What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Lytro - Revolutionary "Shoot First, Focus Later" Camera (1 Viewer)

RhymesMcJuice

Footballguy
This appears to me to be the biggest advance in consumer photography technology since digital. The ability to take a picture instantly with no shutter lag and being able to pick the perfect focus afterwards is amazing. Play with an image here.

The only negative I have is that they are producing proprietary cameras but I hope that changes once it's successful so we can see this technology in a variety of products.

With an innovative camera due out later this year from a company called Lytro, photographers will have one less excuse for having missed that perfect shot.

Shoot Now, Focus Later

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

The company’s technology allows a picture’s focus to be adjusted after it is taken. While viewing a picture taken with a Lytro camera on a computer screen, you can, for example, click to bring people in the foreground into sharp relief, or switch the focus to the mountains behind them.

But is Lytro’s technology just a neat feature, or is it the next big thing in cameras?

The founding team of the Silicon Valley start-up and investors who have put in $50 million are betting on the latter. The technology has won praise from computer scientists and raves from early users of its prototype camera.

“We see technology companies all the time, but it’s rare that someone comes along with something that is this much of a breakthrough,” said Ben Horowitz, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, a major investor in Lytro. “It’s superexciting.”

Lytro’s founder and chief executive is Ren Ng, 31. His achievement, experts say, has been to take research projects of recent years — requiring perhaps 100 digital cameras lashed to a supercomputer — and squeeze that technology into a camera headed for the consumer market later this year.

Mr. Ng explained the concept in 2006 in his Ph.D. thesis at Stanford University, which won the worldwide competition for the best doctoral dissertation in computer science that year from the Association for Computing Machinery. Since then Mr. Ng has been trying to translate the idea into a product that can be brought to market — and building a team of people to do it.

The Lytro camera captures far more light data, from many angles, than is possible with a conventional camera. It accomplishes that with a special sensor called a microlens array, which puts the equivalent of many lenses into a small space. “That is the heart of the breakthrough,” said Pat Hanrahan, a Stanford professor, who was Mr. Ng’s thesis adviser but is not involved in Lytro.

But the wealth of raw light data comes to life only with sophisticated software that lets a viewer switch points of focus. This allows still photographs to be explored as never before. “They become interactive, living pictures,” Mr. Ng said. He thinks a popular use may be families and friends roaming through different perspectives on pictures of, say, vacations and parties posted on Facebook (Lytro will have a Facebook app).

For a photographer, whether amateur or professional, the Lytro technology means that the headaches of focusing a shot go away. Richard Koci Hernandez, a photojournalist, said that when he tried out a prototype earlier this year, he immediately recognized the potential impact.

“You just concentrate on the image and composition, but there’s no need to worry about focus anymore,” Mr. Hernandez said. “That’s something you do later.”

“That was the aha! moment for me,” said Mr. Hernandez, an assistant professor of new media at the graduate school of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. “This is game-changing.”

Mr. Hernandez, who is not affiliated with Lytro, was one of several photographers who tested prototypes. His model, he said, was sheathed in a black plastic shell, so he did not see its design. But he said it was the size of a standard point-and-shoot camera. The picture resolution, he added, was indistinguishable from that of his other point-and-shoots, a Canon and a Nikon.

Eliminating any loss of resolution in a camera like Lytro’s, which is capturing light data from many angles, is a real advance, said Shree Nayar, a professor at Columbia University and an expert in computer vision. Mr. Nayar is familiar with Mr. Ng’s work, but he said he had not seen anything Lytro has done in more than a year.

“If they have been able to recover most of the lost resolution, then their image refocusing application is a very cool feature,” Mr. Nayar said. “But it is an open question how popular it becomes.”

At Lytro, the view is that the technology, once it gets into people’s hands, opens the door to many possible new features and uses. Among its other advantages, the new camera is much faster than conventional ones because there is no “shutter lag” — waiting for the autofocus device to work and the shot to be taken. Those fractions of a second, of course, are often when the dog darts off or the child’s smile becomes a frown.

Lytro cameras can also capture plenty of data for 3-D images, which can be viewed on a computer screen with 3-D glasses.

Lytro is not saying what the price of its first camera will be, but insists it will be for the consumer market, which suggests a price of a few hundred dollars. The company is also not being more precise about when the camera will ship. It will initially be sold through online retailers like Amazon.com and Lytro’s Web site.

