What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Jonas Gray (RB - New England) (1 Viewer)

The Pats do a lot of things well, but in this case I think they really screwed the kid. And as a Pats fan I'm sick of being on the wrong end of karma. Every time BB does something stupid (Aaron Hernandez, Spygate, etc) it comes back to bite us.
Yeah you're right. Too long have we suffered as a fan base. I think we're cursed. :violin:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PatsWillWin said:
ratbast said:
So is he just another guy now? Roster spots are too valuable.
It's difficult to imagine a scenario where you feel comfortable starting him.
I can see four

1) Blount gets hurt

2) Blount fumbles

3) Blount gets arrested again

4) Blount fails a drug test

I don't consider 1,3 and 4 improbable

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rimez said:
General Tso said:
SameSongNDance said:
General Tso said:
I'm starting to think he didn't oversleep...
Yeah, there's more to this story than meets the eye. Is it possible that Jonas Gray is a terrorist?
I'm thinking that Gray was (rightfully) pissed at the Blount signing and was late to practice as some sort of "protest" that grossly backfired on him. Or at least that's the way it was viewed by Belichik. The punishment here just doesn't seem to fit the crime, especially on the heels of such a great performance on Sunday night. Having the guy dress for the game, stand on the bench with his helmet on the whole game, and not give him one single snap seems a little over the top for a tardy practice.
NE schemes specifically for their opponent more than any other team, and friday is the most important practice for the gameplan and so missing friday will cut your snaps by a lot, even if he wasnt late there is no guarantee the touches wouldnt have played out any differently today. everyone besides brady is just another cog in the machine and can be inactive or replaced at any time, and in their eyes "the pats gameplan" rushed for 200 yards and 4 TDs against indy not gray. blount is bigger with better long speed, so it shouldnt come as a surprise if he ends up being the starting big back from here out. but hey its BB, white could get the start next week.
You make the key point: It was a Friday practice. It's the most important practice of the week and BB had one power back available for this Friday's practice. He used the same RB in the game who was available on Friday.

I'm guessing they were teaching Gray a harsh one-game lesson but who knows? They might just keep going with Blount because of their familiarity. Or Gray could be the full big-back starter again next week. All I know is this: Gray won't be in my lineup.

 
General Tso said:
ratbast said:
So is he just another guy now? Roster spots are too valuable.
I'm holding, but his value has fallen quite a bit with the Blount signing. I still feel very confident that NE running backs will score multiple TD's per week coming up. But right now I see Blount getting at least half of the TD's that Gray alone was going to get prior to the Blount signing.
Unfortunately, I agree. Got to at least watch another week to see what happens next. Ask the Crowell folks who dumped too soon if Gray should be held a little longer at least.

 
Perfect week to make an example of him. With the Lions stout rush defense, I doubt running the ball 25-30 times was really the game plan anyway. I bet he would have had 10-15 carries tops this week.

Pretty simple for BB not to start him, and play wait and see to evaluate the flow of the game. I see this being more a Vereen game than a Gray/Blount game, anyway.
:whistle:

 
Gray missed a very important day of meetings with a very poor excuse. Blount has played more games for the Pats than Gray has and probably knows the playbook better. Blount is a veteran with much more experience than Gray.

 
Belidick hates Fantasy Football players and he was waiting for this day to get us back.

He's smiling big inside... He mind ####ed us, he mind ####ed us good.
Belichick loves this for a number of reasons

1. shows up Pittsburgh for cutting Blount

2. Thumbs his nose and say that he basically grab a player off the street and beat you

3. Tells the world that he can bench a 200 yd back and still whip a good team
Doesn't matter, New England can't and won't win the Super Bowl unless they cheat.

 
General Tso said:
ratbast said:
So is he just another guy now? Roster spots are too valuable.
I'm holding, but his value has fallen quite a bit with the Blount signing. I still feel very confident that NE running backs will score multiple TD's per week coming up. But right now I see Blount getting at least half of the TD's that Gray alone was going to get prior to the Blount signing.
Unfortunately, I agree. Got to at least watch another week to see what happens next. Ask the Crowell folks who dumped too soon if Gray should be held a little longer at least.
Ding ding ding. We have a winner!

