What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Build a FRANCHISE draft (1 Viewer)

1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
I don't agree with it, but Flacco would not be available in the second round. If Flacco was his top player, he has to take him. For that reason, I can't criticize any of the picks so far.
 
1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
He's played 5 yrs and has 9 playoff wins. You're gonna downgrade him for not putting up video game stats? After what we just saw him do, I figured his doubters were long gone.
 
1.07 J.J. Watt, DE

ETA: Central Time Zone

We'll see how this goes.

At what point do I need to declare 3-4 or 4-3? I'd rather be able to be flexible depending on how the draft goes...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
He's played 5 yrs and has 9 playoff wins. You're gonna downgrade him for not putting up video game stats? After what we just saw him do, I figured his doubters were long gone.
I don't deride the pick, although I didn't have him in this tier. I do find it somewhat funny though that 6 months (or less) ago, he probably wouldn't have even been considered in the first 20 picks - unless they are all QBs.
 
There's got to be somewhere to put the draft as it goes. Perhaps a GoogleDoc to be thrown up on the Drive by our fearless leader? Only he can edit, anyone can view (avoid tampering)?

ETA: Perhaps get the order in the first post as well? Pain to find who I am supposed to PM.

PM going out to HellToupe now

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
He's played 5 yrs and has 9 playoff wins. You're gonna downgrade him for not putting up video game stats? After what we just saw him do, I figured his doubters were long gone.
There's at least 5 QBs that I would take before him. 3 of whom have won Super Bowls, if that is part of your criteria. Flacco is a fine player, but he's about the 12th-15th best QB in the league. Also would take JJ Watt and at least 2 other non QBs off the top of my head before him.

 
1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
He's played 5 yrs and has 9 playoff wins. You're gonna downgrade him for not putting up video game stats? After what we just saw him do, I figured his doubters were long gone.
There's at least 5 QBs that I would take before him. 3 of whom have won Super Bowls, if that is part of your criteria. Flacco is a fine player, but he's about the 12th-15th best QB in the league. Also would take JJ Watt and at least 2 other non QBs off the top of my head before him.
I would have taken JJ #1 overall, but then again I'm a little biased. :lmao:
 
1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
He's played 5 yrs and has 9 playoff wins. You're gonna downgrade him for not putting up video game stats? After what we just saw him do, I figured his doubters were long gone.
Then why didn't you take Eli over Flacco?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Without being too much of a jerk, I saw another one of these drafts done recently and Flacco went in round 2 at 58th overall. He was the 11th QB off the board.

 
There's got to be somewhere to put the draft as it goes. Perhaps a GoogleDoc to be thrown up on the Drive by our fearless leader? Only he can edit, anyone can view (avoid tampering)?

ETA: Perhaps get the order in the first post as well? Pain to find who I am supposed to PM.

PM going out to HellToupe now
HERE IS THE SPREADSHEETSpreadsheet link

Anyone can edit it. I am not going to keep it up to date. Just add in the picks as they happen.

Remember to snake back up at the end of the 1st. You are welcome to copy it if you want to edit it on your own.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.6 Chicago Bears - Joe Flacco, QB

I mean I'm really shocked that Griffin and Wilson were chosen when there are guys that have won Super Bowls out there, with just as much talent, probably more lets be honest. I had 4 guys I was deciding between here. I took age, talent, leadership, and postseason success into account, and after what he just did (the Montana like 11-0 td-int), I had to take Flacco. His playoff record at his age is really incredible.
:eek: :no: :eek:
He's played 5 yrs and has 9 playoff wins. You're gonna downgrade him for not putting up video game stats? After what we just saw him do, I figured his doubters were long gone.
Then why didn't you take Eli over Flacco?
Considered him and 2 others, but age won out. Had all 4 as similar talents/leaders. Like his size, escapibility, can scramble a little bit. No throw he can't make. Probably the best deep ball in the league. I don't see much downside.
 
Without being too much of a jerk, I saw another one of these drafts done recently and Flacco went in round 2 at 58th overall. He was the 11th QB off the board.
Care to explain the thinking here? Is it just the lack of stats?
 
Flaccos more of an established QB than Russ Wilson. You put Wilson on a team with a weak Defense and running game like KC or Buffalo andI guarantee his year looks a lot different. Lets be honest, Flacco carried the offense in the playoffs.

 
Without being too much of a jerk, I saw another one of these drafts done recently and Flacco went in round 2 at 58th overall. He was the 11th QB off the board.
Care to explain the thinking here? Is it just the lack of stats?
I think he should go higher than 58th, but the 11th qb off the board sounds about right. Maybe player #20-25 overall. He's a good player, but there are much better QBs still available. Stats, yes, of course I would cite stats. How else would we judge players?
 
Without being too much of a jerk, I saw another one of these drafts done recently and Flacco went in round 2 at 58th overall. He was the 11th QB off the board.
Care to explain the thinking here? Is it just the lack of stats?
I think he should go higher than 58th, but the 11th qb off the board sounds about right. Maybe player #20-25 overall. He's a good player, but there are much better QBs still available. Stats, yes, of course I would cite stats. How else would we judge players?
:lmao: Watching them maybe? If I do this right, he would not be putting up big stats on my team either.
 