But to gear up, the company is rapidly adding to its 45-person staff in Mountain View, Calif. Its recruits include veterans of Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel and Sun Microsystems.

One Lytro convert who caught the attention of the Valley digerati was Kurt Akeley, who joined the company last September from Microsoft Research. Mr. Akeley, 53, was one of the early engineers at Silicon Graphics, a pioneer in computer graphics, and is one of the lead developers of OpenGL, a popular set of graphics programming tools.

Mr. Akeley, a consulting professor at Stanford, was familiar with Mr. Ng’s work and said he was lured by the challenge and technical opportunity. Lytro, Mr. Akeley said, has “a powerful technology with legs — great things can happen.”



Lytro chose to design and market a camera itself, instead of licensing its technology to a camera giant like Canon or Nikon. It will farm out the manufacturing to a company in Taiwan, but it wanted to control the details of the camera itself — much as Apple does.

“We can just make a better product this way, and really show what we can do,” Mr. Ng said. “The big camera makers are mostly polishing existing technology, and we didn’t want to do this in an incremental way.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cool. I wonder how precise the focus is after-the-fact, though. I'd like to be able to dial it in with extreme accuracy for perfect depth-of-field, I'd have to see this thing in action before I got too crazy about it.

 
This has been available in surveillance for a while. Especially with high megapixel cameras. Once you have the still or video from the camera you can zoom in and establish focus pretty much anywhere in the image.

 
Cool. I wonder how precise the focus is after-the-fact, though. I'd like to be able to dial it in with extreme accuracy for perfect depth-of-field, I'd have to see this thing in action before I got too crazy about it.
Yep. Also curious how it performs when there is not uniform lighting or if you need a flash. Very cool idea though.
 
Saw this earlier today. Color me intrigued. It will be interesting to see the full specs and price of the camera when it comes out. But if it really works as well as their demo, it certainly looks like a game changer.

 
This appears to me to be the biggest advance in consumer photography technology since digital. The ability to take a picture instantly with no shutter lag and being able to pick the perfect focus afterwards is amazing. Play with an image here.

The only negative I have is that they are producing proprietary cameras but I hope that changes once it's successful so we can see this technology in a variety of products.

With an innovative camera due out later this year from a company called Lytro, photographers will have one less excuse for having missed that perfect shot.

Shoot Now, Focus Later

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

The company’s technology allows a picture’s focus to be adjusted after it is taken. While viewing a picture taken with a Lytro camera on a computer screen, you can, for example, click to bring people in the foreground into sharp relief, or switch the focus to the mountains behind them.

But is Lytro’s technology just a neat feature, or is it the next big thing in cameras?

The founding team of the Silicon Valley start-up and investors who have put in $50 million are betting on the latter. The technology has won praise from computer scientists and raves from early users of its prototype camera.

“We see technology companies all the time, but it’s rare that someone comes along with something that is this much of a breakthrough,” said Ben Horowitz, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, a major investor in Lytro. “It’s superexciting.”

Lytro’s founder and chief executive is Ren Ng, 31. His achievement, experts say, has been to take research projects of recent years — requiring perhaps 100 digital cameras lashed to a supercomputer — and squeeze that technology into a camera headed for the consumer market later this year.

Mr. Ng explained the concept in 2006 in his Ph.D. thesis at Stanford University, which won the worldwide competition for the best doctoral dissertation in computer science that year from the Association for Computing Machinery. Since then Mr. Ng has been trying to translate the idea into a product that can be brought to market — and building a team of people to do it.

The Lytro camera captures far more light data, from many angles, than is possible with a conventional camera. It accomplishes that with a special sensor called a microlens array, which puts the equivalent of many lenses into a small space. “That is the heart of the breakthrough,” said Pat Hanrahan, a Stanford professor, who was Mr. Ng’s thesis adviser but is not involved in Lytro.

But the wealth of raw light data comes to life only with sophisticated software that lets a viewer switch points of focus. This allows still photographs to be explored as never before. “They become interactive, living pictures,” Mr. Ng said. He thinks a popular use may be families and friends roaming through different perspectives on pictures of, say, vacations and parties posted on Facebook (Lytro will have a Facebook app).

For a photographer, whether amateur or professional, the Lytro technology means that the headaches of focusing a shot go away. Richard Koci Hernandez, a photojournalist, said that when he tried out a prototype earlier this year, he immediately recognized the potential impact.