 
General Tso said:
SameSongNDance said:
General Tso said:
I'm starting to think he didn't oversleep...
Yeah, there's more to this story than meets the eye. Is it possible that Jonas Gray is a terrorist?
I'm thinking that Gray was (rightfully) pissed at the Blount signing and was late to practice as some sort of "protest" that grossly backfired on him. Or at least that's the way it was viewed by Belichik. The punishment here just doesn't seem to fit the crime, especially on the heels of such a great performance on Sunday night. Having the guy dress for the game, stand on the bench with his helmet on the whole game, and not give him one single snap seems a little over the top for a tardy practice.
People that hold such little leverage would be unwise to stage a "protest". I hope you're incorrect because that would be far worse than oversleeping.

 
General Tso said:
What was the penalty for Revis after the missed practice? If I remember correctly he played the following game against Chicago. Funny how consistency and fairness take a back seat when it comes to winning.
[Jimmy Johnson] When a third string safety falls asleep in a team meeting you cut him and make an example of him. When Troy Aikman falls asleep, you nudge him to wake him up. [/Jimmy Johnson]

 
General Tso said:
What was the penalty for Revis after the missed practice? If I remember correctly he played the following game against Chicago. Funny how consistency and fairness take a back seat when it comes to winning.
[Jimmy Johnson] When a third string safety falls asleep in a team meeting you cut him and make an example of him. When Troy Aikman falls asleep, you nudge him to wake him up. [/Jimmy Johnson]
Agreed

I grabbed Gray off free agency so I don't feel too burned, but this sucks. At best Gray is now a desperate flex play (ditto for Blount). I hate Bellichick.

 
Such a perfect storm

-- Blount abandons the Steelers

-- get cut

-- Gray oversleeps

What are the odds thatGray would oversleep the next dat=y after another RB who knows the system would suddenly become available?

 
I think it says a lot about BB's character that he cares more about a guy whose alarm clock may have actually ####ed up vs. a guy who quit on his team last week, was caught smoking a J this year and has attempted to hit his teammates multiple times. I'm begining not to like the new NFL. Coaches think they're so ####### cute anymore with their sub packages. Run the guy into the ground. I've seen just as many injuries, if not more with the splitting of RB's. Look at Ingram and Murray, amazing how productive they've become when getting the rock 20 to 30 times a game. Really figured the league would go back to that with Seattle's huge success. Nope, same cutesy bull ####. Sorry this post got off track from about BB and Gray. Gray didn't affect me at all yesterday I'm just sick of this season.

 
I think Blount punched out Gray's alarm clock.

Seriously though, I agree that there could very well be something going on beyond one overslept practice.

 
Fantasy aside Belichick is a sadistic piece of ####, how can you treat a player like this is beyond me.
You must be part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.
Zero accountability ?

What the hell are you talking about ?

There are many people (not me) on this board who think Goodell should allow Adrian Peterson to come back despite having brutalized his own son with a switch and you're telling me that a guy should not see the field just because he overslept once ?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fantasy aside Belichick is a sadistic piece of ####, how can you treat a player like this is beyond me.
You must be part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.
Zero accountability ?

What the hell are you talking about ?

There are many people (not me) on this board who think Goodell should allow Adrian Peterson to come back despite having brutalized his own son with a switch and you're telling me that a guy should not see the field just because he overslept once ?
I'm a Gray owner. He missed practice on the most critical day of the week. He is three weeks removed from being a career practice squad player. He was taught a lesson as the Pats stuck to their rules. He knew the rules. He was held accountable. That is how the world works. He was active. He got paid. He just didn't get to play.

I completely understand what Ponchsox was saying. If you think Belichick was sadistic for enforcing his own well-known rules, then yes, it makes you sound like you are part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.

 
Hilarious people in this thread knocking Belichick after they destroyed Detroit yesterday. Whether Gray overslept or not there was no guarantee he was going to be a focal point this week. No guarantees in this offense other than Brady and Gronk. Get a clue.

 
Hilarious people in this thread knocking Belichick after they destroyed Detroit yesterday. Whether Gray overslept or not there was no guarantee he was going to be a focal point this week. No guarantees in this offense other than Brady and Gronk. Get a clue.
Agreed! I mean, he suited up for 1, that is huge bc I was fully expecting Gray to be a healthy scratch. If Blount couldn't get it going I think we would have seen Gray, but Blount had 6.5 ypc against the number 1 rush defense. Gray has been solid, but let's not pretend that he isn't replaceable, a la Stevan Ridley. To add to Brady and Gronk, you could make a similar case for Wilfork and Revis on defense.

 
Thank you for your contribution Mr. Gray. Now please take a seat over there and I'll call you if I need you.

 
Fantasy aside Belichick is a sadistic piece of ####, how can you treat a player like this is beyond me.
You must be part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.
Zero accountability ?

