What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jonathan Stewart (1 Viewer)

ImTheScientist

Footballguy
I think he deserves his own thread. His combine numbers have been very impressive. This guy is going to be a stud at the next level. If he gets out of the Top 20 someone is going to get a steal.

:mellow: Here's to the #1 Rookie RB next year!

To further the Stewart disscusion I would like to know.......

1) What team does he end up on

2) Stud or Dud

3) List your top 5 RB's in this years class.

ETA:

Some Split stat links for the following RB's 2007 season. Good source of info.

Darren McFadden

Jonathan Stewart

Felix Jones

Rashard Mendenhall

Chris Johnson

Ray Rice

Mike Hart

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree.

My top 5 are:

1. Stewart

2. Mendenhall

3. McFadden

4. Jones

5. Rice

1,2,3 close, 4 not too far behind, then Rice and Charles . I'm not sure who will go where, but obviously it will play a role in fantasy drafts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree.My top 5 are:1. Stewart2. Mendenhall3. McFadden4. Jones5. Rice1,2,3 close, 4 not too far behind, then Rice and Charles . I'm not sure who will go where, but obviously it will play a role in fantasy drafts.
No Chris Johnson??I'm not so sure Jones still has a lock on the 4-hole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My Top 5 Rbs in this class are:

1) Stewart :shrug:

2) Rice

3) Mendenhall

4) McFadden

5) Hart

The more I see rice the more I like him. I had to bump him up the rankings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Before the combine Stewart has been my top back and I base it solely on film study. He might be the best back I've studied on tape in the past three seasons. While it's nice to hear Stewart looks good at the combine, the fact that he runs like a 230-lb Emmitt Smith with more speed is what has me excited about his prospects.

Even after Mendenhall's nice 40-time I'm still convinced owners hoping to land a franchise back with future pro bowl years will be disappointed with him and McFadden.

Give me Stewart, Ray Rice, and Kevin Smith...Smith may take a bit more time to develop, but he has the best hips of any back I've seen in years.

 
My top 5 as of now, I'm sure will change:

1. Stewart

2. McFadden

3. Mendenhall

4. Rice

5. Jones

I've got the 1.7 pick, before the combine results, 2 guys I liked and have really improved themselves after the combine:

Forte

C. Johnson

 
My top 5 as of now, I'm sure will change: 1. Stewart2. McFadden3. Mendenhall4. Rice5. JonesI've got the 1.7 pick, before the combine results, 2 guys I liked and have really improved themselves after the combine:ForteC. Johnson
The thing that bothers me about Chris Johnson is that he takes everything outside. He won't mix it up between the tackles. That will never translate into a fantasy stud RB.I also like Tashard Choice. I would put him somewhere in the top 10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. Rashard Mendenhall*

2. Jonathan Stewart*

3. Darren McFadden*

4. Ray Rice*

5. Felix Jones*

6. Jamaal Charles*

7. Kevin Smith*

8. Chris Johnson

9. Steve Slaton*

10. Mike Hart

11. Matt Forte

12. Tashard Choice

13. Justin Forsett

14. BenJarvus Green-Ellis

15. Allen Patrick

I like the top 4-5 backs in this year's class and the sleeper potential in 9-12.. Johnson is blazing fast, but I'll need to see where he ends up. The same holds true for all of the smaller guys like Johnson, Slaton, Hart and Forsett especially.

 
Big fanJamal Lewis clone
Just like Jamal... Trade him before his 1500 carry or his 26th Birthday... thats when the break down of these "Bigger / Power" backs seem too be at.Seriously, you guys are nutz to call Stewart the best... hes very good yes. But after today.. theres McFadden, then Mendenhall, then theres everyone else... tier 2 begins w/ Stewart.
 
Big fan

Jamal Lewis clone
Just like Jamal... Trade him before his 1500 carry or his 26th Birthday... thats when the break down of these "Bigger / Power" backs seem too be at.Seriously, you guys are nutz to call Stewart the best... hes very good yes. But after today..

theres McFadden, then Mendenhall, then theres everyone else... tier 2 begins w/ Stewart.
Mcfadden and Mendenhall maybe 1 & 2 after today, but Stewart is still ahead of all the other RB's out there. He's closer to tier 1 guys than tier 2. It could end up:Mcfadden

Mendenhall

Stewart

everyone else...