“You just concentrate on the image and composition, but there’s no need to worry about focus anymore,” Mr. Hernandez said. “That’s something you do later.”

“That was the aha! moment for me,” said Mr. Hernandez, an assistant professor of new media at the graduate school of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. “This is game-changing.”

Mr. Hernandez, who is not affiliated with Lytro, was one of several photographers who tested prototypes. His model, he said, was sheathed in a black plastic shell, so he did not see its design. But he said it was the size of a standard point-and-shoot camera. The picture resolution, he added, was indistinguishable from that of his other point-and-shoots, a Canon and a Nikon.

Eliminating any loss of resolution in a camera like Lytro’s, which is capturing light data from many angles, is a real advance, said Shree Nayar, a professor at Columbia University and an expert in computer vision. Mr. Nayar is familiar with Mr. Ng’s work, but he said he had not seen anything Lytro has done in more than a year.

“If they have been able to recover most of the lost resolution, then their image refocusing application is a very cool feature,” Mr. Nayar said. “But it is an open question how popular it becomes.”

At Lytro, the view is that the technology, once it gets into people’s hands, opens the door to many possible new features and uses. Among its other advantages, the new camera is much faster than conventional ones because there is no “shutter lag” — waiting for the autofocus device to work and the shot to be taken. Those fractions of a second, of course, are often when the dog darts off or the child’s smile becomes a frown.

Lytro cameras can also capture plenty of data for 3-D images, which can be viewed on a computer screen with 3-D glasses.

Lytro is not saying what the price of its first camera will be, but insists it will be for the consumer market, which suggests a price of a few hundred dollars. The company is also not being more precise about when the camera will ship. It will initially be sold through online retailers like Amazon.com and Lytro’s Web site.

But to gear up, the company is rapidly adding to its 45-person staff in Mountain View, Calif. Its recruits include veterans of Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel and Sun Microsystems.

One Lytro convert who caught the attention of the Valley digerati was Kurt Akeley, who joined the company last September from Microsoft Research. Mr. Akeley, 53, was one of the early engineers at Silicon Graphics, a pioneer in computer graphics, and is one of the lead developers of OpenGL, a popular set of graphics programming tools.

Mr. Akeley, a consulting professor at Stanford, was familiar with Mr. Ng’s work and said he was lured by the challenge and technical opportunity. Lytro, Mr. Akeley said, has “a powerful technology with legs — great things can happen.”



Lytro chose to design and market a camera itself, instead of licensing its technology to a camera giant like Canon or Nikon. It will farm out the manufacturing to a company in Taiwan, but it wanted to control the details of the camera itself — much as Apple does.

“We can just make a better product this way, and really show what we can do,” Mr. Ng said. “The big camera makers are mostly polishing existing technology, and we didn’t want to do this in an incremental way.”
Can someone please phonetically spell out how to pronounce that guy's last name?
 
This appears to me to be the biggest advance in consumer photography technology since digital. The ability to take a picture instantly with no shutter lag and being able to pick the perfect focus afterwards is amazing. Play with an image here.

The only negative I have is that they are producing proprietary cameras but I hope that changes once it's successful so we can see this technology in a variety of products.

With an innovative camera due out later this year from a company called Lytro, photographers will have one less excuse for having missed that perfect shot.

Shoot Now, Focus Later

Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

The company's technology allows a picture's focus to be adjusted after it is taken. While viewing a picture taken with a Lytro camera on a computer screen, you can, for example, click to bring people in the foreground into sharp relief, or switch the focus to the mountains behind them.

But is Lytro's technology just a neat feature, or is it the next big thing in cameras?

The founding team of the Silicon Valley start-up and investors who have put in $50 million are betting on the latter. The technology has won praise from computer scientists and raves from early users of its prototype camera.

"We see technology companies all the time, but it's rare that someone comes along with something that is this much of a breakthrough," said Ben Horowitz, co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz, a major investor in Lytro. "It's superexciting."

Lytro's founder and chief executive is Ren Ng, 31. His achievement, experts say, has been to take research projects of recent years — requiring perhaps 100 digital cameras lashed to a supercomputer — and squeeze that technology into a camera headed for the consumer market later this year.

Mr. Ng explained the concept in 2006 in his Ph.D. thesis at Stanford University, which won the worldwide competition for the best doctoral dissertation in computer science that year from the Association for Computing Machinery. Since then Mr. Ng has been trying to translate the idea into a product that can be brought to market — and building a team of people to do it.

