What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Resort Fees - how are these still legal? (1 Viewer)

Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
Actually that is not true. In the airline industry any fee you can't opt out of has to be displayed.
Apparently it is hard to fathom for some that e.g. hotels.com are actually showing these fees and so is the hotel web site.
Do they show it when you are comparing rates? Nope. They showed it down at the bottom which you must page down several pages for, right before you are about to confirm the order. Why not show it while you are comparing several hundred rates trying to find the best deal? Why doesn't $80 per night at Hotel A mean the same thing at Hotel B. Ok, if it was optional, I could understand. By it is crazy #### to be defending this practice on mandatory fees. It makes no sense that anyone continues to defend this. Must be fishing at this point.

 
i wonder if the $20 trick would work for this in vegas. like, instead of getting an under the table upgrade, you get the resort fees taken out.

 
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
Actually that is not true. In the airline industry any fee you can't opt out of has to be displayed.
Apparently it is hard to fathom for some that e.g. hotels.com are actually showing these fees and so is the hotel web site.
Do they show it when you are comparing rates? Nope. They showed it down at the bottom which you must page down several pages for, right before you are about to confirm the order. Why not show it while you are comparing several hundred rates trying to find the best deal? Why doesn't $80 per night at Hotel A mean the same thing at Hotel B. Ok, if it was optional, I could understand. By it is crazy #### to be defending this practice on mandatory fees. It makes no sense that anyone continues to defend this. Must be fishing at this point.
Not the hotels problem.

ETA: or responsibility.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.

 
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:

 
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
i havent seen it either.

 
I think Spirit Airlines charges extra for carry-on luggage or checked luggage, etc. But, you can show up for a flight with no luggage and avoid those fees. Basically they are charging you for something that most people need, and they justify it by offering a very low ticket price. You cannot book a hotel room and decline the "resort fee" though, even if you have no need/interest in using the amenities that it provides. That seems like a key difference.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It reminds me of when I was shopping online for something recently and was searching through google. All the prices for this item were comparable, but then there was one site that was significantly less. They had some reason listed, like a sale of some sort.

Once you added the item to your cart and put in your shipping info, you see they built the difference of the price into their shipping cost to make the total cost even more than the competitors.

Misleading at best.

 
:lmao:

Can't believe there are people that think this is OK. I look forward to the future that you enabled where we drive down the street looking for a gas station and see the following prices advertised on the signs of different gas stations.

$1.25*

$1.75*

$2.15*

$1.11*

$4.41*

$0.97*

*Please see pump for a list of applicable fees.
Slight hijack because I've been debating starting a thread about this...Does everyone else have gas stations that advertise one price on their signs, but charge a higher price for credit card purchases? Sometimes there is a small sign (barely noticeable and low to the ground), and sometimes it's only listed at the pump.

It started here within the last year or so and seems like another smoke and mirror scam.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Slight hijack because I've been debating starting a thread about this...Does everyone else have gas stations that advertise one price on their signs, but charge a higher price for credit card purchases? Sometimes there is a small sign (barely noticeable and low to the ground), and sometimes it's only listed at the pump.

It started here within the last year or so and seems like another smoke and mirror scam.
Yes

One of two tricks they use. Used to be gas was cheaper with a car wash. Now they start offering lower prices if you pay cash.

Been going on that way for a few years in Chicago. That one does make sense though as the retailer has to pay a % to the credit card companies. So, they are passing those savings along to you if you decide to use cash. But, some of the signs are a bit misleading.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The whole point of resort fees is to break out the price and be less transparent thus encouraging choices that wouldn't otherwise be made (it's why it's popular, it works). The basis of a contract is one where both parties understand and agree to the terms and this tactic is doing it's best to obfuscate that understanding to increase profit. At it's core, this is a dishonest and immoral tactic even if it's not illegal (and I think it should be). I don't understand the support, I believe profit should be attained by trading value for money instead of exploiting confusion.

 
Actually that is not true. In the airline industry any fee you can't opt out of has to be displayed.
Apparently it is hard to fathom for some that e.g. hotels.com are actually showing these fees and so is the hotel web site.
By law the advertised price has to be the price for airline tickets. That was a recent change, and a good one. If you go to hotels.com and search for vegas hotels the advertised price is lower than the actual. You don't see it until the next screen.

