belljr
Footballguy
i read that, that was awesomeI've got some nimrod in the SP who thinks Rice isn't subject to the CBA because the Ravens cut him
i read that, that was awesomeI've got some nimrod in the SP who thinks Rice isn't subject to the CBA because the Ravens cut him
It is starting to look bleak.So. . Do i start wondering if the giants are drafting jaemis Winston. ..
Mods, unless this is verified to actually be one of them, can we please get this user name changed to ESPN Mike Fan? TIANo offense guys, but this thread is no better than a typical Shark Pool one. Coming from a long time lurker of this site.
Disappointed :(
Do they have good crab legs in New Jersey?It is starting to look bleak.So. . Do i start wondering if the giants are drafting jaemis Winston. ..
Most of the time - depends on where you go.Do they have good crab legs in New Jersey?It is starting to look bleak.So. . Do i start wondering if the giants are drafting jaemis Winston. ..
Why watch Ms America? The gird are all skinny.So should I watch the Bears or Ms. America?
I don't think it's made up. Their findings are anything but conclusive, but it's still funny.That has to be made up, right?
Why not?Why do these Papa Johns commercials have to make Joe Montana look like a starving homeless man?
Current thoughts?Benjamin looking like a big time WR too. for taking Beckham over him.So my Panthers are 2-0. First time since 2008.
And we are winning our division. Great win today. Hope some folks drafted Olsen he is looking unstoppable at times.
Great question.Why not?Why do these Papa Johns commercials have to make Joe Montana look like a starving homeless man?
It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
I'll overturn you 100% of the time!!!It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
The catch had already been established and he made a "football move" with his dive towards the end zone. Doesn't matter that the ball hit the ground after the completed pass.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
He had control, he even tried to reach out toward the endzone. If he's not in control, he's not doing that.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
NTTAWWTI'll overturn you 100% of the time!!!It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
Right. He could have fumbled it forward into the endzone and it still would have been complete at the 1 if they recovered.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
Wait. In order to fumble doesn't control have to be established first?Right. He could have fumbled it forward into the endzone and it still would have been complete at the 1 if they recovered.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
big red xThat's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
They have no clue. As a lions fan I am completely familiar with this stupid rule. They got the call right with the overturn and there is no question about it.Wait. In order to fumble doesn't control have to be established first?Right. He could have fumbled it forward into the endzone and it still would have been complete at the 1 if they recovered.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
Yes, and it was.Wait. In order to fumble doesn't control have to be established first?Right. He could have fumbled it forward into the endzone and it still would have been complete at the 1 if they recovered.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
Not my favorite commercial but if you don't think that was effective, you are dead wrong.Holy #### that mcdonalds commercial is the worst #### ever.
Oh it works. The 4 women in my living room all went ahhhhhhhhh and were captivated.Not my favorite commercial but if you don't think that was effective, you are dead wrong.They even will have people going to Tumblr for some of the back stories to continue the ad at a low cost.Holy #### that mcdonalds commercial is the worst #### ever.
So I don't agree with you.
Give it up. Anywhere on the field the receiver must complete the ####### process of the catch when going to the ground. It was not a catch nor a fumble.Yes, and it was.Wait. In order to fumble doesn't control have to be established first?Right. He could have fumbled it forward into the endzone and it still would have been complete at the 1 if they recovered.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
No, by rule: the catch is established after he controls it through hitting the ground while he is on his way down to the ground. Had he not been falling to the ground while making the catch, the play would not have been over turned.The catch had already been established and he made a "football move" with his dive towards the end zone. Doesn't matter that the ball hit the ground after the completed pass.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
The rule is specific to making a catch while falling to the ground.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
Going to the ground as part of this so-called process. Dez, like Calvin, didn't dive to the ground to catch the ball. They jumped caught the ball and landed on their feet. In Dez's case he took a couple steps forward. When you catch the ball and land on your feet, when do we count it as a catch and the process crap being over with?The rule is specific to making a catch while falling to the ground.That's a rule specific to the endzone.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
He wasn't falling as he made to catch. He took two steps.No, by rule: the catch is established after he controls it through hitting the ground while he is on his way down to the ground. Had he not been falling to the ground while making the catch, the play would not have been over turned.The catch had already been established and he made a "football move" with his dive towards the end zone. Doesn't matter that the ball hit the ground after the completed pass.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
He WAS falling, "stumbling" forward in the act of the catch. That's not a football move.He wasn't falling as he made to catch. He took two steps.No, by rule: the catch is established after he controls it through hitting the ground while he is on his way down to the ground. Had he not been falling to the ground while making the catch, the play would not have been over turned.The catch had already been established and he made a "football move" with his dive towards the end zone. Doesn't matter that the ball hit the ground after the completed pass.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
I see that move in football all the timeHe WAS falling, "stumbling" forward in the act of the catch. That's not a football move.He wasn't falling as he made to catch. He took two steps.No, by rule: the catch is established after he controls it through hitting the ground while he is on his way down to the ground. Had he not been falling to the ground while making the catch, the play would not have been over turned.The catch had already been established and he made a "football move" with his dive towards the end zone. Doesn't matter that the ball hit the ground after the completed pass.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
I see that move in football all the timeHe WAS falling, "stumbling" forward in the act of the catch. That's not a football move.He wasn't falling as he made to catch. He took two steps.No, by rule: the catch is established after he controls it through hitting the ground while he is on his way down to the ground. Had he not been falling to the ground while making the catch, the play would not have been over turned.The catch had already been established and he made a "football move" with his dive towards the end zone. Doesn't matter that the ball hit the ground after the completed pass.It wasn't close. You have to control the ball through the process of going to the ground. As soon as he fell, the ball hit the ground and bounced two feet in the air. That call gets overturned 100 percent of the time.Looked like a football move by me for the Bryant catch. Not sure what Refs were thinking overturning that unless this was a makeup call for the Detroit game.
They even let borderline call in first half stay withheld, so this was an uncalled for bold move by refs.
They should have changed it after the megaton play. They did not, we are stuck with this. Dez got a lesson on what a catch is. Next time he will just worry about keeping possession of the ball instead of stretching for a TD.Ilov80s said:That's my big question in all of this. It makes sense on a catch that's made while diving. But when a player catches the ball and lands on their feet, how is it determined if the player is still in the process of catching the ball? A football move? Why isn't jumping up and landing on your feet and then taking steps considered football moves?