The Lytro camera captures far more light data, from many angles, than is possible with a conventional camera. It accomplishes that with a special sensor called a microlens array, which puts the equivalent of many lenses into a small space. "That is the heart of the breakthrough," said Pat Hanrahan, a Stanford professor, who was Mr. Ng's thesis adviser but is not involved in Lytro.

But the wealth of raw light data comes to life only with sophisticated software that lets a viewer switch points of focus. This allows still photographs to be explored as never before. "They become interactive, living pictures," Mr. Ng said. He thinks a popular use may be families and friends roaming through different perspectives on pictures of, say, vacations and parties posted on Facebook (Lytro will have a Facebook app).

For a photographer, whether amateur or professional, the Lytro technology means that the headaches of focusing a shot go away. Richard Koci Hernandez, a photojournalist, said that when he tried out a prototype earlier this year, he immediately recognized the potential impact.

"You just concentrate on the image and composition, but there's no need to worry about focus anymore," Mr. Hernandez said. "That's something you do later."

"That was the aha! moment for me," said Mr. Hernandez, an assistant professor of new media at the graduate school of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. "This is game-changing."

Mr. Hernandez, who is not affiliated with Lytro, was one of several photographers who tested prototypes. His model, he said, was sheathed in a black plastic shell, so he did not see its design. But he said it was the size of a standard point-and-shoot camera. The picture resolution, he added, was indistinguishable from that of his other point-and-shoots, a Canon and a Nikon.

Eliminating any loss of resolution in a camera like Lytro's, which is capturing light data from many angles, is a real advance, said Shree Nayar, a professor at Columbia University and an expert in computer vision. Mr. Nayar is familiar with Mr. Ng's work, but he said he had not seen anything Lytro has done in more than a year.

"If they have been able to recover most of the lost resolution, then their image refocusing application is a very cool feature," Mr. Nayar said. "But it is an open question how popular it becomes."

At Lytro, the view is that the technology, once it gets into people's hands, opens the door to many possible new features and uses. Among its other advantages, the new camera is much faster than conventional ones because there is no "shutter lag" — waiting for the autofocus device to work and the shot to be taken. Those fractions of a second, of course, are often when the dog darts off or the child's smile becomes a frown.

Lytro cameras can also capture plenty of data for 3-D images, which can be viewed on a computer screen with 3-D glasses.

Lytro is not saying what the price of its first camera will be, but insists it will be for the consumer market, which suggests a price of a few hundred dollars. The company is also not being more precise about when the camera will ship. It will initially be sold through online retailers like Amazon.com and Lytro's Web site.

But to gear up, the company is rapidly adding to its 45-person staff in Mountain View, Calif. Its recruits include veterans of Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel and Sun Microsystems.

One Lytro convert who caught the attention of the Valley digerati was Kurt Akeley, who joined the company last September from Microsoft Research. Mr. Akeley, 53, was one of the early engineers at Silicon Graphics, a pioneer in computer graphics, and is one of the lead developers of OpenGL, a popular set of graphics programming tools.

Mr. Akeley, a consulting professor at Stanford, was familiar with Mr. Ng's work and said he was lured by the challenge and technical opportunity. Lytro, Mr. Akeley said, has "a powerful technology with legs — great things can happen."



Lytro chose to design and market a camera itself, instead of licensing its technology to a camera giant like Canon or Nikon. It will farm out the manufacturing to a company in Taiwan, but it wanted to control the details of the camera itself — much as Apple does.

"We can just make a better product this way, and really show what we can do," Mr. Ng said. "The big camera makers are mostly polishing existing technology, and we didn't want to do this in an incremental way."
Can someone please phonetically spell out how to pronounce that guy's last name?
Woohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ng

 
Lytro: What really makes it revolutionary

Those cameras that everyone calls point-and-shoots? For years, they've involved a lot more than pointing and shooting. They give you different settings for portraits, low-light situations and sports shots. You can turn the flash on or off. You get to choose the resolution and image quality. You can capture in HDR. Most models let you burrow into endless manual settings if you want precise control. Did I mention you can record video?

And then there's Lytro's camera, which was revealed yesterday at a press event led by founder Ren Ng. We already knew that the Silicon Valley startup was working on the first commercial light-field camera--a model that captures light rays rather than flat images, and which lets you focus and refocus a photo after you've snapped it, either in the camera or on a PC. But it turns out that this technology--until now the stuff of lab experiments, not consumer products--is only one of the things that makes the Lytro strikingly different from anything you've seen before.

