What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Packer/Bear week used to be fun around here (1 Viewer)

'RBM said:
'Mr.Pack said:
'flapgreen said:
Trash talking galore by both teams. Awesome! Finley saying the Bears are better off without Urlacher. :yawn: Briggs calling Finley "an idiot." :lmao:

Maybe Finley should worry more about catching the ball and being a part of a powerful offense than about the Bears linebackers. Guy has been a turd for his entire career.
Click to expand...
You missed Marshal talking out his ### too.He's a clown. A good WR, but still a clown.
Click to expand...
Really? He wasn't bracketed by double and triple coverage all game? Try covering him man to man Sunday....see how that works out for ya.Hasn't been a clown as a Bear. That's all that matters now.
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension. I know you're a Bear fan, but I couldn't type it any slower for you.
 
Owned

If the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minute

Pack would win by 40

 
I mean really - are there any bear fans that really think they can win a shoot out with the Packers? You seriously think if both teams went man coverage you could take the Packers?

You have one good wr and a good qb. The Packers can be without their two best WR and still smoke you. Plus, your offensive line makes the Packers O line look great, and the Packers O line is below average compared to most teams.

 
'RBM said:
'flapgreen said:
'sho nuff said:
'Annyong said:
i think it all started with Cutler telling the Packers "good luck" trying to stop Marshallthen, the Packers shut him down, and Woodson made some comments about Cutler sucking and just throwing them the ball or somethingthen Marshall started his yacking about double and triples yada yada yadathen Finley said Urlacher is old and slow (which he is) and the Bears are better off w/o himthen Briggs called Finley an idiotthen Urlacher said something then i went to mcdonalds for a frappe'
Click to expand...
something like that...Jennings chimed in too...saying Marshall was smart begging to be man on man...and that he was daring Chicago to go man up on him too and not play cover 2 :)
Click to expand...
Jennings? :lmao:
Click to expand...
:lmao: Jennings isn't scaring anyone
Click to expand...
Really? You think the Bears want to go Man to Man and no cover 2 against him?Hah2011...9 catches 119 yards in the one game he played against them.2010...2 for 18 and a TD in the early game, 4 for 97 in the last game of the regular season, 9 for 130 in the playoff game2009...6 for 106 and a TD, 3 for 562008...5 for 65 and a TD, 6 for 38 and a TD Could go back further...but he has had some success against the Bears don't you think. And that is while playing mostly cover 2.That playoff game he just torched them over and over on that first drive.
 
I'm looking forward to watching the Super Bowl preview game when the 9ers visit the Pats. Packers vs Bears pales in comparison.

 
'smackdaddies said:
OwnedIf the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minutePack would win by 40
Click to expand...
You have no freaking clue what you're talking about. The Bears don't even play Cover 2 most of the time. Get your facts straight, homer. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'sho nuff said:
'Chicago Hooligan said:
Sweetness and benson already took the year off from the board, right? Too bad, in a way.
Click to expand...
Sweetness is never around when things go bad for his topics or Bears.Benson has not been around for a while now...not sure what happened to him.
Click to expand...
Benson hasn't been around since his boy got injured. Too painful for him to go back to being a Bears fan - after switching sides due to player loyalty - and rooting for a real team.
 
'flapgreen said:
'smackdaddies said:
Owned

If the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minute

Pack would win by 40
Click to expand...
You have no freaking clue what you're talking about. The Bears don't even play Cover 2 most of the time. Get your facts straight, homer. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Really?
Bears really bring it. The Chicago Bears got another turnover on Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks. When Brian Urlacher punched the ball away from running back Marshawn Lynch and Kelvin Hayden recovered, it marked the 300th turnover by this defense under Lovie Smith. This somewhat generic Cover-2 defense is unbelievably opportunistic; the Bears really live the big-play mentality and are OK giving up a couple of extra yards per play while the first guy there tries to strip the ball. Charles Tillman also forced a fumble later in that game, but Seattle managed to recover the ball.
Click to expand...
huh
Now, just six years later, only two teams -- the Bears and Vikings -- consider the cover 2 to be their base defense
Click to expand...
 
'Alex P Keaton said:
'flapgreen said:
'smackdaddies said:
Owned

If the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minute

Pack would win by 40
Click to expand...
You have no freaking clue what you're talking about. The Bears don't even play Cover 2 most of the time. Get your facts straight, homer. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Really?
Bears really bring it. The Chicago Bears got another turnover on Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks. When Brian Urlacher punched the ball away from running back Marshawn Lynch and Kelvin Hayden recovered, it marked the 300th turnover by this defense under Lovie Smith. This somewhat generic Cover-2 defense is unbelievably opportunistic; the Bears really live the big-play mentality and are OK giving up a couple of extra yards per play while the first guy there tries to strip the ball. Charles Tillman also forced a fumble later in that game, but Seattle managed to recover the ball.
Click to expand...
huh
Now, just six years later, only two teams -- the Bears and Vikings -- consider the cover 2 to be their base defense
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Ooooops
 