 
Big fan

Jamal Lewis clone
Just like Jamal... Trade him before his 1500 carry or his 26th Birthday... thats when the break down of these "Bigger / Power" backs seem too be at.Seriously, you guys are nutz to call Stewart the best... hes very good yes. But after today..

theres McFadden, then Mendenhall, then theres everyone else... tier 2 begins w/ Stewart.
Mcfadden and Mendenhall maybe 1 & 2 after today, but Stewart is still ahead of all the other RB's out there. He's closer to tier 1 guys than tier 2. It could end up:Mcfadden

Mendenhall

Stewart

everyone else...

Me and you are on the same page.... :confused:
 
Let's not let the combine and 40 dictate who is the better player.

Location of draft spot for the backs will be the telling tale.

I think McFadden will still drop.

 
Big fanJamal Lewis clone
Just like Jamal... Trade him before his 1500 carry or his 26th Birthday... thats when the break down of these "Bigger / Power" backs seem too be at.Seriously, you guys are nutz to call Stewart the best... hes very good yes. But after today.. theres McFadden, then Mendenhall, then theres everyone else... tier 2 begins w/ Stewart.
The 40 yard dash makes McFadden #1 :mellow:
 
Stewart ran 4.48 40, had the third most reps on the bench, and the second best Vert Jump. Not to mention he is built to play the position at the NFL level. There are three RB's above the rest in this years class IMO. Stewart, Mendenhall, McFadden.

2 are built to play the part while one lacks leg drive and vision IMO. You can have all the speed in the world but if you can't break tackles in the NFL you won't break long runs.

 
Stewart had a better combine than Mendenhall. So if you think today solidified Mendenhall as the RB2, you're putting way too much emphasis on a few tenths of a second in the 40.

 
Marshal Faulk had McFadden as his 1st RB and Jonathan Stewart at no 6. I'm tending to agree with him.
Can't see ranking Stewart any lower than 3 at this point unless you know something we don't. Faulk's rankings were trash. He had Mike Hart as the number 3 runner in the class.
 
Stewart had a better combine than Mendenhall. So if you think today solidified Mendenhall as the RB2, you're putting way too much emphasis on a few tenths of a second in the 40.
Not tenths.. hundredths. They are all very fast, fast enough. And Stewart has run faster many times. I'm sure he's a little disappointed with that 40.
 
Marshal Faulk had McFadden as his 1st RB and Jonathan Stewart at no 6. I'm tending to agree with him.
Can't see ranking Stewart any lower than 3 at this point unless you know something we don't. Faulk's rankings were trash. He had Mike Hart as the number 3 runner in the class.
I'm wacthing their tapes; McFadden has something that Stewart don't. IMO, McFadden >> Stewart game time.
 
Stewart had a better combine than Mendenhall. So if you think today solidified Mendenhall as the RB2, you're putting way too much emphasis on a few tenths of a second in the 40.
Not tenths.. hundredths.
:thumbup: The point remains the same though. I won't fault anyone for ranking Mendenhall above Stewart, but I don't think Mendenhall did anything today to distinguish himself from Stewart today. Stewart had the better overall performance.
 
Marshal Faulk had McFadden as his 1st RB and Jonathan Stewart at no 6. I'm tending to agree with him.
Can't see ranking Stewart any lower than 3 at this point unless you know something we don't. Faulk's rankings were trash. He had Mike Hart as the number 3 runner in the class.
I'm wacthing their tapes; McFadden has something that Stewart don't. IMO, McFadden >> Stewart game time.
I'm not surprised you have Stewart below McFadden. I'm surprised you have him as the 6th best RB in this class. That seems hard to justify at this point.
 
Marshal Faulk had McFadden as his 1st RB and Jonathan Stewart at no 6. I'm tending to agree with him.
Can't see ranking Stewart any lower than 3 at this point unless you know something we don't. Faulk's rankings were trash. He had Mike Hart as the number 3 runner in the class.
I'm wacthing their tapes; McFadden has something that Stewart don't. IMO, McFadden >> Stewart game time.
What....he goes down on first contact and has poor vision. Not too mention character issues (I guess you can't see that on tape)
 
Marshal Faulk had McFadden as his 1st RB and Jonathan Stewart at no 6. I'm tending to agree with him.
Can't see ranking Stewart any lower than 3 at this point unless you know something we don't. Faulk's rankings were trash. He had Mike Hart as the number 3 runner in the class.
I'm wacthing their tapes; McFadden has something that Stewart don't. IMO, McFadden >> Stewart game time.
What....he goes down on first contact and has poor vision. Not too mention character issues (I guess you can't see that on tape)
He does? He may not be the strongest runner, but i have seen him break plenty of tackles. As far as his vision, i think it is just as good as any other RB coming out this year. I know, Mayock showed you three clips that proves he cant break tackles and has poor vision, so it must be right.
 
