What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Withholding Judgment - Buy Low Opportunities (mostly dynasty) (1 Viewer)

karmarooster

Footballguy
I wanted to start a thread dedicated to discussing some guys who we as a fantasy community have collectively "written off" before they've been given due time to develop in the NFL. Remember the 3rd year Wide Receiver breakout rule? It was one of the earlier ideas in this golden age of fantasy football, but it can and should apply to other positions.

The danger in taking a stance on these players right now is that very soon we'll have more, better evidence to add to the files. Right now is precisely the wrong time of year to base a conclusion on a player on a stale "trend" that developed over the past season or two.

Instead, we are soon to be presented with new data points in the form of camp updates, pre-season games, and of course the first few games of the regular season. During this time of year we should be open to re-considering players who we've previously written-off much too soon. And because most owners have stale notions on the players below due mostly to past performance, right now represents a good buy-low window before the next chapters can be written.

Quarterbacks:

Geno Smith (23) - did he stink at times last year? Of course... but he was exactly the kind of hot-and-cold quarterback he was in college, with very high highs and very low lows. On the plus side, he started 16 games as a rookie, and three multi-TD games and one 300+ yard game. By fully-mature QB standards he was objectively bad, but when has a rookie QB not been bad? You can count the times on one hand (Manning, Luck, RG3, Cam). He's borderline not-drafted in startups right now, but would anyone really be surprised if he takes a small step forward this year, and turns into a decent QB by year 3?

EJ Manuel (24) - almost everything that applies for Geno applies for EJ. The one exception is health - and he generally looked shakier making reads and throws than Geno, yet for some reason EJ remains a (slightly) more valuable commodity. The additional weapons on offense should give him a greater chance to succeed, however. It's usually a mistake to call any QB a bust after just one season... they almost all look bad.

The historical track record for late-1st or borderline-1st round QBs isn't great - I'm not advocating them as future superstars, but they could be decent in the future. Considering how cheap they are, the only opportunity cost is the roster spot itself. If, by mid-season, EJ still looks uncomfortable and Geno is still in danger of a melt-down every other game, they are easily drop-able for the latest waiver-wire sensation.

Running Backs:

Marcus Lattimore (22) - the latest news about him on the NFI list isn't encouraging, but it isn't the death-kneel, either... (yet). If 3-6 weeks from now he still isn't practicing, then by all means feel free to move on. But we've basically been waiting 18 months since he was drafted and redshirted to see how much talent remains after his injury. Why make that call now, rather than a very short time from now? IIRC, he could've practiced at some point late last season, and did participate in OTAs. My point here is that his talent deserves just a fraction more of the time we've already spent waiting to see what he still could be. If Willis McGahee and Danario Alexander can come back from their injuries, there's a chance Lattimore could, too. Update - the latest news on Hunter is really disappointing, but it means that health permitting, Lattimore could contribute this year as the 3rd RB.

David Wilson (23) - quick, name the last RB to be selected in the 1st round? With the 32nd pick of the 2012 draft, it was Wilson, with Gio and Sankey missing the cut the last two years. This buy-low ship may have sailed with his clearance for contact and assuming the #2 RB role. Even still, there's a reason his hype train practically went nuclear last offseason - just watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGbRZHcefD8. Either the neck injury is a career roadblock, or it's a non-issue, and we simply don't have the crystal ball to know. As he was a borderline 1st rounder in startups just 12 months ago and now finds himself in the double-digit rounds (for now), his upside is just to appetizing for the price. Watching those highlights from 2012 you see a player with elite speed and elusiveness who, unlike many such backs (ahem, young CJ Spiller), is very comfortable running through the middle of the defense and in high traffic, and doesn't bounce everything outside. Ball security can be learned (AP, Tiki), that sort of running ability cannot. Just two more seasons left on his rookie contract... by then, he'll either be a stud on the Giants or a stud for someone else at age 25 as a FA... so long as the neck holds up.

Bryce Brown (23) - I was buying before he got shipped to Buffalo, but he still remains somewhat of a buy-low opportunity. I saw him go as an 11th rounder in a startup recently whereas I picked him up in the 20th before the trade. Consider that Brown was able to dominate NFL defense in 2012 ... as a 21-year old. Sure the Panthers and Cowboys (372 combined yards against them) were bad, but they were stocked full of older grown men with defensive experience in the NFL. He's still younger than some NFL rookies (Sims), or soon-to-be NFL stars (Michael). The ability, particularly as a RB, to dominate NFL defenses at an extremely young age is an under-rated signal that a player has a very high ceiling. Compare Brown's age-21 seeason (4.9 ypc) to LeSean McCoy's 21-year old season (4.1 ypc).

Mark Ingram (24) - this guy ran with an urgency last year that he had not previously shown in the NFL. Running backs are often the players we expect most to show promise at an earlier age, and for good reason. But he may have never been truly healthy until last season, and has never played in an offense that gets him regular touches. There's a slim chance he turns into a reliable flex of RB3 this year year, but more likely, he's a 25-year old free agent who could easily find himself in a Ben Tate-Rashad Jennings situation next year ... almost any team is going to present a better opportunity for him to get regular touches than splitting time on the Saints with a half-dozen other RBs. As good as a play-caller as Sean Payton is, he's been painfully obvious that when Ingram is in the game, a run up the middle is coming. If he can get a few more looks in the passing game with Sproles gone, he might be able to improve his YPA as well.

Wide Receivers:

Stephen Hill (23) - he's 6'4'', 215, a former early-2nd pick, and has the size-speed combo that only a few elite-of-the-elite WRs possess (DT, Julio, Calvin; bigger than Dez, thicker than AJ). Yet due to health and drops has been written off completely as a bust before his 3rd season. As a raw 2nd year with Geno Smith throwing the ball on a bad Jets team, still put up decent games (3-108-1) and as a 21-year old rookie in his first NFL game ever (5-89-2). If he battles drops and knees this season, feel free to place him in the Greg Little bin... but for now, he's everything you look for in a breakout WR with a very low price tag. And if the Jets/Geno combo never lets him develop, has just two more years on his rookie contract when he'll be a 25 year old FA. His numbers in years 1 and 2 compare not-too-unfavorably to Justin Hunter's rookie year, and yet Hill is about a dozen rounds cheaper.