'Mr.Pack said:
'Alex P Keaton said:
'flapgreen said:
'smackdaddies said:
Owned

If the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minute

Pack would win by 40
Click to expand...
You have no freaking clue what you're talking about. The Bears don't even play Cover 2 most of the time. Get your facts straight, homer. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Really?
Bears really bring it. The Chicago Bears got another turnover on Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks. When Brian Urlacher punched the ball away from running back Marshawn Lynch and Kelvin Hayden recovered, it marked the 300th turnover by this defense under Lovie Smith. This somewhat generic Cover-2 defense is unbelievably opportunistic; the Bears really live the big-play mentality and are OK giving up a couple of extra yards per play while the first guy there tries to strip the ball. Charles Tillman also forced a fumble later in that game, but Seattle managed to recover the ball.
Click to expand...
huh
Now, just six years later, only two teams -- the Bears and Vikings -- consider the cover 2 to be their base defense
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Ooooops
Click to expand...
oooooooh because I don't know much about the defense my favorite team runs. They run it far less frequently than they used to. I doubt you two follow the Bears as closely as I do.
 
'sho nuff said:
'RBM said:
'flapgreen said:
'sho nuff said:
'Annyong said:
i think it all started with Cutler telling the Packers "good luck" trying to stop Marshallthen, the Packers shut him down, and Woodson made some comments about Cutler sucking and just throwing them the ball or somethingthen Marshall started his yacking about double and triples yada yada yadathen Finley said Urlacher is old and slow (which he is) and the Bears are better off w/o himthen Briggs called Finley an idiotthen Urlacher said something then i went to mcdonalds for a frappe'
Click to expand...
something like that...Jennings chimed in too...saying Marshall was smart begging to be man on man...and that he was daring Chicago to go man up on him too and not play cover 2 :)
Click to expand...
Jennings? :lmao:
Click to expand...
:lmao: Jennings isn't scaring anyone
Click to expand...
Really? You think the Bears want to go Man to Man and no cover 2 against him?Hah2011...9 catches 119 yards in the one game he played against them.2010...2 for 18 and a TD in the early game, 4 for 97 in the last game of the regular season, 9 for 130 in the playoff game2009...6 for 106 and a TD, 3 for 562008...5 for 65 and a TD, 6 for 38 and a TD Could go back further...but he has had some success against the Bears don't you think. And that is while playing mostly cover 2.That playoff game he just torched them over and over on that first drive.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Tillman would have no problem shutting him down. Cover 2 sucks
 
'Mr.Pack said:
'RBM said:
'Mr.Pack said:
'flapgreen said:
Trash talking galore by both teams. Awesome! Finley saying the Bears are better off without Urlacher. :yawn: Briggs calling Finley "an idiot." :lmao:

Maybe Finley should worry more about catching the ball and being a part of a powerful offense than about the Bears linebackers. Guy has been a turd for his entire career.
Click to expand...
You missed Marshal talking out his ### too.He's a clown. A good WR, but still a clown.
Click to expand...
Really? He wasn't bracketed by double and triple coverage all game? Try covering him man to man Sunday....see how that works out for ya.Hasn't been a clown as a Bear. That's all that matters now.
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension. I know you're a Bear fan, but I couldn't type it any slower for you.
Click to expand...
So where was he talking out of his ###? Figured you were referring to him saying he was doubled and tripled all game.
 
'Wrigley said:
I'll be there for the beat down.
Click to expand...
Even though the Pack are the far superior team at this point, obviously, it doesn't mean the Bears can't win. Don't think it doesn't pain me to say that. Recent history and an injury riddled aging defense doesn't bode well for the Bears. Lovie can rarely seem to beat Green Bay . When he first came to Chicago, he said beating the Packers was his first goal. Well, that hasn't happened lately. This game is more about pride than anything else. If the Bears do happen to make a push and make the playoffs, they're not good enough to make it far. Everyone knows it. If it takes another Packers blowout to get Lovie out of town, so be it.With that said, I'd still love to see Rodgers face driven into the ground after his silly ### "discount doublecheck" dance. That guy is such a cheeseball. I don't give a damn about Finley or Jennings. Finley is a bum, even Packers fans know it. Jennings is not as important to the offense as he once was and has barely played this year. I'm not sure why either guy was talking. If anyone, Rodgers or Cobb should be doing the talking. However, they're smarter than that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'flapgreen said:
'Mr.Pack said:
'Alex P Keaton said:
'flapgreen said:
'smackdaddies said:
Owned

If the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minute

Pack would win by 40
Click to expand...
You have no freaking clue what you're talking about. The Bears don't even play Cover 2 most of the time. Get your facts straight, homer. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Really?
Bears really bring it. The Chicago Bears got another turnover on Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks. When Brian Urlacher punched the ball away from running back Marshawn Lynch and Kelvin Hayden recovered, it marked the 300th turnover by this defense under Lovie Smith. This somewhat generic Cover-2 defense is unbelievably opportunistic; the Bears really live the big-play mentality and are OK giving up a couple of extra yards per play while the first guy there tries to strip the ball. Charles Tillman also forced a fumble later in that game, but Seattle managed to recover the ball.
Click to expand...
huh
Now, just six years later, only two teams -- the Bears and Vikings -- consider the cover 2 to be their base defense
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Ooooops
Click to expand...
oooooooh because I don't know much about the defense my favorite team runs. They run it far less frequently than they used to. I doubt you two follow the Bears as closely as I do.
Click to expand...
I look forward to seeing how often they run cover 2 today.....you know, since that was the whole point of debating your dip#### comments.
 