Even after Mendenhall's nice 40-time I'm still convinced owners hoping to land a franchise back with future pro bowl years will be disappointed with him and McFadden.

Give me Stewart, Ray Rice, and Kevin Smith...Smith may take a bit more time to develop, but he has the best hips of any back I've seen in years.
Didn't see hardly any College games this year and I have dialup, so no clips on the net. One thing I saw today that bothers me that I have not seen talked about was Mendenhalls Dummy Bag/Cone Drill. He came to a complete "Happyfeet Stutterstop" before he made his cuts. Rice looked good in the same drill and I never saw Stewart in it. Mendenhall looked like it didn't register which way he was supposed to go or he cannot change direction :unsure:
 
Even after Mendenhall's nice 40-time I'm still convinced owners hoping to land a franchise back with future pro bowl years will be disappointed with him and McFadden.

Give me Stewart, Ray Rice, and Kevin Smith...Smith may take a bit more time to develop, but he has the best hips of any back I've seen in years.
Didn't see hardly any College games this year and I have dialup, so no clips on the net. One thing I saw today that bothers me that I have not seen talked about was Mendenhalls Dummy Bag/Cone Drill. He came to a complete "Happyfeet Stutterstop" before he made his cuts. Rice looked good in the same drill and I never saw Stewart in it. Mendenhall looked like it didn't register which way he was supposed to go or he cannot change direction :whoosh:
If you were to see the youtube videos of Mendenhall you would see a back that has zero problems cutting back or changing directions. Actually, this might be one of his strengths.
 
Big fan

Jamal Lewis clone
Just like Jamal... Trade him before his 1500 carry or his 26th Birthday... thats when the break down of these "Bigger / Power" backs seem too be at.Seriously, you guys are nutz to call Stewart the best... hes very good yes. But after today..

theres McFadden, then Mendenhall, then theres everyone else... tier 2 begins w/ Stewart.
The 40 yard dash makes McFadden #1 :sarcasm:
Maybe their college career's have something to do with my decision...
 
Wow, Adrian Peterson finally got the benefit of the doubt from the skeptics after a great Combine, not McFadden, huh? When you have no place to go but down, you are always going to take shots, but McFadden was the top RB on the field and did nothing lose the title working out. The guy is the real deal. Ball security is a concern, but if you look back at his fumbles, a lot of them came on kick-offs and as a QB in the Wild Hog package, which he isn't going to be running regularly at the next level, on exchanges and such. My bigger concern is him getting the footwork down out of the I and patience to allow blocks to set up after running in such an unconventional offense. However, that is a short term concern, he'll be coached up and natural talent will rise to the top. This is actually a concern for a few guys, e.g. Mendenhall also ran out of mostly spread sets w/a running threat QB, which helped pad his numbers, but same as McFadden, I'm not worried this will work out fine. As for his off-field issues, the lack of maturity is more disappointing than them being a concern he is a thug or lacks focus. The first one is a non-factor, someone tries to steal his brother's car and he gets in a fight. Unfortunately, it resulted in his only serious injury in college (almost lost a toe), but he bounced back fine. The disappointing part is his latest incident at a club, which was even less of a problem in a vaccuum, but you would have thought he learned his lesson about avoiding the nightlife, especially heading in to the draft. That and the paternity claim are pure lack of maturity.

