Eagles can key on Nelson and Jones split wide, but won't be able to cover a slot man, especially one this bigAmendola went 5-45-0 against them in 3 quartersTony Gonzalez 7-83-2Josh Morgan 3-63-1Pretty good play in PPR, imoDon't know what happened to him last week, but what are thoughts on him this week?
Do you mean key on Stevie J and Jones split wide?Eagles can key on Nelson and Jones split wide, but won't be able to cover a slot man, especially one this bigDon't know what happened to him last week, but what are thoughts on him this week?
Correct. I believ Nnamdi always plays the outside, and Samuel will take the other wideout, leaving DRC (when he's in the game) on NelsonDo you mean key on Stevie J and Jones split wide?Eagles can key on Nelson and Jones split wide, but won't be able to cover a slot man, especially one this bigDon't know what happened to him last week, but what are thoughts on him this week?
I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
How do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
TB is kind of the opposite of Philly...pretty bad against receivers split out, but ok against the slot. I see Crabtree as a better play than Nelson (and a very strong play regardless of comps) if (a) he's healthy and (b) Bad Alex doesn't show upHow do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
starting him with confidence.Don't know what happened to him last week, but what are thoughts on him this week?
Appears to be healthy...now all that matters is Bad Alex Smith stays away. Harbaugh has done a good job so far this season.TB is kind of the opposite of Philly...pretty bad against receivers split out, but ok against the slot. I see Crabtree as a better play than Nelson (and a very strong play regardless of comps) if (a) he's healthy and (b) Bad Alex doesn't show upHow do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
I've had to make this same decision, and whoever I'm don't start I'm going to have to drop (short bench, massive bye week issues). I'm rolling with Nelson for the reasons mentioned...Philly is weak up the middle and gets torched by tight ends, Buffalo doesn't have a quality tight end, but does have a 6'5" slot receiver. I'm expecting Philly to put points on the board, and Buffalo having to respond. I struggled good argument for Crabtree. Would love to hear one. Certainly more talanted than Nelson, but nothing but a flash here and there in 3 years.How do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
vs TB this year:C Johnson 6-88-2/Burleson 5-60-0Harvin 7-76-0R White 9-140-0/J Jones 6-115-0Garcon 2-146-2/ Wayne 4-59-0The matchup is pretty favorableI've had to make this same decision, and whoever I'm don't start I'm going to have to drop (short bench, massive bye week issues). I'm rolling with Nelson for the reasons mentioned...Philly is weak up the middle and gets torched by tight ends, Buffalo doesn't have a quality tight end, but does have a 6'5" slot receiver. I'm expecting Philly to put points on the board, and Buffalo having to respond. I struggled good argument for Crabtree. Would love to hear one. Certainly more talanted than Nelson, but nothing but a flash here and there in 3 years.How do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
yeah, I'm gonna role with Crabtree after those stats. Thanks man.vs TB this year:C Johnson 6-88-2/Burleson 5-60-0Harvin 7-76-0R White 9-140-0/J Jones 6-115-0Garcon 2-146-2/ Wayne 4-59-0The matchup is pretty favorableI've had to make this same decision, and whoever I'm don't start I'm going to have to drop (short bench, massive bye week issues). I'm rolling with Nelson for the reasons mentioned...Philly is weak up the middle and gets torched by tight ends, Buffalo doesn't have a quality tight end, but does have a 6'5" slot receiver. I'm expecting Philly to put points on the board, and Buffalo having to respond. I struggled good argument for Crabtree. Would love to hear one. Certainly more talanted than Nelson, but nothing but a flash here and there in 3 years.How do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
Disagree with the last part. If Brown finally hits paydirt, Id bet he has better numbers than Nelson and has a higher ceiling. Both have a similar floor though....and related to other posts, Id start Nelson over Crabtree for the reasons stated with Nelson's matchup. Come on now with those stats of WRs vs TB. The only 1 that is in the tier of Crabtree is Burleson. The rest are stud's or proven WR2sI'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this weekI have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