Hakeem Nicks/Kenny Britt (26) - doesn't exactly fit the mold of the younger players above, but I needed more WRs. New teams are exactly what these two needed. Both were once top-10 WR prospects earlier in their careers, because both showed the ability to dominate in short-to-medium stretches. Both have one-year prove it deals which should amp them up to "$get paid$"... but that logic should have applied to them both last year as well. Britt playing for Fisher and Nicks playing with the best QB of his career ... these guys represent not just buy-low opportunities for dynasty but for re-draft as well (ADP in the double-digit rounds for both). Both have health concerns, but both are also now removed by a decent stretch of time to let those injuries heal. We'll know at some point this season whether either has that elite upside they both once possessed.

-----

Not on the List - Tavon Austin - while he's still young and has the chance to improve on his disaster of a rookie year, he just doesn't have the size to ever be a consistent contributor for fantasy. Could be a better NFL player than fantasy asset as a returner/gadget player. But the combo of his OC and the strength of the Rams defense, plus their Fisher-ball mentality and a number of other, bigger WRs on his team... I doubt he'll ever live up to his NFL draft position. He's an inconsistent WR3, who has the upside of developing into an inconsistent WR2.

-----

What say you to these players - why should they be written off as busts or valued on the margins, in most cases before their 2nd or 3rd NFL season?

Or, what other players are you not ready to write-off just yet?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not on the List - Tavon Austin - while he's still young and has the chance to improve on his disaster of a rookie year, he just doesn't have the size to ever be a consistent contributor for fantasy. Could be a better NFL player than fantasy asset as a returner/gadget player. But the combo of his OC and the strength of the Rams defense, plus their Fisher-ball mentality and a number of other, bigger WRs on his team... I doubt he'll ever live up to his NFL draft position. He's an inconsistent WR3, who has the upside of developing into an inconsistent WR2.

-----

What say you to these players - why should they be written off as busts or valued on the margins, in most cases before their 2nd or 3rd NFL season?

Or, what other players are you not ready to write-off just yet?
Top Rookie WRs with a minimum of 35 grabs last season. Based on draft position I could see some people being disappointed but considering he missed 3 games due to injury, it's not that bad and definitely not a disaster.

NAME POS YR AGE EXP G REC RECYD YD/REC RECTD FANT PT

1 Keenan Allen wr 2013 21 1 15 71 1046 14.73 8 152.6

2 DeAndre Hopkins wr 2013 21 1 16 52 802 15.42 2 92.2

3 Ace Sanders wr 2013 22 1 15 51 484 9.49 1 59.9

4 Marlon Brown wr 2013 22 1 14 49 524 10.69 7 94.2

5 Cordarrelle Patterson wr 2013 22 1 16 45 469 10.42 4 104.7

6 Terrance Williams wr 2013 24 1 16 44 736 16.73 5 104.0

7 Tavon Austin wr 2013 22 1 13 40 418 10.45 4 86.9

8 Robert Woods wr 2013 21 1 14 40 587 14.68 3 78.3

9 Aaron Dobson wr 2013 22 1 12 37 519 14.03 4 75.9

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not on the List - Tavon Austin - while he's still young and has the chance to improve on his disaster of a rookie year, he just doesn't have the size to ever be a consistent contributor for fantasy. Could be a better NFL player than fantasy asset as a returner/gadget player. But the combo of his OC and the strength of the Rams defense, plus their Fisher-ball mentality and a number of other, bigger WRs on his team... I doubt he'll ever live up to his NFL draft position. He's an inconsistent WR3, who has the upside of developing into an inconsistent WR2.

-----

What say you to these players - why should they be written off as busts or valued on the margins, in most cases before their 2nd or 3rd NFL season?

Or, what other players are you not ready to write-off just yet?
Top Rookie WRs with a minimum of 35 grabs last season. Based on draft position I could see some people being disappointed but considering he missed 3 games due to injury, it's not that bad and definitely not a disaster.

NAME POS YR AGE EXP G REC RECYD YD/REC RECTD FANT PT

1 Keenan Allen wr 2013 21 1 15 71 1046 14.73 8 152.6

2 DeAndre Hopkins wr 2013 21 1 16 52 802 15.42 2 92.2

3 Ace Sanders wr 2013 22 1 15 51 484 9.49 1 59.9

4 Marlon Brown wr 2013 22 1 14 49 524 10.69 7 94.2

5 Cordarrelle Patterson wr 2013 22 1 16 45 469 10.42 4 104.7

6 Terrance Williams wr 2013 24 1 16 44 736 16.73 5 104.0

7 Tavon Austin wr 2013 22 1 13 40 418 10.45 4 86.9

8 Robert Woods wr 2013 21 1 14 40 587 14.68 3 78.3

9 Aaron Dobson wr 2013 22 1 12 37 519 14.03 4 75.9
In terms of potential I think people want big play ability, in that regard you have to look at Allen, Hopkins, Williams, Woods and Dobson, all of whom had 14+ YPC, but also one other guy not on here, Kenny Stills, who had the 4th most yards receiving among rookies plus a whopping 20 YPC.

Austin showed very big playmaking ability at the end of last season But for 90% of the year they seemed to only throw to him after he was open on short routes. And so few touches.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good list and your premise is valid: these players can mostly be gotten cheaply and a few of them will probably pan out and exceed expectations.

QBs: I am not a big fan of either Gino or EJ eventhough I happen to have EJ. I like EJ's situation better because he seems to have some good pieces around him but if he doesn't show considerably progress by week 6 I will probably jettison. And you're right, we expect to see big progress going from first to second year and if we don't--then these two guys get dropped for some waiver wire prospect.

Key Question: how do Gino and EJ compare to Manziel, Teddy, and Bortles?

RBs: Can Ingram really only be 24? Seems like he has been sucking it up for longer than that. Well, given his age, he could go somewhere next year and possibly resuscitate his career--obviously NO was not a good spot for a guy like him with bad hands. I could see him as a stash with value going up.

Brown is also a stash and hope--as long as Spiller is healthy his value is minimal, but he showed me enough in PHI to think that he could be a decent starting RB if he gets the shot.

Wilson and Lattimore? Those injuries scare me. And Lattimore also has some pretty stiff competition so I would pass on him for sure. I think Jennings is the guy to own in NYG rather than Wilson and Andre Williams is a decent prospect; I would rather have Andre Williams than Wilson.

