What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Kevin Jones in the Mike Martz Offense (1 Viewer)

I thought Kevin Jones looked very good and he was punishing tacklers the whole game. He broke a number of tackles and ran with power. His yardage doesn't show how good he looked. He also had a nice 18 yard run called back because Roy Williams moved a hair too fast, and he cwas on the opposite side of the play. I also was impressed with his receiving. He has improved a lot in that area since last year. We also were missing 2 starters on the offensive line, and their really weren't a lot of holes.

This might be a good time to buy low. His numbers looked worse than he did.
nope. try after week 2 after he gets stuffed by CHI. then his schedule frees up.
 
Jones did look pretty good considering the circumstances. The Lions passing game looked awful though. Kitna just was off on so many passes. Jones in what limited chances he got, did a not bad job IMO. He did fumble though

 
I thought Kevin Jones looked very good and he was punishing tacklers the whole game. He broke a number of tackles and ran with power. His yardage doesn't show how good he looked. He also had a nice 18 yard run called back because Roy Williams moved a hair too fast, and he cwas on the opposite side of the play. I also was impressed with his receiving. He has improved a lot in that area since last year. We also were missing 2 starters on the offensive line, and their really weren't a lot of holes.

This might be a good time to buy low. His numbers looked worse than he did.
nope. try after week 2 after he gets stuffed by CHI. then his schedule frees up.
This sounds eriely like last year. Everyone was saying that he'd be better and he only got worse. I'd stay away.
 
I watched the game and I was impressed with the fact that Jones was on the receiving end of 5 passes. I think after the Bear game, good things will happen, hey maybe before, A. Green rushed for about 100 yards against the Bears. This might be the time to buy Jones now.

 
Jones looked okay at best . . .

I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .

he's just an average back . . .

 
Jones looked okay at best . . . I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .he's just an average back . . .
It's because he was great in college and a first round pick. But the loyalty is kinda Ron Dayne-esque.
 
Q. Could Kevin Jones really be the difference in the game versus the Bears this week? It seems like he ran well last week but in the end he didn’t have great stats.A. The receivers didn’t block well downfield to help Jones. You need more production out of him but you need the passing game to click more, you can’t take penalties and knock yourself out of drives and it will be more offensive. I thought the offensive line and Jones were both fine and not the reason they didn’t run the ball well and they’re the most important part of the run.
 
Jones looked okay at best . . . I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .he's just an average back . . .
Most people like to sound informed by voicing a very strong opinion, which unfortunately is based on very casual knowledge more often than not. They then get very piqued when said player doesn't perform (either positively or negatively) like they said he would.It's funny, but I've seen posters around here avoid more facts and concrete statistics than you could shake a stick at. :shrug:
 
Jones looked okay at best . . . I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .he's just an average back . . .
Most people like to sound informed by voicing a very strong opinion, which unfortunately is based on very casual knowledge more often than not. They then get very piqued when said player doesn't perform (either positively or negatively) like they said he would.It's funny, but I've seen posters around here avoid more facts and concrete statistics than you could shake a stick at. :shrug:
Jones was a HUGE recruit out of HS - the #1 HS back in the country his senior year and surprised a lot of people by choosing Tech over Penn State. At Tech, he was exceptional even though he had to share carries with Lee Suggs. He has the prototype body and sub 4.4 speed. He got 1100 yrds as a rookie (4.7 ypc), and looked dominant in the final 5 games (led the NFL in rushing the 2nd half of the season). 2005 was an admitted disaster.So the facts show a RB who was considered All Everything in HS, the best RB of all time at Tech, ran for 1100 his rookie year with a high average, and then had one bad season. Which is the anomaly again?
 
Q: Caller asks how good will Kevin Jones be Sunday against Chicago's defense?

KOWALSKI

A: Ahman Green had 110 yards rushing against the Bears. It's not like you can't run on the Bears. What didn't work last week for the Lions was the screen game. That may be because Mike Holmgren had seen so much of Martz's offense in the past. They were sticking with Kevin Jones really tight all game long.

Martz keeps saying they will keep giving Jones the ball. The only reason Jones got the ball 14 times against Seattle is because the Lions didn't have the ball on long drives.

