What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

more wet: walking through rain, or running? (1 Viewer)

more wet: walking through rain, or running?

  • walking

    Votes: 35 64.8%
  • running

    Votes: 19 35.2%

  • Total voters
    54
Mythbusters did this. Pretty sure they concluded that running the rain actually gets you wetter.
It makes sense that you would be getting more water on you by running into it rather than letting it fall on your just head and shoulders (assuming no wind and the rain is coming straight down).

However, if it's windy and raining at an angle I think you'd be better off getting out of it as soon as possible.

 
My wife and I had this same debate. I made a bet with her. I ran to the car, she walked. I drove away before she got to the car. She was much wetter than I was when she finally got home.

 
Let's say there are a thousand rain drops in the air between you and your door, and they're falling at a perfectly steady pace. If you walk straight ahead, you should walk through 1000 drops. But if you run, you should also walk through 1000 drops. No difference.

The difference seems to be how long you are in the rain. If it takes you five seconds to run and ten seconds of you walk, then you should get gone seconds wetter walking.

 
Mythbusters did this. Pretty sure they concluded that running the rain actually gets you wetter.
It makes sense that you would be getting more water on you by running into it rather than letting it fall on your just head and shoulders (assuming no wind and the rain is coming straight down).

However, if it's windy and raining at an angle I think you'd be better off getting out of it as soon as possible.
You walk into the rain too, though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If there's enough rain that you're completely soaked when running, you're as wet as if you would've walked. Like if you're in the rain for a mile, it doesn't matter. If you're 25 feet from a door, and it's not a torrential downpour, running gets you less wet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So wouldn't the clearest answer be that if you can run more quickly than the drops are coming down and can reach your destination before becoming completely soaked, you're less wet by running?

 
Mythbusters did this. Pretty sure they concluded that running the rain actually gets you wetter.
It makes sense that you would be getting more water on you by running into it rather than letting it fall on your just head and shoulders (assuming no wind and the rain is coming straight down).

However, if it's windy and raining at an angle I think you'd be better off getting out of it as soon as possible.
You walk into the rain too, though.
http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/running-in-the-rain-minimyth.htm

running gets you wetter by almost a 2-1 margin

when you run, your body isn't perfectly vertical.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mythbusters did this. Pretty sure they concluded that running the rain actually gets you wetter.
It makes sense that you would be getting more water on you by running into it rather than letting it fall on your just head and shoulders (assuming no wind and the rain is coming straight down).

However, if it's windy and raining at an angle I think you'd be better off getting out of it as soon as possible.
You walk into the rain too, though.
http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/running-in-the-rain-minimyth.htm

running gets you wetter by almost a 2-1 margin

when you run, your body isn't perfectly vertical.
But I swear I've had personal instances where I would run in and someone else would walk in from the rain and the walker is substantially wetter.

 
Mythbusters did this. Pretty sure they concluded that running the rain actually gets you wetter.
It makes sense that you would be getting more water on you by running into it rather than letting it fall on your just head and shoulders (assuming no wind and the rain is coming straight down).

However, if it's windy and raining at an angle I think you'd be better off getting out of it as soon as possible.
You walk into the rain too, though.
http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/running-in-the-rain-minimyth.htm

running gets you wetter by almost a 2-1 margin

when you run, your body isn't perfectly vertical.
before I click I need to know if kari is the one who gets all wet.

 
Let's say there are a thousand rain drops in the air between you and your door, and they're falling at a perfectly steady pace. If you walk straight ahead, you should walk through 1000 drops. But if you run, you should also walk through 1000 drops. No difference.

The difference seems to be how long you are in the rain. If it takes you five seconds to run and ten seconds of you walk, then you should get gone seconds wetter walking.
Let's say there are a 1000 rain drops that will hit you on your head and shoulders if you walk. If you run twice as fast as you walk there will be half as many rain drops that hit your head and shoulders (500) but many more that will hit your body which has a much larger surface area.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's say there are a thousand rain drops in the air between you and your door, and they're falling at a perfectly steady pace. If you walk straight ahead, you should walk through 1000 drops. But if you run, you should also walk through 1000 drops. No difference.

The difference seems to be how long you are in the rain. If it takes you five seconds to run and ten seconds of you walk, then you should get gone seconds wetter walking.
Let's say there are a 1000 rain drops that will hit you on your head and shoulders if you walk. If you run twice as fast as you walk there will be half as many rain drops that hit your head and shoulders (500) but many more that will hit your body which has a much larger surface area.
precisely the same number should hit your front surface. If you send pac man down the same hallway, it doesn't matter how fast he goes, he still eats the same number of dts.
 
Of course you're going to get more wet walking than if you were running, dummies.

Think in extremes: Walk... very... very... very... slow-ly. Do you think that more, or less rain will get on you than if you walked at a normal pace?

 
The storm starts, when the drops start dropping

When the drops stop dropping then the storm starts stopping.

-Ben Franklin

 
Let's say there are a thousand rain drops in the air between you and your door, and they're falling at a perfectly steady pace. If you walk straight ahead, you should walk through 1000 drops. But if you run, you should also walk through 1000 drops. No difference.

The difference seems to be how long you are in the rain. If it takes you five seconds to run and ten seconds of you walk, then you should get gone seconds wetter walking.
Let's say there are a 1000 rain drops that will hit you on your head and shoulders if you walk. If you run twice as fast as you walk there will be half as many rain drops that hit your head and shoulders (500) but many more that will hit your body which has a much larger surface area.
If you are running with the wind, it could be less. I think in most every case you will be hit by more raindrops by going slower because the longer exposure time will have a bigger impact than whatever increase you might get by running into some extra drops.

 
Mythbusters did this. Pretty sure they concluded that running the rain actually gets you wetter.
It makes sense that you would be getting more water on you by running into it rather than letting it fall on your just head and shoulders (assuming no wind and the rain is coming straight down).

However, if it's windy and raining at an angle I think you'd be better off getting out of it as soon as possible.
You walk into the rain too, though.
http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/videos/running-in-the-rain-minimyth.htm

running gets you wetter by almost a 2-1 margin

when you run, your body isn't perfectly vertical.
Why didn't they measure the head area? I would think most people would care more about their hair getting wet or not.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top