What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (1 Viewer)

The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:

 
In a March 13 request for the issuance of a capias to authorize Zimmerman's arrest, police noted that "on August 3, August 4 and October 6, 2011, and February 2, 2012, George Zimmerman reported suspicious persons, all young Black males, in the Retreat neighborhood to the Sanford Police Department. According to records checks, all of Zimmerman's suspicious persons calls while residing in the Retreat neighborhood have identified Black males as the subjects."
Why am I not surprised by this? As I said, I had no proof, but if it walks like a duck...
If the surrounding neighborhoods are largely black, it is just a silly assertion. But you are quick to label Zimmerman a racist. Four events is statistically insignificant.
It's just a feel I get, jon. Sometimes you can sense it. The events are only somewhat of a confirmation of what I already feel.
A feeling you get from three thousand miles away and filtered through crappy media sensationalism?
:goodposting: :lmao:

 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
The point he was trying to make, was that there was actual proof backing up some of the claims. Not all, but a lot. Pictures, recordings, tweets are all bits and pieces of info that aren't biased. How they are spun can be, but the evidence itself isn't. Hearsay from an anonymous call 2 days after the incident is the least credible piece of anything. Regardless if it was about Zimmerman or Trayvon, they have no solid basis of even knowing either person. It would be like if I made an anonymous phonecall to the police about you saying that you had racist ideologies and people wishing something more came from it. It's ridiculous.

 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
The point he was trying to make, was that there was actual proof backing up some of the claims. Not all, but a lot. Pictures, recordings, tweets are all bits and pieces of info that aren't biased. How they are spun can be, but the evidence itself isn't. Hearsay from an anonymous call 2 days after the incident is the least credible piece of anything. Regardless if it was about Zimmerman or Trayvon, they have no solid basis of even knowing either person. It would be like if I made an anonymous phonecall to the police about you saying that you had racist ideologies and people wishing something more came from it. It's ridiculous.
im not disagreeing that an anonymous call is ridiculous. I am saying that the slandrous crap that is spewed from all sides is just as ridiculous.
 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
The point he was trying to make, was that there was actual proof backing up some of the claims. Not all, but a lot. Pictures, recordings, tweets are all bits and pieces of info that aren't biased. How they are spun can be, but the evidence itself isn't. Hearsay from an anonymous call 2 days after the incident is the least credible piece of anything. Regardless if it was about Zimmerman or Trayvon, they have no solid basis of even knowing either person. It would be like if I made an anonymous phonecall to the police about you saying that you had racist ideologies and people wishing something more came from it. It's ridiculous.
im not disagreeing that an anonymous call is ridiculous. I am saying that the slandrous crap that is spewed from all sides is just as ridiculous.
I think we all can agree with that :thumbup:
 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?

3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.

 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
They were posted by him on his youtube account, but have since been removed. Some of them are still out there, you only need to google them.Here's one, Trayvon in black and silver stripes

And read the info under the video..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
So that's the only one you contend?Even if you removed the video's, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to a not so innocent young man..

 
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
So that's the only one you contend?Even if you removed the video's, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to a not so innocent young man..
You said it, post up the links.
 
'BigSteelThrill said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'jon_mx said:
'timschochet said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
So that's the only one you contend?Even if you removed the video's, there is still plenty of evidence pointing to a not so innocent young man..
You said it, post up the links.
here, let me help you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'jon_mx said:
'timschochet said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
They were posted by him on his youtube account, but have since been removed. Some of them are still out there, you only need to google them.Here's one, Trayvon in black and silver stripes

And read the info under the video..
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'jon_mx said:
'timschochet said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
They were posted by him on his youtube account, but have since been removed. Some of them are still out there, you only need to google them.Here's one, Trayvon in black and silver stripes

And read the info under the video..
That is what you are falling back on? Seriously have you lost all sense of reality? Are you really using some choppy vid of a high school fight to make some sort of point? Godalmighty there simply are no words to describe that type of stupidity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'Carolina Hustler said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
'jon_mx said:
'timschochet said:
'BustedKnuckles said:
The documents also show that a Sanford police investigator, Trekell Perkins, received a phone call from an anonymous woman two days after the shooting who said that Zimmerman had "racist ideologies," and was "fully capable" of instigating a deadly confrontation.
Needless to say this doesn't shock me either. Hopefully some more information will come out about it.
:lmao: :lmao: Truly pitiful that anyone would put any weight into an anonymous call in such an emotionally charged case.
No different than the pro-zimms believing all the thug crap about treyvon.
Yea, a police officer at the school, Trayvons own voice, pictures, and video are = to an anonymous call..It's exactly the same.. "No different"...

