What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who will be named in the Mitchell Report? (1 Viewer)

Biggest Name Pitcher

  • Roger Clemens

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Andy Pettite

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roy Halladay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roy Oswalt

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Randy Johnson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Curt Schilling

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • John Smoltz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trevor Hoffman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mariano Rivera

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Johan Santana

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (list in your post bro)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Id be pretty damn upset if Paul O'Neil, Bernie or Pettite are on there.
Pettitte wouldnt surprise me since hes gay lovers with Clemens. ONeill wouldnt surprise me with all his temper tantrums.
Ever since the Grimsley thing, I've assumed that Pettitte and Clemens were going to be implicated in some way. O'Neill would definitely hurt though. I'm pretty sure I could deal with anyone aside from the following:JeterMattinglyMoO'NeillLuis SojoBecause if you can't trust Luis Sojo, then dammit who CAN you trust?!?Oh and I think Leyritz and perhaps Strawberry are on the list too.
 
by the way, it would be absolutely super awesome if Jon Papelbon or David Ortiz is on the list. (not that i expect it.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think its assinine to think any less than 50% of players were on the juice at some point. Thats why I was never big Bonds basher.
VERY :cry: I'm glad I never attacked Bonds and got on that band wagon... From Day 1 I said WAY too many people did it to single out Bonds........Other than the Perjury thing, I've felt bad from Bonds the whole time.
 
As long as Jeter and Mo aren't on the list, I wouldn't be particularly saddened. Obviously I'm hoping guys like Pettitte, Clemens, and Tino aren't on it but I have a strong suspicion that they are.

Aside from the names who have already been directly linked in some way (either through Grimsely, Canseco, BALCO, or the recent Florida/Albany cases), I'd say Piazza, Hundley, Bagwell, Luis Gonzalez have GOT to be on. Plus Gonzalez and Tino are BFF from their Tampa days, so it wouldn't be shocking to see the two of them on there. A few more potentials:

Jeff Kent >>>>>>>

Edgardo Alfonzo >>>>>>>>>>> All three with a Mets connection to Radomsky

Jeromy Burnitz >>>>>>>

Julio Franco

Todd Helton

Larry Walker

Jim Thome

Juan Gonzalez

Jim Edmonds

Adrian Beltre

Javy Lopez

Shawn Green

Frank Thomas

Mark Teixeira (dark horse)

Bret Boone (though I think he was implicated by Canseco at one point)

Richard Hidalgo

I wonder how far back the names go. Like, is it 60-80 CURRENT players? Because guys like Jay Bell (38 HR in 1999) and Kevin Elster (24 HR in 1996) are mortal locks for having taken roids at some point. But if the list is only current, fairly recent guys OR focuses exclusively on the big names, then guys like this won't be anywhere on it even though they're obvious.
Frank Thomas? Hasn't he been one of the most outspoken guys against steroids? I know he was pushing for more/stricter testing.
 
Bob Klapisch in the Bergen Record:

Regardless of where the pendulum rests, this will be a sea-change moment in baseball history, particularly in New York. According to one industry official, "several" prominent Yankees will be named by Mitchell in his 2 p.m. news conference in Manhattan. The official, who spoke to a third party who'd seen the final report, predicted, "It's going to be a rough day in the Bronx" after the identities are made public.

No Mets from the current 40-man roster are named, according to the same source.

'Current' Mets. Wouldn't be shocked if Hundley and Piazza were named.

Oh boy
Doesnt George Mitchell have part ownership in the Red Sox? I hope this report is unbiased. Anyway, it doesnt surprise me that several prominent Yanks are on it with Clemens, Pettitte, Sheffield, Giambi, & Grimsley all being in the news linked to steroids in the past.
Is this true or simply :thumbup:
 
The Yankee spin machine is in full efffect. Even before the entire list comes out - hysterical.

Eh drugs smugs - no big deal.

I LOVE BARRY BONDS and never cared that his head grew 3X the size of a normal melon.

 
As long as Jeter and Mo aren't on the list, I wouldn't be particularly saddened. Obviously I'm hoping guys like Pettitte, Clemens, and Tino aren't on it but I have a strong suspicion that they are.