Apparently that is hard to fathom for some.

 
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
By all means please show me an example of this happening. Between me and my wife we fly over 50 times a year on a variety of airlines. I have yet to see this happen or hear of it happening to any one I know.

 
I know when I started driving in '88 in MD, the price on the sign was cash and then cc was more. In some rare cases both prices were on the sign. Only noticed the last few years that it seemed to have changed and they are/were now the same rate.

And yeah, definitely calling bs on the getting to the airport and being charged more for your ticket.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao:

Can't believe there are people that think this is OK. I look forward to the future that you enabled where we drive down the street looking for a gas station and see the following prices advertised on the signs of different gas stations.

$1.25*

$1.75*

$2.15*

$1.11*

$4.41*

$0.97*

*Please see pump for a list of applicable fees.
Slight hijack because I've been debating starting a thread about this...Does everyone else have gas stations that advertise one price on their signs, but charge a higher price for credit card purchases? Sometimes there is a small sign (barely noticeable and low to the ground), and sometimes it's only listed at the pump.

It started here within the last year or so and seems like another smoke and mirror scam.
I thought this was against the rules of the credit card agreement the merchant has with the CC company, but I guess that rule has been relaxed or removed recently because it's popping up more often in the last couple of years.
I believe it's because they offer it as a cash discount and not an added credit card fee

 
Besides the obvious benefits to the hotels can someone please explain how the hotels are explaining a separate fee that you must pay? What is their Bs explanation having a fee on top of the rack rate?

 
Besides the obvious benefits to the hotels can someone please explain how the hotels are explaining a separate fee that you must pay? What is their Bs explanation having a fee on top of the rack rate?
They can get away with it. And t hey will continue to do it until they a) are stopped by legislation, or b) the masses rally and put up a united front and make them regret it. Since B is not going to happen, I'm all for legislation to make charges as obvious as common sense would dictate.

 
Besides the obvious benefits to the hotels can someone please explain how the hotels are explaining a separate fee that you must pay? What is their Bs explanation having a fee on top of the rack rate?
They can get away with it. And t hey will continue to do it until they a) are stopped by legislation, or b) the masses rally and put up a united front and make them regret it. Since B is not going to happen, I'm all for legislation to make charges as obvious as common sense would dictate.
Didn't answer my question. Knew all that already. When asked, what reason does the hotel give to justify the resort fee and how do they answer "Why isn't it in the rack rate"?

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
This_Guy said:
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
By all means please show me an example of this happening. Between me and my wife we fly over 50 times a year on a variety of airlines. I have yet to see this happen or hear of it happening to any one I know.
Ryan air comes to mind

 
Apple Jack said:
I know when I started driving in '88 in MD, the price on the sign was cash and then cc was more. In some rare cases both prices were on the sign. Only noticed the last few years that it seemed to have changed and they are/were now the same rate.

And yeah, definitely calling bs on the getting to the airport and being charged more for your ticket.
Please do read the whole sentence before speaking your mind.

If you book e.g. Ryan Air, do not add luggage at time of booking and then show up with luggage in the airport they wil charge you a higher fee at the airport than you could have booked it for online.

 
parasaurolophus said:
msommer said:
parasaurolophus said:
Actually that is not true. In the airline industry any fee you can't opt out of has to be displayed.
Apparently it is hard to fathom for some that e.g. hotels.com are actually showing these fees and so is the hotel web site.
By law the advertised price has to be the price for airline tickets. That was a recent change, and a good one. If you go to hotels.com and search for vegas hotels the advertised price is lower than the actual. You don't see it until the next screen.

Apparently that is hard to fathom for some.
OMG. We need the government to protect us from actually having to read what it says on the internet page 2, before paying!

And it's in smaller font

The HORROR!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
This_Guy said:
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
By all means please show me an example of this happening. Between me and my wife we fly over 50 times a year on a variety of airlines. I have yet to see this happen or hear of it happening to any one I know.
Ryan air comes to mind
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.

