Please save comedy attempts for the FFA. TIA.JLooked like a Lis Franc to me.
Please save comedy attempts for the FFA. TIA.JLooked like a Lis Franc to me.
So in your opinion, AD will be back as a full time starter right in time for the FF playoffs? Sounds more like wishful thinking. Odds are they are ultra careful with him for the rest of the year. No way they risk their franchise back considering they are all but out of the playoffs.I think im missing something here? Who created a new thread? The OP? or Someone else? And i dont see where they merged any threads.... someone fill me in please!IMO- ADP will be back week 13 RBBC and week 14 fully.Nothing to get. Sometimes it's easier to merge. Sometimes it's easier to start a new thread.And posts like yours and mine are always damaging to a thread where we get off the intended topic.Because his new thread had the new information on the tear in the headline.He's wondering why you started a new post when there is another one already active and located in the first ten posts on the first page.I dont know what you meanI don't get the new moderation. Every time there's new news, there's a new thread, but sometimes there isn't, and they just merge.
J
TIA for fillling me in...
I all seriousness, as I was watching the game, it just "felt" like he was getting too many carries.Not sure if this makes any sense (and I understand that the injury had nothing to do with the # of carries).Guess that shows all of us. Chili was right to limit him to 12-15 carries a game. See what the increased workload got us?
No, I know what you mean. You could just tell that all eleven guys on the defense were looking to take a shot at him, knowing that the Vikings couldn't pass the ball.It was literally dangerous for him to be out there under those conditions.I all seriousness, as I was watching the game, it just "felt" like he was getting too many carries.Not sure if this makes any sense (and I understand that the injury had nothing to do with the # of carries).Guess that shows all of us. Chili was right to limit him to 12-15 carries a game. See what the increased workload got us?
Huh?? he had 11 carries and 3 receptions.. If that is too many he may need to switch to Board Games.I all seriousness, as I was watching the game, it just "felt" like he was getting too many carries.Guess that shows all of us. Chili was right to limit him to 12-15 carries a game. See what the increased workload got us?
Not sure if this makes any sense (and I understand that the injury had nothing to do with the # of carries).
AJ had an MCL or PCL IIRC. Not an LCL.lol at all the acronymsI believe Andre Johnson had the same type of injury and he has been out for 7 weeks. The style of running ADP has I would think he will be out for awhile.
Here are all of the Vikings offensive plays until AP got injured...1st Possession -- 2 touches, 3 playsHuh?? he had 11 carries and 3 receptions.. If that is too many he may need to switch to Board Games.I all seriousness, as I was watching the game, it just "felt" like he was getting too many carries.Guess that shows all of us. Chili was right to limit him to 12-15 carries a game. See what the increased workload got us?
Not sure if this makes any sense (and I understand that the injury had nothing to do with the # of carries).
Isn't it the Defense' job to tackle the ball carrier?No, I know what you mean. You could just tell that all eleven guys on the defense were looking to take a shot at him, knowing that the Vikings couldn't pass the ball.It was literally dangerous for him to be out there under those conditions.I all seriousness, as I was watching the game, it just "felt" like he was getting too many carries.Not sure if this makes any sense (and I understand that the injury had nothing to do with the # of carries).Guess that shows all of us. Chili was right to limit him to 12-15 carries a game. See what the increased workload got us?