:rolleyes:
ya...all spun to look worse than it was by people with an agenda.There is no proof of him referring any mma style fights. The ''stolen jewelry'' was never proven to be stolen.No proof of ever swinging at a bus driver, just goofy tweets .So ya, the same thing buddy.
1) I saw 2 videos where he was refereeing fights2) If the jewelry was his, and not stolen, why didn't he ask for it back?3) No proof that he swung at a bus driver, but more convincing evidence then that you're using to suggest Zimmerman is racist..

4) You forgot to mention:

- The 'Trayvon made' rap music that has since been removed from youtube

- The photos of him posing as a thug. I've seen at least 3 of these..

- The graffiti at school

- the illegal drug use, and drugs at school

- the multiple school suspensions. 3 or 4 within one school year..

I never said Trayvon was a thug, but suggesting all of this ^ is in some way comparable to 1 anonymous callers testament is crazy. You don't know who made that call, and/or what their motivation was. Could have been a friend of the Martin family for all we know.
Link?
They were posted by him on his youtube account, but have since been removed. Some of them are still out there, you only need to google them.Here's one, Trayvon in black and silver stripes

And read the info under the video..
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
 
Either way this case gets decided, we will have a bad outcome. People were chanting recreate 68' well before this case. We will see riots in the streets one way or the other.

 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
Link?

 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
again...the EMT`s worked on George Zimbecile for around 8 minutes or less, never even bandaged his cuts and he felt no need to go to the hospital that night....oh the horror of that attack must have been more than he could handle, that poor man. Good thing he had that handgun at the ready. :loco: its too bad he had that gun because honestly i think treyvon would have taught that idiot a lesson in minding his own business, a good old fashioned beatdown can have that effect sometimes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
again...the EMT`s worked on George Zimbecile for around 8 minutes or less, never even bandaged his cuts and he felt no need to go to the hospital that night....oh the horror of that attack must have been more than he could handle, that poor man. Good thing he had that handgun at the ready. :loco: its too bad he had that gun because honestly i think treyvon would have taught that idiot a lesson in minding his own business, a good old fashioned beatdown can have that effect sometimes.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
Good god :lmao: Id rather go back n forth with Jon_mx and C.H all day long than see this crap...at least they try to say something and dont talk in circles hahahaha
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
Woulda, coulda... do you have anything besides conjecture and the belief of a guy who is clearly not very capable? You say you wouldn't excuse some hypothetical, made up maiming but you're cool with a dude plugging a teen through the heart at close range, then claiming he feared for his life when the entire altercation lasted about as long as Hustler's farce video evidence? Think about that for a moment.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
Good god :lmao: Id rather go back n forth with Jon_mx and C.H all day long than see this crap...at least they try to say something and dont talk in circles hahahaha
What crap? How does Neofight know that Martin was entitled to invoke SYG?
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
The Florida law fairie told me. Does the law change for Martin somehow? If so, why?

 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
The Florida law fairie told me. Does the law change for Martin somehow? If so, why?
I'm asking you. What facts do we know that entitled Martin to rely upon SYG?
 
The fact that Martin was clearly out to menace George Zimmerman by circling his car prior to the pursuit. Coupled with the fact that Martin clearly felt comfortable about Zimmerman pursuing him. Sprinkle in the screams, which we most certainly know were the voice of Zimmerman...

The irony.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The fact that Martin was clearly out to menace George Zimmerman by circling his car prior to the pursuit. Coupled with the fact that Martin clearly felt comfortable about Zimmerman pursuing him. Sprinkle in the screams, which we most certainly know were the voice of Zimmerman...The irony.
You don't have to answer. I was just curious if you knew something the rest of us didn't or you were just guessing.
 
The fact that Martin was clearly out to menace George Zimmerman by circling his car prior to the pursuit. Coupled with the fact that Martin clearly felt comfortable about Zimmerman pursuing him. Sprinkle in the screams, which we most certainly know were the voice of Zimmerman...The irony.
You don't have to answer. I was just curious if you knew something the rest of us didn't or you were just guessing.
How could I not be guessing about what Martin would claim were he still alive? I'm guessing he'd have a story similar to Zimmerman's, sans the prejudice, pursuit and firearm.We do know these facts (or those little untruths that Zimmerman has tried to pass): Martin did not circle his car, Zimmerman did get out to follow him and Martin was indeed aware of it and worried. Most of the rest has been conjecture on either side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
Why did you stop with telling all the facts? Based on the call with the police dispatcher, the following was said (you already know this but it didn't fit with your point):At 2:07 minutes into his call to the police, Zimmerman says, "he's running.". At 2:37 minutes, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, "he ran." The sound of an "open door" chime, a change in Zimmerman's voice and the sound of wind indicate that Zimmerman has left his vehicle, prompting the dispatcher to ask if Zimmerman is following Martin. When Zimmerman confirms that he is, the dispatcher says, "We don't need you to do that."[111] Zimmerman says "OK".Based on the 'facts' - Zimmerman stopped his pursuit of Martin when instructed. Anything after THAT is conjecture. You can say Zimmerman continued to follow Martin but we have no proof.
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
Why did you stop with telling all the facts? Based on the call with the police dispatcher, the following was said (you already know this but it didn't fit with your point):At 2:07 minutes into his call to the police, Zimmerman says, "he's running.". At 2:37 minutes, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, "he ran." The sound of an "open door" chime, a change in Zimmerman's voice and the sound of wind indicate that Zimmerman has left his vehicle, prompting the dispatcher to ask if Zimmerman is following Martin. When Zimmerman confirms that he is, the dispatcher says, "We don't need you to do that."[111] Zimmerman says "OK".