For one thing, it looks nothing like a garden-variety Canon, Nikon or Olympus camera--it's a sleek rectangular tube that you might mistake for an elegant, pocket-sized kaleidoscope. There's a square touchscreen on one end, and an 8X f/2 lens on the other. You can zoom by touching a strip on the top, and snap a photo by pushing a button.

And that's about it. You don't get any fancy settings or video features. There isn't even a flash. And the battery and memory are both sealed into the camera, not removable.

If you're in the market for a camera in the Lytro's price range--it starts at $399 for an 8GB model--and try to compare it to other models such as Canon's PowerShot S95, your head will explode. It simply doesn't care about the things that other cameras care about.

What the Lytro does remind me of, in certain respects, is the Flip video camera. Like that dearly-departed product, it's small and sleek and meant to succeed on the strength of how little it expects from the user, not how much control a serious photographer has over it. Both the Lytro and the Flip are less cameras than photographic appliances. They're true point-and-shoots. (Of course, the Flip was also a hit in part because it was a bargain by camcorder standards; the Lytro, at $399, isn't an impulse item.)

As I attended Lytro's launch event yesterday and watched Ng unveil his invention, I also thought about a forty-year-old camera that strikes me as a spiritual granddaddy of the new camera: Polaroid's SX-70, the first instant camera that was truly simple to use. It too was basically a box (albeit one that unfolded) with a shutter button. You didn't have to worry about any of the things that previous Polaroids required you to think about, such as timing the photo and pulling off a messy, gooey cover to expose the picture at exactly the right time.

Like the Lytro, it had little in common with typical cameras of the era and was, in fact, barely recognizable as being a camera. If you loved the powerful-but-complex 35mm SLRs of the era, odds were pretty good that you wouldn't even understand what Polaroid was getting at.

As Victor K. McElheny wrote in Insisting on the Impossible, his 1998 biography of Polaroid co-founder Edwin Land:

Land intended Aladdin [the SX-70's code name] to terminate a succession of shortfalls and compromises and make photography more truly intuitive and impulsive by taking away manipulative barriers. To many amateur and professional photographers, who reveled in the variety and complexity of their equipment, Aladdin was no more welcome than earlier one-step systems. For the mass of photographers, however, instant photography was welcome. Time after time, they reached for the minimum of fuss that Aladdin represented.

Lytro is trying to get at something similar, I think. It doesn't want you to think about photography. It just wants you to look, push a button, and capture a memory. And because it's a light-field camera, you shouldn't even have to stop and check whether the picture was focused properly or not.

Ng and the rest of the Lytro team already deserve credit for thinking big--and I'm going to be fascinated to see how consumers, and other camera companies, react to this truly new device once it hits the market early next year.
 
Saw this earlier today. Color me intrigued. It will be interesting to see the full specs and price of the camera when it comes out. But if it really works as well as their demo, it certainly looks like a game changer.
Ars Technica's article on itMentions a 8G of memory for $399 & 16G for $499.

But the article also says that these pictures convert to the equivalent of a 2 Megapixel picture right now, which is good for the web presentation it describes but not that good for prints.

 
Saw this earlier today. Color me intrigued. It will be interesting to see the full specs and price of the camera when it comes out. But if it really works as well as their demo, it certainly looks like a game changer.
Ars Technica's article on itMentions a 8G of memory for $399 & 16G for $499.

But the article also says that these pictures convert to the equivalent of a 2 Megapixel picture right now, which is good for the web presentation it describes but not that good for prints.
It's like the start of the digital camera era all over again. I think the first 2MP digital cameras came out in 2000 so these cameras are far away from image quality of current cameras.BTW, as much as I like the potential of these cameras the form factor is ridiculous.

 
Saw this earlier today. Color me intrigued. It will be interesting to see the full specs and price of the camera when it comes out. But if it really works as well as their demo, it certainly looks like a game changer.
Ars Technica's article on itMentions a 8G of memory for $399 & 16G for $499.

But the article also says that these pictures convert to the equivalent of a 2 Megapixel picture right now, which is good for the web presentation it describes but not that good for prints.
Weird, I saw 22 MP equivalent on a different site. Wired maybe? Will have to recon.

