Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
How Not To Draft In The NFL: Quarterbacksby Marcus Mosher · January 8, 2015
... Today, we are going to look at drafting quarterbacks in the late rounds. Typically, these are the rounds (4-7) in which teams draft quarterback ...
... I would advise teams to not use a pick on a quarterback after the third round. If your primary goal is to draft a backup quarterback and not have them play, you are already wasting your pick. For the purpose of just a backup quarterback, we have seen that there’s no real success in drafting a backup quarterback as they have no higher of a win percentage than a quarterback in free agency or wherever else they may appear. It also so happens to be that most teams in the NFL don’t pass on franchise quarterbacks multiple times in one draft, therefore there aren’t many “diamonds in the rough” in those later rounds. But let’s dig into this a little further.
Below is a list of every quarterback drafted in rounds four through seven since 2000. There has been a total of 115 drafted and we will analyze these quarterbacks:
Quite a list, huh? Of those 115 quarterbacks, only 33% of them went on to start more than one game. Only 55% of that entire list even attempted a pass in the NFL. For the most part, you are just as likely to draft a quarterback that will never attempt an NFL pass than drafting one who will. For that fact alone it would scare me away from using a pick in those rounds on a quarterback.
If you remove Tom Brady from that list(we will get to him in a moment), those 114 quarterbacks combined for 792 starts, which actually seemed high to me at first. But in those 792 games, those quarterbacks went 283-508-1. That means quarterbacks not named Tom Brady combined to have a career win percentage of 36%. Not good.
Speaking of Brady, we know that he is clearly the exception to the rule. Some quarterbacks did go on to have minor to some success in the NFL (Marc Bulger, David Garrard, Ryan Fitzpatrick,) but Brady is the crown jewel of this group. He is what everyone hopes and prays their day three pick evolves into.
But here’s the fact. If you selected a quarterback in rounds four through seven from 2000 to 2014, there was a less than one percent chance he became a franchise quarterback. Would you be willing to throw away a pick every year in the hope that you hit on the less than one percent magic draft card? I mean, I guess people play the lottery knowing they have much worst odds than that, right?
Or are you from the camp that would rather spend that pick building the rest of your team and drafting a player at a different position with a much higher probability of greatness? If my best case scenarios include Ryan Fitzpatrick and Kyle Orton, I am looking to spend my pick/s elsewhere.
How does that compare to 4th-7th round picks at other positions (disregarding the time they spend on special teams)?Of those 115 quarterbacks, only 33% of them went on to start more than one game. Only 55% of that entire list even attempted a pass in the NFL. For the most part, you are just as likely to draft a quarterback that will never attempt an NFL pass than drafting one who will. For that fact alone it would scare me away from using a pick in those rounds on a quarterback.
The article took a look at drafting QBs in the late rounds and those are the results they came up with.Those numbers are very skewed. If a coach/gm/owner take a QB early he HAS TO play. If he fails the coach/gm get another chance and it's the QB's fault because everyone liked him. Nobody is going to draft a 4th or 5th round rated QB in the first because they'll be thought a fool and lose their job if the QB fails. If they take one in the 5th or 6th and he fails they'll lose their job for playing him and not knowing he would fail. These are bigtime jobs. You get a lot more slack if you took the guy everyone likes early. So anyone that takes a QB late has little to gain from playing him. That doesn't mean they suck.
Context is a great point but teams don't draft as many QBs as they do DBs or linemen or LBs, RBs, etc. and QBs don't typically play on special teams so the stat that you pulled stating only 55% of late drafted QBs even attempt a pass is probably the worst of any position. Just makes sense that QBs would have the worst chance to see the field if they were a late flyer type pick whereas a late flyer on a DB or lineman would have a far greater shot for at least one chance to see the field.How does that compare to 4th-7th round picks at other positions (disregarding the time they spend on special teams)?Of those 115 quarterbacks, only 33% of them went on to start more than one game. Only 55% of that entire list even attempted a pass in the NFL. For the most part, you are just as likely to draft a quarterback that will never attempt an NFL pass than drafting one who will. For that fact alone it would scare me away from using a pick in those rounds on a quarterback.
