What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lions at Packers (1 Viewer)

and there's another example of Stafford getting absolutely trucked and no call. that was ten times worse than Suh's little shove and just as late. :no:
Jesus, dude. You whine more than a two year old.Suh is the dirtiest player in the league (one of them anyways) and Fairly isn't far behind, yet its the OTHER team that is throwing the cheap shots.
i just don't understand why they can't call things equally. stupid pansy "unnecessary roughness" penalties abound, yet when Stafford gets drilled up high well after the throw he NEVER gets a flag. you'd think he was Vick. And Suh's dirtiness is WAY overblown. that was his first PF this entire season tonight...and it was a nonsense call. if he were really a dirty player he'd have more than 2 penalties in 13 games. I didn't see whatever hit by Fairley you're talking about, but if it was bad then it should be called too. the double standard with #### like that and then calling these hits on WRs is ridiculous. the games are becoming unwatchable because it's all so inconsistent.
 
Not that it matters, but that is a stupid timeout. Now you don't get to use the 2 minute warning because the clock stops when Detroit takes over. Shows how bad the coaching is.

 
Not that it matters, but that is a stupid timeout. Now you don't get to use the 2 minute warning because the clock stops when Detroit takes over. Shows how bad the coaching is.
We were told that Schwartz was supposed to be this smart guy. Looks like we were sold a bill of goods.
 
and there's another example of Stafford getting absolutely trucked and no call. that was ten times worse than Suh's little shove and just as late. :no:
Jesus, dude. You whine more than a two year old.Suh is the dirtiest player in the league (one of them anyways) and Fairly isn't far behind, yet its the OTHER team that is throwing the cheap shots.
I see your "not being a #####" movement is long gone.Here's a hint: just because one team has cheap players doesn't override the possibility of cheap shots coming from the other team.Oh wait, were you joking?
It seems my very own stalker is back! And still not over his anger issues. Even Sadder Weeney?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Side note, 1600 Penn on NBC looks...awful.
I have a bunch of friends that work on it, some in post production so they see the whole episode put together. They all say it's utterly hilarious. I agree that the promos haven't made it look very good though.
 
Always sucks watching the opposing fantasy QB get the ball in these types of situations

 
and there's another example of Stafford getting absolutely trucked and no call. that was ten times worse than Suh's little shove and just as late. :no:
Jesus, dude. You whine more than a two year old.Suh is the dirtiest player in the league (one of them anyways) and Fairly isn't far behind, yet its the OTHER team that is throwing the cheap shots.
I see your "not being a #####" movement is long gone.Here's a hint: just because one team has cheap players doesn't override the possibility of cheap shots coming from the other team.Oh wait, were you joking?
It seems my very own stalker is back! And still not over his anger issues. Even Sadder Weeney?
:lmao: Yeah, I started posting in this thread from the beginning of the game hoping you'd come in here for me to stalk.
 
and there's another example of Stafford getting absolutely trucked and no call. that was ten times worse than Suh's little shove and just as late. :no:
Jesus, dude. You whine more than a two year old.Suh is the dirtiest player in the league (one of them anyways) and Fairly isn't far behind, yet its the OTHER team that is throwing the cheap shots.
I see your "not being a #####" movement is long gone.Here's a hint: just because one team has cheap players doesn't override the possibility of cheap shots coming from the other team.Oh wait, were you joking?
It seems my very own stalker is back! And still not over his anger issues. Even Sadder Weeney?
:lmao: Yeah, I started posting in this thread from the beginning of the game hoping you'd come in here for me to stalk.
So this is what Sad Weeney looks like in denial. Interesting...If you want to talk about your anger issues, PM me.
 
w/ 118 more tonight, Calvin is now 302 yards from tying Jerry Rice w/ 3 games to go. should be interesting. They should just feed him all game long since the season is ####.