What the hell are you talking about ?

There are many people (not me) on this board who think Goodell should allow Adrian Peterson to come back despite having brutalized his own son with a switch and you're telling me that a guy should not see the field just because he overslept once ?
I'm a Gray owner. He missed practice on the most critical day of the week. He is three weeks removed from being a career practice squad player. He was taught a lesson as the Pats stuck to their rules. He knew the rules. He was held accountable. That is how the world works. He was active. He got paid. He just didn't get to play.I completely understand what Ponchsox was saying. If you think Belichick was sadistic for enforcing his own well-known rules, then yes, it makes you sound like you are part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.
Wait a minute, what are these well known Patriot rules you keep talking about? That if you miss practice you are benched? Why didn't that happen to Revis?If you want to argue that it's all about winning, then that's fine. But don't paint it up as an accountability issue, because that necessitates a level of fairness and equal application of the well known rules.

The only entitlement that seems to exist here is with Belichik and Revis. When a rule doesn't apply to one person because they're more talented, that's called entitlement.

 
Last edited:
General Tso said:
CR69 said:
These are some crazy conspiracies. Have you guys read anything gray has said in interviews? He genuinely seems like a good kid, is a hard worker and knows his place. I guarantee he wasn't taking about the coaches in his Tweet and there's no way him being late was some passive aggressive response to the Blount signing.
What was the penalty for Revis after the missed practice? If I remember correctly he played the following game against Chicago. Funny how consistency and fairness take a back seat when it comes to winning.
Gray didn't play because he's not as good as Blount. It wasn't a punishment for being late to practice. What is inconsistent or unfair about that?

 
General Tso said:
CR69 said:
These are some crazy conspiracies. Have you guys read anything gray has said in interviews? He genuinely seems like a good kid, is a hard worker and knows his place. I guarantee he wasn't taking about the coaches in his Tweet and there's no way him being late was some passive aggressive response to the Blount signing.
What was the penalty for Revis after the missed practice? If I remember correctly he played the following game against Chicago. Funny how consistency and fairness take a back seat when it comes to winning.
Gray didn't play because he's not as good as Blount. It wasn't a punishment for being late to practice. What is inconsistent or unfair about that?
I agree with that, and the more I think about it, this has to be what happened. I think BB probably planned to bench Gray for the first couple series - saw Blount playing well - and decided to just roll with him the whole game.
 
Fantasy aside Belichick is a sadistic piece of ####, how can you treat a player like this is beyond me.
You must be part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.
Zero accountability ?

What the hell are you talking about ?

There are many people (not me) on this board who think Goodell should allow Adrian Peterson to come back despite having brutalized his own son with a switch and you're telling me that a guy should not see the field just because he overslept once ?
I'm a Gray owner. He missed practice on the most critical day of the week. He is three weeks removed from being a career practice squad player. He was taught a lesson as the Pats stuck to their rules. He knew the rules. He was held accountable. That is how the world works. He was active. He got paid. He just didn't get to play.I completely understand what Ponchsox was saying. If you think Belichick was sadistic for enforcing his own well-known rules, then yes, it makes you sound like you are part of the entitlement/zero accountability generation.
Wait a minute, what are these well known Patriot rules you keep talking about? That if you miss practice you are benched? Why didn't that happen to Revis?If you want to argue that it's all about winning, then that's fine. But don't paint it up as an accountability issue, because that necessitates a level of fairness and equal application of the well known rules.

The only entitlement that seems to exist here is with Belichik and Revis. When a rule doesn't apply to one person because they're more talented, that's called entitlement.
That you get sent home when you arrive late to practice. That is the rule. You have no idea what went into Gray not getting any snaps. Sadistic piece of #####? Unfair? That is a ridiculous posture. He didn't just miss any practice...he missed the critical Friday practice. Belichick obviously thought Blount, who WAS at practice, was better prepared to play. Very well might be other extenuating circumstances too. There is nothing wrong with what Belichick did. Break the rules? You are in jeopardy. That's life, my friend.

 
Team and league sources confirmed to ESPNBoston.com's Jackie MacMullan that Belichick let his team know following the victory over Detroit that he would not tolerate any tardy players on his team, although he did not single out Gray by name
http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId=11924151&city=boston&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F%22%7D

I still think it's s little of both - BB disciplining Gray and doing what he thought would win him the game. At this point I'm not playing Gray unless Blount is not available that week. I'm still not convinced that Blount is a better RB than Gray is, but it seems clear at this point that The Pats coaching staff likes Blount more.

