Mr. Pickles
Footballguy
It's beyond time we talked about this.
I suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
I believe the endless ramblings of nuanced opinions are his.
30%? It's word-for-word from this website.http://www.writers-free-reference.com/page03.htmI suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
Yeah. Please read the bolded. I thought he was referring to a different posting. It's true that that one was taken directly, before I had my source book in hand, and I admitted it at the time. I've never tried to pretend anything else.30%? It's word-for-word from this website.http://www.writers-f....com/page03.htmI suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
But only 30% of the page was copied.30%? It's word-for-word from this website.http://www.writers-free-reference.com/page03.htmI suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
It's okay - I know it must be hard keeping track of which posts are copied from where.Anyway, when you post it without citing a source, you are implying that it is your own, and thus are plagiarizing. I stand by my approx. 50% answer.Yeah. Please read the bolded. I thought he was referring to a different posting. It's true that that one was taken directly, before I had my source book in hand, and I admitted it at the time. I've never tried to pretend anything else.30%? It's word-for-word from this website.http://www.writers-f....com/page03.htmI suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
I believe the endless ramblings of nuanced opinions are his.
This is a fair point. I don't care where the info is coming from, but it should be sourced properly on each post.Anyway, when you post it without citing a source, you are implying that it is your own, and thus are plagiarizing. I stand by my approx. 50% answer.
Great Plagiarists Draft?Countdown to "history of plagiarism" thread in 3...2...
Regardless, you are suppose to cite your sources. You get a FAIL for this paper.I suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
Well professor I didn't know I had to cite my sources, I thought if I paraphrased it would be ok.Regardless, you are suppose to cite your sources. You get a FAIL for this paper.I suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
1.01 bueno?Great Plagiarists Draft?Countdown to "history of plagiarism" thread in 3...2...
1.02 A-Train or whoever it was that got busted in the smack off many years ago.1.01 bueno?Great Plagiarists Draft?Countdown to "history of plagiarism" thread in 3...2...
For future reference And be sure to read the syllabus next time Mr.Well professor I didn't know I had to cite my sources, I thought if I paraphrased it would be ok.Regardless, you are suppose to cite your sources. You get a FAIL for this paper.I suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
Thomas A1.02 A-Train or whoever it was that got busted in the smack off many years ago.
"Ouch."1.01 bueno?Great Plagiarists Draft?Countdown to "history of plagiarism" thread in 3...2...
EXACTLYIt's pretty remarkable that even the stuff timschochet decides to copy is boring.
Unless I missed a post, you didn't "admit" to any plagiarism until days later. I still don't get why an academic like yourself is unwillingly to list any sources used at the end of the post; no matter if you're using the same source over and over or not. You realize that anyone who comes into that thread and doesn't read the first 5 or so pages will be completely oblivious to any sources you are using?Yeah. Please read the bolded. I thought he was referring to a different posting. It's true that that one was taken directly, before I had my source book in hand, and I admitted it at the time. I've never tried to pretend anything else.30%? It's word-for-word from this website.http://www.writers-f....com/page03.htmI suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
what?!? I thought he was a jewish(non practicing of course) slumlord/property mgr?Unless I missed a post, you didn't "admit" to any plagiarism until days later. I still don't get why an academic like yourself is unwillingly to list any sources used at the end of the post; no matter if you're using the same source over and over or not. You realize that anyone who comes into that thread and doesn't read the first 5 or so pages will be completely oblivious to any sources you are using?Yeah. Please read the bolded. I thought he was referring to a different posting. It's true that that one was taken directly, before I had my source book in hand, and I admitted it at the time. I've never tried to pretend anything else.30%? It's word-for-word from this website.http://www.writers-f....com/page03.htmI suppose "blatant plagiarized" is correct, since I've never denied it. However, the example you posted is not a good one, since I had to change so much of it around to suit my purposes that probably only about 30% of it can be attributed to the original source (which any reader of that thread knows is Rock of Ages.) But enjoy your fun
ETA- wrong post, sorry. The one you cited was from earlier in the thread, and taken directly from a website, which I also admitted at the time.
In as a judge. Could also advise or team up with someone.Great Plagiarists Draft?Countdown to "history of plagiarism" thread in 3...2...
My condolences...perhaps the LCM (latinachubbymature.com) forums will be a better place for you to post.If the FFA finds that a poster has committed plagiarism, notice of this fact will be placed in the posters's forum record. When deemed appropriate, the FFA can request that a student be dismissed from the forum for violating these policies. For more on this process, and for an explanation of the appeals procedure, see The FFA Handbook, 2011 Editon.
The internet is serious business, Tim, and I am afraid you will have to be expelled. I found this in Section 8, Paragraph 3 of the FFA Handbook (PDF available):
My condolences...perhaps the LCM (latinachubbymature.com) forums will be a better place for you to post.If the FFA finds that a poster has committed plagiarism, notice of this fact will be placed in the posters's forum record. When deemed appropriate, the FFA can request that a student be dismissed from the forum for violating these policies. For more on this process, and for an explanation of the appeals procedure, see The FFA Handbook, 2011 Editon.
Sorry, we can't find "latinachubbymature.com". We suggest that you check the spelling of the web address or search above.
Did you ever stop to think that maybe those sites are plagiarizing from Tim?
In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
This isn't an issue of internet vs. book sources. Anything that isn't yours needs to be cited. So cite it.The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.
It has been confirmed.Wait, so Mr. Ham really = timsochet?
noWait, so Mr. Ham really = timsochet?
That's a shame because I really like Mr. Ham.noWait, so Mr. Ham really = timsochet?