 
Apple Jack said:
I know when I started driving in '88 in MD, the price on the sign was cash and then cc was more. In some rare cases both prices were on the sign. Only noticed the last few years that it seemed to have changed and they are/were now the same rate.

And yeah, definitely calling bs on the getting to the airport and being charged more for your ticket.
Please do read the whole sentence before speaking your mind.If you book e.g. Ryan Air, do not add luggage at time of booking and then show up with luggage in the airport they wil charge you a higher fee at the airport than you could have booked it for online.
I get upset when I order pancakes to-go from a restaurant, and I show up and decide I want bacon too, and those bastards have the audacity to try and charge me for it.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
Happened to me on Allegiant.

They would not let me on unless I paid $50 more.

I'd flown the same flight, chose the same seat online (exit row, I'm 6'4") three prior times with no issues. All within 12 months. Paid an extra fee to choose my own seat. Never have a a problem with that.

Fourth time, they would not let me down the ramp.

There was nothing online when I booked the flight that said there would be any extra fees. Exactly the same process all four times I booked. No email or text of any changes prior to trip number four. No extra charge on the first leg to Vegas.

On my return leg home on flight four, the gate attendant claimed that my section of the plane (it was like a 4 or 6 row section in the middle) had a carry on baggage fee of $50 that they put into place about a year before. Never mentioned on any leg of the prior flights. I always have only one carry on and check nothing in.

They lied badly. I had to pay to get on. I usually let things slide. Not this one. That company treats customers like dog ####.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're looking for a place on the strip, I haven't verified recently, but I think the Best Western Casino Royale does not have resort fees.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
Happened to me on Allegiant.

They would not let me on unless I paid $50 more.

I'd flown the same flight, chose the same seat online (exit row, I'm 6'4") three prior times with no issues. All within 12 months. Paid an extra fee to choose my own seat. Never have a a problem with that.

Fourth time, they would not let me down the ramp.

There was nothing online when I booked the flight that said there would be any extra fees. Exactly the same process all four times I booked. No email or text of any changes prior to trip number four. No extra charge on the first leg to Vegas.

On my return leg home on flight four, the gate attendant claimed that my section of the plane (it was like a 4 or 6 row section in the middle) had a carry on baggage fee of $50 that they put into place about a year before. Never mentioned on any leg of the prior flights. I always have only one carry on and check nothing in.

They lied badly. I had to pay to get on. I usually let things slide. Not this one. That company treats customers like dog ####.
You have a case.

People (person?) who are claiming that these resort fees are just like airlines charging baggage fees, when you aren't forced to pay an extra fee if you do not bring a bag, do not have a case.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
Happened to me on Allegiant.

They would not let me on unless I paid $50 more.

I'd flown the same flight, chose the same seat online (exit row, I'm 6'4") three prior times with no issues. All within 12 months. Paid an extra fee to choose my own seat. Never have a a problem with that.

Fourth time, they would not let me down the ramp.

There was nothing online when I booked the flight that said there would be any extra fees. Exactly the same process all four times I booked. No email or text of any changes prior to trip number four. No extra charge on the first leg to Vegas.

On my return leg home on flight four, the gate attendant claimed that my section of the plane (it was like a 4 or 6 row section in the middle) had a carry on baggage fee of $50 that they put into place about a year before. Never mentioned on any leg of the prior flights. I always have only one carry on and check nothing in.

They lied badly. I had to pay to get on. I usually let things slide. Not this one. That company treats customers like dog ####.
I have flown Allegiant many times, and it is very clear when you book that you will pay $50 for carry on/checked bags if you wait until the airport. It is much cheaper if you pay beforehand.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
This_Guy said:
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
By all means please show me an example of this happening. Between me and my wife we fly over 50 times a year on a variety of airlines. I have yet to see this happen or hear of it happening to any one I know.
Ryan air comes to mind
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
This is a strawman argument. Hotels don't do that either. I just tried a mock booking on 3 or 4 of the big Vegas Hotels and on every one the resort fee is clearly stated right next to or right below the room rate, in the same size font, on the first page after you enter your dates, number of guests and room type, before you go to the checkout page.