Based on the 'facts' - Zimmerman stopped his pursuit of Martin when instructed. Anything after THAT is conjecture. You can say Zimmerman continued to follow Martin but we have no proof.
I'll just let Christo take care of this...Wait, you already answered his question yourself in the very next few sentences. Well done.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
Why did you stop with telling all the facts? Based on the call with the police dispatcher, the following was said (you already know this but it didn't fit with your point):At 2:07 minutes into his call to the police, Zimmerman says, "he's running.". At 2:37 minutes, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, "he ran." The sound of an "open door" chime, a change in Zimmerman's voice and the sound of wind indicate that Zimmerman has left his vehicle, prompting the dispatcher to ask if Zimmerman is following Martin. When Zimmerman confirms that he is, the dispatcher says, "We don't need you to do that."[111] Zimmerman says "OK".

Based on the 'facts' - Zimmerman stopped his pursuit of Martin when instructed. Anything after THAT is conjecture. You can say Zimmerman continued to follow Martin but we have no proof.
I'll just let Christo take care of this...Wait, you already answered his question yourself in the very next few sentences. Well done.
ummm...you just repeated what i said witz only you added him saying ok, that doesnt change the fact that zimm was the follower by his own words...period ...the ...end.
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
Why did you stop with telling all the facts? Based on the call with the police dispatcher, the following was said (you already know this but it didn't fit with your point):At 2:07 minutes into his call to the police, Zimmerman says, "he's running.". At 2:37 minutes, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, "he ran." The sound of an "open door" chime, a change in Zimmerman's voice and the sound of wind indicate that Zimmerman has left his vehicle, prompting the dispatcher to ask if Zimmerman is following Martin. When Zimmerman confirms that he is, the dispatcher says, "We don't need you to do that."[111] Zimmerman says "OK".

Based on the 'facts' - Zimmerman stopped his pursuit of Martin when instructed. Anything after THAT is conjecture. You can say Zimmerman continued to follow Martin but we have no proof.
I'll just let Christo take care of this...Wait, you already answered his question yourself in the very next few sentences. Well done.
ummm...you just repeated what i said witz only you added him saying ok, that doesnt change the fact that zimm was the follower by his own words...period ...the ...end.
:lmao:
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
Why did you stop with telling all the facts? Based on the call with the police dispatcher, the following was said (you already know this but it didn't fit with your point):At 2:07 minutes into his call to the police, Zimmerman says, "he's running.". At 2:37 minutes, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, "he ran." The sound of an "open door" chime, a change in Zimmerman's voice and the sound of wind indicate that Zimmerman has left his vehicle, prompting the dispatcher to ask if Zimmerman is following Martin. When Zimmerman confirms that he is, the dispatcher says, "We don't need you to do that."[111] Zimmerman says "OK".

Based on the 'facts' - Zimmerman stopped his pursuit of Martin when instructed. Anything after THAT is conjecture. You can say Zimmerman continued to follow Martin but we have no proof.
I'll just let Christo take care of this...Wait, you already answered his question yourself in the very next few sentences. Well done.
ummm...you just repeated what i said witz only you added him saying ok, that doesnt change the fact that zimm was the follower by his own words...period ...the ...end.
:lmao:
But he said, "...period ...the ...end."
 
