Tau837
Footballguy
I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
Well, the year they got rid of Moss (and lost Culpepper to injury) they went from 8-8 to 9-7 so I don't see how losing them was such a bad thing.First they give away Moss then Culpepper and still predict success. Vikings fans never cease to amaze.Chester will molest the defenses, grab him if you can
bet you a lifetime sig they don't break .500Well, the year they got rid of Moss (and lost Culpepper to injury) they went from 8-8 to 9-7 so I don't see how losing them was such a bad thing.First they give away Moss then Culpepper and still predict success. Vikings fans never cease to amaze.Chester will molest the defenses, grab him if you can![]()
Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
Oh, hell!- sign me up for some of that CT RB20 or better stuff.Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.
what about injury?Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.
When I proposed the arrangement I included injury to be covered under the "tough noogies" clause. He gets hurt, his supporters lose. Reason: Many detractors feel he won't hold up. If people truly believe he'll be RB20 or better, they are assuming he stays healthy.what about injury?Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.
wow, you RB20 or better crowd are suckersWhen I proposed the arrangement I included injury to be covered under the "tough noogies" clause. He gets hurt, his supporters lose. Reason: Many detractors feel he won't hold up. If people truly believe he'll be RB20 or better, they are assuming he stays healthy.what about injury?Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.
wow, you RB20 or better crowd are suckersWhen I proposed the arrangement I included injury to be covered under the "tough noogies" clause. He gets hurt, his supporters lose. Reason: Many detractors feel he won't hold up. If people truly believe he'll be RB20 or better, they are assuming he stays healthy.what about injury?Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.![]()
This would be a VERY good bet FunkyPlutos. I see very little chance of the Vikings not breaking the .500 mark this season.bet you a lifetime sig they don't break .500Well, the year they got rid of Moss (and lost Culpepper to injury) they went from 8-8 to 9-7 so I don't see how losing them was such a bad thing.First they give away Moss then Culpepper and still predict success. Vikings fans never cease to amaze.Chester will molest the defenses, grab him if you can![]()
yeah, DO IT!edit: I am undefeated across the boards I post on in sig/avatar bets.This would be a VERY good bet FunkyPlutos. I see very little chance of the Vikings not breaking the .500 mark this season.bet you a lifetime sig they don't break .500Well, the year they got rid of Moss (and lost Culpepper to injury) they went from 8-8 to 9-7 so I don't see how losing them was such a bad thing.First they give away Moss then Culpepper and still predict success. Vikings fans never cease to amaze.Chester will molest the defenses, grab him if you can![]()
be careful what you wish for GByeah, DO IT!This would be a VERY good bet FunkyPlutos. I see very little chance of the Vikings not breaking the .500 mark this season.bet you a lifetime sig they don't break .500Well, the year they got rid of Moss (and lost Culpepper to injury) they went from 8-8 to 9-7 so I don't see how losing them was such a bad thing.First they give away Moss then Culpepper and still predict success. Vikings fans never cease to amaze.Chester will molest the defenses, grab him if you can![]()
wow, you RB20 or better crowd are suckersWhen I proposed the arrangement I included injury to be covered under the "tough noogies" clause. He gets hurt, his supporters lose. Reason: Many detractors feel he won't hold up. If people truly believe he'll be RB20 or better, they are assuming he stays healthy.what about injury?Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.![]()
agreed but it's just a sig bet. HK - sig language looks good to me...wow, you RB20 or better crowd are suckersWhen I proposed the arrangement I included injury to be covered under the "tough noogies" clause. He gets hurt, his supporters lose. Reason: Many detractors feel he won't hold up. If people truly believe he'll be RB20 or better, they are assuming he stays healthy.what about injury?Welcome to the light, my ACC brethren!UPDATE:I'll join the RB21 or worse crew.CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
CT RB21 or worse: HK, MLBrandow, Just Win Baby
CT RB20 or better: TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref
OK, this thing will be closed out at Midnight tonight. Sigs need to be determined, as well as length of time to display the sig.![]()
Yeah, damn this was fool's bet. That injury clause should have killed it. I wonder how many RB20 or better supporters missed that pink elephant.
Yeah sucks how they signed one of the best in the league. (?)I think they may o line issues.
Agree but they have possibilities and at least some real size/speed to keep Ds honest.I have no faith in the receivers. People are very high on Robinson. It is my opinion that he is very much overated.