You have to run the ball inside against the Bears because they have so much speed. But the Lions believe they can run on the perimeter, too. If they do beat the Bears on the perimeter, you could see some big plays. I'm not predicting that, but that's what they think they can do.

 
Q. Could Kevin Jones really be the difference in the game versus the Bears this week? It seems like he ran well last week but in the end he didn’t have great stats.A. The receivers didn’t block well downfield to help Jones. You need more production out of him but you need the passing game to click more, you can’t take penalties and knock yourself out of drives and it will be more offensive. I thought the offensive line and Jones were both fine and not the reason they didn’t run the ball well and they’re the most important part of the run
 
Lions will try to go inside, outside on Bears

Friday, September 15, 2006

By Tom Kowalski

ALLEN PARK -- When drawing up a game plan to play the Chicago Bears, who had the NFL's second-best defense last year, the conventional wisdom is to run the football straight at them. The Bears have extremely fast linebackers and trying to run outside plays right to their strengths.

The 0-1 Detroit Lions, who will visit the 1-0 Bears on Sunday, agree with that philosophy, but only to a degree.

"That's what everybody tries to do, but sometimes you can get out of your game plan if you don't stick with it enough," said center Dominic Raiola, who believes the Lions can also hurt the Bears on the perimeter. "You've got to still go outside; (if you don't) that's like conceding that you don't have enough talent or firepower to beat these guys. You've got to run your offense. But to set it up, you've got to run at them."

Said Lions right guard Damien Woody: "We've got some plays to hit on the perimeter but I think the money's going to be made in the tackle box. That's where we've really got to win the battle."

Running back Kevin Jones rushed for 123 yards against the Bears in their final meeting in 2004 (a Detroit victory) but had a total of only 88 yards in two games against Chicago last year -- both Lions losses.

"I think the best success you can have with that team is running the ball because they want to make you one-dimensional and force you to pass and create turnovers that way," Woody said. "You have to run downhill on them.

"They're light -- and they're fast -- but they're light and you've got to go after those guys. You've got to pound and pound and it's not going to be pretty all the time because they're so good defensively, but you've got to keep pounding on them and then you'll break some runs. (Green Bay running back) Ahman Green had 110 yards against them (last week) so you can run the ball on them, you just have to prove you can do it." Lions fullback Cory Schlesinger is expected to have another big battle against Chicago middle linebacker Brian Urlacher. It'll be the 12th meeting between the two players.

"It's a solid defense and I've got to concentrate on getting my pad leverage down and getting him out of the hole," Schlesinger said. "We've got to go right at them and take it to them. In games we've taken it right at them, we've been pretty successful."

Because the Lions offense has changed and gone away from the West Coast style, Urlacher doesn't believe he'll have as many head-cracking collisions with Schlesinger.

"Their offense has changed, man, it's not going to be the same," Urlacher said. "It's a little different running game now. He's a great player to play against. He knows what he's doing and he's a solid guy who's been around for a while."

Schlesinger admits that if the outside running game is clicking or the passing attack is doing damage, he might not see much action.

"It's hard to tell with this offense. If it's working, whatever it is, we're going to keep at it," Schlesinger said.

Chicago head coach Lovie Smith, who was a defensive coordinator under Mike Martz with the St. Louis Rams, knows the Bears can expect just about anything from Martz, now the Lions offensive coordinator. And Smith said he doesn't put much stock in the fact the Lions scored just six points last week against the Seattle Seahawks.

"It's only one game. I don't put a lot into what happens in one football game," Smith said. "Mike has a proven success rate with his offense and what he gets done with it. I watched the tape and they were very close to scoring a lot of points."

Right tackle Rex Tucker (knee), who saw limited action in the season opener, is expected to start Sunday.
 