'RBM said:
Yeah, Tillman would have no problem shutting him down. Cover 2 sucks
Click to expand...
Tillman is having a great year and all...but if he goes strictly one on one man against Jennings....he better get that punch ready...because he will be giving up a lot of completions.Also better get it ready against Cobb...please go man up with Cobb, Jones, and Jennings without those 2 deep safeties.
 
'flapgreen said:
'Mr.Pack said:
'Alex P Keaton said:
'flapgreen said:
'smackdaddies said:
Owned

If the bears want to man up and drop the cover two coverage the packers would take that in a new York minute

Pack would win by 40
Click to expand...
You have no freaking clue what you're talking about. The Bears don't even play Cover 2 most of the time. Get your facts straight, homer. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Really?
Bears really bring it. The Chicago Bears got another turnover on Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks. When Brian Urlacher punched the ball away from running back Marshawn Lynch and Kelvin Hayden recovered, it marked the 300th turnover by this defense under Lovie Smith. This somewhat generic Cover-2 defense is unbelievably opportunistic; the Bears really live the big-play mentality and are OK giving up a couple of extra yards per play while the first guy there tries to strip the ball. Charles Tillman also forced a fumble later in that game, but Seattle managed to recover the ball.
Click to expand...
huh
Now, just six years later, only two teams -- the Bears and Vikings -- consider the cover 2 to be their base defense
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Ooooops
Click to expand...
oooooooh because I don't know much about the defense my favorite team runs. They run it far less frequently than they used to. I doubt you two follow the Bears as closely as I do.
Click to expand...
Yet obviously we watch more Packer/Bear games than you do, because that is exactly how the Bears (like 90% of the league) play the packers.
 
'RBM said:
'Mr.Pack said:
'RBM said:
'Mr.Pack said:
'flapgreen said:
Trash talking galore by both teams. Awesome! Finley saying the Bears are better off without Urlacher. :yawn: Briggs calling Finley "an idiot." :lmao:

Maybe Finley should worry more about catching the ball and being a part of a powerful offense than about the Bears linebackers. Guy has been a turd for his entire career.
Click to expand...
You missed Marshal talking out his ### too.He's a clown. A good WR, but still a clown.
Click to expand...
Really? He wasn't bracketed by double and triple coverage all game? Try covering him man to man Sunday....see how that works out for ya.Hasn't been a clown as a Bear. That's all that matters now.
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension. I know you're a Bear fan, but I couldn't type it any slower for you.
Click to expand...
So where was he talking out of his ###? Figured you were referring to him saying he was doubled and tripled all game.
Click to expand...
Really? The whole statement was out of his his ###. The stuff he was crying about Woodson talking about was Woodsons response to Cutlers comment earlier in the year!

He's as stupid as Finley. Just shut the hell up and play.

 
'gigantor said:
Lovie owns the Pack. :popcorn:
Click to expand...
Update?Lovie started out hot against GB for sure...but it sure has turned.Now time to cheer for the Bears (and Dallas and Washington) a bit the rest of the season. Would much rather see them make it as a WC than the Giants.
 
The Bears looked very strong in the beginning, but in the end I think the better team won the game. I don't think Cutler is the answer down there in Chicago. Time to look elsewhere.

 
urlacher seems like a baby these days

boohoo the fans booed us

booohoo the refs hate us

booohooo the media is mean

shuddup already

 
There it is :excited:

Has anyone ever found anything using the search function around here?

Lot's of internal crap going on inside the Pack locker room between McCarthy & Rodgers. Bears got dinged up last night but found a way to win. I see lots of Lacy and Forte in this, the greatest rivalry the NFL has to offer.

GO PACK GO!!

 
Kind of wish FBG would delete threads after a certain amount of in activity. Sucks reading through pages of threads to find relevant current information.

Also, something like this could use a new revival, new trash talk, etc.

That being said, cutler should be thrilled this week. He gets his favorite targets back, the gb secondary

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Phenomena said:
Should be interesting to see Rodgers vs. Bears secondary, whom are now starting the hot-dog vendor at cornerback.
Click to expand...
can the packers underperforming o-line block the bears underperforming pass rush? that is the ball game because rodgers can pick apart this 2nd and 3rd level if no pass rush

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JohnnyU
College WR Evan Stewart, Oregon **** INJURY ****
Replies
15
Views
463
Hankmoody
Hankmoody
D
Training camp for the media/public
Replies
0
Views
71
dblock05
D
Harjiran
Too many flags
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
Runkle
Runkle

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top