Johnson sucks FF-wise but is good NFL-wise. Basically he won't burn any team much but that includes his own.I think that the WR corp with not scare anyone with BJ throwing the ball.
This seems to be the big hang-up for most. I'm playing wait n see on that.There have been comments about the conditioning of Taylor.
ie BETTER coach.Not a big Taylor fan - guess I'm just saying IMO this is even more up in the air than you might expect or hope, even for this early in the year.New coach.
Also, water is wet. If only it were that simple/easy. :(Get players that will significantly outperform their draft position and you will build a winning team.
TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref, glock, & Gravity were right about Chester Taylor, he is a stud and I should have heeded their wisdom... I also wear a tu-tu come game time.
TeamDingo, Real Man of Genius, Banger, The Scientist, Broncofan13000, The Ref, glock, & Gravity were right about Chester Taylor, he is a stud and I should have heeded their wisdom... I also wear a tu-tu come game time.![]()
Fluff piece. RBs with 400+ touches in the past 5 years:LT - 2002, 2003TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
Keep in mind it says ideal mix. For the Vikings, ideally, they're killing a 20 point lead in the 4th quarter every game. Reality is much different. Projecting that many touches over 16 games isn't realistic, as you mentioned, but it might be a good base to project realistic touches.Fluff piece. RBs with 400+ touches in the past 5 years:LT - 2002, 2003TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
Ricky Williams - 2002, 2003
Lewis - 2003
Martin - 2004
James - 2005
Tiki - 2005
Green - 2003
McAllister - 2003
10 times, an average of 2 times per year. Not that this means a lot--Taylor can be a great fantasy player without 400 touches. But this type of thing is said about 20 different RBs every preseason, and only 2 actually typically get that many touches. If I had to bet on which 2 it will be this year, Taylor certainly wouldn't be one of them.
This is right along the lines of what they said when they signed him. At that time, they said something like they saw Taylor as a 20-30 touch per game back.We all know that 25-30 touches a game is crazy talk, but averaging 20-22 does not seem excessive (320-350 on the season).TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
LOL. The intent and style was meant to be a playful jab at HK's hysteric INJURY BUMP thread.I would say it is more ( maybe only slightly) significant than a fluff piece. I do not expect him to get 400+ touches. Nor as you say does he need to to be a significant fantasy contributor( certainly >RB20).Fluff piece. RBs with 400+ touches in the past 5 years:LT - 2002, 2003TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
Ricky Williams - 2002, 2003
Lewis - 2003
Martin - 2004
James - 2005
Tiki - 2005
Green - 2003
McAllister - 2003
10 times, an average of 2 times per year. Not that this means a lot--Taylor can be a great fantasy player without 400 touches. But this type of thing is said about 20 different RBs every preseason, and only 2 actually typically get that many touches. If I had to bet on which 2 it will be this year, Taylor certainly wouldn't be one of them.
Uh, guys....I'd read the WHOLE article before getting too excited:LOL. The intent and style was meant to be a playful jab at HK's hysteric INJURY BUMP thread.I would say it is more ( maybe only slightly) significant than a fluff piece. I do not expect him to get 400+ touches. Nor as you say does he need to to be a significant fantasy contributor( certainly >RB20).Fluff piece. RBs with 400+ touches in the past 5 years:LT - 2002, 2003TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
Ricky Williams - 2002, 2003
Lewis - 2003
Martin - 2004
James - 2005
Tiki - 2005
Green - 2003
McAllister - 2003
10 times, an average of 2 times per year. Not that this means a lot--Taylor can be a great fantasy player without 400 touches. But this type of thing is said about 20 different RBs every preseason, and only 2 actually typically get that many touches. If I had to bet on which 2 it will be this year, Taylor certainly wouldn't be one of them.
But to the people that say:
"RBBC with Moore et al "
"splitting carries or on the bench "
"Taylor plays for a coach who has shown that he likes to use multiple backs in a game."
"The comparasion of Taylor to Jordan can only become reality if Taylor get the touches Jordan did. I just don't see that happening."
"RBBC to start, then bench, then unemployment"
"I think Taylor will have minimal receptions"
You might want to at least consider that his coaches have every intention of getting him at least 20 touches a game.