Flaccos more of an established QB than Russ Wilson. You put Wilson on a team with a weak Defense and running game like KC or Buffalo andI guarantee his year looks a lot different. Lets be honest, Flacco carried the offense in the playoffs.
:shrug: Aside from an elite few - most of which are older than I'd select to be my franchise QB heading into the future, this can be said about all QBs. Wilson, I believe, is the 3rd best young QB in the NFL. He isn't neccessarily better than many that are close to 30 or older, but he has room to improve.
 
1.8 Pittsburgh Steelers Cam Newton QB

sorry was caught in the commute home

was targeting JJ Watt or a QB. With Watt going I'm shocked at the QB decision I had . Choice came down to Cam , the other guy & the elephant in the room Q that is still out there. Cam & the other guy do what I want to do offensively. I just think Newton is more polished & refined.

 
'HellToupee said:
1.8 Pittsburgh Steelers Cam Newton QB sorry was caught in the commute homewas targeting JJ Watt or a QB. With Watt going I'm shocked at the QB decision I had . Choice came down to Cam , the other guy & the elephant in the room Q that is still out there. Cam & the other guy do what I want to do offensively. I just think Newton is more polished & refined.
Cam was the guy I typed out, was ready to roll with, but I just am not quite sure about his maturity and leadership.
 
'HellToupee said:
1.8 Pittsburgh Steelers Cam Newton QB sorry was caught in the commute homewas targeting JJ Watt or a QB. With Watt going I'm shocked at the QB decision I had . Choice came down to Cam , the other guy & the elephant in the room Q that is still out there. Cam & the other guy do what I want to do offensively. I just think Newton is more polished & refined.
Cam was the guy I typed out, was ready to roll with, but I just am not quite sure about his maturity and leadership.
I think Wilson trumps Cam in leadership
 
'HellToupee said:
1.8 Pittsburgh Steelers Cam Newton QB sorry was caught in the commute homewas targeting JJ Watt or a QB. With Watt going I'm shocked at the QB decision I had . Choice came down to Cam , the other guy & the elephant in the room Q that is still out there. Cam & the other guy do what I want to do offensively. I just think Newton is more polished & refined.
Cam was the guy I typed out, was ready to roll with, but I just am not quite sure about his maturity and leadership.
I also had the choice between JJ Watt and Cam staring me in the face. I'm not sure why, or what it is, but something just nags at me about Cam. I have no idea, but it was enough to sway my decision.
 
After reading the original post, I have some questions.

1. Are we sticking to 32 rounds or going to go for 53?

2. Is there a specific quota on the number of college players? Do we HAVE to have 2? Can we have more/less?

3. Can we go away with the limitations per position. What if I want my base defense to be nickel?

 
After reading the original post, I have some questions.1. Are we sticking to 32 rounds or going to go for 53?2. Is there a specific quota on the number of college players? Do we HAVE to have 2? Can we have more/less?3. Can we go away with the limitations per position. What if I want my base defense to be nickel?
My Preferences:1. 322. No limit3. No limitations as long as you can field a legal formation on O and D.
 
Apologize for the wait - I was out at dinner last night when I got the text, and completely forgot about it when we got home. :loco:

1.09 - 49ers take Drew Brees, QB (Saints)

Will PM commish and next person.

EDIT: Can't go wrong with Brees. Younger than Brady, and just as accomplished of a passer. Debated another guy here who is younger and faster, but Brees should have another good 3-4 years of championship-worthy play in him.

Records

 
Last edited by a moderator:
After reading the original post, I have some questions.1. Are we sticking to 32 rounds or going to go for 53?2. Is there a specific quota on the number of college players? Do we HAVE to have 2? Can we have more/less?3. Can we go away with the limitations per position. What if I want my base defense to be nickel?
I'm hoping everyone stays interested to go for a full 53 man roster.There is no limitations on positions or college players.
 
Sorry, I was #9 with brees. I was looking at the spreadsheet, and it was line #10, but I forgot that it started on line 2, not line 1.

Duckboy should be up at #10, then Meecrob at #11.

 
Several directions to go here. Calvin would have been an option here as we'll as one other from a positional scarcity standpoint. But you can't pick from here and not get a quality QB when there are still a few to choose from depending on your opinion.

That said I'm going with upside here as opposed to safety with the other I considered:

1.10 QB Colin Kaepernick

Has the arm and the legs that give me options constructing the offense moving forward. Shorter body of work but I will take the risk here.

 
1st post is being updated with draft order and google spreadsheet link.

I will also try and link everyone's page so it will be easier to PM.

When we get into the 2nd round and beyond, please list who is on your team, then into the later rounds give a mini depth chart.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Several directions to go here. Calvin would have been an option here as we'll as one other from a positional scarcity standpoint. But you can't pick from here and not get a quality QB when there are still a few to choose from depending on your opinion. That said I'm going with upside here as opposed to safety with the other I considered:1.10 QB Colin KaepernickHas the arm and the legs that give me options constructing the offense moving forward. Shorter body of work but I will take the risk here.
Wow. Maybe I'm in the minority on this read option being a fad?
 