 
Saw this earlier today. Color me intrigued. It will be interesting to see the full specs and price of the camera when it comes out. But if it really works as well as their demo, it certainly looks like a game changer.
Ars Technica's article on itMentions a 8G of memory for $399 & 16G for $499.

But the article also says that these pictures convert to the equivalent of a 2 Megapixel picture right now, which is good for the web presentation it describes but not that good for prints.
Weird, I saw 22 MP equivalent on a different site. Wired maybe? Will have to recon.
I want this one!
 
"Light field photography lets you create interactive, living pictures, unlike print, so that's our focus right now," Ng told Ars.
This will prevent it from becoming very popular to the masses, imo. People still like printing their pictures, or at least knowing that they have that option.
 
"Light field photography lets you create interactive, living pictures, unlike print, so that's our focus right now," Ng told Ars.
This will prevent it from becoming very popular to the masses, imo. People still like printing their pictures, or at least knowing that they have that option.
It's not that you can't print - although that seems like a convoluted process - it's that the quality isn't good enough for more than 3x5.
 
"Light field photography lets you create interactive, living pictures, unlike print, so that's our focus right now," Ng told Ars.
This will prevent it from becoming very popular to the masses, imo. People still like printing their pictures, or at least knowing that they have that option.
It's not that you can't print - although that seems like a convoluted process - it's that the quality isn't good enough for more than 3x5.
This is what I was referring to.
 
:shrug:http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/tag/lytro/

The funniest thing about the new Lytro Light Field Camera is the obsession with megapixels. Despite the fact that the megapixel myth has long been shattered, people still want to know many pixels the Lytro’s sensor contains.This seems absurd. The Lytro — which lets you refocus photos after you have snapped them — may use a standard sensor underneath its fancy micro-lens array, but it uses this information to feed the “Light Field Engine” that actually creates the image. Counting pixels in this case is like counting the bristles on an artist’s paint brush....Michael Zhang of PetaPixel did the math, measuring the image and comparing it to the size of the camera as listed in Lytro’s specs. He puts the sensor at between 7.5 and 10.5mm on a side, similar to those used in high-end compacts.
The camera’s pictures aren’t measured in megapixels. Instead, photographs are 11 “megarays” — the number of light rays captured by the light-field sensor. In actuality, this works out to about 22 megapixels
 
:shrug:http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/tag/lytro/

The funniest thing about the new Lytro Light Field Camera is the obsession with megapixels. Despite the fact that the megapixel myth has long been shattered, people still want to know many pixels the Lytro’s sensor contains.This seems absurd. The Lytro — which lets you refocus photos after you have snapped them — may use a standard sensor underneath its fancy micro-lens array, but it uses this information to feed the “Light Field Engine” that actually creates the image. Counting pixels in this case is like counting the bristles on an artist’s paint brush....Michael Zhang of PetaPixel did the math, measuring the image and comparing it to the size of the camera as listed in Lytro’s specs. He puts the sensor at between 7.5 and 10.5mm on a side, similar to those used in high-end compacts.
The camera’s pictures aren’t measured in megapixels. Instead, photographs are 11 “megarays” — the number of light rays captured by the light-field sensor. In actuality, this works out to about 22 megapixels
That's all well and good, but really matters is the quality of the final image when you want to use it. Most of those 22 megapixels of information are going to be wasted when you print it.
 
Link

Lytro reps do a lot of dodging when asked what the 2D resolution of resulting images is, repeating some version of the following:

The Lytro is built for online sharing and interaction with pictures, not for large format printing. The living pictures you see in the Lytro Picture Gallery are representative of the image quality you can expect (but dependent on the screen resolution of your viewing device.) Asking about the pixel resolution of a light field camera system is not really relevant because pixels are very well defined. A pixel is color value and luminosity, and a light field camera’s unit of capture is much more than that because each unit contains directional light ray data in addition to color and luminosity. Light field cameras capture megarays, not megapixels. The first Lytro captures 11 megarays. Our target resolution is HD at 1080p, but the full answer isn’t completely straightforward. 2D projections in light field are rooted in computational photography, and 2D resolution can vary based on all sorts of factors including focal depth (refocus).
While valid, all that is probably said in an effort to redirect the question away from the answer which is that if you want to export to JPEG and print, you’ll be able to choose a focus point and export at 1080×1080 pixels — yep, a paltry 1.2 megapixels.
:mellow:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top