KP--I'll buy your opinion on Brown's ceiling. When he breaks out--and he will, I know--his ceiling shoots way past Nelson's. I just don't think he will this week, due to the factors I stated in my OP. In a PPR league (and mine gives 2 PPR), Nelson looks a lot stronger this week.As for the stats, I see your point comparing very good WRs to Crabtree. He clearly hasn't risen to that level yet, and may never. So let's break down the data a different way.Against DET, TB Def allowed Stafford his highest completion rate all year. TB D alowed Stafford his second highest yardage total of the year.Against MIN, TB Def allowed McNabb his highest passing yardage total all year.Against ATL, TB Def allowed Ryan his highest passing yardage total all year.Against IND, TB Def allowed Indy QBs their highest passing yardage total all year. TB D is also the only team to allow 2 passing TDs to IndyClearly a trend here, whether the passing offense is strong like DET or ATL, or miserable, like MIN or IND. Crabtree is no Megatron, or Roddy, or even Julio Jones. But TB D can't cover, and passing offenses have a field day against them'Kenny Powers said:Disagree with the last part. If Brown finally hits paydirt, Id bet he has better numbers than Nelson and has a higher ceiling. Both have a similar floor though....and related to other posts, Id start Nelson over Crabtree for the reasons stated with Nelson's matchup. Come on now with those stats of WRs vs TB. The only 1 that is in the tier of Crabtree is Burleson. The rest are stud's or proven WR2s'doeseatplace said:I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this week'theoneandonly said:I have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
umm have you been watching Buffalo this year? Chandler has been quite effective. Not sure why you don't think he's a quality TE.'otis68 said:I've had to make this same decision, and whoever I'm don't start I'm going to have to drop (short bench, massive bye week issues). I'm rolling with Nelson for the reasons mentioned...Philly is weak up the middle and gets torched by tight ends, Buffalo doesn't have a quality tight end, but does have a 6'5" slot receiver. I'm expecting Philly to put points on the board, and Buffalo having to respond. I struggled good argument for Crabtree. Would love to hear one. Certainly more talanted than Nelson, but nothing but a flash here and there in 3 years.'kimbosliced said:How do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?'doeseatplace said:I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this week'theoneandonly said:I have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
That would bode poorly for stevie J. I think nelson is a good play in what could be a shootout.I also don't like playing players vs Tampa. They take the air out of the ball and kill so much clock in the process. I prefer to get in a shootout with the eagles/pats/bills/panthers/pack etc if given the preference.Philly has largely taken away most prime time WRs against them this season. Julio Jones 2/29, Nicks 3/35, R.White 3/23 but did have a TD...I don't think Nelson will go off but he might scrape 8-10 together.
Then that would mean taking Steve Johnson out of the equation then wouldn't it?That would help to a degree. With Jones, Chandler, Nelson and Jackson left for opportunity. I feel that Jackson would draw quite a bit of attention, leaving Nelson able to see more targets, as Buffalo should be forced into passing a lot this weekend. Could be wrong about him getting the numbers, but I think more along the lines of 8/97/1.Philly has largely taken away most prime time WRs against them this season. Julio Jones 2/29, Nicks 3/35, R.White 3/23 but did have a TD...I don't think Nelson will go off but he might scrape 8-10 together.
Chandler has 6 catches for 34 yards over the last 3 WEEKS! Only reason he's even been fantasy relevant are the targets inside the 10, which does affect Nelson to a degree, but hardly a reason to start/sit him.umm have you been watching Buffalo this year? Chandler has been quite effective. Not sure why you don't think he's a quality TE.'otis68 said:I've had to make this same decision, and whoever I'm don't start I'm going to have to drop (short bench, massive bye week issues). I'm rolling with Nelson for the reasons mentioned...Philly is weak up the middle and gets torched by tight ends, Buffalo doesn't have a quality tight end, but does have a 6'5" slot receiver. I'm expecting Philly to put points on the board, and Buffalo having to respond. I struggled good argument for Crabtree. Would love to hear one. Certainly more talanted than Nelson, but nothing but a flash here and there in 3 years.'kimbosliced said:How do you feel about Nelson over Crabtree as a WR2?'doeseatplace said:I'm going the other way and sitting Brown for Nelson, but its a close call. Brown has been so darn consistent for me so its hard to bench him. But I am swayed by the uncertainty with almost all aspects of Pittsburgh O, a decent Titatns pass D and the Nelson matchup against the Eagles.I could definitely see going the other way and going with the regular points Antonio has deliveredDisclaimer: I'm in 15th place out of 16, so I have to take a few chances to try and get back in the game and I see Nelson's ceiling much higher than Brown's this week'theoneandonly said:I have a option in 2 ppr leagues of playing him in a 3rd wr spot and a flex spot. As of today I will be benching him for A.Brown and aging LT at flex. I just want to see more of him getting targets. With F.Jax and 3wrs I just dont trust Nelson for consistent production as of yet. He also burned me last week so that may be part of it.
