Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
You shouldn't. You may be wrong.
Only if you can predict the future.
Never, ever, ever, ever.Please don't try to run other people's team for them. TIA.
If you void the trade and Mendy blows an ACL this week and Nelson goes for 150/2, what will you tell the 0-3 (make that 0-4) team?
Wow, if those guys are free agents, it is easy to see how the 0-3 owner is 0-3. I would rather have Rice, Moore and Manningham for the rest of the season over Nelson anyway. That said, it is a bad trade, but not awful based on the current production, awful because it is a stupid move.
If the other owner was also 0-3, would you be asking? Its not a trade I'd make, but if the guy getting Nelson believes he's making his team better, let him run his team his way.
Then no. Period. Always. Just repeat this to yourself about 34,985,398,539,579,837,593,475 times so we don't have to keep seeing these types of posts in the SP...every. freaking. hour.
Wouldn't he need to drop a player to get one of them?
Or Nelson could be the Lloyd of the 2011 season and Mendy could break his femur next game. It's foolish to think players past performance or lack thereof is a certainty for their future worth..
You should quit the league for considering voiding the trade. In fact, quit fantasy football altogether. This is a fundamental idea and you don't get it.
Quit. It's for the best. Maybe you can play fantasy knitting or something, but not this.
Don't void it just because your mad you didn't rip him off. If you had, would you veto THAT trade?
If your role is to keep all the teams balanced you need another league.
Sticky post:"If you are going to post a 'should I veto' question first send it through the following filter:Is there collusion?Yes = veto and boot involved owners from the leagueNo = don't interfere"It is really that simple.We need a veto forum.
Yup. Sometimes its a slow start. Other times you're seeing a trend. Let each owner decide for themselves what they think is happening.
Why haven't you quit yet?
if this is the case, the it is in the leagues best interest to kick the owner out, not veto the trade
The number 2 WR in an offense that is scoring over 37 points a week, has been targeted 27 times, and has 20 catches, is nothing?
While it's not a trade I'd make, after next week, we're 1/4 of the way into the NFL season and more than that through the regular fantasy football season. Where do you draw the line? Do we have to wait until half the season's over before we can start ranking players based on performance instead of pre-season draft cheat sheets?
That's a really stupid way to look at trades.