Receivers:

Stephen Hill? No thank you. Seen enough.

Britt? I think his knees are shot so I would not roster him and in fact unloaded him a few months ago.

Nicks? Sure. I would give him a shot. He landed in a great situation. Yes he is on a show-me contract, but I expect him to show up.

Tavon Austin, Hopkins, Patterson, and Allen are not going to be cheap--I wouldn't comment on them in this group.

I like Terrance Williams as a prospect, but I don't think he is a sure thing and the price in my leagues is steep--I'll wait.

I like Robert Woods. He showed great hands and good chemistry with Manuel last season. I could see him being Buffalo's leading WR this year while the rookie matures. Departure of Johnson opens the door for lots of opportunity.

Marlon Brown is what he is: I am not interested as I think the ceiling is too low to be worth it.

Not a believer in Ace Sanders or Dobson.

Players I would add:

Andre Holmes, Marcus Wheaton: Holmes has good size and physical ability and started to come on last year. Plus, James Jones is at the end of his career and yet is WR1 for Oakland. I like Rod Streater but I think I agree with those who say he is a WR2 and not a featured guy with a high ceiling.

And Wheaton is a guy with good speed and a good route runner and he is poised to be a starter on PIttsburgh where we have seen guys put up pretty good numbers: Holmes, Emmanuel Sanders, Mike Wallace.

 
Not on the List - Tavon Austin - while he's still young and has the chance to improve on his disaster of a rookie year, he just doesn't have the size to ever be a consistent contributor for fantasy. Could be a better NFL player than fantasy asset as a returner/gadget player. But the combo of his OC and the strength of the Rams defense, plus their Fisher-ball mentality and a number of other, bigger WRs on his team... I doubt he'll ever live up to his NFL draft position. He's an inconsistent WR3, who has the upside of developing into an inconsistent WR2.

-----

What say you to these players - why should they be written off as busts or valued on the margins, in most cases before their 2nd or 3rd NFL season?

Or, what other players are you not ready to write-off just yet?
Top Rookie WRs with a minimum of 35 grabs last season. Based on draft position I could see some people being disappointed but considering he missed 3 games due to injury, it's not that bad and definitely not a disaster.

NAME POS YR AGE EXP G REC RECYD YD/REC RECTD FANT PT

1 Keenan Allen wr 2013 21 1 15 71 1046 14.73 8 152.6

2 DeAndre Hopkins wr 2013 21 1 16 52 802 15.42 2 92.2

3 Ace Sanders wr 2013 22 1 15 51 484 9.49 1 59.9

4 Marlon Brown wr 2013 22 1 14 49 524 10.69 7 94.2

5 Cordarrelle Patterson wr 2013 22 1 16 45 469 10.42 4 104.7

6 Terrance Williams wr 2013 24 1 16 44 736 16.73 5 104.0

7 Tavon Austin wr 2013 22 1 13 40 418 10.45 4 86.9

8 Robert Woods wr 2013 21 1 14 40 587 14.68 3 78.3

9 Aaron Dobson wr 2013 22 1 12 37 519 14.03 4 75.9
Tavon Austin's YPC was so epically bad last year the only player comp is Dexter McCluster. That's his upside, with some Dante Hall mixed in. He's just not on the right offense, and is far too small. He also fumbled on a bout 1 of every 10 touches (4 on 49 touches). Plus, the drops. Even if he cleans up the drops, YPC, and fumbles, he's still small on a run-first team with a less than creative gameplan.

Comparing with Hill... if hill does clean up his issues, he's a size-speed freak that we've seen more and more commonly in the top 10 WRs. And he's one year closer to getting off the Jets than Austin is to getting off the Rams. It's just premature to label him a bust when he's a 23 year old with less than two full seasons played. For comparison:

Stephen Hill years 1 and 2 = 45 / 594 / 4 (23 games)

Roddy White = 59 / 952 / 3 (32 games)

Demaryius = 54 / 834 / 6 (21 games)

Riley Cooper - 23 / 431 / 2 (29 games)

More realistically, Hill's career probably tracks closer to Cooper than the truly elites.... but we'll have a much clearer idea of what that upside is 3-4 months from now rather than right now.


 
Good list and your premise is valid: these players can mostly be gotten cheaply and a few of them will probably pan out and exceed expectations.

QBs: I am not a big fan of either Gino or EJ eventhough I happen to have EJ. I like EJ's situation better because he seems to have some good pieces around him but if he doesn't show considerably progress by week 6 I will probably jettison. And you're right, we expect to see big progress going from first to second year and if we don't--then these two guys get dropped for some waiver wire prospect.

Key Question: how do Gino and EJ compare to Manziel, Teddy, and Bortles?

RBs: Can Ingram really only be 24? Seems like he has been sucking it up for longer than that. Well, given his age, he could go somewhere next year and possibly resuscitate his career--obviously NO was not a good spot for a guy like him with bad hands. I could see him as a stash with value going up.

Brown is also a stash and hope--as long as Spiller is healthy his value is minimal, but he showed me enough in PHI to think that he could be a decent starting RB if he gets the shot.

Wilson and Lattimore? Those injuries scare me. And Lattimore also has some pretty stiff competition so I would pass on him for sure. I think Jennings is the guy to own in NYG rather than Wilson and Andre Williams is a decent prospect; I would rather have Andre Williams than Wilson.

Receivers:

Stephen Hill? No thank you. Seen enough.

Britt? I think his knees are shot so I would not roster him and in fact unloaded him a few months ago.

Nicks? Sure. I would give him a shot. He landed in a great situation. Yes he is on a show-me contract, but I expect him to show up.

Tavon Austin, Hopkins, Patterson, and Allen are not going to be cheap--I wouldn't comment on them in this group.

I like Terrance Williams as a prospect, but I don't think he is a sure thing and the price in my leagues is steep--I'll wait.

I like Robert Woods. He showed great hands and good chemistry with Manuel last season. I could see him being Buffalo's leading WR this year while the rookie matures. Departure of Johnson opens the door for lots of opportunity.

Marlon Brown is what he is: I am not interested as I think the ceiling is too low to be worth it.

Not a believer in Ace Sanders or Dobson.

Players I would add:

Andre Holmes, Marcus Wheaton: Holmes has good size and physical ability and started to come on last year. Plus, James Jones is at the end of his career and yet is WR1 for Oakland. I like Rod Streater but I think I agree with those who say he is a WR2 and not a featured guy with a high ceiling.