 
Packers get 2 pro-bowlers back on D now. Could be the start of something good! :thumbup:
yea.. charles woodson and matthews are gonna sure up this defense :lmao:
So it won't get better getting them back? Seriously?
Im not saying they wont get better but it still wont matter.. they're not good. :banned:
Yeah...adding one of the best pass rushers in the game won't help a defense that is severely lacking in a pass rush right now.You sir are crazy.
 
a lot of comments on the defense.. the Offensive line stinks and the Lions dominated most of the game. The Packers are not going to outscore teams when the QB is running for his life constantly

 
and there's another example of Stafford getting absolutely trucked and no call. that was ten times worse than Suh's little shove and just as late. :no:
Jesus, dude. You whine more than a two year old.Suh is the dirtiest player in the league (one of them anyways) and Fairly isn't far behind, yet its the OTHER team that is throwing the cheap shots.
I see your "not being a #####" movement is long gone.Here's a hint: just because one team has cheap players doesn't override the possibility of cheap shots coming from the other team.Oh wait, were you joking?
It seems my very own stalker is back! And still not over his anger issues. Even Sadder Weeney?
:lmao: Yeah, I started posting in this thread from the beginning of the game hoping you'd come in here for me to stalk.
So this is what Sad Weeney looks like in denial. Interesting...If you want to talk about your anger issues, PM me.
When I get angry at you, I'll let you know. So far though you're a mild annoyance at best. And even then it's more like a 10:1 ratio of sad laughter to annoyance. Sorry to burst your bubble.eta: I am a little peeved that the last Det FG cost me a parlay that would've paid about $200. So I guess there's that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
a lot of comments on the defense.. the Offensive line stinks and the Lions dominated most of the game. The Packers are not going to outscore teams when the QB is running for his life constantly
The Oline is bad...but has improved in a few areas.Barclay looks better at RT than Lang was since Bulaga has been out.Lang is much better at LG than he is at RT...and better than Dietrich Smith there.So getting him back (he was active tonight...and ready if they had an injury...but another week should do him good)...but getting him back will help some.They still won't be a great or even that good OL...but they don't necessarily have to be.
 
Packers get 2 pro-bowlers back on D now. Could be the start of something good! :thumbup:
yea.. charles woodson and matthews are gonna sure up this defense :lmao:
I have a brazillion dollars that says they won't sure up the defense. Even Cameo says that's dumb. They will however probably shore up the defense. The pressure has been lacking and that can only help with Clay and Woodson back.
Especially with Shields back and playing well...Tramon again playing well...and having House and Hayward doing well and getting all this experience.But yeah...no real impact from adding back a guy like Clay Matthews.
 
Yeah...adding one of the best pass rushers in the game won't help a defense that is severely lacking in a pass rush right now.You sir are crazy.
Are you watching the same team? The Packers arent that good.... I dont get it. Matthews had 6/9 sacks in 2 games
 
Packers get 2 pro-bowlers back on D now. Could be the start of something good! :thumbup:
yea.. charles woodson and matthews are gonna sure up this defense :lmao:
I have a brazillion dollars that says they won't sure up the defense. Even Cameo says that's dumb. They will however probably shore up the defense. The pressure has been lacking and that can only help with Clay and Woodson back.
sorry Im operating at a 9 beer ratio here.. gimme a break
 
Yeah...adding one of the best pass rushers in the game won't help a defense that is severely lacking in a pass rush right now.You sir are crazy.
Are you watching the same team? The Packers arent that good.... I dont get it. Matthews had 6/9 sacks in 2 games
Enjoy your night of fishing...They were leading the league in sacks when he was in there.Its not just about his numbers chief.
 
Packers get 2 pro-bowlers back on D now. Could be the start of something good! :thumbup:
yea.. charles woodson and matthews are gonna sure up this defense :lmao:
I have a brazillion dollars that says they won't sure up the defense. Even Cameo says that's dumb. They will however probably shore up the defense. The pressure has been lacking and that can only help with Clay and Woodson back.
sorry Im operating at a 9 beer ratio here.. gimme a break
I'm on 12 ;)
 
Yeah...adding one of the best pass rushers in the game won't help a defense that is severely lacking in a pass rush right now.You sir are crazy.
Are you watching the same team? The Packers arent that good.... I dont get it. Matthews had 6/9 sacks in 2 games
Enjoy your night of fishing...They were leading the league in sacks when he was in there.Its not just about his numbers chief.
Hey, Id love to see the Pack get it going but I dont like what I see. Not trying to stir it up you know but Im disappointed lately
 
People can say whatever they want about Suh, but calling that penalty on him had nothing to do with the actual play and everything to do with the name on his jersey.

It's a ####### joke. :thumbdown:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top