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
Depends when Martin would have stopped. If he would have done permanent damage to Zimmerman, it would have been a felony. As big of an idiot as Zimmerman might have been, it does not excuse it.
well lets just deal with the facts as we know them. Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture. You can say treyvon doubled back and followed zimm all you want but we have no proof. Yet we do have proof that zimm was the agressor in the sense that he was following someone who was moving away from zimmerman, not the other ay around.End of argument.
Why did you stop with telling all the facts? Based on the call with the police dispatcher, the following was said (you already know this but it didn't fit with your point):At 2:07 minutes into his call to the police, Zimmerman says, "he's running.". At 2:37 minutes, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, "he ran." The sound of an "open door" chime, a change in Zimmerman's voice and the sound of wind indicate that Zimmerman has left his vehicle, prompting the dispatcher to ask if Zimmerman is following Martin. When Zimmerman confirms that he is, the dispatcher says, "We don't need you to do that."[111] Zimmerman says "OK".

Based on the 'facts' - Zimmerman stopped his pursuit of Martin when instructed. Anything after THAT is conjecture. You can say Zimmerman continued to follow Martin but we have no proof.
I'll just let Christo take care of this...Wait, you already answered his question yourself in the very next few sentences. Well done.
ummm...you just repeated what i said witz only you added him saying ok, that doesnt change the fact that zimm was the follower by his own words...period ...the ...end.
Wait, what?You said the following: Zimmerman by his own testimony said treyvon had fled and that he was going after him...period. Anything after that is conjecture.

The point is you stopped short of what we know - the dispatcher said he didn't need to follow and he said ok. That is a pretty huge component to leave out when making the statement that anything after that is conjuncture.

Just because he followed him initially doesn't mean he was following him when the confrontation took place (i.e. just because I chewed gum yesterday doesn't mean I'm chewing gum now). Based on your logic thought, I'm guessing Zimmerman is still following Martin right now.

 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
again...the EMT`s worked on George Zimbecile for around 8 minutes or less, never even bandaged his cuts and he felt no need to go to the hospital that night....oh the horror of that attack must have been more than he could handle, that poor man. Good thing he had that handgun at the ready. :loco: its too bad he had that gun because honestly i think treyvon would have taught that idiot a lesson in minding his own business, a good old fashioned beatdown can have that effect sometimes.
:lmao: I love it when people on message boards talk about things like good old fashioned beatdowns. The anger over things looking more like Zimmerman's account being truthful is mystifying. We all should be about the truth on this, regardless of our political lean. If Zimmerman truly instigated the fight and killed Martin then we all should agree he should be found guilty. That just doesn't seem to be the way the evidence released so far is suggesting. If Zimmerman's story proves to be true, then why wouldn't everyone agree he should be found not guilty and released? Even some of the MSNBC hardliners have abandoned talking about this case in the light of what is coming out and it not agreeing with their agenda.
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
He doesnt. He is just stating that Martin was in a situation where stand your ground applied in order to justify his already formed opinion.

 
:lmao: I love it when people on message boards talk about things like good old fashioned beatdowns. The anger over things looking more like Zimmerman's account being truthful is mystifying. We all should be about the truth on this, regardless of our political lean. If Zimmerman truly instigated the fight and killed Martin then we all should agree he should be found guilty. That just doesn't seem to be the way the evidence released so far is suggesting. If Zimmerman's story proves to be true, then why wouldn't everyone agree he should be found not guilty and released? Even some of the MSNBC hardliners have abandoned talking about this case in the light of what is coming out and it not agreeing with their agenda.
:goodposting:
 
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Seriously???? THATS your video proof??? hahahahahahaha.You cant tell one person from the next...nice try.

But lets play this out, even if that wasnt just some black high school kid and it really was him, that video doesnt help zimmermans case in the least. If thats the level of fighting that treyvon is accustomed too then thats all the proof one needs to say zimmerman was in no way in fear for his life. Little high school yard fights, not exactly Kimbo Slice lmao. :lmao:
But George had his nose broken!
It doesn't take Mike Tyson to kill someone by banging their head into the ground. I somehow managed to get through life without banging someones head into the ground. The innocent skittle's boy was likely in the process of committing a felony when he was shot.
Some solid evidence here.
Oh yeah, physical evidence of injuries, eye-witnesses who saw a fight, testimony from participant....yep, not much different than an anonymous tipster.
What do Mike Tyson, your managing to get through life without banging someone's head into the ground (which is considerably softer than concrete) and Skittles have to do with your lack of evidence that Trayvon Martin was committing a felony?Where's the logic?
It was a response to the Kimbo Slice logic. There is plenty of evidence that Trayvon was engaged in assault and battery. Multiple eye-witnesses and injuries. Enough evidence to convict him in a court of law if he were alive.
According to Florida law Martin was not obligated to back down. Regardless, even in a statutorily sane state Martin might have at most faced misdemeanor charges for besting that idiot.
How do you know?
He doesnt. He is just stating that Martin was in a situation where stand your ground applied in order to justify his already formed opinion.
You do realize, being that Martin was shot dead that night, that we are dealing in hypotheticals here, yes?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top