And Wheaton is a guy with good speed and a good route runner and he is poised to be a starter on PIttsburgh where we have seen guys put up pretty good numbers: Holmes, Emmanuel Sanders, Mike Wallace.
Manziel obviously has the upside that guys like Geno, EJ, Bortles, don't... but this time next year when Bridgewater and Bortles fail to be as good as Peyton Manning and see their values drop, it'll be the same scenario.

Re: Jennings, Wilson, and Williams. From Grantland's "bad contracts" article:

Paying for the Outlier: Watch out for those career years, teams. When a player who averages two touchdowns per season over four years puts together a 10-touchdown campaign, don’t pay him like he’s going to score 10 touchdowns a year from that point forward. This was a classic Jaguars blunder under Gene Smith, as they made that move with Marcedes Lewis and Laurent Robinson.
Jennings is exactly that sort of guy from last year... was the first year he'd gone over 500 yards, and only the second time over 100 carries. I know he's low mileage, but he's 29 this year, and will be 30 next year. So he's got a year, maybe two left... he is a decent value in redraft, but will not be an obstacle long term if Wilson is as good (and healthy) as he can be.

Andre Williams is simply a two-down plodder who can't catch. He's Shonn Greene at best. Consider it from the Giants POV - they drafted Wilson in the 1st, Williams in the 4th, and yet the immediate reaction is "well they must be ready to move on from David Wilson because they drafted a RB in the 4th round"... and signed a 29 year old journeyman who finally put up one decent season.

Only one of these RBs is substantially above replacement value, and it's Wilson. And yet the neck injury is scary. Peyton Manning was pretty good last year, though.

Wheaton is a tremendous prospect, but his price is much higher than the likes of e.g. Stephen Hill, David Wilson, and Mark Ingram.

I tend to think that Terrence Williams has WR2 upside, but is much more likely to hit that ceiling very early on in his career.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of this group, I like EJ Manuel. Lots of weapons. Think the Bills will play to his strengths. The injury really hurt his development. Think he becomes a top 16 QB this year and too 10 in two years.

 
Strictly shooting from the gut here, based on bad fantasy football vibes:

God bless his heart and determination to come back from injury, but I believe Lattimore is done. McGahee was just a freak of nature. Sam Bradford seems to be just that type of guy that won't make it. I love David Wilson, but the neck....I shudder to think what happens the first time he instinctively lowers his head...ugh.

 
Not on the List - Tavon Austin - while he's still young and has the chance to improve on his disaster of a rookie year, he just doesn't have the size to ever be a consistent contributor for fantasy. Could be a better NFL player than fantasy asset as a returner/gadget player. But the combo of his OC and the strength of the Rams defense, plus their Fisher-ball mentality and a number of other, bigger WRs on his team... I doubt he'll ever live up to his NFL draft position. He's an inconsistent WR3, who has the upside of developing into an inconsistent WR2.

-----

What say you to these players - why should they be written off as busts or valued on the margins, in most cases before their 2nd or 3rd NFL season?

Or, what other players are you not ready to write-off just yet?
Top Rookie WRs with a minimum of 35 grabs last season. Based on draft position I could see some people being disappointed but considering he missed 3 games due to injury, it's not that bad and definitely not a disaster.

NAME POS YR AGE EXP G REC RECYD YD/REC RECTD FANT PT

1 Keenan Allen wr 2013 21 1 15 71 1046 14.73 8 152.6

2 DeAndre Hopkins wr 2013 21 1 16 52 802 15.42 2 92.2

3 Ace Sanders wr 2013 22 1 15 51 484 9.49 1 59.9

4 Marlon Brown wr 2013 22 1 14 49 524 10.69 7 94.2

5 Cordarrelle Patterson wr 2013 22 1 16 45 469 10.42 4 104.7

6 Terrance Williams wr 2013 24 1 16 44 736 16.73 5 104.0

7 Tavon Austin wr 2013 22 1 13 40 418 10.45 4 86.9

8 Robert Woods wr 2013 21 1 14 40 587 14.68 3 78.3

9 Aaron Dobson wr 2013 22 1 12 37 519 14.03 4 75.9
Tavon Austin's YPC was so epically bad last year the only player comp is Dexter McCluster. That's his upside, with some Dante Hall mixed in. He's just not on the right offense, and is far too small. He also fumbled on a bout 1 of every 10 touches (4 on 49 touches). Plus, the drops. Even if he cleans up the drops, YPC, and fumbles, he's still small on a run-first team with a less than creative gameplan.
I'm not even a big Tavon Austin backer, but one might suggest you're "writing him off" before he has a chance to develop. His upside is Dexter McCluster?

I'm pretty sure he hit McCluster's ceiling last year. Guy's longest play from scrimmage in the NFL is 49 yards which Tavon bested both receiving (81) and rushing (65). McCluster has 6 career TDs, or one more TD than Austin had last year. And I suppose you're down on Corderelle Patterson as well? He basically had that same "epically bad" YPC - and I assume you mean yards per catch since Austin's yards per carry were through the roof - admittedly a small sample size, though.

I think you did hit the real problem, though, and that's the offensive coordinator. But there is a sign of hope there. Austin's big plays came in the second half of the season. The Rams turned Austin into Danny Amendola 2.0 for the first half of the year last year (Amendola's career yards per catch is in that "epically bad" range of 9.4). They just couldn't get him into space... it was pathetic. They started to stretch him out as the season went a long and he had some big plays.

Honestly, I think Tavon Austin was a perfect addition to your list. He was drafted as the 8th overall pick one year ago, first WR off the board, and he's now being treated as what... the 5th or 6th best WR in the class? His ADP at DLF is in the range with Donte Moncrief and Kenny Stills. I'll kick the can at those prices.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not on the List - Tavon Austin - while he's still young and has the chance to improve on his disaster of a rookie year, he just doesn't have the size to ever be a consistent contributor for fantasy. Could be a better NFL player than fantasy asset as a returner/gadget player. But the combo of his OC and the strength of the Rams defense, plus their Fisher-ball mentality and a number of other, bigger WRs on his team... I doubt he'll ever live up to his NFL draft position. He's an inconsistent WR3, who has the upside of developing into an inconsistent WR2.