I'm shocked that Drew Brees was available at 1.09 and taken after Flacco, Watt, and Newton. He's one of those quarterbacks that makes your team playoff bound even if your draft outside of the first round is only average compared to the rest of the teams. He just turned 34 so he still has a good 5 or so years left. Gandalas has to be thrilled.

 
Several directions to go here. Calvin would have been an option here as we'll as one other from a positional scarcity standpoint. But you can't pick from here and not get a quality QB when there are still a few to choose from depending on your opinion. That said I'm going with upside here as opposed to safety with the other I considered:1.10 QB Colin KaepernickHas the arm and the legs that give me options constructing the offense moving forward. Shorter body of work but I will take the risk here.
Wow. Maybe I'm in the minority on this read option being a fad?
His ability to run the RO is a huge asset but he has the arm strength to make any throw and good accuracy. He's still extremely young and has his best football still ahead of him. I like the pick.
 
I'm shocked that Drew Brees was available at 1.09 and taken after Flacco, Watt, and Newton. He's one of those quarterbacks that makes your team playoff bound even if your draft outside of the first round is only average compared to the rest of the teams. He just turned 34 so he still has a good 5 or so years left. Gandalas has to be thrilled.
Very hard for me to choose Flacco over him, but the age and size were the deciding factors. I disagree with the 5 good yrs comment. I'd say more like 2-3 at his current level.
 
Ok first post has been updated. I have linked the Google spreadsheet. I have also linked everyone's page so PMs should be easy.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE PM the drafter after you, after you have picked. Very important!!!!! I will stay on top of texting as much as possible, but PMs are still important.

Remember we are doing 3RR.

DRAFT ORDER

1st Round

1.Saints Awesomeauger

2.Giants WuBanger

3.Eagles SkeletoreEh

4.Titans Fubar

5.Vikings 8ebok24

6.Bears RBM

7.Rams Instinctive

8.Steelers HellToupe

9.49ers Gandalas

10.Seahawks Duckboy

11.Cowboys Meecrob

12.Bengals ExaltedOne

13.Pats Late225

14.Raiders Warrior

15.Cardinals Whicker

16.Skins NateBlough

17.Packers Shakezula

18.Lions Fubar

19.Jets Duckboy

20.Bucs Bamac

21.Chargers WuBanger

22.Browns ExaltedOne

23.Falcons HellToupee

24.Dolphins Dolfan

25.Chiefs Awesomauger

26.Bills RBM

27.Colts Gandalas

28.Ravens NateBlough

29.Texans Meecrob

30.Panthers SkeletoreEh

31.Broncos Instinctive

32.Jaguars 8ebok24

Google Spreadsheet with updated picks:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ag68aKS2xJNodDZjc0dHaEhKMGZkclJ6R0QtNTluTWc&usp=sharing#gid=0

 
I'm shocked that Drew Brees was available at 1.09 and taken after Flacco, Watt, and Newton. He's one of those quarterbacks that makes your team playoff bound even if your draft outside of the first round is only average compared to the rest of the teams. He just turned 34 so he still has a good 5 or so years left. Gandalas has to be thrilled.
Very hard for me to choose Flacco over him, but the age and size were the deciding factors. I disagree with the 5 good yrs comment. I'd say more like 2-3 at his current level.
Yes, I was VERY happy. :thumbup: Now that I have a complete stud at the QB position, I can go wherever the draft takes me with my later picks.
 
Concerned about Dolfan, still hasn't sent me his number, and he hasn't posted in here since agreeing to take over.

 
I think quarterbacks like Brady and Brees will play longer than they would have had they been born 20 years earlier for a couple of reasons.

[*]The rule shift to favoring offenses heavily and discouraging big hits. The emphasis of protecting the players will extend his career.

[*]Brees has a playing style that doesn't allow big hits often. He plays with a great internal clock and has great pocket presence.

[*]Brees has some of the best anticipation in the league. He has never had a cannon and doesn't need one

 
I'm shocked that Drew Brees was available at 1.09 and taken after Flacco, Watt, and Newton. He's one of those quarterbacks that makes your team playoff bound even if your draft outside of the first round is only average compared to the rest of the teams. He just turned 34 so he still has a good 5 or so years left. Gandalas has to be thrilled.
Very hard for me to choose Flacco over him, but the age and size were the deciding factors. I disagree with the 5 good yrs comment. I'd say more like 2-3 at his current level.
Yes, I was VERY happy. :thumbup: Now that I have a complete stud at the QB position, I can go wherever the draft takes me with my later picks.
Exactly. I feel the same way. Rodgers and Brees don't need grade A talent around them on offense to be successful. If I started with a Flacco or a Newton for example I would feel like I would have to invest early on offense to put them in a position to succeed. With Rodgers, I feel like I could focus on defense early if the board dictated that and still have one of the best offenses in the league.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top