When they're playing the Vikings, yes. When playing the other 31 teams, some defensive players are reserved for defending recievers and tight ends.Isn't it the Defense' job to tackle the ball carrier?No, I know what you mean. You could just tell that all eleven guys on the defense were looking to take a shot at him, knowing that the Vikings couldn't pass the ball.It was literally dangerous for him to be out there under those conditions.I all seriousness, as I was watching the game, it just "felt" like he was getting too many carries.Not sure if this makes any sense (and I understand that the injury had nothing to do with the # of carries).Guess that shows all of us. Chili was right to limit him to 12-15 carries a game. See what the increased workload got us?![]()
Well, you ever heard of incentives?.........there are certain milestones in Peterson's contract that call for the Vikes to fork over additional $$$$$ if he exceeds them......1,300 yards rushing is one of the incentives, and there are several others, like R.O.Y. and NFL leading rusher, etc, that would call for the Vikes to fork over more $$$$$$.........So, given the fact that this org just tried to stiff a guy his weekly paycheck for attending a family member's funeral, do you actually think they (Vikes) would simply love to hand over (possibly) millions of $$$ to "AD" when they have no shot at the postseason this year?........There have been numerous situations like this in the past where team doctors can "suggest" an end to a player's season......and who's paying the team doctors?........hmmmmmmmWhat's not to understand? Obviously you missed the Rams announcement indicating that since they are now mathematically eliminated from contention and having just given Bulger big $ that they will be shelving hime for the rest of the year. Oh, and the Jets are moving back to Pennington as they fear getting Clemens hurt - he is their future after all.I don't get this. If he's healthy, why wouldn't he play? It's his job.Ryan and Kirwan were just speculating on Sirius that ADP may be done for the year. The thinking if it takes 3-4 weeks before he can play and the Vikes are out of it...why rush him back when he has such a bright future.
I was wondering about this too. On the other hand, the Vikings are trying to fill the Metrodome and would love to have a new stadium. So maybe they hope to bring AD back to at least draw in some fans and $$.kremenull said:Well, you ever heard of incentives?.........there are certain milestones in Peterson's contract that call for the Vikes to fork over additional $$$$$ if he exceeds them......1,300 yards rushing is one of the incentives, and there are several others, like R.O.Y. and NFL leading rusher, etc, that would call for the Vikes to fork over more $$$$$$.........So, given the fact that this org just tried to stiff a guy his weekly paycheck for attending a family member's funeral, do you actually think they (Vikes) would simply love to hand over (possibly) millions of $$$ to "AD" when they have no shot at the postseason this year?........There have been numerous situations like this in the past where team doctors can "suggest" an end to a player's season......and who's paying the team doctors?........hmmmmmmmMorton Muffley said:What's not to understand? Obviously you missed the Rams announcement indicating that since they are now mathematically eliminated from contention and having just given Bulger big $ that they will be shelving hime for the rest of the year. Oh, and the Jets are moving back to Pennington as they fear getting Clemens hurt - he is their future after all.Nigel Tufnel said:I don't get this. If he's healthy, why wouldn't he play? It's his job.Frenchy Fuqua said:Ryan and Kirwan were just speculating on Sirius that ADP may be done for the year. The thinking if it takes 3-4 weeks before he can play and the Vikes are out of it...why rush him back when he has such a bright future.
If anyone would know, its Schlereth:Before ending his playing career, Schlereth endured 29 surgeries, 20 on his knees (15 left, 5 right). After the 13th procedure on his left knee on July 24, 2000, Denver head coach Mike Shanahan stated, "He has a great pain threshold. I think the doctors said that it was the worst knee that they've ever seen." Schlereth would have two more procedures on his left knee during the 2000 season, his last in the NFL.Mark Schlerith on ESPN said the fact that its only the LCL is good news. It doesn't sound like a serious injury, but being that AD is a running back, he wouldn't be able to make cuts until its healed.
I'm sticking with my Week 15 return.. If the doctors clear him to play and he is feeling no pain from practice they will get him out there as part of a RBBC.I listened to the local radio through this newfangled interweb thingy. Radio hosts have been talking to doctors who, admittedly without seeing the MRI, said this injury should be more like 4 weeks to heal + 2 to rehab. Again, this is speculation on their part without any first-hand knowledge of ADP's exact injury, so take it FWIW. Still, it's worrisome.
This is the correct answer. 6 weeks. Coming from an orthopedic i know.I listened to the local radio through this newfangled interweb thingy. Radio hosts have been talking to doctors who, admittedly without seeing the MRI, said this injury should be more like 4 weeks to heal + 2 to rehab. Again, this is speculation on their part without any first-hand knowledge of ADP's exact injury, so take it FWIW. Still, it's worrisome.
