Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I agree, but Nolan and MM have earned the benefit of the doubt. Love Lithgow and Caine, too.
sorry, but with his obsession with practical effects and how his films look, Nolan is the anti-Bay. also, no body fluid humor and 250 product placements/movie.
I could see saying that about TDKR, but one film (in a franchise that he was clearly fatigueing on) does not a pattern make.
Sorry but this has got to be the most ridiculous post I've seen in a while. Bay is a Hack through and through. Nolan is not even close.
GTFO
I agree mostly but still give it an 8 out of 10. I thought it was going great for the first half. Great story, great action, visuals and humor (I want a T.A.R.S.).
Great posting. Both would have worked better in the other role.I thought it was the extra large milkshake of movies: enjoyable and took a while to consume, but left me with a headache after due to brain freeze and the insipid ending.
Really? I never wanted to see any of Nolan's big movies more than once. Supersize canvas, boat loads of cliches, a small sprinkle of human spirit.
I would like to see him make a movie about a normal person grounded in reality for a change, but I suspect that will never happen.
That's called day to day life...and we know how that goes.
sounds dull, and it doesn't seem to be the movie that Nolan is interested in making.
I am glad about that. There's plenty of other directors that can do the real life stuff. I want something new and interesting to get lost in. Nolan has consistently delivered that.
That is why he makes money. And it is the reason why you like Avata and I don't. I suppose it is okay as long as Nolan does not think he has painted himself into a corner creatively.
A lot of people may think Interstellar is more sentimental then Nolan's other movies and they're right. Even though it needs work in this area, it is a step in the right direction in terms of connecting with day-to-day life.That's called day to day life...and we know how that goes.
now I gotta ask:
Huh? It has nothing to do with the money. I was pretty excited about Nolan's work when I saw Following.
I ####### hate Avatar. All fluff with a regurgitated script from at least a dozen movies. Avatar is in the Bay realm to me.
Wow. Okay, you win. You hate Avatar more than I do.
part I'd give it a 9 out of 10.. But have to knock it down to 8 out of 10 because of it.
To hell with your ears because this movie is "important to the human race".
I'm not sure if that whole thing is shtick or not. IMO, the movie was simply not that good. I was extremely disappointed as I'm a huge fan of Nolan.To hell with your ears because this movie is "important to the human race".
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/quora/interstellar-is-the-best-_b_6122732.html
No, I did not.Rohn Jambo said:
not really. sci-fi that doesn't have jedis or fighting robots doesn't usually haul in a ton of money. add to that the 3hour run time, and it won't be able to screen as many times as other movies.
Thanks. Guess I don't have to see the movie now.snogger said:Loved everything about this movie.. except the Matt Damon part.. So many other ways to go with that other then "take a guy for a walk and kill him and then beat everyone back to the ship to leave".
Really enjoyed the "One hour down there is many years back on Earth" when they left for the planet next to the Black Hole. especially liked how they handled it when they returned to the main ship to find they had been gone 23 years... Watching 23 years of videos from home was
I didn't find it nearly as much of a Mind F**K as Deception, but still takes a few "wait what did they say/do" turns that it will make it worth watching a couple of times once it is released to video.
All and all a very enjoyable movie.. Without the Matt Damon goes