Aside from the names who have already been directly linked in some way (either through Grimsely, Canseco, BALCO, or the recent Florida/Albany cases), I'd say Piazza, Hundley, Bagwell, Luis Gonzalez have GOT to be on. Plus Gonzalez and Tino are BFF from their Tampa days, so it wouldn't be shocking to see the two of them on there. A few more potentials:

Jeff Kent >>>>>>>

Edgardo Alfonzo >>>>>>>>>>> All three with a Mets connection to Radomsky

Jeromy Burnitz >>>>>>>

Julio Franco

Todd Helton

Larry Walker

Jim Thome

Juan Gonzalez

Jim Edmonds

Adrian Beltre

Javy Lopez

Shawn Green

Frank Thomas

Mark Teixeira (dark horse)

Bret Boone (though I think he was implicated by Canseco at one point)

Richard Hidalgo

I wonder how far back the names go. Like, is it 60-80 CURRENT players? Because guys like Jay Bell (38 HR in 1999) and Kevin Elster (24 HR in 1996) are mortal locks for having taken roids at some point. But if the list is only current, fairly recent guys OR focuses exclusively on the big names, then guys like this won't be anywhere on it even though they're obvious.
Frank Thomas? Hasn't he been one of the most outspoken guys against steroids? I know he was pushing for more/stricter testing.
Don't forget Brady Anderson.
 
The Yankee spin machine is in full efffect. Even before the entire list comes out - hysterical.Eh drugs smugs - no big deal.I LOVE BARRY BONDS and never cared that his head grew 3X the size of a normal melon.
Huh.... We're you around in 1986???????Or is Coke and other drugs different... You think they were against enhancing drugs and only did non enhancers by the bushel......I don't see how a Mets fan can get up on a HIGH horse about anything......I've always been consistent on the issue myself.
 
The Yankee spin machine is in full efffect. Even before the entire list comes out - hysterical.Eh drugs smugs - no big deal.I LOVE BARRY BONDS and never cared that his head grew 3X the size of a normal melon.
Show me links where Ive said anything different.
 
Bob Klapisch in the Bergen Record:

Regardless of where the pendulum rests, this will be a sea-change moment in baseball history, particularly in New York. According to one industry official, "several" prominent Yankees will be named by Mitchell in his 2 p.m. news conference in Manhattan. The official, who spoke to a third party who'd seen the final report, predicted, "It's going to be a rough day in the Bronx" after the identities are made public.

No Mets from the current 40-man roster are named, according to the same source.

'Current' Mets. Wouldn't be shocked if Hundley and Piazza were named.

Oh boy
Doesnt George Mitchell have part ownership in the Red Sox? I hope this report is unbiased. Anyway, it doesnt surprise me that several prominent Yanks are on it with Clemens, Pettitte, Sheffield, Giambi, & Grimsley all being in the news linked to steroids in the past.
Is this true or simply :rolleyes:
Mitchell also serves as a Director in the front office for the Boston Red Sox.
 
The Yankee spin machine is in full efffect. Even before the entire list comes out - hysterical.Eh drugs smugs - no big deal.I LOVE BARRY BONDS and never cared that his head grew 3X the size of a normal melon.
Huh.... We're you around in 1986???????Or is Coke and other drugs different... You think they were against enhancing drugs and only did non enhancers by the bushel......I don't see how a Mets fan can get up on a HIGH horse about anything......I've always been consistent on the issue myself.
Especially when one of the main source is a Mets trainer. And you never saw me going around saying the Mets were all cheats. Every team has steroid users.
 
shadyridr said:
Doctor Detroit said:
There goes Cobalt 27's Bonds argument. If there are a boatload of Yankees on the list that's gonna hurt. :ouch:
What was cobalt's Bonds argument?
The asterisk. I said that's fine if the Yankees World Championships get them too and he said he needed more evidence. HELLO EVIDENCE!
I think its assinine to think any less than 50% of players were on the juice at some point. Thats why I was never big Bonds basher.
but everyone gets pissed at bonds for how smug and above the game he thoguht he was. what an arrogant ##### that guy is. i still hate him.
 
