Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Nothing at all like SPR to me. I'll admit, the plot could probably have been tighter. Maybe I got too caught up in the imagery it presented, and the "win at all costs" mentality of the German military at the time period it was attempting to depict, which I thought it did a good job of doing.Perhaps I was a bit overzealous in my first rating. For the battle sequences and imagery alone, I'd give it a solid 7.5. Definitely worth checking out IMO.
Just returned myself.. Time flew by.... very enjoyable and tense Movie.. easily a 8 out of 10 for me..
BustedKnuckles said:
Just came in to post about this. Man that was some great battle cinematography.BroncoFreak_2K3 said:
Freddy and Jason have nothing on Denzel in the creative kill categoryBustedKnuckles said:
saw with my GF...we both liked it a lot...not a feel good story at all lol. Doesnt hold a candle to SPR but stands on its own as a tank war movie
That's what I was getting at in my original post regarding my cousin. I've done a ton of research on him and where he was during the waning days of the war and it was downright barbaric at times. Thought the film did a good job with the realism of the times.
Watched January last night.
i like how they made you hate and respect both guys
I watched it- and even after watching some critique of it posted here, still came away with my sentiment.
Sorry, but I've watched it twice and don't understand how anyone could call it obvious and dumb. Not calling you simple-minded, I just think there's a lot more going on that you think.
Out of 36 critics on Metacritic, 29 of them gave it at least an 80.
Yep. I used to watch it. Mrs. Dogg and I were obsessed with his name: Edward Woodward. That like naming your kid Bobby Bobson.Gene Sackman said:
I really liked this as well. I'm not into racing or race movies myself but gave this a shot and I recommend it. I even looked both guys up to see more of their careers and rivalry. Good stuff.
I was going to watch this on Netflix yesterday where almost every movie gets a 4 - 4.5 stars.
about all i can say for it was that it was slick looking. the rest of it? pretty self-indulgent. i don't think it was as bad as you seem to but it's just not that good.
All I can say is that I found switching over to a 5-0 World series game, which I really don't care who wins or loses, was more interesting then this movieabout all i can say for it was that it was slick looking. the rest of it? pretty self-indulgent. i don't think it was as bad as you seem to but it's just not that good.
Why are they on a moving train, complete with all the potential issues that causes, instead of just being hunkered down in one spot?El Floppo said:I watched it- and even after watching some critique of it posted here, still came away with my sentiment.cstu said:El Floppo said:
Sorry, but I've watched it twice and don't understand how anyone could call it obvious and dumb. Not calling you simple-minded, I just think there's a lot more going on that you think.
Out of 36 critics on Metacritic, 29 of them gave it at least an 80.
maybe "dumb" is unfair- the creators were trying to do #### with the craft beyond telling the story, which I appreciate. "silly", more than "dumb".
but, but, but... train.Why are they on a moving train, complete with all the potential issues that causes, instead of just being hunkered down in one spot?El Floppo said:I watched it- and even after watching some critique of it posted here, still came away with my sentiment.cstu said:El Floppo said:
Sorry, but I've watched it twice and don't understand how anyone could call it obvious and dumb. Not calling you simple-minded, I just think there's a lot more going on that you think.
Out of 36 critics on Metacritic, 29 of them gave it at least an 80.
maybe "dumb" is unfair- the creators were trying to do #### with the craft beyond telling the story, which I appreciate. "silly", more than "dumb".
they would have had to call the movie something other than "snow piercer". maybe "snow hole"?but, but, but... train.Why are they on a moving train, complete with all the potential issues that causes, instead of just being hunkered down in one spot?El Floppo said:I watched it- and even after watching some critique of it posted here, still came away with my sentiment.cstu said:El Floppo said:
Sorry, but I've watched it twice and don't understand how anyone could call it obvious and dumb. Not calling you simple-minded, I just think there's a lot more going on that you think.
Out of 36 critics on Metacritic, 29 of them gave it at least an 80.
maybe "dumb" is unfair- the creators were trying to do #### with the craft beyond telling the story, which I appreciate. "silly", more than "dumb".
though), but I'd forgotten how hot Michelle Williams and Kristen Dunst were in that - and I'm not generally a fan of either one.
Caught the end of **** last night. It was as mildly amusing as I remembered it (Dan Hedaya as Nixon was
Saw the Usual Suspects again a few days ago after not seeing it for a few years. Has to be a top 10 all time movie right? I had forgotten how good it was. I can't think of anything that's come out since that's better - maybe as good as, but not better.
That is a bold statement.Caught the end of **** last night. It was as mildly amusing as I remembered it (Dan Hedaya as Nixon was
Saw the Usual Suspects again a few days ago after not seeing it for a few years. Has to be a top 10 all time movie right? I had forgotten how good it was. I can't think of anything that's come out since that's better - maybe as good as, but not better.
Haven't seen it, but I expect to have the same reaction. I'll wait until it hits the $3 theater.
A critic pointed out that many WW2 films are heroic exaggerations of a war that was every bit as brutal as Vietnam. So I liked that Fury was willing to be more accurate about that brutality.
. When you see it you will get it