-----

What say you to these players - why should they be written off as busts or valued on the margins, in most cases before their 2nd or 3rd NFL season?

Or, what other players are you not ready to write-off just yet?
Top Rookie WRs with a minimum of 35 grabs last season. Based on draft position I could see some people being disappointed but considering he missed 3 games due to injury, it's not that bad and definitely not a disaster.

NAME POS YR AGE EXP G REC RECYD YD/REC RECTD FANT PT

1 Keenan Allen wr 2013 21 1 15 71 1046 14.73 8 152.6

2 DeAndre Hopkins wr 2013 21 1 16 52 802 15.42 2 92.2

3 Ace Sanders wr 2013 22 1 15 51 484 9.49 1 59.9

4 Marlon Brown wr 2013 22 1 14 49 524 10.69 7 94.2

5 Cordarrelle Patterson wr 2013 22 1 16 45 469 10.42 4 104.7

6 Terrance Williams wr 2013 24 1 16 44 736 16.73 5 104.0

7 Tavon Austin wr 2013 22 1 13 40 418 10.45 4 86.9

8 Robert Woods wr 2013 21 1 14 40 587 14.68 3 78.3

9 Aaron Dobson wr 2013 22 1 12 37 519 14.03 4 75.9
Tavon Austin's YPC was so epically bad last year the only player comp is Dexter McCluster. That's his upside, with some Dante Hall mixed in. He's just not on the right offense, and is far too small. He also fumbled on a bout 1 of every 10 touches (4 on 49 touches). Plus, the drops. Even if he cleans up the drops, YPC, and fumbles, he's still small on a run-first team with a less than creative gameplan.
I'm not even a big Tavon Austin backer, but one might suggest you're "writing him off" before he has a chance to develop. His upside is Dexter McCluster?

I'm pretty sure he hit McCluster's ceiling last year. Guy's longest play from scrimmage in the NFL is 49 yards which Tavon bested both receiving (81) and rushing (65). McCluster has 6 career TDs, or one more TD than Austin had last year. And I suppose you're down on Corderelle Patterson as well? He basically had that same "epically bad" YPC - and I assume you mean yards per catch since Austin's yards per carry were through the roof - admittedly a small sample size, though.

I think you did hit the real problem, though, and that's the offensive coordinator. But there is a sign of hope there. Austin's big plays came in the second half of the season. The Rams turned Austin into Danny Amendola 2.0 for the first half of the year last year (Amendola's career yards per catch is in that "epically bad" range of 9.4). They just couldn't get him into space... it was pathetic. They started to stretch him out as the season went a long and he had some big plays.

Honestly, I think Tavon Austin was a perfect addition to your list. He was drafted as the 8th overall pick one year ago, first WR off the board, and he's now being treated as what... the 5th or 6th best WR in the class? His ADP at DLF is in the range with Donte Moncrief and Kenny Stills. I'll kick the can at those prices.
I write Austin off, going against the grain of the whole point of the OP, because of his size. He may not even be the best WVU WR on his own team. Most likely scenario is that he is more efficient with his targets this year (hopefully), but he's never going to be a 100+ target guy. Patterson, OTOH, is a size-speed freak who could be the WR1 for a Norv Turner offense. While both players have to have their touches manufactured in some sense now, if Patterson develops his route running, he has the size and height to box out/jump ball/beat people deep/run with the ball in his hands. Austin has not yet touched McCluster in terms of usage... I don't think Austin could ever support 100+ carries and 50+ receptions. He's the smallest player on the field every time... let's assume he does actually develop in the Rams WR1... how's he going to handle coverage by the likes of Richard Sherman and Patrick Peterson?

Plus, his price is still relatively high... looks like about an 8th round pick in startups. So the fantasy community as a whole has downgraded him, but still largely considers him a decent option, meaning that he hasn't hit rock bottom yet. The other guys I pointed out (Hill, Lattimore, etc.) are basically considered "done"... and my point was that it's silly to make the call that player X is done right now rather than 2-3 weeks from now. Austin's value could still sink lower than it is right now -or it could improve - but there's no indication he's at rock bottom. With Hill and Lattimore, they are basically borderline WW guys, but who could rebound in the short term. And if they don't, what have you lost? Very little.

Put it this way, I would much rather have Still as the deep threat in a Brees offense given his target efficiency last year, or even take a shot at Moncrief if he can be the big body WR option in a Luck offense (assuming Nicks is one and done in Indy), rather than a mini-mite gadget player who can't survive with the volume of targets necessary to be a decent fantasy WR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tavon Austin's YPC was so epically bad last year the only player comp is Dexter McCluster. That's his upside, with some Dante Hall mixed in. He's just not on the right offense, and is far too small. He also fumbled on a bout 1 of every 10 touches (4 on 49 touches). Plus, the drops. Even if he cleans up the drops, YPC, and fumbles, he's still small on a run-first team with a less than creative gameplan.
Wes Welker's YPR his rookie year was 0.00.

I'll give you that he's probably in the wrong offense for his skills but I don't buy the 'too small' argument at all. The 10 lbs. Welker has on him can be worked on and he's already talking about it - "“I am going to put on a couple more pounds, not lose my speed and just work on the small things of the game, the mental part, some things like that.”"

 
how's he going to handle coverage by the likes of Richard Sherman and Patrick Peterson?
If he gets his route running down, more like how are they going to cover him?

 
Plus, his price is still relatively high... looks like about an 8th round pick in startups. So the fantasy community as a whole has downgraded him, but still largely considers him a decent option, meaning that he hasn't hit rock bottom yet. The other guys I pointed out (Hill, Lattimore, etc.) are basically considered "done"... and my point was that it's silly to make the call that player X is done right now rather than 2-3 weeks from now. Austin's value could still sink lower than it is right now -or it could improve - but there's no indication he's at rock bottom. With Hill and Lattimore, they are basically borderline WW guys, but who could rebound in the short term. And if they don't, what have you lost? Very little.

Put it this way, I would much rather have Still as the deep threat in a Brees offense given his target efficiency last year, or even take a shot at Moncrief if he can be the big body WR option in a Luck offense (assuming Nicks is one and done in Indy), rather than a mini-mite gadget player who can't survive with the volume of targets necessary to be a decent fantasy WR.
The late 8th is a good spot for him.

That you prefer Stills to him is baffling to me.

 
How about Jared Cook?