Man, what a difference a week makes. From the penthouse to the doghouse. At least he'll always have the Sports Illustrated cover.

 
Team and league sources confirmed to ESPNBoston.com's Jackie MacMullan that Belichick let his team know following the victory over Detroit that he would not tolerate any tardy players on his team, although he did not single out Gray by name
http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId=11924151&city=boston&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F%22%7D

I still think it's s little of both - BB disciplining Gray and doing what he thought would win him the game. At this point I'm not playing Gray unless Blount is not available that week. I'm still not convinced that Blount is a better RB than Gray is, but it seems clear at this point that The Pats coaching staff likes Blount more.

Man, what a difference a week makes. From the penthouse to the doghouse. At least he'll always have the Sports Illustrated cover.
It could have some discipline in it, but I just think Gray is not that good. He had a great game against a team that New England for whatever reason can run against easily. Blount had a better game against Indy in the playoffs last year when it comes right down to it. I think Blount is more talented. I don't think either is special but Blount has been a 1,000 yard rusher in the past and always on a roster. Gray didn't have an NFL carry until year 3 and that took a major injury.

 
If a bum like Blount could run like the wind, just imagine what LeVeon Bell could've done in NE...

Yes, I'm a Bell owner and I think he's top 3 RB in the league.

 
Teddy Bruschi on WEEI right now just said that in his opinion the benching was entirely disciplinary. He said that BB probably used this opportunity to drive home with the rest of the team that tardiness will not be tolerated.

Who knows. It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...

 
Dr. Octopus said:
General Tso said:
SameSongNDance said:
General Tso said:
I'm starting to think he didn't oversleep...
Yeah, there's more to this story than meets the eye. Is it possible that Jonas Gray is a terrorist?
I'm thinking that Gray was (rightfully) pissed at the Blount signing and was late to practice as some sort of "protest" that grossly backfired on him. Or at least that's the way it was viewed by Belichik. The punishment here just doesn't seem to fit the crime, especially on the heels of such a great performance on Sunday night. Having the guy dress for the game, stand on the bench with his helmet on the whole game, and not give him one single snap seems a little over the top for a tardy practice.
People that hold such little leverage would be unwise to stage a "protest". I hope you're incorrect because that would be far worse than oversleeping.
He would have to be the stupidest human being to ever walk the planet to pull something like this, I sincerely doubt it.

 
It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...
Watch "A football life" featuring Jimmy Johnson and you will understand how the discipline works. It's not equal to everyone. Jimmy takes BB out on a few boating trips a year for advice so don't tell me his philosophy didn't play a role and trickle into BBs decision making process.

Pay attention when they ask Jimmy about the time he cut a player for being late, particularly when they asked if he would have done the same to Aikman. The job of the coach is to motivate players to the point of excellence. It would do not good to cut Brady if he was late, but it would do good to cut an expendable player for doing the same thing. This isn't really about being fair across the board.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Teddy Bruschi on WEEI right now just said that in his opinion the benching was entirely disciplinary. He said that BB probably used this opportunity to drive home with the rest of the team that tardiness will not be tolerated.

Who knows. It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...
Brady, Gronk, Revis aren't going to get benched for the entire game, but that's probably more due to the fact that their replacements would not come close to replacing them.

A few years ago, Welker was benched for the 1st quarter after he made some comments about Rex Ryan and his foot fetish. He played during the 2nd quarter, because he was important to their offense.

If Blount screws up, it will be just as easy for BB to replace him now.

 
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?

 
As far as Belhichickian moves, none of them really bother me, but for those that do, I thought cutting the guy the night before the Super Bowl was "worse."

 
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.

 
What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.
2 TDs for his owners?

 
It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...
Watch "A football life" featuring Jimmy Johnson and you will understand how the discipline works. It's not equal to everyone. Jimmy takes BB out on a few boating trips a year for advice so don't tell me his philosophy didn't play a role and trickle into BBs decision making process.

Pay attention when they ask Jimmy about the time he cut a player for being late, particularly when they asked if he would have done the same to Aikman. The job of the coach is to motivate players to the point of excellence. It would do not good to cut Brady if he was late, but it would do good to cut an expendable player for doing the same thing. This isn't really about being fair across the board.
Thanks - I'll check that out. My first reaction is that having been on many teams in my life, and having managed a few myself, it is a very tricky proposition to apply the rules differently based on talent or perceived "motivation to excellence". I understand it full well, and there is some merit to the point that ultimately the objective is to motivate each individual to excellence, but I think the fallacy with this argument is in the assumption that people of lesser talent are not just as motivated to achieve excellence as a Tom Brady is. And in that circumstance the unfair application of discipline can completely backfire on a coach and demoralize a player.It's been my experience that being fair and consistent with all employees is more difficult to implement, but yields the best long term results.