AFTERNOON UPDATE: Athletic trainer Eric Sugarman said Peterson would “absolutely, no question” play again this season. In fact, Sugarman would not rule out Peterson returning as early as the Nov. 25 game at the New York Giants. It is possible, Sugarman said, that Peterson will need to wear a custom-made brace when he does resume playing.
I personally thought the veiled suggestion that formally educated people in this matter should say that, and those that aren't should add that caveat in the beginning of the post as a valuable suggestion. It's frustrating to read a blurb that ends up being a cut and paste from tehdoctor.com rather than from the mind of an actual one.snogger said:Joe Bryant said:Please don't go there. TIA.Jsnogger said:Yea.. Thanks for your info.. Because, as we know every LCL/ACL/MCL tear is exactly the same.Without your input where would we be.thehornet said:thanks for the added value.I love these "I'm not a doctor but I did stay at a Holiday Express last night" comments.![]()
![]()
![]()
I was making a statement as a whole about all the people in here claiming they know more than what we are being told. He took it as a personal
and I thought I'd run with it.Sometimes as a Vikings fan you have to go with what you have.. My bad.
![]()
kid, what are you talking about? nobody cut and pasted anything here. go play with your baseball cards.I personally thought the veiled suggestion that formally educated people in this matter should say that, and those that aren't should add that caveat in the beginning of the post as a valuable suggestion. It's frustrating to read a blurb that ends up being a cut and paste from tehdoctor.com rather than from the mind of an actual one.snogger said:Joe Bryant said:Please don't go there. TIA.Jsnogger said:Yea.. Thanks for your info.. Because, as we know every LCL/ACL/MCL tear is exactly the same.Without your input where would we be.thehornet said:thanks for the added value.I love these "I'm not a doctor but I did stay at a Holiday Express last night" comments.![]()
![]()
![]()
I was making a statement as a whole about all the people in here claiming they know more than what we are being told. He took it as a personal
and I thought I'd run with it.Sometimes as a Vikings fan you have to go with what you have.. My bad.
![]()
Not sure why Joe didn't appreciate it.
![]()
Sounds like good news. I always tend to worry about the physiological side of playing at less than 100%.Link
AFTERNOON UPDATE: Athletic trainer Eric Sugarman said Peterson would “absolutely, no question” play again this season. In fact, Sugarman would not rule out Peterson returning as early as the Nov. 25 game at the New York Giants. It is possible, Sugarman said, that Peterson will need to wear a custom-made brace when he does resume playing.
I have ADP in a dynasty, SHUT HIM DOWN NOW! The future is too bright. I got ADP because of his injury risk, well it happened, but so be it. No need to bring him back too early and risk further injury.Proud ADP owner here and I am making my plans to be without him the rest of the year. No reason to think he should play in December if they are out of the playoff race. He is obviously their franchise player.
Pains me to say it, as I'm fighting for a playoff spot, but I agree.Until there is a Vikes QB who D's need to respect AD will be a marked man.I have ADP in a dynasty, SHUT HIM DOWN NOW! The future is too bright. I got ADP because of his injury risk, well it happened, but so be it. No need to bring him back too early and risk further injury.Proud ADP owner here and I am making my plans to be without him the rest of the year. No reason to think he should play in December if they are out of the playoff race. He is obviously their franchise player.
That is a fact, without a QB and at 3-6 it does not make sense.Pains me to say it, as I'm fighting for a playoff spot, but I agree.Until there is a Vikes QB who D's need to respect AD will be a marked man.I have ADP in a dynasty, SHUT HIM DOWN NOW! The future is too bright. I got ADP because of his injury risk, well it happened, but so be it. No need to bring him back too early and risk further injury.Proud ADP owner here and I am making my plans to be without him the rest of the year. No reason to think he should play in December if they are out of the playoff race. He is obviously their franchise player.