I'm not sure where this myth that it is hidden in the fine print or you don't find out until you check in at the Hotel is coming from.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
This_Guy said:
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
By all means please show me an example of this happening. Between me and my wife we fly over 50 times a year on a variety of airlines. I have yet to see this happen or hear of it happening to any one I know.
Ryan air comes to mind
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
This is a strawman argument. Hotels don't do that either. I just tried a mock booking on 3 or 4 of the big Vegas Hotels and on every one the resort fee is clearly stated right next to or right below the room rate, in the same size font, on the first page after you enter your dates, number of guests and room type, before you go to the checkout page.

I'm not sure where this myth that it is hidden in the fine print or you don't find out until you check in at the Hotel is coming from.
Even Priceline says this:

No surprises! Total cost includes estimated hotel fees (e.g resort fees). Your total cost will never be higher than displayed above.
*Prices are in US dollars.
and the total showed the resorts "Hotel Fee" and the Total Cost with that Fee when bidding. I'm not sure what the problem is. If you don't like the Total Cost don't go.

I understand why people get pissed off with these fees, but it's not like they are exactly hidden either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
and the total showed the resorts "Hotel Fee" and the Total Cost with that Fee when bidding. I'm not sure what the problem is. If you don't like the Total Cost don't go.

I understand why people get pissed off with these fees, but it's not like they are exactly hidden either.
been awhile since I booked a room on Priceline and got hit with an unexpected resort fee. does this mean they've changed it?

so, if I win a room at Priceline using 'name your own price' for $200/night and they charge my credit card...you're saying when I find out the hotel name and show up, they won't add on the resort fee afterwards? it's covered in the blind bid?

just googled it and this thread at flyertalk came up: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/online-travel-booking-bidding-agencies/1386340-priceline-name-your-own-price-resort-fee-fraud.html

one response:

OP,

The information is there. It is not in bold (is it ever?), but it's there.

When you enter your bid and click "Preview Offer", it is under the "Important Information" area:

..."The reservation holder must present a valid photo ID and credit card at check-in. The credit card is required for any additional hotel specific service fees or incidental charges or fees that may be charged by the hotel to the customer at checkout. These charges may be mandatory (e.g., resort fees) or optional (parking, phone calls or minibar charges) and are not included in your offer price."

Clicking on the "charges" link pops up a new window with this...

..."Charges

Depending on the property you stay at, you may also be charged (i) certain per person, per room or percentage based mandatory hotel specific service fees, for example, resort fees (which typically apply to resort type destinations and, if applicable, may range from $10 to $40 per day), energy surcharges, newspaper delivery fees, in-room safe fees, tourism fees, or housekeeping fees and/or (ii) certain optional incidental fees, for example, parking charges, minibar charges, phone calls, room service and movie rentals, etc. These charges, if applicable, will be payable by you to the hotel directly at checkout and are not included in your offer price. Please contact the hotel directly as to whether and which charges or service fees apply."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
found this from the NY times 4 years ago:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/your-money/when-hotels-add-resort-fees-to-pricelines-price.html

Q. Your recent column on Priceline brought to mind a different issue I have with the company and its “name your price” system of hotel booking. The price you name often doesn’t include fees that the hotel requires you to pay.

Let me give you an example, based on an experience last year. I bid $110 for a hotel on the North Strip of Las Vegas. Priceline quoted me $110, plus the company’s own fees and taxes. I accepted and wound up at the Trump International.

But that hotel charges a $15-a-night “resort fee.” To everybody. Now, if that fee is unavoidable, why is the Trump International considered by Priceline to be a hotel that charges $110 a night? It’s like walking into a grocery store and seeing an item priced at $20, which you can’t actually buy unless you hand over $25.

Or maybe it’s worse, because at least at a grocery you can return that item to the shelves once you discover what it really costs. With Priceline, you find out about the added fees when you check in, and by then it’s too late. Priceline has already charged your credit card for your stay; the resort fee is charged by the hotel when you check out.

What is going on here? Is it beyond the technology of Priceline and the hotel it lists to include mandated fees? And is it acceptable — or legal — for Priceline to require a nonrefundable payment from customers before they know the actual price they will pay for the hotel?