 
Last edited:
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.
Sorry, you're not entitled to anything in the NFL. Especially an end-of-roster guy like Gray. Even after a big game. He's not owed a "chance to prove himself." That's what he got when the Patriots signed him after he was released by the Miami practice squad. The guy is still on the roster, if he's good, he'll have a career. If we never hear from him again, it's not because he wasn't given a "chance to prove himself" against the Lions in week 12 of the regular season.

 
It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...
Watch "A football life" featuring Jimmy Johnson and you will understand how the discipline works. It's not equal to everyone. Jimmy takes BB out on a few boating trips a year for advice so don't tell me his philosophy didn't play a role and trickle into BBs decision making process.

Pay attention when they ask Jimmy about the time he cut a player for being late, particularly when they asked if he would have done the same to Aikman. The job of the coach is to motivate players to the point of excellence. It would do not good to cut Brady if he was late, but it would do good to cut an expendable player for doing the same thing. This isn't really about being fair across the board.
Thanks - I'll check that out. My first reaction is that having been on many teams in my life, and having managed a few myself, it is a very tricky proposition to apply the rules differently based on talent or perceived "motivation to excellence". I understand it full well, and there is some merit to the point that ultimately the objective is to motivate each individual to excellence, but I think the fallacy with this argument is in the assumption that people of lesser talent are not just as motivated to achieve excellence as a Tom Brady is. And in that circumstance the unfair application of discipline can completely backfire on a coach and demoralize a player.It's been my experience that being fair and consistent with all employees is more difficult to implement, but yields the best long term results.
if only we could recruit you to coach the pats maybe they'd finally get somewhere

 
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.
Sorry, you're not entitled to anything in the NFL. Especially an end-of-roster guy like Gray. Even after a big game. He's not owed a "chance to prove himself." That's what he got when the Patriots signed him after he was released by the Miami practice squad. The guy is still on the roster, if he's good, he'll have a career. If we never hear from him again, it's not because he wasn't given a "chance to prove himself" against the Lions in week 12 of the regular season.
That's like asserting Ridley fumbling didn't affect his career in NE. You asked if Gray's mistake actually cost him anything and the answer is obviously yes, it cost him play time. Is it possible this seemingly small mistake will affect his career in NE moving forward? Of course; especially since BB loves utilizing the "next man up" philosophy. Anyway, I never said he was owed anything but that he was squandering his chances. You hit me with a nice straw man there.

 
I think Jonas Gray = Aaron Dobson. BB doesn't suffer bad behavior lightly. It might've been no big deal in the long run but with Blount back Gray likely is on the periphery now unless Blount can't behave either.
Not posting this to brag about the call but more to say that BB is pretty predictable only this regard. Gray put himself in the dog house and will stay there until there's a reason (Blount fumbles, misbehaves, or gets hurt).

 
It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...
Watch "A football life" featuring Jimmy Johnson and you will understand how the discipline works. It's not equal to everyone. Jimmy takes BB out on a few boating trips a year for advice so don't tell me his philosophy didn't play a role and trickle into BBs decision making process.

Pay attention when they ask Jimmy about the time he cut a player for being late, particularly when they asked if he would have done the same to Aikman. The job of the coach is to motivate players to the point of excellence. It would do not good to cut Brady if he was late, but it would do good to cut an expendable player for doing the same thing. This isn't really about being fair across the board.
Thanks - I'll check that out. My first reaction is that having been on many teams in my life, and having managed a few myself, it is a very tricky proposition to apply the rules differently based on talent or perceived "motivation to excellence". I understand it full well, and there is some merit to the point that ultimately the objective is to motivate each individual to excellence, but I think the fallacy with this argument is in the assumption that people of lesser talent are not just as motivated to achieve excellence as a Tom Brady is. And in that circumstance the unfair application of discipline can completely backfire on a coach and demoralize a player.It's been my experience that being fair and consistent with all employees is more difficult to implement, but yields the best long term results.
It's dependent on value of the player to the team.

Actually I don't think Jimmy cut a guy for being late, the guy was sleeping during a meeting, something like that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top