The Yankee spin machine is in full efffect. Even before the entire list comes out - hysterical.Eh drugs smugs - no big deal.I LOVE BARRY BONDS and never cared that his head grew 3X the size of a normal melon.
Huh.... We're you around in 1986???????Or is Coke and other drugs different... You think they were against enhancing drugs and only did non enhancers by the bushel......I don't see how a Mets fan can get up on a HIGH horse about anything......I've always been consistent on the issue myself.
Especially when one of the main source is a Mets trainer. And you never saw me going around saying the Mets were all cheats. Every team has steroid users.
except for maybe the marlins! they cant afford it! oh im so funny...
 
Bob Klapisch in the Bergen Record:

Regardless of where the pendulum rests, this will be a sea-change moment in baseball history, particularly in New York. According to one industry official, "several" prominent Yankees will be named by Mitchell in his 2 p.m. news conference in Manhattan. The official, who spoke to a third party who'd seen the final report, predicted, "It's going to be a rough day in the Bronx" after the identities are made public.

No Mets from the current 40-man roster are named, according to the same source.

'Current' Mets. Wouldn't be shocked if Hundley and Piazza were named.

Oh boy
Doesnt George Mitchell have part ownership in the Red Sox? I hope this report is unbiased. Anyway, it doesnt surprise me that several prominent Yanks are on it with Clemens, Pettitte, Sheffield, Giambi, & Grimsley all being in the news linked to steroids in the past.
Is this true or simply :rolleyes:
He is a director for the Boston Red Sox...
 
Bob Klapisch in the Bergen Record:

Regardless of where the pendulum rests, this will be a sea-change moment in baseball history, particularly in New York. According to one industry official, "several" prominent Yankees will be named by Mitchell in his 2 p.m. news conference in Manhattan. The official, who spoke to a third party who'd seen the final report, predicted, "It's going to be a rough day in the Bronx" after the identities are made public.

No Mets from the current 40-man roster are named, according to the same source.

'Current' Mets. Wouldn't be shocked if Hundley and Piazza were named.

Oh boy
Doesnt George Mitchell have part ownership in the Red Sox? I hope this report is unbiased. Anyway, it doesnt surprise me that several prominent Yanks are on it with Clemens, Pettitte, Sheffield, Giambi, & Grimsley all being in the news linked to steroids in the past.
Is this true or simply :fishing:
Yes, his official title is "Director" and I believe he is one of the many minority owners of the team. He's taken a leave of abscence from the team since taking over the investigation. Still though, I am puzzled as to why they'd hire the guy to take on an investigation like that.
 
shadyridr said:
Doctor Detroit said:
There goes Cobalt 27's Bonds argument. If there are a boatload of Yankees on the list that's gonna hurt. :ouch:
What was cobalt's Bonds argument?
The asterisk. I said that's fine if the Yankees World Championships get them too and he said he needed more evidence. HELLO EVIDENCE!
I think its assinine to think any less than 50% of players were on the juice at some point. Thats why I was never big Bonds basher.
but everyone gets pissed at bonds for how smug and above the game he thoguht he was. what an arrogant ##### that guy is. i still hate him.
I do dislike him cuz of his attitude but not cuz of the steroid thing.
 
shadyridr said:
Doctor Detroit said:
There goes Cobalt 27's Bonds argument. If there are a boatload of Yankees on the list that's gonna hurt. :ouch:
What was cobalt's Bonds argument?
The asterisk. I said that's fine if the Yankees World Championships get them too and he said he needed more evidence. HELLO EVIDENCE!
I think its assinine to think any less than 50% of players were on the juice at some point. Thats why I was never big Bonds basher.
I don't know about the percentage but I do know I've had to hear all this crap about Bonds for years and I kept saying, just wait, just wait. Wait is over. Every generation of baseball has their scandel and players have cut corners forever yet bonds is always the at the center of every discussion with the haters wanting us to believe he wasn't as good as his numbers suggest. My message has always been he's the best player of his era regardless, with or without steroids. This will just prove he was better than giys that were taking steroids when he wasn't, and better than guys taking steroids when he was also. You can't asterisk the whole era but at least now hopefully people can accept that it happened and move on without placing the blame on a handful of individuals. I would guess people won't let up on Bonds either way.
 