Jones looked okay at best . . . I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .he's just an average back . . .
Most people like to sound informed by voicing a very strong opinion, which unfortunately is based on very casual knowledge more often than not. They then get very piqued when said player doesn't perform (either positively or negatively) like they said he would.It's funny, but I've seen posters around here avoid more facts and concrete statistics than you could shake a stick at. :shrug:
Jones was a HUGE recruit out of HS - the #1 HS back in the country his senior year and surprised a lot of people by choosing Tech over Penn State. At Tech, he was exceptional even though he had to share carries with Lee Suggs. He has the prototype body and sub 4.4 speed. He got 1100 yrds as a rookie (4.7 ypc), and looked dominant in the final 5 games (led the NFL in rushing the 2nd half of the season). 2005 was an admitted disaster.So the facts show a RB who was considered All Everything in HS, the best RB of all time at Tech, ran for 1100 his rookie year with a high average, and then had one bad season. Which is the anomaly again?
:goodposting:
 
I thought the performance was better than the stats showed - the passing game was terrible, and he did have his longest run called back due to Roy Williams being an idiot on the other side away from the play and getting an illegal motion call against him. Roy should have just stood there like he does when he isn't the primary receiving option, but alas...

That being said, he took a shot that didn't look too terrible and it sent him to the sidelines for a time. Considering his previous issues with injuries it just seems that the guy isn't tough...

 
Jones looked okay at best . . . I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .he's just an average back . . .
Most people like to sound informed by voicing a very strong opinion, which unfortunately is based on very casual knowledge more often than not. They then get very piqued when said player doesn't perform (either positively or negatively) like they said he would.It's funny, but I've seen posters around here avoid more facts and concrete statistics than you could shake a stick at. :shrug:
Jones was a HUGE recruit out of HS - the #1 HS back in the country his senior year and surprised a lot of people by choosing Tech over Penn State. At Tech, he was exceptional even though he had to share carries with Lee Suggs. He has the prototype body and sub 4.4 speed. He got 1100 yrds as a rookie (4.7 ypc), and looked dominant in the final 5 games (led the NFL in rushing the 2nd half of the season). 2005 was an admitted disaster.So the facts show a RB who was considered All Everything in HS, the best RB of all time at Tech, ran for 1100 his rookie year with a high average, and then had one bad season. Which is the anomaly again?
If you want to consider just his pro career, the dominant 5 games appear to be the anomaly at this point. He sucked over the first half of his rookie year and was hurt, he sucked all of last season and was hurt.... I think it's questionable to consider his HS and college resume as more relevant than 3/4's of his pro career, since we do get fantasy points based on what he does as a pro.
 
I thought Kevin Jones looked very good and he was punishing tacklers the whole game. He broke a number of tackles and ran with power. His yardage doesn't show how good he looked. He also had a nice 18 yard run called back because Roy Williams moved a hair too fast, and he cwas on the opposite side of the play. I also was impressed with his receiving. He has improved a lot in that area since last year. We also were missing 2 starters on the offensive line, and their really weren't a lot of holes.

This might be a good time to buy low. His numbers looked worse than he did.
nope. try after week 2 after he gets stuffed by CHI. then his schedule frees up.
in a "shark" league guys know this and won't move him. if you're league mates are on top of things you should get him this week when they check teh schedule and see the bears on tap.
 
I thought Kevin Jones looked very good and he was punishing tacklers the whole game. He broke a number of tackles and ran with power. His yardage doesn't show how good he looked. He also had a nice 18 yard run called back because Roy Williams moved a hair too fast, and he cwas on the opposite side of the play. I also was impressed with his receiving. He has improved a lot in that area since last year. We also were missing 2 starters on the offensive line, and their really weren't a lot of holes.

This might be a good time to buy low. His numbers looked worse than he did.
nope. try after week 2 after he gets stuffed by CHI. then his schedule frees up.
This sounds eriely like last year. Everyone was saying that he'd be better and he only got worse. I'd stay away.
As a Kevin Jones owner from last year, I say :goodposting:
 