He came into the league as a raw athletic specimen, we knew he would require some time to develop. Considering tight ends often have an extended learning curve anyhow, I still consider it possible Cook hasn't reached his full potential. He has a tight end loving OC and his HC apparently likes him. He got a good but of targets last year, and under such conditions he didn't have a terrible season last year. As I don't foresee the targets going away (perhaps they increase), 2014 likely serves as his floor.

Perhaps he doesn't make an ideal starting TE, but his price has dropped to ridiculous levels. It startups you can get him with your 15th pick - tight end 22. I'd take Jared Cook as my back up with upside any day.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me count the ways I prefer Stills to Austin:

Cheaper than Austin

Brees > Bradford

Payton > Fisher

6' vs. 5'7''

195 vs. 175

20 YPR vs. 10

5 TDs on 32 rec. vs. 4 TDs on 40 rec.

Fewer drops

Compare this:

The NFL's best QB rating when throwing to a single wide receiver last season was Drew Brees to Kenny Stills (139.3).

Don't underestimate Stills' rookie season just because he only had 32 catches. He dropped just one pass on 51 targets, led the NFL in yards per catch (20.0) and turned five of his grabs into touchdowns. He was extremely efficient while also producing big plays, a surefire sign of chemistry. Now ticketed for a bigger role in the wake of Lance Moore's release, Stills carries plenty of upside into his second season. May 1 - 9:38 AM
with this:

Tavon Austin acknowledged he struggled to learn the Rams' playbook as a rookie.

It's worth noting Austin scored a 7 on his 2013 Wonderlic test. "I didn't really know what was going on," he said. "Everything looked like Spanish and sounded like Spanish to me." Entering his second season, Austin now claims to have OC Brian Schottenheimer's system down pat. He's expected to be a sub-package weapon, playing limited snaps. Austin is a long shot for steady WR3 value. Jul 23 - 12:06 PM
I'm assuming he thought the Playbook sounded like Spanish, and not the Wonderlic, but it's not quite clear.

Stills is cheaper, bigger, younger, and better.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Austin was brought in with the dream of replacing Bradford's crazy rapport with Amendola, except with a faster, more dynamic, bigger-play version. That was super clear right from the get go, when he was compiling 6 rec per game out of the gate for a while.

But as the thing above states, he was having trouble with the plays. So they had to dial back. And before there was any real chance of that ship righting itself, Bradford went down for the year. As time went on, Austin began to showcase the explosive potential the Rams wanted from him, but the chance was no longer there for him and Bradford to build into anything.

I think writing him off is crazy talk. He showed enough of absolutely everything they wanted from him that it's very reasonable to suspect they'll open up the new season trying to force him the ball, just as they did last go around. If he knows the playbook now, all the better. And with Bradford coming off the kind of knee surgery that frequently sees QB's taking a year or two to get their deep ball back, a much-expanded short game seems probable.

I'm on Austin above everyone on that list, and it ain't close.

 
All these players have flaws, that's why they are cheap. Nitpick if you must but remember these players are on this list for a reason.

Knile Davis (22): He's the primary back up to Charles. As good as JC is, his concussion last year is worrisome for a workhorse back.

DeAnthony Thomas (21): Andy Reid knows that Thomas isn't a true RB and it doesn't appear he's going to use him like one. Which means he doesn't have that kind of upside but he might have Sproles like upside.

Trent Richardson (23): It feels like a "He-who-must-not-be-named" situation with him. It's sacrilegious to even talk about him. However, his cost might be incredibly low as some owners try to get off this sinking ship. His yards per catch went up with Indy and by the time this season starts he should have the play book down.

Kenbrell Thompkins (26)/Aaron Dobbson (23):

Camp reports have been very positive for Thompkins. Dobbson is younger and was off to a decent start last year but a foot injury and surgery in March have him losing reps with Brady, which might make him even cheaper.

Mohamed Sanu (25): Lost the #2 spot to Marvin Jones last year which will bring down his price. His numbers improved greatly from his first to second year and he will have a new OC this year. He is also in the magical third year for a WR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
All these players have flaws, that's why they are cheap. Nitpick if you must but remember these players are on this list for a reason.

Knile Davis (22): He's the primary back up to Charles. As good as JC is, his concussion last year is worrisome for a workhorse back.

DeAnthony Thomas (21): Andy Reid knows that Thomas isn't a true RB and it doesn't appear he's going to use him like one. Which means he doesn't have that kind of upside but he might have Sproles like upside.

Trent Richardson (23): It feels like a "He-who-must-not-be-named" situation with him. It's sacrilegious to even talk about him. However, his cost might be incredibly low as some owners try to get off this sinking ship. His yards per catch went up with Indy and by the time this season starts he should have the play book down.

Kenbrell Thompkins (26)/Aaron Dobbson (23):

Camp reports have been very positive for Thompkins. Dobbson is younger and was off to a decent start last year but a foot injury and surgery in March have him losing reps with Brady, which might make him even cheaper.

Mohamed Sanu (25): Lost the #2 spot to Marvin Jones last year which will bring down his price. His numbers improved greatly from his first to second year and he will have a new OC this year. He is also in the magical third year for a WR.
All good picks for cheap guys that might do something except Trent. In my leagues, there's at least one guy who still views him as a potential top 10 RB. Usually, that's the guy who owns him.

 
What is with all the hyperbole when describing Austin? "Disaster" rookie year? "Epically bad YPR" for 10.5?

I mean, you make some good points, but put your biases aside and discuss it.

 
All these players have flaws, that's why they are cheap. Nitpick if you must but remember these players are on this list for a reason.

Knile Davis (22): He's the primary back up to Charles. As good as JC is, his concussion last year is worrisome for a workhorse back.

DeAnthony Thomas (21): Andy Reid knows that Thomas isn't a true RB and it doesn't appear he's going to use him like one. Which means he doesn't have that kind of upside but he might have Sproles like upside.

Trent Richardson (23): It feels like a "He-who-must-not-be-named" situation with him. It's sacrilegious to even talk about him. However, his cost might be incredibly low as some owners try to get off this sinking ship. His yards per catch went up with Indy and by the time this season starts he should have the play book down.

Kenbrell Thompkins (26)/Aaron Dobbson (23):

Camp reports have been very positive for Thompkins. Dobbson is younger and was off to a decent start last year but a foot injury and surgery in March have him losing reps with Brady, which might make him even cheaper.