shadyridr said:
Doctor Detroit said:
There goes Cobalt 27's Bonds argument. If there are a boatload of Yankees on the list that's gonna hurt. :ouch:
What was cobalt's Bonds argument?
The asterisk. I said that's fine if the Yankees World Championships get them too and he said he needed more evidence. HELLO EVIDENCE!
I think its assinine to think any less than 50% of players were on the juice at some point. Thats why I was never big Bonds basher.
I don't know about the percentage but I do know I've had to hear all this crap about Bonds for years and I kept saying, just wait, just wait. Wait is over. Every generation of baseball has their scandel and players have cut corners forever yet bonds is always the at the center of every discussion with the haters wanting us to believe he wasn't as good as his numbers suggest. My message has always been he's the best player of his era regardless, with or without steroids. This will just prove he was better than giys that were taking steroids when he wasn't, and better than guys taking steroids when he was also. You can't asterisk the whole era but at least now hopefully people can accept that it happened and move on without placing the blame on a handful of individuals. I would guess people won't let up on Bonds either way.
i agree 100%. Ive always been a "Bonds is the best player in baseball since ruth" proponent
 
From another board. Not sure how accurate:

Brady Anderson, Manny Alexander, Rick Ankiel, Jeff Bagwell, Barry Bonds, Aaron Boone, Rafaeil Bettancourt, Bret Boone, Milton Bradley, David Bell, Dante Bichette, Albert Belle, Paul Byrd, Wil Cordero, Ken Caminiti, Mike Cameron, Ramon Castro, Jose and Ozzie Canseco, Roger Clemens, Paxton Crawford, Wilson Delgado, Lenny Dykstra, Johnny Damon, Carl Everett, Kyle Farnsoworth, Ryan Franklin, Troy Glaus, Rich Garces :lmao: , Jason Grimsley, Troy Glaus, Juan Gonzalez, Eric Gagne, Nomar Garciaparra, Jason Giambi, Jeremy Giambi, Jose Guillen, Jay Gibbons, Juan Gonzalez, Clay Hensley, Jerry Hairston, Felix Heredia, Jr., Darren Holmes, Wally Joyner, Darryl Kile :goodposting: , Matt Lawton, Raul Mondesi, Ma rk McGwire, Guillermo Mota, Robert Machado, Damian Moss, Abraham Nunez, Trot Nixon, Jose Offerman, Andy Pettitte, Mark Prior, Neifi Perez, Rafael Palmiero, Albert Pujols, Brian Roberts, Juan Rincon, John Rocker, Pudge Rodriguez, Sammy Sosa, Scott Schoenweiis, David Segui, Alex Sanchez, Gary Sheffield, Miguel Tej ada, Julian Tavarez,Fernando Tatis, Maurice Vaughn, Jason Varitek, Ismael Valdez, Matt Williams and Kerry Wood
Cant say any of these names surprise me.
 
They should add an * to all those NY championships.
:boxing:
Well if the NY Post can put an * next to the Patriots record this year, why should they not put an * next to the yankees championships IF more than a few prominent Yankee players are named? Personally, I'm not sayign they should or shouldn't, but if the NY Post were to label the Pats with an *, they should do the same for any team that won championships and have more than a few prominent players named in this report.
 
if that list is true, none of those yankees bother me being on the list.
Considering the role Clemens and Pettitte played in their world championships, you probably should. There are going to be a lot of people saying a lot of things in the next few days about that. David Bell and Neifi make me laugh.
 