In the past I had gone back to the 1980s working with all QBs drafted past the first round. This article only goes back to 2000 and uses only rounds 4-7. You don't want to go back too far since the game has changed so much over the years and the draft has changed, number of teams in the leagues, defenses, rules, coaches, etc. I like this list since the year 2000 is more reflective of the current state of the NFL than using numbers from the 1990s and 1980s or 1970s.A variety of thoughts on the QB thing:
...If you don't cut it off right at 2000, you run into a much bigger bumper crop of later round and undrafted successes.
...This doesn't take into account the relatively higher hit rate with some other positions, nor, therefore, the opportunity cost of taking a QB early.
...There is very real value to finding a good, reliable backup QB in those late rounds, too.
...Even up through the HOF, there is a good pedigree of success for the idea of letting somebody else draft, groom, and move on from your eventual HOF QB. There are certainly plenty of HOF QB's who were taken 1.01 by their teams, but for every one of those guys, there are guys who never panned out for their first team, or were drafted late, or who went undrafted, etc.
The history of the NFL is hardly Brady and then a whole bunch of Mannings and Bradshaws. There's plenty of Montanas and Bradys, Unitases and Moons, Youngs and Elways, Warners and Foutses...and leaving alone the ancient HOF, plenty of modern Romos and Hasselbecks and Wilsons and Foleses and Grbacs and Trent Greens, too.
You can certainly make the case that nailing your QB with 1.01 is an awesome strategy if you can pull it off. But the case for waiting isn't nearly as bleak as some want to paint it.
And I told you why their numbers look like that. A 1st rd QB will get EVERY chance to succeed from draft to training camp to games. If he fails it's all on him most times. Playing a guy you took in the 5th or 6th only happens because of injury or some other extrordinary happening. If nothing happens and you play him and he fails you get fired for failing to get a QB early. There is 0 risk to taking one top 5 and all the risk when playing a 5th round guy. These late rounders get very little first team/TC reps.Bracie Smathers said:The article took a look at drafting QBs in the late rounds and those are the results they came up with.Slider said:Those numbers are very skewed. If a coach/gm/owner take a QB early he HAS TO play. If he fails the coach/gm get another chance and it's the QB's fault because everyone liked him. Nobody is going to draft a 4th or 5th round rated QB in the first because they'll be thought a fool and lose their job if the QB fails. If they take one in the 5th or 6th and he fails they'll lose their job for playing him and not knowing he would fail. These are bigtime jobs. You get a lot more slack if you took the guy everyone likes early. So anyone that takes a QB late has little to gain from playing him. That doesn't mean they suck.
You think the numbers are VERY SKEWED.
OK, tell what you think the numbers really mean or provide different numbers because their numbers look solid to me as do their results that they derived from the numbers.
Another money making opportunity for the owners, I'm sure.Cool. The NFL is going to have a veteran combine for NFL free agent veterans. Smart move NFL.
----------------
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet · 16m 16 minutes ago
Fascinating. The @NFL will host on March 22 in AZ the first ever NFL Veteran Combine, according to a memo sent today. Its for veterans FAs.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet · 7m 7 minutes ago
From Matt Birks memo on the veteran combine, veteran FAs will participate in position-specific drills, timing and testing for 32 teams.
And here is the link to his top-fifty list.1. Tampa Bay QB Jameis Winston
2. Tennessee OLB Randy Gregory
3. Jacksonville OLB Dante Fowler, Jr.
4. Oakland WR Kevin White
5. Washington DE Leonard Williams
6. NY Jets QB Marcus Mariota
7. Chicago DE Shane Ray
8. Atlanta WR Amari Cooper
9. NY Giants NT Danny Shelton
10. St. Louis CB Trae Waynes
Published: Jan. 19, 2015 at 12:10 p.m.
Top 50 NFL draft prospect rankings USC's Williams opens as top-rated prospect
- Updated: Jan. 19, 2015 at 12:15 p.m.
Daniel Jeremiah
NFL Media analyst