Hank Youngerman

Morrisville, N.C.

A. It turns out that Mr. Youngerman is far from the first person to complain about a resort fee surprise after booking through Priceline. The issue was even fodder for a class-action lawsuit, filed in California in 2006 and alleging fraudulent inducement, breach of contract and an assortment of other no-no’s.

So none of the questions posed by Mr. Youngerman are new to Priceline. Which might be why a spokesman for the company, Brian Ek, needed only a few hours to e-mail the Haggler a response:

“We encourage hotels to include all mandatory fees (resort, safe, etc.) as part of their base rate,” Mr. Ek wrote. “To date, some do, and some don’t. Those that do charge these fees will charge them regardless of whether the room is being booked through an online travel agency like Priceline, or directly through the hotel.”

Mr. Ek also noted that Priceline alerts travelers to the possibility of fees — resort and otherwise — during the “name your own price” buying process. Which is true. In a heads-up that appears before you type in your credit card data, customers are alerted about “additional hotel specific service fees or incidental charges or fees that may be charged by the hotel to the customer at checkout.”

Clearly, Mr. Youngerman and many others don’t notice this warning. But it’s there, and in that previously mentioned class-action case, a judge determined that the alert was prominent enough to pass legal muster. Dismissing the lawsuit in 2010, Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl of the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles. described Priceline’s fee disclosure as “appropriately clear and conspicuous.”

Fair enough. But given that some resort fees are inevitable, why is it up to a hotel to decide whether to include them in the price listed by Priceline? A system like that seems to reward hotels that essentially disguise a portion of their price by labeling it a fee and punish those that don’t.

Shouldn’t Priceline just stipulate to hotels: “If you want to show up on our ‘name your price’ list, you need to give us your actual price. The whole thing. All in?”

Forget it, Mr. Ek says.

“Most of the hotels charging resort fees have told us that, operationally, they can’t bundle the resort fee into the base rate and then guarantee us that their front desk personnel won’t go ahead and charge it again at the front desk,” he wrote in a follow-up.

Weird, isn’t it? The world has made some amazing advances in recent years — new vaccines, Wi-Fi, the Slanket. But a resort fee that neither takes a traveler by surprise nor is charged twice — this dream eludes us. Why? The Haggler will pose this and other questions to some resort-fee-charging hotels in our next episode.
 
i think these types of deceptive/fraudulent charges are mainstream in the Hotel business but is mostly fringe airlines which do this. The practice is wrong in either case. In a free market goods and services should be competed for in a fair manner, not one of trickery. Some hotels and websites are upfront with these charges, but there are lots of abusers.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
This_Guy said:
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
The ever popular 'I haven't seen it so it doesn't exist' argument. Good job :thumbup:
By all means please show me an example of this happening. Between me and my wife we fly over 50 times a year on a variety of airlines. I have yet to see this happen or hear of it happening to any one I know.
Ryan air comes to mind
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
(oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation)
Did you miss the bolded?

 
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
(oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation)
Did you miss the bolded?
Yes I did miss that irrelevant piece of info that you did NOT include in your response to me.

Here's the thing...they are charging you for an additional service that you requested. They do not require you to pay the fee to get on the plane. They charge the fee for the additional service of checking a bag that you asked for. The hotels are not doing this. They are saying that unless you pay the additional fee for these service that you did not request and may not even use you may not get the service that you paid for originally.

So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
This is a strawman argument. Hotels don't do that either. I just tried a mock booking on 3 or 4 of the big Vegas Hotels and on every one the resort fee is clearly stated right next to or right below the room rate, in the same size font, on the first page after you enter your dates, number of guests and room type, before you go to the checkout page.

I'm not sure where this myth that it is hidden in the fine print or you don't find out until you check in at the Hotel is coming from.
The thing is this is exactly what the hotels are doing. They may disclose it at the time of booking, I'm not arguing that. But when you show up to check in you have to pay the resort fee if you want to you the room you have already booked. Airlines are not doing that. They are charging you optional fees for extra services you request.

The problem is that when the hotels do not include the required in the price it makes it harder to compare prices. Additionally it makes it easier to mislead customers since the resort fees can be less obvious in some cases.

