SSOG said:
Jedimaster21 said:
SSOG said:
2,000 is a lot harder to reach when you don't get 300 of it in a single game.
Is this a pro or a con regarding his chances? Since he has already achieved this, and rushed for over 200 yards twice, doesn't that make him more likely to do it again?
Corey Dillon and Jamal Lewis also almost hit 300 yards rushing. How many times did they repeat that performance during their careers?Peterson did it once in his one year in the league, which makes a lot of people think it's going to be easier than it really is. That's a career game. Peterson might have one or two near it left in him during his career, but it's not like it's going to become a regular occurance.
You do not think you are worshiping at the statistical altar a bit? Are really suggesting that it's easier for a guy to get a 200 yard game if he hasn't done it before, rather than a guy to have a 2nd one? The guy has shown he has the talent, unprecedented talent.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...t&p=8179585Edit: Also, Jim Brown, Walter Peyton, Barry Sanders, O.J. Simpson, Gale Sayers, Bo Jackson, and innumerable other RBs take exception to you calling Peterson's talent "unprecedented". Let's wait until he has more than 14 games under his belt before calling him the most talented RB the NFL has ever seen.
Even better, let's wait until he's not coming off of a stretch where he was held under 80 yards in 7 of the past 9 games. Or until he's not averaging 2.67 yards per carry in his last 4 games (including a 14-carry, 3-yard performance) while running behind the best run-blocking line in the league. Is he talented? Yes. Is he incredibly talented? Yes. Is he one of the most talented RBs in the league? Yes. Is his talent unprecedented in the history of the NFL? Hell no. Maybe.