Here's the list I got e-mail:

Albert Belle, Paul Byrd, Wil Cordero, Ken Caminiti, Mike Cameron, Ramon Castro, Jose and Ozzie Canseco, Roger Clemens, Paxton Crawford, Wilson Delgado, Lenny Dykstra, Johnny Damon, Carl Everett, Kyle Farnsoworth, Ryan Franklin, Troy Glaus, Rich Garces, Jason Grimsley, Troy Glaus, Juan Gonzalez, Eric Gagne, Nomar Garciaparra, Jason Giambi, JeremyGiambi, Jose Guillen, Jay Gibbons, Juan Gonzalez, Clay Hensley,Jerry Hairston, Felix Heredia, Jr., Darren Holmes, Wally Joyner, Darryl Kile, Matt Lawton, Raul Mondesi, Mark McGwire, Guillermo Mota, Robert Machado, Damian Moss,Abraham Nunez, Trot Nixon, Jose Offerman, Andy Pettitte, Mark Prior, Neifi Perez, Rafael Palmiero, Albert Pujols, Brian Roberts, Juan Rincon, John Rocker, Pudge Rodriguez, Sammy Sosa, Scott Schoenweiis, David Segui, Alex Sanchez, Gary Sheffield, Miguel Tejada, Julian Tavarez,Fernando Tatis, Maurice Vaughn, Jason Varitek, Ismael Valdez, Matt Williams and Kerry Wood."
 
if that list is true, none of those yankees bother me being on the list.
Considering the role Clemens and Pettitte played in their world championships, you probably should. There are going to be a lot of people saying a lot of things in the next few days about that. David Bell and Neifi make me laugh.
If varitek and Damon are indeed on there will the sox get the same bashing? For some reason, i think not.
 
This list cost $60 million to compile, you can be pretty damn sure that anyone named is/was a juicer.

EDIT: Respect to Frank Thomas and Griffey Jr....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From another board. Not sure how accurate:

Brady Anderson, Manny Alexander, Rick Ankiel, Jeff Bagwell, Barry Bonds, Aaron Boone, Rafaeil Bettancourt, Bret Boone, Milton Bradley, David Bell, Dante Bichette, Albert Belle, Paul Byrd, Wil Cordero, Ken Caminiti, Mike Cameron, Ramon Castro, Jose and Ozzie Canseco, Roger Clemens, Paxton Crawford, Wilson Delgado, Lenny Dykstra, Johnny Damon, Carl Everett, Kyle Farnsoworth, Ryan Franklin, Troy Glaus, Rich Garces :bs: , Jason Grimsley, Troy Glaus, Juan Gonzalez, Eric Gagne, Nomar Garciaparra, Jason Giambi, Jeremy Giambi, Jose Guillen, Jay Gibbons, Juan Gonzalez, Clay Hensley, Jerry Hairston, Felix Heredia, Jr., Darren Holmes, Wally Joyner, Darryl Kile :boxing: , Matt Lawton, Raul Mondesi, Ma rk McGwire, Guillermo Mota, Robert Machado, Damian Moss, Abraham Nunez, Trot Nixon, Jose Offerman, Andy Pettitte, Mark Prior, Neifi Perez, Rafael Palmiero, Albert Pujols, Brian Roberts, Juan Rincon, John Rocker, Pudge Rodriguez, Sammy Sosa, Scott Schoenweiis, David Segui, Alex Sanchez, Gary Sheffield, Miguel Tej ada, Julian Tavarez,Fernando Tatis, Maurice Vaughn, Jason Varitek, Ismael Valdez, Matt Williams and Kerry Wood
Cant say any of these names surprise me.
Quite a few Boston or guys with Boston connections as well. If this list is fairly accurate, Canseco/Damon/Everett/Nomar/Nixon/Tavarez/Vaughn/Varitek are all prominent Boston guys at one time or another, and a few more like Moss and Crawford are smaller-time with the team. I guess this would eliminate the notion that Mitchell avoided reporting on any Sox players.IBT someone suggesting that he intentionally threw out these Boston names and hid Ortiz and Manny in order to appease fans who would want to see some impartiality on his part.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
shadyridr said:
Doctor Detroit said:
There goes Cobalt 27's Bonds argument. If there are a boatload of Yankees on the list that's gonna hurt. :ouch:
What was cobalt's Bonds argument?
The asterisk. I said that's fine if the Yankees World Championships get them too and he said he needed more evidence. HELLO EVIDENCE!
I think its assinine to think any less than 50% of players were on the juice at some point. Thats why I was never big Bonds basher.
I don't know about the percentage but I do know I've had to hear all this crap about Bonds for years and I kept saying, just wait, just wait. Wait is over. Every generation of baseball has their scandel and players have cut corners forever yet bonds is always the at the center of every discussion with the haters wanting us to believe he wasn't as good as his numbers suggest. My message has always been he's the best player of his era regardless, with or without steroids. This will just prove he was better than giys that were taking steroids when he wasn't, and better than guys taking steroids when he was also. You can't asterisk the whole era but at least now hopefully people can accept that it happened and move on without placing the blame on a handful of individuals. I would guess people won't let up on Bonds either way.
i agree 100%. Ive always been a "Bonds is the best player in baseball since ruth" proponent
:boxing:
 