Asomugha has not been used in man-to-man alot (if not most) of the time. There are definitely scheme issues with the Philadelphia D right now. Besides the injury issues.From what I saw on NFL Fantasy Live today (FWIW), they made it sound/look like Nnamdi isnt exactly shutting people down so far. On that note, Id just say dont expect Stevie to get shut down and not get targets because he's being covered by the Dream Team savior if youre a Nelson owner.
And a touchdown. With Jones injured, maybe you should drop him . . .he now has 26 yards receiving over the last 10 qtrs.
any idea why he is so uninvolved? even after jones was injured he had 0 catches.And a touchdown. With Jones injured, maybe you should drop him . . .he now has 26 yards receiving over the last 10 qtrs.
With Asomugha on Johnson, the defense focused on Nelson. He was doubled alot. He is the reason Roosevelt got so many targets. Strategy didn't work. At least in the not fantasy world.any idea why he is so uninvolved? even after jones was injured he had 0 catches.And a touchdown. With Jones injured, maybe you should drop him . . .he now has 26 yards receiving over the last 10 qtrs.
2nd half of the Pats game? The Pats decided to shut him down. The Pats are known to take away one player from the other team and make said team beat them with other guys. Cincy just has a great defense.I think it's too early to give up on him right now.seems it worked well enough. fitz only had 193 yard passing and 85 went to fjax. seems they shut down the wr pretty damn well.any idea what happened last week? or the 2nd half of the pitt game?
All depends who's out there in your league. The TD today was nice but he only has three receptions in his last 10 quarters. There's little reason to feel good about him right now. In shallow leagues or ones with tight roster limits I think he's definitely droppable if more productive WRs are available.I think it's too early to give up on him right now.
I dont understand why these teams would focus on Nelson instead of Stevie Johnsonof all the players on the bills for the pats to focus on, they went at david nelson. likewise the eagles. and im not sure the bengals are great at shutting down wr, as massoqui, eric decker, jason hill, and even mike thomas have been at least respectable.
cuz it makes people feel better about their ww pickupI dont understand why these teams would focus on Nelson instead of Stevie Johnsonof all the players on the bills for the pats to focus on, they went at david nelson. likewise the eagles. and im not sure the bengals are great at shutting down wr, as massoqui, eric decker, jason hill, and even mike thomas have been at least respectable.
THIS. As if the Eagles schemed all week to stop David Nelson. LMAOcuz it makes people feel better about their ww pickupI dont understand why these teams would focus on Nelson instead of Stevie Johnsonof all the players on the bills for the pats to focus on, they went at david nelson. likewise the eagles. and im not sure the bengals are great at shutting down wr, as massoqui, eric decker, jason hill, and even mike thomas have been at least respectable.
Did you even read the thread before commenting? The Eagles had a shutdown CB on Johnson (i.e. they schemed to take out Johnson). That allowed them to take the #2 option out with mixed double coverages also. Neither player had an impact, so I'm thinking the scheme worked. Its just other players stepped up and beat them. Namely, Fred Jackson and Nate Roosevelt.FWI - The eagles have some pretty good CBs. Its stopping the run they are struggling with. Edit to Add: No disrespect intended. But dang, please read before commenting. Especially if you are just commenting to be a tool D-Man.'Dought Man said:THIS. As if the Eagles schemed all week to stop David Nelson. LMAO'shadyridr said:cuz it makes people feel better about their ww pickup'Kenny Powers said:I dont understand why these teams would focus on Nelson instead of Stevie Johnson'cvnpoka said:of all the players on the bills for the pats to focus on, they went at david nelson. likewise the eagles. and im not sure the bengals are great at shutting down wr, as massoqui, eric decker, jason hill, and even mike thomas have been at least respectable.
Given how infrequently he's been targeted the past 10 quarters, I'm not sure it's accurate to call Nelson the No. 2 WR - even with Jones out.That allowed them to take the #2 option out with mixed double coverages also.
That's what I was wondering. Nelson only has 5 looks over these last 2 weeks, where have all the targets been going in those 2 games? I still think he's a hold, especially with Jones going down. You have to think they start going back to him at some point. For what it's worth they did run the ball an awful lot this past week, and Jackson was very effective. He saw his season high in carries and receptions.Given how infrequently he's been targeted the past 10 quarters, I'm not sure it's accurate to call Nelson the No. 2 WR - even with Jones out.That allowed them to take the #2 option out with mixed double coverages also.