Jones looked okay at best . . . I have yet to figure out why people make so many excuses for this guy . . .he's just an average back . . .
Most people like to sound informed by voicing a very strong opinion, which unfortunately is based on very casual knowledge more often than not. They then get very piqued when said player doesn't perform (either positively or negatively) like they said he would.It's funny, but I've seen posters around here avoid more facts and concrete statistics than you could shake a stick at. :shrug:
Jones was a HUGE recruit out of HS - the #1 HS back in the country his senior year and surprised a lot of people by choosing Tech over Penn State. At Tech, he was exceptional even though he had to share carries with Lee Suggs. He has the prototype body and sub 4.4 speed. He got 1100 yrds as a rookie (4.7 ypc), and looked dominant in the final 5 games (led the NFL in rushing the 2nd half of the season). 2005 was an admitted disaster.So the facts show a RB who was considered All Everything in HS, the best RB of all time at Tech, ran for 1100 his rookie year with a high average, and then had one bad season. Which is the anomaly again?
He had 1 1/2 bad seasons . . . despite what people post in this thread, he is not a strong inside runner; he prefers to go outside . . . he will not move the pile . . . he is an average (at best) receiver and back . . . please don't bring up what someone did in high school and college . . . there is a laundry list of first round picks that spent a very short time in the NFL . . . he had 1100 yards in his frist year, but has done little since . . . on Sunday, he did NOT look good at all . . . admittedly, he did look better than his numbers indicated; he was actually able to get some yards after contact, but still , the way guys rave about him, you'd think he was a threat to string together 100 yard runs . . . as to his speed, Trung Canidate was faster . . . where is he?? Jones does not have great vision or cutback ability . . . Is he a great back?? absolutely not . . . the word great is overused . . .
 
. . . and to the guy that said he was "punishing tacklers" , I don't know what game you were watching . . . he is NOT a bulldozer by any stretch of the imagination . . . he got a few yards afte contact . . . If you want to talk about "punishing guys", Ernie Sims was the one punishing on Sunday, he was destroying Alexander . . .

 
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n143/sc...jones9pi1hd.gif

this kind of run isnt unusual from him (other than seeing the endzone) ;)

do you watch kj?

i have watched every game of his-and the he runs as hard as any back in the league. he runs hard between the tackles, he runs hard outside the tackles, he runs over people all the time(granted its to make a -2 yard run into a 2 yard run) if he was denvers starting back he would be getting 100+ on a consistent basis. if the lions get their passing game together he will be right around a #10 back in fantasy.

he ran harder than shaun alexander last week and he will run harder than thomas jones this week.

his lack of production isnt because of his lack of talent or effort.

 
http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n143/sc...jones9pi1hd.gif

this kind of run isnt unusual from him (other than seeing the endzone) ;)

do you watch kj?

i have watched every game of his-and the he runs as hard as any back in the league. he runs hard between the tackles, he runs hard outside the tackles, he runs over people all the time(granted its to make a -2 yard run into a 2 yard run) if he was denvers starting back he would be getting 100+ on a consistent basis. if the lions get their passing game together he will be right around a #10 back in fantasy.

he ran harder than shaun alexander last week and he will run harder than thomas jones this week.

his lack of production isnt because of his lack of talent or effort.
:goodposting: He had 1100 yds his first year as was pointed out. Last year's situation couldn't have been worse for him. The coach was horrible and the offense was as bad as I've seen. New QB, new HC and new OC all should help KJ become a SOLID #2 back. I'm not calling him great, but I think his value compared to where he was drafted could be.

 
MLIVE.COM

After last year's loss, the team was left in shambles. Running back Kevin Jones and wide receiver Roy Williams bickered openly on the sideline while other players questioned the offensive game plan. There was also concern about Detroit's lack of on-field leadership and a sense of impending gloom settled over the team.

"It felt different on the sideline," left tackle Jeff Backus said. "In the past, we had guys get after each other and turn on each other. Today, we stuck together. That's the one thing (head coach Rod) Marinelli has definitely done, he's brought this team together."

 
Come on Detroit homers? Where are you?

No mention of his two fumbles??

What's even worse?? Detroit has the ball 1st and GOAL from inside the 5, and Jones takes the handoff (NOT a designed sweep) and promptly goes outside instead of sticking his nose inside . . .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its kinda hard to win when your team has a horrible offensive line. Look around the league. All the ####ty teams have the same thing in common: Houston, Raiders, Lions, Packers. This franchise is pathetic. 3/4 years top 10 picks are busts and the one thats not is more worried about making guarantees and doing dances after first downs than winning. Don't forget about the franchise tag on Jeff "On his" Backus. He's a real keeper. Can we please have an expansion team in Toronto so I don't have to deal with this #### anymore. :thumbdown:

 
Q: The offensive line was pretty poor, even with the great Rex Tucker back. Will that improve?A: They need Ross Verba back. Rex Tucker played hurt. He knew he had to play or they'd have a rookie in there.There are issues with the running game. I don't know if the coaches are telling Kevin Jones too much, or not enough, but they need to rely on his instincts. He could have cut the ball back couple of times for big plays, and I don't know if he didn't see it or if he was told not to do it. He has to stick to his instincts. Even if he makes mistakes. It's not all on the offensive line.Q: Rod Marinelli blames himself for fumbling, too.A: Look at Mariucci's regime. They did not fumble under Mooch.Q: Is that an epidemic with Kevin Jones? Will he improve?A: He's not getting rocked. When you get blown up, you'll lose the ball. That happens. These guys are just punching the ball and it's coming out. Kevin Jones is not normally a fumbler. You can't let that get into his head. "At least, he hasn't been a fumbler
 
September 21, 2006, 10:13

Lions :: RB

RB K.Jones Frustrated With Fumbles

Mike O'Hara, Detroit News - [Full Article]

Kevin Jones is unhappy with himself and his recent bout with fumbleitis. The third-year back has couged up the ball three times in two games this season. He had only fumbled four times in his first 475 carries the previous two years. He is also concerned with his 3.0 yards per carry and that he hasn't run for over 100 yards since week 15 of the 2004 season. Jones also has yet to reach the end zone this season.

 
Seattle and Chicago both have amazing run defenses. It's too early to give up on Jones at this point.
Ahman Green ran for 100+ on the Bears week 1, and then shat the bed in week 2 against New Orleans. I think the Bears run D could be a bit overrated this year, though its still early. the next two weeks will tell the story on Jones. my strategy is Hold right now....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its kinda hard to win when your team has a horrible offensive line. Look around the league. All the ####ty teams have the same thing in common: Houston, Raiders, Lions, Packers. This franchise is pathetic. 3/4 years top 10 picks are busts and the one thats not is more worried about making guarantees and doing dances after first downs than winning. Don't forget about the franchise tag on Jeff "On his" Backus. He's a real keeper. Can we please have an expansion team in Toronto so I don't have to deal with this #### anymore. :thumbdown:
It often does get overlooked because of all the attention given to the bust WR picks, but Detroit does have one of the worst O-lines in the league especially for run blocking. Jeff Backus sucks. And he's the top rated lineman on the team. Oh how I hate the Seahaws for drafting Hutchinson in 2000 one pick ahead of the Lions, leaving us with the only Michigan OT that was not any good. And for those keeping score at home, the three straight 1999-2001 1st round OL picks by the Lions were just as bad as the 2003-2005 #1 WR picks. Aaron Gibson, Stockar McDougle and Jeff Backus :X
 
although KJ has had 2 bad games before this first game where he was at least a servicable fantasy back..

17/81/1 plus 5/44/0

the thing that has caught my attention is that he has been involved in the passing game in each of the Lions games...

This is where KJ's value has gotten the biggest boost. Now you can count on an additional 30-40 yards (plus PPR if you score that way) which you did not get last year.

game 1 5/45

game 2 6/38

game 3 5/44

an extra four to possibly even 9 points a game out of KJ

pretty good for a guy who had an anemic total of 20 receptions for 109 yards in all of 2005

 
in addition to his ascendance in the passing game, he's simply looked STRONG. pounds the ball and is punishing defenders. He's only going to get better as the season where's on and they get more and more comfortable in the Martz offense.

Detroit: The best 0-3 team in history!! :D

 
Martz helped Jones improve during week, and it pays off

Kevin Jones said Mike Martz told him he'd get the ball early and often in the game against the Packers, and he did. Jones is no longer frustrated with his role on the team, as he was last year, and after 125 yards of total offense he appears to be improving. He credits a talk with Martz on Saturday.

September 25, Free Press: Jones said he had a positive discussion with Martz on Saturday about what he could be doing better.

"I just wanted to know what he thought," Jones said. "He could be walking around thinking I'm not doing the right thing and not saying it. I just wanted to know for sure what he thought I could do better, so he told me."

Jones said Martz told him he was doing a good job, but to trust his blockers a little more.

Jones said he was trying to "run elusive" and instead of trying to be a "power back," something he has attempted to do in the past.

 
LT2: Tom, KJ looked good. Even though they were behind, they should've kept feeding him. He only had 6 carries in the 2nd half.