This list cost $60 million to compile, you can be pretty damn sure that anyone named is/was a juicer. With that being said, it smells like a PR stunt for MLB. 60-80 players named? Of the possible 4000 or so that played during the time-frame? Sure, it may be that hard to get legit evidence on a player, but I'm not buying it. This is an attempt to placate the fans, and the juicing will go on...do we really care at this point? This goes for every sport where millions are at stake...
A PR stunt? There are future HOFers on that list and the best player in baseball in Albert Pujols. Think before you start typing.
 
This list cost $60 million to compile, you can be pretty damn sure that anyone named is/was a juicer. With that being said, it smells like a PR stunt for MLB. 60-80 players named? Of the possible 4000 or so that played during the time-frame? Sure, it may be that hard to get legit evidence on a player, but I'm not buying it. This is an attempt to placate the fans, and the juicing will go on...do we really care at this point? This goes for every sport where millions are at stake...
A PR stunt? There are future HOFers on that list and the best player in baseball in Albert Pujols. Think before you start typing.
Time will tell...and I didn't see the full list before I typed...only those geezers Clemens and Pettite...nevertheless...I take the placate statement back...On the other hand, the MLB PR department will earn their salaries over the next week...but I'm not sure it will matter...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Given Mitchell's connection to the Red Sox, how fishy will it be if a bunch of Yankees are named and no Red Sox?
Might want to go easy on the conspiracy there, fellow. Guy has a bit of a positive reputation.
It was a question, not an accusation.
No, it was an accusation. You don't use the word 'fishy' otherwise.
No, it was a question.
I'll be interested to see if Ortiz and/or Manny are on the list.
Honestly, I would be surprised if Ortiz isn't named, given how his numbers suddenly blew up when he went to Boston.
 
This list cost $60 million to compile, you can be pretty damn sure that anyone named is/was a juicer. With that being said, it smells like a PR stunt for MLB. 60-80 players named? Of the possible 4000 or so that played during the time-frame? Sure, it may be that hard to get legit evidence on a player, but I'm not buying it. This is an attempt to placate the fans, and the juicing will go on...do we really care at this point? This goes for every sport where millions are at stake...
A PR stunt? There are future HOFers on that list and the best player in baseball in Albert Pujols. Think before you start typing.
Time will tell...and I didn't see the full list before I typed...only those geezers Clemens and Pettite...nevertheless...I take the placate statement back...
If the report comes out and there a bunch of Ozzie Cansecos and no stars then I would be suspicious also. But Pujols is huge and MLB probably cringed when they saw that report with his name on it. The older guys that were great hurt also but this is gonna dog Pujols a young star player for awhile. MLB doesn't want that.
 
if that list is true, none of those yankees bother me being on the list.
:excited:oh enough, already
:lmao: I think Sox fans with Varitek and Cardinals fans with Pujols have alot more to be bothered about than me
As a Cardinals fan, Pujols was the one guy I had hoped wouldn't be mentioned, so if he is, it will suck, but honestly, so many MLers cheat nowadays, that no name will really surprise me today. That is kinda sad, I know.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top