to quit following the kid, and 4 not only did he take the life of a child, he has also ####ed up his life as well.

skittles

 
What i find funny is ive been saying since my first post, that zimmerman murdered treyvon martin and he didnt have to. Now that ive seen the arrest video im more convinced than ever that zimmerman has lied at every turn to save his ### from going to prison. If he WAS covered in blood and had a broken nose and the back of his head was as injured as he claimed, i would have said i was wrong . I would have said Treyvon was beating him and he shot trey in self defense. I still would say he inadvertanly caused it by following trey , but he shot trey in self defense. Why cant the defenders of zimmerman watch that video and say maybe zimmerman was lying and is full of crap. Its right there in color. Is it pride?

 
It all makes sense now. Police can't really photograph injuries that aren't there.
:goodposting:
I have to agree. But what about Chaos Commish's argument? If this is true, must we believe the police is lying, the fire department is lying, the witness named "John" is lying- how do you guys rectify all of this?
John didn't say anything about the extent of Zimmerman's injuries, did he? I don't remember details about his injuries from the fire department either. I believe it's conceivable an officer or someone exaggerated the extent of his injuries when later typing up the report. But we'll see, I guess.
All the police report says is that "Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and the back of the head."
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
Again, he refused treatment. He did not claim to be beat up so badly he was not able to defend himself, as a result he went for the gun. What Zimmerman claims is that there was a struggle for the gun which was obviously life or death at that point. Why would the lack of evidence of blood everywhere make him less credible?I heard on other forums that the casing from the gun did not eject, jamming the gun. That means something was blocking the slide from racking and ejecting the casing and chambering another. That could mean the sign of two people struggling for the gun. Again, nothing offical there. Still searching for confirmation there.

 
What i find funny is ive been saying since my first post, that zimmerman murdered treyvon martin and he didnt have to. Now that ive seen the arrest video im more convinced than ever that zimmerman has lied at every turn to save his ### from going to prison. If he WAS covered in blood and had a broken nose and the back of his head was as injured as he claimed, i would have said i was wrong . I would have said Treyvon was beating him and he shot trey in self defense. I still would say he inadvertanly caused it by following trey , but he shot trey in self defense. Why cant the defenders of zimmerman watch that video and say maybe zimmerman was lying and is full of crap. Its right there in color. Is it pride?
So you think it's murder because Zimmerman didn't bleed enough.
 
What i find funny is ive been saying since my first post, that zimmerman murdered treyvon martin and he didnt have to. Now that ive seen the arrest video im more convinced than ever that zimmerman has lied at every turn to save his ### from going to prison. If he WAS covered in blood and had a broken nose and the back of his head was as injured as he claimed, i would have said i was wrong . I would have said Treyvon was beating him and he shot trey in self defense. I still would say he inadvertanly caused it by following trey , but he shot trey in self defense. Why cant the defenders of zimmerman watch that video and say maybe zimmerman was lying and is full of crap. Its right there in color. Is it pride?
Read post above
 
Honest question: What is Zimmerman's motivation to kill Martin, if not in self defense?
He's nucking futs.
OK. I get the over aggressive neighborhood watch guy, but are you saying he just decided to kill the kid? Or that he got too close and during the struggle killed him and should be jailed on involuntary manslaughter?
Sorry, was being flip.I think he created the situation because he's paranoid and delusional. Then he shot the kid because he got in over his head and believed he was dealing with a hardened gang banger instead of a kid going to the corner store for skittles and iced tea.
OK, fair enough. So is that what makes him racist? I mean, if it was a white or hispanic kid would he not have followed him or not have approached him or not have shot him?
 
The people that are posting about their broken noses and other people's broken noses doesn't mean anything. Who cares if you bleed like a stuck hog when your nose gets bumped? I don't care that a kid took a kick ball to the face and had to have a blood transfusion. What does that have to do with this case? Trayvon probably told Zimmerman "get the #### away from me and #### off!" Zimmerman pushed the issue, ended up getting his ### beat and shot the kid because, 1 he is an idiot, 2 he walks around armed in his neighborhood looking for someone to shoot, 3 he was told to quit following the kid, and 4 not only did he take the life of a child, he has also ####ed up his life as well. skittles
From all the 911 calls he has made. Sounds like he had every opportunity to brandish a gun and shoot someone or a pitbull in his garage before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
Again, he refused treatment. He did not claim to be beat up so badly he was not able to defend himself, as a result he went for the gun. What Zimmerman claims is that there was a struggle for the gun which was obviously life or death at that point. Why would the lack of evidence of blood everywhere make him less credible?I heard on other forums that the casing from the gun did not eject, jamming the gun. That means something was blocking the slide from racking and ejecting the casing and chambering another. That could mean the sign of two people struggling for the gun. Again, nothing offical there. Still searching for confirmation there.
Where are we getting that Zimmerman refused treatment. The police report states that "Zimmerman was placed in the rear of my police vehicle and was given first aid by the SFD . . . . Once Zimmerman was cleared by the SFD, he was transported to the Sanford Police Department."
 