Happened to me on Allegiant.

They would not let me on unless I paid $50 more.

I'd flown the same flight, chose the same seat online (exit row, I'm 6'4") three prior times with no issues. All within 12 months. Paid an extra fee to choose my own seat. Never have a a problem with that.

Fourth time, they would not let me down the ramp.

There was nothing online when I booked the flight that said there would be any extra fees. Exactly the same process all four times I booked. No email or text of any changes prior to trip number four. No extra charge on the first leg to Vegas.

On my return leg home on flight four, the gate attendant claimed that my section of the plane (it was like a 4 or 6 row section in the middle) had a carry on baggage fee of $50 that they put into place about a year before. Never mentioned on any leg of the prior flights. I always have only one carry on and check nothing in.

They lied badly. I had to pay to get on. I usually let things slide. Not this one. That company treats customers like dog ####.
They were not charging you extra to get on the plane, they were charging you a fee for your carry on. They had a policy change since the last time you flew with them. I don't know how they disclosed this to you when you booked so it is possible that they mislead you there. But the additional fee was for an additional service that you requested not a requirement to get on the plane. Very different than what the hotels are doing..

 
But other airlines aren't charging this. How can you expect me to actually read the information on the booking page and now that I haven't proceed to charge me more?

How can it possibly still be legal?

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
msommer said:
Is that a hotel issue or a 3rd party website issue? It appears that e.g. hotels.com is allowed to show the extra charges
I don't know exactly where the fault lies, but it's misleading to tell someone they are paying $100/night for a room, and then after it's booked and can't be cancelled to let them know "oh btw, there's also a $30/night resort fee that the hotel charges". feels very much like a bait and switch system.
Well, if that happened to me I'd stop booking hotels in such a way that I would be exposed to a bait and switch.
yes, as would most.

that still doesn't change the fact that it's an unfair way to do business. most uninformed consumers would still be victimized.
But as mentioned earlier in the thread the hotels make that information available to e.g. hotels.com so the unfair business model is not the hotel's but the website's, so blaming the hotel is pointless (for anything else than choosing to engage with companies with flawed business models).

If you had the same experience at the hotel's own website you could blame them.

This type of pricing is very common in the airline industry (oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation), and most types of (international) commercial transportation have oodles of addtl charges that you can find if you are really, really persistent on their websites.

The resort fee is just an add-on that you can only fight by choosing to book where it isn't charged, and yes, that may mean that Vegas is off limits.
I have never bought an airline ticket then been told I need to pay more to use the ticket when I show up at the airport. Nor have I ever heard of that happening to anyone I know.
Happened to me on Allegiant.

They would not let me on unless I paid $50 more.

I'd flown the same flight, chose the same seat online (exit row, I'm 6'4") three prior times with no issues. All within 12 months. Paid an extra fee to choose my own seat. Never have a a problem with that.

Fourth time, they would not let me down the ramp.

There was nothing online when I booked the flight that said there would be any extra fees. Exactly the same process all four times I booked. No email or text of any changes prior to trip number four. No extra charge on the first leg to Vegas.

On my return leg home on flight four, the gate attendant claimed that my section of the plane (it was like a 4 or 6 row section in the middle) had a carry on baggage fee of $50 that they put into place about a year before. Never mentioned on any leg of the prior flights. I always have only one carry on and check nothing in.

They lied badly. I had to pay to get on. I usually let things slide. Not this one. That company treats customers like dog ####.
I have flown Allegiant many times, and it is very clear when you book that you will pay $50 for carry on/checked bags if you wait until the airport. It is much cheaper if you pay beforehand.
Sorry, it was never online when I booked. It was never brought up on any of the seven prior legs.

The only thing I ever saw was a fee when I booked online was a fee if you checked in your bag. Not carry on.

 
This_Guy said:
msommer said:
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
(oh, my, did you actually expect to bring a suitcase, that's extra - sorry you didn't notice when you booked the extremely cheap ticket that cannot be refunded - by the way it's more expensive here in the airport than on our website now that we have you in a monopoly situation)
Did you miss the bolded?
Yes I did miss that irrelevant piece of info that you did NOT include in your response to me.