Two tangible things that bother me about Stewart are his left ankle, including a bit on his "durability potential" I'll call it, and his elusiveness at full speed. The ankle has been a recurring problem going back to high school and he is prone to get dinged up, in general. Now he's proven very tough in playing through it most of the time (one of his strong assets), I think he only missed one full game in his college career, but stability of the ankle and all his joints and tendons are headed for a beating like they've never endured before. I'm always nervous about extreme size/speed freaks like him. Your joints and tendons have to be pushed to their limits to support the weight of a guy like that moving at the speed he does. Physics seems to catch up with guys like this (Terry Glenn, Greg Jones, the aforementioned Jamal Lewis, etc) when it comes to serious injuries and that left ankle seems primed to be in the equation. Still, I'm sure plenty of medical tests will be done on the stability of all his parts, so if a team is still confident enough to spend a first round pick on him, that obviously trumps my unsubstantiated gut feelings and observations (although the xspurts have all been wrong before too :sarcasm: ). The only thing I dislike about Stewart on tape is he becomes a bit stiff once he's at full speed. Watching him in 2006, I struggled to understand why the track speed he had that translated on returns didn't do the same as much from scrimmage. In 2007, it seemed to translate better, but when I took a closer look at the home runs he hit, he almost exclusively went untouched on them. Got the corner before anyone touched him or went up the middle on a perfectly executed play and no one got him. Now, admittedly, this is usually the case when any player breaks a long one, hence why it is a long one, but when you look at more of his runs, you see that some don't go longer b/c, while he gets up to full speed quickly - and that's a great asset, he doesn't have much wiggle once he's there. The intangible thing that bothers me about Stewart is his desire. It's a fine line between being a team player and having a sufficient level of arrogance to demand the ball when you're a star to make the plays that make you a star. So while from a rah-rah perspective, it was nice the way he shared balls w/Johnson until he blew his knee, I just got the feeling Stewart didn't mind not having the pressure of being a feature back, a bit, as well. And then there was Dixon, he was really "the man" on that team. After he went down, the team went on a three-game losing streak (including two very beatable opponents) to end the season after looking like a national championship contender. I hardly blame that on Stewart, but there are undoubtedly guys who step up in those situations to carry their teams, and in this one small example, he did not. In the overall picture it shouldn't cause much concern, I mean look at Peyton Manning and big games in college, but it's all a puzzle until they step on an NFL field and these are just a few minor pieces I saw fitting together regarding intangibles. Anyway, my only point here was to take some of the luster off the shine in thinking Stewart walks on water. I could go on even longer about his positives, which regardless of all this, still clearly points to him as one of the top three RB prospects. I just have him at #3 largely for those reasons compared to Run DMC and Mendenhall.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its pretty clear the Stewart lovers either didnt watch Stewart play or didnt watch McFadden play.

Look, if you watched players like Randy Moss, Larry Fitzgerald, Calvin Johnson, and even Adrian Peterson you watched men amongst boys. It was clear to everyone on the field and during the game who were the great players. McFadden in one of these players. I am not saying Stewart or MenDen wont have a better career or be the better back. I will say that anyone who doesnt value 2006/7 game tape over the combine is asking for trouble. Do youself a favor and watch Ark this year and last year. McFadden is a beast and simply from game tape a better overall/all around player than AP was coming out of school.

 
Its pretty clear the Stewart lovers either didnt watch Stewart play or didnt watch McFadden play.
It's also pretty clear that DMC supporters are ignoring how tall he runs, coupled with this weak lower body, which could translate into injuries, and most likely lack of power. Even though it's not a guarantee that he will be injury prone, it does throw up the biggest red flag in my mind, and I'm ignoring his perceived lack of vision and character issues. The NFL is a different animal than college. They are bigger, faster, and we're not talking about Earl Campbell here with respect to taking on tacklers.
 
Its pretty clear the Stewart lovers either didnt watch Stewart play or didnt watch McFadden play.
It's also pretty clear that DMC supporters are ignoring how tall he runs, coupled with this weak lower body, which could translate into injuries, and most likely lack of power. Even though it's not a guarantee that he will be injury prone, it does throw up the biggest red flag in my mind, and I'm ignoring his perceived lack of vision and character issues. The NFL is a different animal than college. They are bigger, faster, and we're not talking about Earl Campbell here with respect to taking on tacklers.
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?segway on topic ...Id like to hear more about how Slaton's numbers were inflated due to running in the "spread offense". Anyone here tell me about the offensive schemes Chip Kelly and Mike Locksley run?How do I know so much about Kelly and Locks? Well, lets just sasy my team was in the running for a nice HC and OC a little while ago.
 