Mohamed Sanu (25): Lost the #2 spot to Marvin Jones last year which will bring down his price. His numbers improved greatly from his first to second year and he will have a new OC this year. He is also in the magical third year for a WR.
All good picks for cheap guys that might do something except Trent. In my leagues, there's at least one guy who still views him as a potential top 10 RB. Usually, that's the guy who owns him.
True. I wasn't going to put him in my list but there is the odd team that has him in the clearance bin. You're right though.

 
Of this group, I like EJ Manuel. Lots of weapons. Think the Bills will play to his strengths. The injury really hurt his development. Think he becomes a top 16 QB this year and too 10 in two years.
Agree on the weapons aspect... Watkins, Tampa Mike, Woods, Goodwin... Really like that group.... But they also like to run the ball. I think they lean on the running game this year and open it up more in 2015.

 
How about Jared Cook?

He came into the league as a raw athletic specimen, we knew he would require some time to develop. Considering tight ends often have an extended learning curve anyhow, I still consider it possible Cook hasn't reached his full potential. He has a tight end loving OC and his HC apparently likes him. He got a good but of targets last year, and under such conditions he didn't have a terrible season last year. As I don't foresee the targets going away (perhaps they increase), 2014 likely serves as his floor.

Perhaps he doesn't make an ideal starting TE, but his price has dropped to ridiculous levels. It startups you can get him with your 15th pick - tight end 22. I'd take Jared Cook as my back up with upside any day.
No. Cook has had enough time to develop. I think he is at best an average TE and that is practically worthless.

 
With all this Rams talk, let's talk about Brian quick. He's entering year 3, tall, athletic, and needed some time to develop coming from an FCS school. Most importantly, he's running with the 1's right now and is dirt cheap.

 
Let me count the ways I prefer Stills to Austin:

Cheaper than Austin

Brees > Bradford

Payton > Fisher

6' vs. 5'7''

195 vs. 175

20 YPR vs. 10

5 TDs on 32 rec. vs. 4 TDs on 40 rec.

Fewer drops
And not likely to ever see much more than the 50 targets he had last year.

 
All these players have flaws, that's why they are cheap. Nitpick if you must but remember these players are on this list for a reason.

Knile Davis (22): He's the primary back up to Charles. As good as JC is, his concussion last year is worrisome for a workhorse back.

DeAnthony Thomas (21): Andy Reid knows that Thomas isn't a true RB and it doesn't appear he's going to use him like one. Which means he doesn't have that kind of upside but he might have Sproles like upside.

Trent Richardson (23): It feels like a "He-who-must-not-be-named" situation with him. It's sacrilegious to even talk about him. However, his cost might be incredibly low as some owners try to get off this sinking ship. His yards per catch went up with Indy and by the time this season starts he should have the play book down.

Kenbrell Thompkins (26)/Aaron Dobbson (23):

Camp reports have been very positive for Thompkins. Dobbson is younger and was off to a decent start last year but a foot injury and surgery in March have him losing reps with Brady, which might make him even cheaper.

Mohamed Sanu (25): Lost the #2 spot to Marvin Jones last year which will bring down his price. His numbers improved greatly from his first to second year and he will have a new OC this year. He is also in the magical third year for a WR.
All good picks for cheap guys that might do something except Trent. In my leagues, there's at least one guy who still views him as a potential top 10 RB. Usually, that's the guy who owns him.
Trent has already shown he has top 10 potential, but ranking him top 10 after last year is a big mistake. I think the thing with Trent is that most of the other RBs ranked around him dont really have top 10 potential, if Trent turns things around he does, especially in PPRs where he could 40+ rec plus goal line work in a good offense,

 
Let me count the ways I prefer Stills to Austin:

Cheaper than Austin

Brees > Bradford

Payton > Fisher

6' vs. 5'7''

195 vs. 175

20 YPR vs. 10

5 TDs on 32 rec. vs. 4 TDs on 40 rec.

Fewer drops
And not likely to ever see much more than the 50 targets he had last year.
What could possibly make you think that a 21-year old rookie with the best YPR and efficiency rating with his QB has seen the most targets of his career? Mind you, while sharing with Colston and Lance Moore.

The likes of Devery Henderson, and Robert Meachem have been in the 75-85 target range. Lance Moore has gone up to 120. Colston annually sees 110-140 and can't have many more years left.

There's Graham, Colston for another year or two, Cooks, and the RBs.... and then guys like Joe Morgan and Nick Toon. Plenty of pie to go around. This offense hasn't thrown less than 650 times since 2009.

Coach Sean Payton said he feels he needs to get WR Kenny Stills more opportunities this season.

Still was targeted 46 times last regular season, good for sixth-most on the team. With the release of Lance Moore and trade of Darren Sproles, that opens up 136 targets for Stills and first-round rookie Brandin Cooks. Cooks is expected to help replace Sproles, while Stills should vault into the No. 2 receiver role vacated by Moore. Stills' targets may not dramatically rise as only the fourth or fifth option in the passing game, though 70 could be achievable. He has WR3/4 upside. Jun 11 - 6:33 PM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Terrance Cobb, JAX, RB (24)

Pretty much everything is going against him so there is no shortage of reasons not to even consider him but he's dirt cheap and does have some talent.

Article:

http://staugustine.com/sports/local-sports/2014-05-17/rb-terrance-cobb-looking-catch-jaguars#.U9xQW4BdXII

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwLY1pjN_T0

*** FBG doesn't even have him in their JAX depth chart. I don't think he has been cut since he tweeted this:

https://twitter.com/BigCatCountry/status/493902691001589763

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rod Streeter is entering year three as a WR1 with a reasonably competent QB. His numbers have steadily progressed each year... He's pretty much free.

 
With all this Rams talk, let's talk about Brian quick. He's entering year 3, tall, athletic, and needed some time to develop coming from an FCS school. Most importantly, he's running with the 1's right now and is dirt cheap.
i need to see him in preseason before i am a believer. i want to see how he gets used rather than him getting built up in camp.

 
I'm warm on two guys in your list: Britt and Bryce Brown.