Here's the thing...they are charging you for an additional service that you requested. They do not require you to pay the fee to get on the plane. They charge the fee for the additional service of checking a bag that you asked for. The hotels are not doing this. They are saying that unless you pay the additional fee for these service that you did not request and may not even use you may not get the service that you paid for originally.

Marauder said:
So with Ryan Air you (1) purchase a ticket (2) show up at the airport (3) try to get on the aircraft (4) they stop you and say that will an extra $50 if you want on this aircraft? Just wondering because it seems like your response was missing some of the details.
This is a strawman argument. Hotels don't do that either. I just tried a mock booking on 3 or 4 of the big Vegas Hotels and on every one the resort fee is clearly stated right next to or right below the room rate, in the same size font, on the first page after you enter your dates, number of guests and room type, before you go to the checkout page.

I'm not sure where this myth that it is hidden in the fine print or you don't find out until you check in at the Hotel is coming from.
The thing is this is exactly what the hotels are doing. They may disclose it at the time of booking, I'm not arguing that. But when you show up to check in you have to pay the resort fee if you want to you the room you have already booked. Airlines are not doing that. They are charging you optional fees for extra services you request.

The problem is that when the hotels do not include the required in the price it makes it harder to compare prices. Additionally it makes it easier to mislead customers since the resort fees can be less obvious in some cases.

Happened to me on Allegiant.

They would not let me on unless I paid $50 more.

I'd flown the same flight, chose the same seat online (exit row, I'm 6'4") three prior times with no issues. All within 12 months. Paid an extra fee to choose my own seat. Never have a a problem with that.

Fourth time, they would not let me down the ramp.

There was nothing online when I booked the flight that said there would be any extra fees. Exactly the same process all four times I booked. No email or text of any changes prior to trip number four. No extra charge on the first leg to Vegas.

On my return leg home on flight four, the gate attendant claimed that my section of the plane (it was like a 4 or 6 row section in the middle) had a carry on baggage fee of $50 that they put into place about a year before. Never mentioned on any leg of the prior flights. I always have only one carry on and check nothing in.

They lied badly. I had to pay to get on. I usually let things slide. Not this one. That company treats customers like dog ####.
They were not charging you extra to get on the plane, they were charging you a fee for your carry on. They had a policy change since the last time you flew with them. I don't know how they disclosed this to you when you booked so it is possible that they mislead you there. But the additional fee was for an additional service that you requested not a requirement to get on the plane. Very different than what the hotels are doing..
When I was charged, that agent said the policy was put in place 12 months ago. This was the fourth RT within a year from BOI to LV. Not once was it ever mentioned online or before I boarded.

Carrying my own bag on is a service? :lmao:

 
I called a Vegas hotel today asking for reservation quotes... unsolicited, they gave me the all-in price including the resort fees. I felt so duped.

:popcorn:

 
I called a Vegas hotel today asking for reservation quotes... unsolicited, they gave me the all-in price including the resort fees. I felt so duped.

:popcorn:
Doesn't seem to be the norm. You must be pissed that they told you what it was actually going to cost you.
 
So which hotel chain does msommer work for?
He hasn't been defending the practice. He's been advocating that people become a bit more responsible and pay attention. Also he's one of the few that seems to get that Third-party websites aren't the hotel.
 
So which hotel chain does msommer work for?
He hasn't been defending the practice. He's been advocating that people become a bit more responsible and pay attention. Also he's one of the few that seems to get that Third-party websites aren't the hotel.
He has absolutely defended the practice. He may not have come out and said " I love it" but he has posted like 15 times saying other industries do it, that it is obvious, and just go elsewhere if you don't like it. He hasn't been an advocate for anybody but the hotels.

 
So which hotel chain does msommer work for?
He hasn't been defending the practice. He's been advocating that people become a bit more responsible and pay attention. Also he's one of the few that seems to get that Third-party websites aren't the hotel.
Have you even read the thread? He absolutely has defended the practice. And if you'd read the thread, you'd know that those third party websites have asked the hotels to include the resort fees in their quoted prices that they submit to the websites, but many hotels choose to manipulate the system and not do so.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top