Its pretty clear the Stewart lovers either didnt watch Stewart play or didnt watch McFadden play.
It's also pretty clear that DMC supporters are ignoring how tall he runs, coupled with this weak lower body, which could translate into injuries, and most likely lack of power. Even though it's not a guarantee that he will be injury prone, it does throw up the biggest red flag in my mind, and I'm ignoring his perceived lack of vision and character issues. The NFL is a different animal than college. They are bigger, faster, and we're not talking about Earl Campbell here with respect to taking on tacklers.
:goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its pretty clear the Stewart lovers either didnt watch Stewart play or didnt watch McFadden play.
It's also pretty clear that DMC supporters are ignoring how tall he runs, coupled with this weak lower body, which could translate into injuries, and most likely lack of power. Even though it's not a guarantee that he will be injury prone, it does throw up the biggest red flag in my mind, and I'm ignoring his perceived lack of vision and character issues. The NFL is a different animal than college. They are bigger, faster, and we're not talking about Earl Campbell here with respect to taking on tacklers.
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
How many touches has he had in 3 yrs.. 1400???? and not one injury.
 
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
No, I'm not predicting injuries, I just know that RBs who run tall are more susceptible to injury, especially those that take on tacklers given their lack of power.
 
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
No, I'm not predicting injuries, I just know that RBs who run tall are more susceptible to injury, especially those that take on tacklers given their lack of power.
Something doesnt seem right with Mcfadden. Call it gut instinct but I'll be bypassing him and going for Mendenhall or stewart unless they get drafted by teams that dont need them to start right away.
 
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
No, I'm not predicting injuries, I just know that RBs who run tall are more susceptible to injury, especially those that take on tacklers given their lack of power.
Like Adrian Peterson? Like Eddie George?Is this about Chris Brown? Anyone else? Brandon Jacobs?
 
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
No, I'm not predicting injuries, I just know that RBs who run tall are more susceptible to injury, especially those that take on tacklers given their lack of power.
Like Adrian Peterson? Like Eddie George?Is this about Chris Brown? Anyone else? Brandon Jacobs?
Do you prefer that a RB runs tall? If I had to choose it would be that they run with a low pad level. See Jonathan Stewart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
No, I'm not predicting injuries, I just know that RBs who run tall are more susceptible to injury, especially those that take on tacklers given their lack of power.
Like Adrian Peterson? Like Eddie George?Is this about Chris Brown? Anyone else? Brandon Jacobs?
Do you prefer that a RB runs tall? If I had to choose it would be that they run with a low pad level. See Jonathan Stewart.
I prefer to take my chances with stud college players. Ill start with AP, then move to DMac. There is nothing wrong with Stewart per se, but I saw much more from McFadden than Stewart. Feel free to post the games where Stewart took them over. Especially the ones with Dixon out. Then Ill post the games where Slaton took over where White was out.You can fall in love with Stewarts physique and combine all you want. Ill take DMac' college body of work all day.
 
How many games has DMac missed in his career? Are you into predicting injuries?
No, I'm not predicting injuries, I just know that RBs who run tall are more susceptible to injury, especially those that take on tacklers given their lack of power.
Like Adrian Peterson? Like Eddie George?Is this about Chris Brown? Anyone else? Brandon Jacobs?
Do you prefer that a RB runs tall? If I had to choose it would be that they run with a low pad level. See Jonathan Stewart.
I prefer to take my chances with stud college players. Ill start with AP, then move to DMac. There is nothing wrong with Stewart per se, but I saw much more from McFadden than Stewart. Feel free to post the games where Stewart took them over. Especially the ones with Dixon out. Then Ill post the games where Slaton took over where White was out.You can fall in love with Stewarts physique and combine all you want. Ill take DMac' college body of work all day.
Stewart played through turf toe last season. It was still bothering him all the way through the bowl game. People who cite Dixon as the cause of Stewart's success might want to take a closer look at Dixon's college career. I owned him in my college dynasty league for his entire career. He wasn't an impact player until 2007. He wasn't even the full-time starter in 2006. Citing Dennis Dixon as the cause for Jonathan Stewart's success just means you don't know much about Oregon football. Stewart was considered the better prospect entering Oregon and is considered the better prospect leaving Oregon. He had a solid YPC average in 2006 when Dixon was mediocre. Anyhow, using a player's college career to predict his NFL success is kind of pointless since almost every elite prospect had a great college career. I pointed this out in another thread, but when you look at college production you'll see that Forsett, Forte, Rice, Slaton, Stewart, Mendenhall, Charles, Choice, Smith and Johnson were all dominant players. Obviously they're not all going to succeed in the NFL. Stats are important, but you also have to look beyond the numbers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stewart ran 4.48 40, had the third most reps on the bench, and the second best Vert Jump. Not to mention he is built to play the position at the NFL level. There are three RB's above the rest in this years class IMO. Stewart, Mendenhall, McFadden.2 are built to play the part while one lacks leg drive and vision IMO. You can have all the speed in the world but if you can't break tackles in the NFL you won't break long runs.
Stewart is actually a bit too big to be a solid NFL RB, and his 40 time was one of the slowest of the RBs. I'm not sure how adding those two together makes him tops... TJ Duckett anyone?
 