Yup, they did a great job there. But even with all the running there were still targets for other WRs. Nelson had as many targets as Jones, who got hurt in the first quarter. That's a pretty bad sign when you become a starter and can't get more targets then a guy who missed 3/4 of the game. With Jones out, I do think Nelson has potential but I'm really struggling with how to view him going forward given how significantly diminished his role has become. Opportunity is great, but it only matters if you're involved in the offense and right now Nelson really isn't. Will that change now that Jones is out? That seems to be the question. Unfortunately, I don't see any strong evidence either way, which makes it real tough to gauge Nelson's value moving forward.That's what I was wondering. Nelson only has 5 looks over these last 2 weeks, where have all the targets been going in those 2 games? I still think he's a hold, especially with Jones going down. You have to think they start going back to him at some point. For what it's worth they did run the ball an awful lot this past week, and Jackson was very effective. He saw his season high in carries and receptions.Given how infrequently he's been targeted the past 10 quarters, I'm not sure it's accurate to call Nelson the No. 2 WR - even with Jones out.That allowed them to take the #2 option out with mixed double coverages also.
I read somewhere that with Jones out that they will have to move to the outside since Buf is so thin at WR. The article said they expectthat to hurt Nelson's production since he would presumably be out of his comfort zone not playing in the slot and not getting the matchup against the 3rd corner/safety.'packersfan said:Yup, they did a great job there. But even with all the running there were still targets for other WRs. Nelson had as many targets as Jones, who got hurt in the first quarter. That's a pretty bad sign when you become a starter and can't get more targets then a guy who missed 3/4 of the game. With Jones out, I do think Nelson has potential but I'm really struggling with how to view him going forward given how significantly diminished his role has become. Opportunity is great, but it only matters if you're involved in the offense and right now Nelson really isn't. Will that change now that Jones is out? That seems to be the question. Unfortunately, I don't see any strong evidence either way, which makes it real tough to gauge Nelson's value moving forward.'ThePittbully said:That's what I was wondering. Nelson only has 5 looks over these last 2 weeks, where have all the targets been going in those 2 games? I still think he's a hold, especially with Jones going down. You have to think they start going back to him at some point. For what it's worth they did run the ball an awful lot this past week, and Jackson was very effective. He saw his season high in carries and receptions.Given how infrequently he's been targeted the past 10 quarters, I'm not sure it's accurate to call Nelson the No. 2 WR - even with Jones out.That allowed them to take the #2 option out with mixed double coverages also.
This sounds like a pretty strong vote against Nelson in my opinion. I don't think anyone is expecting him to be a stud player, but from a fantasy perspective you'd at least like to see him get consistent targets and that's not happening. Based on what you just wrote, it doesn't sound like it will ever happen.You have to understand Buffalo's offense. It's a lot like New Orleans's offense in that Fitzpatrick is willing to spread the ball around. They're not going to force passes to guys and there isn't a WR on Buffalo that has the type of talent of an Andre Johnson or Calvin Johnson. So the guy that gets the targets each week is going to change based on the defense they're going up against and what that defense is doing.Stevie Johnson is the most talented and will have the most consistent targets and stats, but after that, the Bills are going to throw it to whoever is open or just simply pound the ball on the ground if the game situation warrants it.
I have also read that Roosevelt will play the slot role moving forward. I agree that this will hurt Nelson's value and bump up Roosevelt's.I read somewhere that with Jones out that they will have to move to the outside since Buf is so thin at WR. The article said they expectthat to hurt Nelson's production since he would presumably be out of his comfort zone not playing in the slot and not getting the matchup against the 3rd corner/safety.'packersfan said:Yup, they did a great job there. But even with all the running there were still targets for other WRs. Nelson had as many targets as Jones, who got hurt in the first quarter. That's a pretty bad sign when you become a starter and can't get more targets then a guy who missed 3/4 of the game. With Jones out, I do think Nelson has potential but I'm really struggling with how to view him going forward given how significantly diminished his role has become. Opportunity is great, but it only matters if you're involved in the offense and right now Nelson really isn't. Will that change now that Jones is out? That seems to be the question. Unfortunately, I don't see any strong evidence either way, which makes it real tough to gauge Nelson's value moving forward.'ThePittbully said:That's what I was wondering. Nelson only has 5 looks over these last 2 weeks, where have all the targets been going in those 2 games? I still think he's a hold, especially with Jones going down. You have to think they start going back to him at some point. For what it's worth they did run the ball an awful lot this past week, and Jackson was very effective. He saw his season high in carries and receptions.Given how infrequently he's been targeted the past 10 quarters, I'm not sure it's accurate to call Nelson the No. 2 WR - even with Jones out.That allowed them to take the #2 option out with mixed double coverages also.