I'm sticking with my Week 15 return.. If the doctors clear him to play and he is feeling no pain from practice they will get him out there as part of a RBBC. I don't expect we will see him carry the full load again this season. But I do expect, barring a set back, him to return by week 15.FWIW
First point well taken, should he come back. To the second point by the DaGuru, if he is fully healed, which looks like he should be, you have some stuff to work on... why not put him out there. If is 100% fully healed, why not? Risk that he gets re-injured... it's like the Chargers benching LT in week 17 if they already know they are going to miss the playoffs. There's pride all the way around, much less getting the kid to learn the NFL as much as you can, so he's not doing it Week 1 in '08.I would think Minny would shut ADP down for the rest of the season, at 3-6 and without a QB they are going nowhere this year and ADPs future is too bright to risk.
Well if he heals up and is healthy, how would that put him at more risk to be injured? Its not as if he made his ACL or MCL for that matter, weaker by tearing his LCL. In other words, they don't support eachother. In fact, the LCL heals a lot faster and better than an ACL.I have ADP in a dynasty, SHUT HIM DOWN NOW! The future is too bright. I got ADP because of his injury risk, well it happened, but so be it. No need to bring him back too early and risk further injury.Proud ADP owner here and I am making my plans to be without him the rest of the year. No reason to think he should play in December if they are out of the playoff race. He is obviously their franchise player.
Exactly, AD owners should prefer to have teams teeing off on him at the beginning of the season and lose him for more gamesBlessing in disguise?I don't really want teams teeing off on him for the remainder of the schedule anyway. Save the wear and tear for next year - hopefully with an NFL caliber coach and quarterback.
Now how on earth can you make a definative statement like that?Well, here is the problem for ADP owners. He won't be the same for the rest of the year, even if he does return.
OK then.. Why not just shut him down until 2009.. The Vikings probably won't be competing for a Super Bowl until then any ways... No need to risk it.Pains me to say it, as I'm fighting for a playoff spot, but I agree.Until there is a Vikes QB who D's need to respect AD will be a marked man.I have ADP in a dynasty, SHUT HIM DOWN NOW! The future is too bright. I got ADP because of his injury risk, well it happened, but so be it. No need to bring him back too early and risk further injury.Proud ADP owner here and I am making my plans to be without him the rest of the year. No reason to think he should play in December if they are out of the playoff race. He is obviously their franchise player.
Because they will return to the RBBC approach they started the year off. I don't expect him to have more than 15 carries a game when he returns.Now how on earth can you make a definative statement like that?Well, here is the problem for ADP owners. He won't be the same for the rest of the year, even if he does return.
How does that explain that he will not be the same? Might he have less opportunity? Yes. Will he definately not be the same? Who the heck knows!?Because they will return to the RBBC approach they started the year off. I don't expect him to have more than 15 carries a game when he returns.Now how on earth can you make a definative statement like that?Well, here is the problem for ADP owners. He won't be the same for the rest of the year, even if he does return.
Ya i agree with this. you sit him only if he CAN'T come back 100% this year, Do you take a chance and play him if he is not 100% and cause more damage for next year , IMO NO!! But your right you don't just sit him to sit him, if healthy he will play, but I believe the Vikes will be extra carfeful with himGuys, the NFL doesn't work that way. You don't sit him if he's able to play just because you're out of the playoffs. If that were the case, why on earth was S. Jackson, Bulger, T. Holt, and Bruce playing yesterday? Why does any team in the NFL continue to play their starters despite being eliminated? Because they get paid to do so and the fans who buy tickets pay to see them, not 2nd stringers. If AP is healthy and cleared to play, he will be out on the field carrying the ball. Of course, they won't "rush him back", but you better believe he'll be out on the field even if it's just the last game of the season if he's able to play. And he should be.
I think even if he comes back I think Taylor carries the load to increase his trade value, his days in MIN are numbered w/ADP there. Assuming they are out of playoffs.Guys, the NFL doesn't work that way. You don't sit him if he's able to play just because you're out of the playoffs. If that were the case, why on earth was S. Jackson, Bulger, T. Holt, and Bruce playing yesterday? Why does any team in the NFL continue to play their starters despite being eliminated? Because they get paid to do so and the fans who buy tickets pay to see them, not 2nd stringers. If AP is healthy and cleared to play, he will be out on the field carrying the ball. Of course, they won't "rush him back", but you better believe he'll be out on the field even if it's just the last game of the season if he's able to play. And he should be.