Its pretty clear the Stewart lovers either didnt watch Stewart play or didnt watch McFadden play.
It's a simple difference of opinion so nothing personal, but I think there's no clarity of thought in your statement above. I watched both and I'd much rather have Stewart than McFadden.Upright running doesn't bother me. Lack of patience with his blockers, only showing consistent power when he gets to bully a DB after a 15-30 yard run, and consistently making the wrong choices at the line of scrimmage does bother me. The only thing DMac has over Stewart is a little over a tenth of a second in an overrated measurement that participants run in shorts and t-shirts. The only worry I have with Stewart is some issues with an ankle over the years, but it's not a big concern. When I first saw McFadden, I was really impressed with his speed and acceleration, but upon second and third-viewings (and then more after that) I believe those two qualities are far and away the best traits he has to offer--and I don't mean to be complimentary to his skills as a runner when I say it. At this point, I'd rather have 4-5 other backs than McFadden. I've seen your posts in the past few years and I respect your viewpoints on a fair number of topics, but I couldn't disagree more with what you've stated above.
 
Duckett & Stewart?

Please...Stewart is not much better than Ronnie Brown or Ricky Williams. Duckett was close to 250 and a doughboy with very little lateral agility compared to Stewart. Stewart is regarded as a freak of nature by the NIKE SPARQ folks who conduct testing for combine-like measurements. Stewart had one of the better scores you can get for speed, agility, explosiveness...

Plus, you just have to watch the games to see that Stewart and Duckett are nowhere close in a comparison.

 
Stewart ran 4.48 40, had the third most reps on the bench, and the second best Vert Jump. Not to mention he is built to play the position at the NFL level. There are three RB's above the rest in this years class IMO. Stewart, Mendenhall, McFadden.2 are built to play the part while one lacks leg drive and vision IMO. You can have all the speed in the world but if you can't break tackles in the NFL you won't break long runs.
Stewart is actually a bit too big to be a solid NFL RB, and his 40 time was one of the slowest of the RBs. I'm not sure how adding those two together makes him tops... TJ Duckett anyone?
:goodposting: Stewart had arguably the best overall combine numbers when you factor in all of the drills. He had a sick 10'8" long jump, a very solid 36.5" vert, a very solid 4.48 40, and an outstanding 28 reps on the bench.It's laughable to see you cite his 40 time as a negative since you were a big Marshawn Lynch fan and Stewart's 40 time is .04 seconds faster than Lynch's best time at last year's combine. You're obviously just looking for reasons to justify your skepticism here.
 
EBF said:
switz said:
The Scientist said:
Stewart ran 4.48 40, had the third most reps on the bench, and the second best Vert Jump. Not to mention he is built to play the position at the NFL level. There are three RB's above the rest in this years class IMO. Stewart, Mendenhall, McFadden.2 are built to play the part while one lacks leg drive and vision IMO. You can have all the speed in the world but if you can't break tackles in the NFL you won't break long runs.
Stewart is actually a bit too big to be a solid NFL RB, and his 40 time was one of the slowest of the RBs. I'm not sure how adding those two together makes him tops... TJ Duckett anyone?
:unsure: Stewart had arguably the best overall combine numbers when you factor in all of the drills. He had a sick 10'8" long jump, a very solid 36.5" vert, a very solid 4.48 40, and an outstanding 28 reps on the bench.It's laughable to see you cite his 40 time as a negative since you were a big Marshawn Lynch fan and Stewart's 40 time is .04 seconds faster than Lynch's best time at last year's combine. You're obviously just looking for reasons to justify your skepticism here.
Not to mention TJ Duckett is 6' 255lbs. Either he was :lmao: or just didn't watch any games.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top