Fason might be third on the depth chart but he said Childress has told the running backs that there is no "clear-cut starter" at this point.
LOL, as long as Taylor gets 20 carries and a couple catches/game that's all that matters. You can hang your hat on Fason if you wish.Uh, guys....I'd read the WHOLE article before getting too excited:LOL. The intent and style was meant to be a playful jab at HK's hysteric INJURY BUMP thread.I would say it is more ( maybe only slightly) significant than a fluff piece. I do not expect him to get 400+ touches. Nor as you say does he need to to be a significant fantasy contributor( certainly >RB20).Fluff piece. RBs with 400+ touches in the past 5 years:LT - 2002, 2003TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
Ricky Williams - 2002, 2003
Lewis - 2003
Martin - 2004
James - 2005
Tiki - 2005
Green - 2003
McAllister - 2003
10 times, an average of 2 times per year. Not that this means a lot--Taylor can be a great fantasy player without 400 touches. But this type of thing is said about 20 different RBs every preseason, and only 2 actually typically get that many touches. If I had to bet on which 2 it will be this year, Taylor certainly wouldn't be one of them.
But to the people that say:
"RBBC with Moore et al "
"splitting carries or on the bench "
"Taylor plays for a coach who has shown that he likes to use multiple backs in a game."
"The comparasion of Taylor to Jordan can only become reality if Taylor get the touches Jordan did. I just don't see that happening."
"RBBC to start, then bench, then unemployment"
"I think Taylor will have minimal receptions"
You might want to at least consider that his coaches have every intention of getting him at least 20 touches a game.Fason might be third on the depth chart but he said Childress has told the running backs that there is no "clear-cut starter" at this point.![]()
Read it all.Keep grasping at them straws.Uh, guys....I'd read the WHOLE article before getting too excited:LOL. The intent and style was meant to be a playful jab at HK's hysteric INJURY BUMP thread.I would say it is more ( maybe only slightly) significant than a fluff piece. I do not expect him to get 400+ touches. Nor as you say does he need to to be a significant fantasy contributor( certainly >RB20).Fluff piece. RBs with 400+ touches in the past 5 years:LT - 2002, 2003TeamDingo said:PROPOSED WORKLOAD BUMP
http://www.startribune.com/510/story/601214.html
West Coast offense a perfect fit for Taylor
Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
Last update: August 07, 2006 – 11:22 PM
Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said the ideal mix for Taylor in a game would be to get him more than 20 carries and four or five passes.
Ricky Williams - 2002, 2003
Lewis - 2003
Martin - 2004
James - 2005
Tiki - 2005
Green - 2003
McAllister - 2003
10 times, an average of 2 times per year. Not that this means a lot--Taylor can be a great fantasy player without 400 touches. But this type of thing is said about 20 different RBs every preseason, and only 2 actually typically get that many touches. If I had to bet on which 2 it will be this year, Taylor certainly wouldn't be one of them.
But to the people that say:
"RBBC with Moore et al "
"splitting carries or on the bench "
"Taylor plays for a coach who has shown that he likes to use multiple backs in a game."
"The comparasion of Taylor to Jordan can only become reality if Taylor get the touches Jordan did. I just don't see that happening."
"RBBC to start, then bench, then unemployment"
"I think Taylor will have minimal receptions"
You might want to at least consider that his coaches have every intention of getting him at least 20 touches a game.Fason might be third on the depth chart but he said Childress has told the running backs that there is no "clear-cut starter" at this point.![]()
Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.LOL, as long as Taylor gets 20 carries and a couple catches/game that's all that matters. You can hang your hat on Fason if you wish.
You do know that you go well out of your way to be more then a little bit of a putz, don't you?Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.LOL, as long as Taylor gets 20 carries and a couple catches/game that's all that matters. You can hang your hat on Fason if you wish.