What i find funny is ive been saying since my first post, that zimmerman murdered treyvon martin and he didnt have to. Now that ive seen the arrest video im more convinced than ever that zimmerman has lied at every turn to save his ### from going to prison. If he WAS covered in blood and had a broken nose and the back of his head was as injured as he claimed, i would have said i was wrong . I would have said Treyvon was beating him and he shot trey in self defense. I still would say he inadvertanly caused it by following trey , but he shot trey in self defense. Why cant the defenders of zimmerman watch that video and say maybe zimmerman was lying and is full of crap. Its right there in color. Is it pride?
So you think it's murder because Zimmerman didn't bleed enough.
ZIMMERMAN LIED ...period
 
What i find funny is ive been saying since my first post, that zimmerman murdered treyvon martin and he didnt have to. Now that ive seen the arrest video im more convinced than ever that zimmerman has lied at every turn to save his ### from going to prison. If he WAS covered in blood and had a broken nose and the back of his head was as injured as he claimed, i would have said i was wrong . I would have said Treyvon was beating him and he shot trey in self defense. I still would say he inadvertanly caused it by following trey , but he shot trey in self defense. Why cant the defenders of zimmerman watch that video and say maybe zimmerman was lying and is full of crap. Its right there in color. Is it pride?
So you think it's murder because Zimmerman didn't bleed enough.
ZIMMERMAN LIED ...period
About what?
 
Martin was a thug, he attacked Zimmerman, they both went after Zimmerman's gun after Martin started beating him up and Martin lost...We went over this yesterday, all supported by witnesses, that's why no charges were files, that's why the "stand your ground" defense will not be used and Zimmerman if charged will be acquitted because he was attacked and defended himself...All he is guilty of is being stupid, maybe...
So when you were 17 and some jerk came up to you in your neighborhood or any neighbohood, and confronted you for walking down the road on your way home from the store, you would have been ok and not gone confrontational.
 
What i find funny is ive been saying since my first post, that zimmerman murdered treyvon martin and he didnt have to. Now that ive seen the arrest video im more convinced than ever that zimmerman has lied at every turn to save his ### from going to prison. If he WAS covered in blood and had a broken nose and the back of his head was as injured as he claimed, i would have said i was wrong . I would have said Treyvon was beating him and he shot trey in self defense. I still would say he inadvertanly caused it by following trey , but he shot trey in self defense. Why cant the defenders of zimmerman watch that video and say maybe zimmerman was lying and is full of crap. Its right there in color. Is it pride?
So you think it's murder because Zimmerman didn't bleed enough.
ZIMMERMAN LIED ...period
About what?
so the answer to my question is PRIDE...got it.
 
It all makes sense now. Police can't really photograph injuries that aren't there.
:goodposting:
I have to agree. But what about Chaos Commish's argument? If this is true, must we believe the police is lying, the fire department is lying, the witness named "John" is lying- how do you guys rectify all of this?
John didn't say anything about the extent of Zimmerman's injuries, did he? I don't remember details about his injuries from the fire department either. I believe it's conceivable an officer or someone exaggerated the extent of his injuries when later typing up the report. But we'll see, I guess.
All the police report says is that "Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and the back of the head."
I believe the actual quote was "only bleeding about the face, breast, chest, neck, and head. Other than that he looked fine."
 
And I honestly don't think that even if the SPD is as incompetent as people believe it to be lead investigators would be going around telling witnesses mothers "This is absolutely not self defense."
I agree with this....but you cant just discount what he said, whether he should have said it or not. After seeing that arrest video im sure that the lead investigator saw the same thing. If you have a guy saying what zimmerman said and then you dont see any real signs of a life and death struggle , no blood or wounds or torn clothes, then your going to have a lot of doubt hes telling the truth.
Again, he refused treatment. He did not claim to be beat up so badly he was not able to defend himself, as a result he went for the gun. What Zimmerman claims is that there was a struggle for the gun which was obviously life or death at that point. Why would the lack of evidence of blood everywhere make him less credible?I heard on other forums that the casing from the gun did not eject, jamming the gun. That means something was blocking the slide from racking and ejecting the casing and chambering another. That could mean the sign of two people struggling for the gun. Again, nothing offical there. Still searching for confirmation there.
Where are we getting that Zimmerman refused treatment. The police report states that "Zimmerman was placed in the rear of my police vehicle and was given first aid by the SFD . . . . Once Zimmerman was cleared by the SFD, he was transported to the Sanford Police Department."
Refused treatment at a hospital. If I'm establishing a self defense case that I shot the kid because he was beating me senseless, I would be requesting photos and a trip to the hospital.
 
OK, fair enough. So is that what makes him racist? I mean, if it was a white or hispanic kid would he not have followed him or not have approached him or not have shot him?
I think Zimmerman is whacked and guilty of killing another person for no legitimate reason. I don't think race had much to do with it as far as he goes, except to help convince him that he was dealing with a hoodlum.i.e. he wasn't acting out of hate (the idea that this is a hate crime seems really farfetched to me), but his prejudices helped lead him down a path that led to killing someone.I do think a fair number of people who are defending Zimmerman like he's a family member would be interpreting things a bit differently if the skin colors were reversed though.
 
It all makes sense now. Police can't really photograph injuries that aren't there.
:goodposting:
I have to agree. But what about Chaos Commish's argument? If this is true, must we believe the police is lying, the fire department is lying, the witness named "John" is lying- how do you guys rectify all of this?
John didn't say anything about the extent of Zimmerman's injuries, did he? I don't remember details about his injuries from the fire department either. I believe it's conceivable an officer or someone exaggerated the extent of his injuries when later typing up the report. But we'll see, I guess.
All the police report says is that "Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and the back of the head."
I believe the actual quote was "only bleeding about the face, breast, chest, neck, and head. Other than that he looked fine."
You forgot "profusely."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top