I talked in another thread about Britt. Basically he's back with his old coach, on a new team (fresh start) and reports say he's looking good physically in camp. He's starting opposite Austin, and he knows this is probably his last chance. I still don't really believe in him, but at the end of a draft, if I've got room then I'm picking him up. (sorry for the bold, the browser just went nuts)

Bryce Brown is behind two RBs that I don't trust: Jackson and Spiller. Jackson has to get old at some point (right?), and Spiller is just Spiller - he could carry you or kill you. I think both Jackson and Spiller are at the end of their contracts after this year, and Brown is a stud who has looked good in camp so far.

*Just checked, and Jackson's is up, and Spiller has a option, so there's a good chance he gets paid somewhere else and Brown comes in as a better option for less money. Brown's only making a half mil a year. Spiller is making 3.5 mil and hitting the Bills cap for almost 6 million. I like Brown next year (or maybe even this year).

 
Tommy Streeter. Looks like he could be the #3 and if so should see some solid action.
i don't know that he has much value in that offense. lots of mouths to feed there with jackson, evans, martin, and whomever emerges at TE.

 
Very good topic, and one which is always useful to have around.

As opposed to just digging up guys who were once good and then sucked (like a Bernard Pierce), I like to go back and look at my rookie draft lists from a year or two back. There's something I saw when evaluating players prior to the NFL that I liked, and something happened that didn't lead to success at the NFL level. Maybe it's just that they weren't good enough. Maybe it's an injury or situation that didn't allow it. Ultimately, I'm confident in my evaluations and hope they work out long term. Here are a couple guys I liked that fit this criteria.

Da'Rick Rogers: It's amazing how things change. He was on the Bills practice squad, then the Colts practice squad, then finally the Colts active roster. Guy went off in Week 14 for 6 catches, 107 yards and 2 TDs. His value after that game was through the roof. Obviously made a huge catch against the Chiefs in the playoffs. He's behind Reggie Wayne and Hakeem Nicks on that side of the WR depth chart. There's a possibility neither is there next year. He flashed the potential I saw when evaluating him and can be had right now for virtually nothing. Not much redraft value, but a solid, cheap dynasty stash.

Tyler Eifert: Really didn't do anything wrong as a rookie. This guy was routinely going in the first round last year like Ebron is this year. Had a solid first year for a TE, which usually take longer to develop. But for some reason, he seems to have lost some of his luster. Maybe it's Jermaine Gresham. But I'm personally not a big believer in any of the receivers on the roster other than AJ Green. I'd expect to see Eifert lined up out wide more often this year even with Gresham on the field. He should have an even better redraft season this year, but we very well may be talking about him as a Top 5 TE next offseason. In the past 25 years, 28 TEs have been taken in the first round. Only 3 had more receptions as a rookie than Eifert (ironically one of those is Gresham).

Dwayne Allen: Another Colts player, but that's OK. Allen was injured in the first game last year after a very strong rookie campaign. The Colts liked Allen so much that they drafted him just one round after drafting the top TE in the draft Coby Fleener. He's not really flying under anyone's radar, but coming off an injury, there are probably some owners who aren't as tied to him as they were after year 1. He may not end up being a big time TE, but you shouldn't have to give up too much to get him.

ETA: Lance Dunbar: Not a big window left to make a statement, but he's got the speed to force his way onto the field and get some touches. He's always been impressive running the ball and averaged 5 YPC in limited work last year. He's the type of player that is prone to having a big preseason, driving his value up. Could be a nice stash even if you're not a Murray owner.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My favorite buy low is Dri Archer. Been getting him in the 4th round of rookie drafts and for peanuts in trade. I think he could have a significant "sproles" type role on that team and is a threat to score every time the ball is in his hands. Better ppr value than standard scoring. Even more so in leagues that reward return yardage.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oof, the last couple of days have not been kind to my original suggestions.

Manuel - someone gets balls batted down at the LOS despite being pretty big for a QB. Does not look good, WW material at best.

Geno - OK, I'll hold.

Lattimore - not looking good, but I'm not cutting him.

Wilson - what a bummer. Fantastic talent. Really appreciated his perspective on 'retiring' though -- he got to live his dream and scored multiple TDs in the NFL. Made a few mil, gets to keep walking. How cool is that?

Brown - was decent with the reserves. Sucks they signed the oldest RB in the league to an extension, though.

Ingram - he's more of a hold for next year as a FA. Undetermined.

Hill - ding ding. Reports have been strong.

Britt - ding ding. Listed as the starter.

Nicks - apparently still sucks.

Austin - needed a 'boost to his confidence' apparently by listing him with the 1s even though he's just a slot guy. Apparently it's Quick. Makes sense to have two huge WRs with that O-Line and Fisherball. I don't think Austin could block the kicker.

 
Brian Quick is a guy I am very interested in. He came in with a ton of physical skill but raw skill set. It isn't unusual for young player to develop slowly. The physical gifts are still there. There are no character issues and he seems to be improving. The thing about guys like him is that they seem to arrive quickly after their long journey if that makes sense. I could see him topping 900 this year.

 
Do people really believe that Bryce brown looked good the other night? He ran like a high school back who's never been coached to hit a hole. As soon as he gets the ball he's looking to bounce outside. He needs to her did of those bad habits.

 
Do people really believe that Bryce brown looked good the other night? He ran like a high school back who's never been coached to hit a hole. As soon as he gets the ball he's looking to bounce outside. He needs to her did of those bad habits.
I read he looked good in camp. I didn't get to see the game. He looked bad? That's not a good sign, then. :(

 
Yes as we know we need to really pay attention to pre season.
It cant hurt :penalty:

Id say Geno probably tops that list for me.. Im not saying Ive watched all his games, but I have heard of the issues in so far as his weapons. For instance I was writing off Tom last Season, based on lack of weapons.

Lattimore truly takes the fun and/or challenge out of estimating whose the real (raw) deal! The NFL could really use a 1B type to Charles 1A imho But the only real positive Ive heard recently is Latti will be here for the duration of the Season (or something like that)

Ingram yeah Hes still the starter, so he has the opportunity...

Now I dunno how much we really care to get into each player But One aspect that kinda catch's my eye involves Geno tbh I only know he was born in Florida, but it is kinda interesting to consider playing in NY.. I was listening to the radio (HOF game) and Tony Dungy started discussing the significance of a player being able to drive "home" during OTA's etc. Tony also went on to mention several things actually.

Once again I like Geno, but if your gonna take the position of writing down plus's and negative's to make a choice or something Id consider adding yet another negative (away from family n close friends)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top