You do know that you go well out of your way to be more then a little bit of a putz, don't you?Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.LOL, as long as Taylor gets 20 carries and a couple catches/game that's all that matters. You can hang your hat on Fason if you wish.![]()
Just checking.You do know that you go well out of your way to be more then a little bit of a putz, don't you?Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.LOL, as long as Taylor gets 20 carries and a couple catches/game that's all that matters. You can hang your hat on Fason if you wish.![]()
![]()
"it's over Johny" (airplane)....couldn't resist....Have they ever played a preseason game yet? You seem to be fairly knowledgable but all along you have been looking for something that's not there and when one theory fails you move onto the next. First it was he's out of shape, then Chris Brown was coming to town, then he was injured, now it's Fason is looming. What will it be next week? If a Mike Bell scenario plays out and Fason/MM move up the depth charts believe me I'm not gonna put my head in the sand and pretend that all is well. At this point and time there is nothing to indicate that anything at all has changed except that Taylor had a hammy that put him on the sidelines for a day or two. He was back yesterday practicing with the 1st team.FBG we need a grasping at straws smilie....Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.LOL, as long as Taylor gets 20 carries and a couple catches/game that's all that matters. You can hang your hat on Fason if you wish.
Can be people just relax on Mewelde Moore? We already know he is as fragile as a glass vase and is not a serious contenter for the full-time starting job.but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role.
Get back to me in week 4Can be people just relax on Mewelde Moore? We already know he is as fragile as a glass vase and is not a serious contenter for the full-time starting job.but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role.
Being a Minnesota fan, it pains me this guy is on the team. When healthy, he gets the job done. His downside is, whenever he gets a paper cut the first thing he does is update his will.If Mewelde does start a game by week 4, than his season-ending contusion should happen early in week 5.Get back to me in week 4Can be people just relax on Mewelde Moore? We already know he is as fragile as a glass vase and is not a serious contenter for the full-time starting job.but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role.
-Mewelde Moore is still struggling in pass protection and has to be constantly reminded where his eyes are and what he's looking for. I think he will get it, but his problems there make the gap between him and Chester Taylor just that much more wide.-As for Taylor, he had a very strong practice today making several good runs with decisive cut backs. His vision seems good and he's shown better explosion than I expected to see.
......and punctuated with a savage spike of the football.
So what do I make of the first 240 posts in this thread?August 9, 2006, 10:05
Vikings :: RB
RB C. Taylor Star Of The Day
Don Seeholzer, St. Paul Pioneer Press - [Full Article]
RB Chester Taylor was the offensive star of the morning, full-pads practice. Taylor participated in his first full practice since suffering a mild groin strain Friday night. He ripped off three nice runs, including one against the first-team defense and another cutback job on which he stiff-armed CB Ronyell Whitaker. "He had a tremendous day," QB Brad Johnson said. "That's what we're going to have to have with Chester. That's what we expect, and that's what you saw today."
link
what impressed me most:
......and punctuated with a savage spike of the football.![]()
You are doing it wrong. You have to put a breathless all caps bold header on these posts X BUMP!eg:August 9, 2006, 10:05
Vikings :: RB
RB C. Taylor Star Of The Day
Don Seeholzer, St. Paul Pioneer Press - [Full Article]
RB Chester Taylor was the offensive star of the morning, full-pads practice. Taylor participated in his first full practice since suffering a mild groin strain Friday night. He ripped off three nice runs, including one against the first-team defense and another cutback job on which he stiff-armed CB Ronyell Whitaker. "He had a tremendous day," QB Brad Johnson said. "That's what we're going to have to have with Chester. That's what we expect, and that's what you saw today."
link
what impressed me most:
......and punctuated with a savage spike of the football.![]()
Not sure about Chester, but I think the consensus is that I am a putz...So what do I make of the first 240 posts in this thread?
You are doing it wrong. You have to put a breathless all caps bold header on these posts X BUMP!
eg:
STAR OF THE DAY BUMP!
*sigh* Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then. Besides, who doesn't look good against the Vikings defense? Now that McKinnie is hurting, things get even worse for CT. :XCTaylor must have missed the memo. I could have swore H.K. said this yesterday:
Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.
on the same day he was #1 on the first official depth chart and offensive star of the day.
*sigh* Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then. Besides, who doesn't look good against the Vikings defense? Now that McKinnie is hurting, things get even worse for CT. :XCTaylor must have missed the memo. I could have swore H.K. said this yesterday:
Look at the Facts: Taylor is hurt and the other RB's are impressing in his absence. The Depth Chart is undetermined at this point, but a player who can't (or won't) come out of the trainers' room is not going to win a starting role. Again, CT will not start week one, its already over for him.
on the same day he was #1 on the first official depth chart and offensive star of the day.
I'm on record. No schtick. BTW, IIs this just schtick, or do you actually believe that Chester has no shot at being a decent RB?