TomKowalski: YOU KNOW, I ASKED SOME PLAYERS ABOUT THE LACK OF RUNNING -- EVEN SOME OFFENSIVE LINEMEN WHO LOVE TO RUN BLOCK -- AND THEY SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THE PLAYCALLING -- THEY SAID THE BIG PLAYS WERE THERE ...

 
Q: Was that the real Kevin Jones? Or the bad Packer defense that allowed Kevin Jones to get 5-yards per carry?

A: Jones said last week he was going to change the way he ran. He felt he was running like a robot. You have to give him freedom to find the hole. Yesterday he cut back deep against the grain and ran a long way where the play wasn't supposed to go. It won't always be right, but that's how guys get good. You got a glimpse of him doing well.

 
Jones said Martz told him he was doing a good job, but to trust his blockers a little more.Jones said he was trying to "run elusive" and instead of trying to be a "power back," something he has attempted to do in the past.
I don't understand what this last sentence is saying. Does this mean he's now going to try to "run elusive" or that he's now trying to be a "power back"? If he's trying to "run elusive" now and getting better results, that's great, as it probably means less wear and tear than trying to be a "power back."
 
iI see it as KJ trying to be a bit more creative in space, as opposed to trying to pound it through holes which are not always there.

I like KJ trying to bounce it to the outside much more than seeing him pull his hesitation move before hitting a hole

 
It will be interesting to see how far up the Top 200 Forward list Kevin Jones can move this week, and who he might pass along the way...

:popcorn:

 
SportsLine Reports:

Lions to give Jones more carries

Kevin Jones, RB DET

News: RB Kevin Jones, who is averaging approximately 95 yards per game in rushing and receiving yardage, could get an increased work load Sunday in St. Louis as the Lions attempt to get their running game on track. After gaining 35 and 44 yards respectively in the first two games, Jones got 81 yards on 17 carries, despite getting only six second-half carries.

Analysis: Jones continues to inch his way toward a 100-yard performance and it could be likely he reaches that plateau in Week 4 vs. St. Louis, as the Rams are giving up 129.7 rushing yards per game. He is a solid No. 2 running back for Week 4.

 
Kevin Jones is one of the most talented runners in the league. He tries to do too much at times, dances too much, and doesn't always find the hole. I like what Martz said about trusting his blockers. KJ could have an explosive year if this offense stays on track.

 
gotta love this game out of KJ..still waiting for a 100 rushign game but the 2 TD's... sweet
its only been 21 games since the "star" has gone over 100 yards; you're too impatient . . .
and its been just about as long since he got 20+ carries.....
he's part of the problem, can't keep giving the guy the ball if he keeps getting shut down on first down . . .admittedly, I did watch the game today and he looked a lot better than usual . . .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kowalski's take

Q: Kevin Jones ran the ball well yesterday. I'd like to see him get 100 yards.

A: I don't know if he'll ever get 100 yards because they throw an awful lot. With six minutes left they threw two passes to Kevin Jones. Before that they threw to him … and got nothing. The defense fears two players, Kevin Jones and Roy Williams. Those guys are keying on them real tight. They are not going to let him catch a screen in space. They did put Shawn Bryson in with Jones, and then threw to Bryson -- which was clever. They need to do more of that. When the game is on the line, the defense is not going to allow those guys to break free.

 
1/4 through the season.. KJ's game log shows that

1) he is more involved than last year with increased touches

2) his YPC has improved week to week (only four games I know)

3) his 3TD's in the last 2 weeks can give some hope for his biggest TD total of his career (which up to now is 5 TD's so that shouldn't be too hard to do)

4) his receptions and his involvement in the passing game has really helped his value.. he has at least 5 catches in each of the four games

5) it seems that he is not being pulled on third downs like he was last year

6) from the game-threads it sounds like he is running with more power and assertiveness

the issues are of course

1) Lions are playing from behind a whole lot, so they aren't running the ball 25-30 times a game (Which would give KJ 22-25 carries)

2) Martz' system is so pass friendly, it sounds like even in closer games they will stop running the ball fairly early if the game is not going that way

3) the Bears... twice

 
well i have to admit i'm trying to run along side the bus and wait for it to stop at the next station. I had him behind Dunn and Brown this week. I've always like KJ and and totally missed out on this week's points prize. I may have to start adding back into my lineup.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top