Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Sure, why not?
cuz the chances of it being good if rotten tomatoes kills it is statistically low?
if a movie gets only a 40 or 50% rating on rotten tomatoes i'm not watching it because it most likely sux.if it gets 55-70 i'll redbox it, if it gets 80+ i'll goto the theater.
^This.
So Renner is gonna keep the Bourne movies going and the Mission Impossible movies going?
Going to guess his agent would use both franchises as leverage and sign a multi-picture deal with whoever is offering more money. If they haven't done that already.
I believe Renner has said he has no interest in doing more of either franchise and he is looking to pick up more serious roles that are not action related.
Good, I've been waiting a long time for Senior Trip 2.
Yes, no one else could play an emotionless automaton.Killer idea, I think. Good choice in Renner, a new hero, not Bourne. Nice.
Sequel with new Treadstone guy, NOT Bourne. Apparently the goings-on in the first three movies triggered this new storyline. Lines from the trailer:"Jason Bourne was just the tip of the iceberg."
Ah thanks. I thought they were referring to Renner being Bourne and talking about another agent who had gone rogue that he was going to have to go after. And we know there were other Treadstone agents from the previous Bourne movies.Have to say, looks pretty good.
You guys never seen a Bond film after You Only Live Twice or what?
Matt Damon wasn't why the movies succeeded... he didn't even have to talk or do that much really... the script and action was good. I'm fairly certain I can think of at least 8-10 guys that could've done the same level of acting and it would've been just as good.Re-watch the Bournes... there is a lot less dialogue than you think especially with Jason Bourne.Bond succeeding without Connery, or even Roger Moore was a bigger stretch because the Bond character talks a lot and is central to almost every scene.
Cuz the Bourne trilogy made over $1b. Its all in the name recognition.If this follows the book at all, then it is another Bourne movie, but it also has his son in it (hence the title).It was the first Bourne Novel that was actually not written by the original author, as he had died prior to it being written.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bourne_LegacyEDIT: Just read the Wiki page...apparently they are not following the novel at all, so I don't know why they would even call it the same name.
I am aware, but why specifically that name? Why not make something else up, like the Bourne Successor or something like that (just off the top of my head, I am sure there are better titles, but you get my point).If they are not going to use the actual book, then why not save the name in case someday they DO? Or are they now just hopping off the Bourne wagon forever, and not following any more of the books (they all have Jason Bourne in them, I believe...)Cuz the Bourne trilogy made over $1b. Its all in the name recognition.If this follows the book at all, then it is another Bourne movie, but it also has his son in it (hence the title).It was the first Bourne Novel that was actually not written by the original author, as he had died prior to it being written.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bourne_LegacyEDIT: Just read the Wiki page...apparently they are not following the novel at all, so I don't know why they would even call it the same name.
The earlier Bourne movies didn't follow the books either. Guy has amnesia.......end of.similarities.I am aware, but why specifically that name? Why not make something else up, like the Bourne Successor or something like that (just off the top of my head, I am sure there are better titles, but you get my point).If they are not going to use the actual book, then why not save the name in case someday they DO? Or are they now just hopping off the Bourne wagon forever, and not following any more of the books (they all have Jason Bourne in them, I believe...)Cuz the Bourne trilogy made over $1b. Its all in the name recognition.If this follows the book at all, then it is another Bourne movie, but it also has his son in it (hence the title).It was the first Bourne Novel that was actually not written by the original author, as he had died prior to it being written.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bourne_LegacyEDIT: Just read the Wiki page...apparently they are not following the novel at all, so I don't know why they would even call it the same name.
Or, wait for it....Bourne Again?I am aware, but why specifically that name? Why not make something else up, like the Bourne Successor or something like that (just off the top of my head, I am sure there are better titles, but you get my point).If they are not going to use the actual book, then why not save the name in case someday they DO? Or are they now just hopping off the Bourne wagon forever, and not following any more of the books (they all have Jason Bourne in them, I believe...)Cuz the Bourne trilogy made over $1b. Its all in the name recognition.If this follows the book at all, then it is another Bourne movie, but it also has his son in it (hence the title).It was the first Bourne Novel that was actually not written by the original author, as he had died prior to it being written.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bourne_LegacyEDIT: Just read the Wiki page...apparently they are not following the novel at all, so I don't know why they would even call it the same name.
legacy and successor aren't too disimilarI am aware, but why specifically that name? Why not make something else up, like the Bourne Successor or something like that (just off the top of my head, I am sure there are better titles, but you get my point).If they are not going to use the actual book, then why not save the name in case someday they DO? Or are they now just hopping off the Bourne wagon forever, and not following any more of the books (they all have Jason Bourne in them, I believe...)Cuz the Bourne trilogy made over $1b. Its all in the name recognition.If this follows the book at all, then it is another Bourne movie, but it also has his son in it (hence the title).It was the first Bourne Novel that was actually not written by the original author, as he had died prior to it being written.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bourne_LegacyEDIT: Just read the Wiki page...apparently they are not following the novel at all, so I don't know why they would even call it the same name.
Matt Damon is an actor in Hollywood.WTF is Matt Damon?
He's a good one for sure; deserves some bigger roles.
