What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Django Unchained -- new Tarantino film (1 Viewer)

It's all subjective but I'll say again that I think you can make a strong case that "Death Proof" is one of the worst movies made in recent years by an acclaimed director. Saying it's better than "Contraband" isn't a rousing endorsement. I haven't seen "Contraband" so only assuming it's schlock and it's a Mark Wahlberg action flick so I'm not sure how great it could be to begin with. The bar is set higher than that for a Tarantino film and I think "Death Proof" falls considerably short of expectations. The only thing Tarantino did right in that film was cast Kurt Russell, who was great. But it's a paper thin plot with uninteresting characters (save Russell's). It's a pretty huge disappointment for a director of Tarantino's caliber.
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
Who cares?
:lmao:

Excellent point.

 
It's all subjective but I'll say again that I think you can make a strong case that "Death Proof" is one of the worst movies made in recent years by an acclaimed director. Saying it's better than "Contraband" isn't a rousing endorsement. I haven't seen "Contraband" so only assuming it's schlock and it's a Mark Wahlberg action flick so I'm not sure how great it could be to begin with. The bar is set higher than that for a Tarantino film and I think "Death Proof" falls considerably short of expectations. The only thing Tarantino did right in that film was cast Kurt Russell, who was great. But it's a paper thin plot with uninteresting characters (save Russell's). It's a pretty huge disappointment for a director of Tarantino's caliber.
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
Who cares?
:lmao:

Excellent point.
Well, putting one of any Soderbergh's Ocean's movies on that list may have made your same point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's all subjective but I'll say again that I think you can make a strong case that "Death Proof" is one of the worst movies made in recent years by an acclaimed director. Saying it's better than "Contraband" isn't a rousing endorsement. I haven't seen "Contraband" so only assuming it's schlock and it's a Mark Wahlberg action flick so I'm not sure how great it could be to begin with. The bar is set higher than that for a Tarantino film and I think "Death Proof" falls considerably short of expectations. The only thing Tarantino did right in that film was cast Kurt Russell, who was great. But it's a paper thin plot with uninteresting characters (save Russell's). It's a pretty huge disappointment for a director of Tarantino's caliber.
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
Who cares?
:lmao:

Excellent point.
Well, putting one of any Soderbergh's Ocean's movies on that list may have made your same point.
Thanks for the advice. I was dying to know what you thought of me.

 
It's all subjective but I'll say again that I think you can make a strong case that "Death Proof" is one of the worst movies made in recent years by an acclaimed director. Saying it's better than "Contraband" isn't a rousing endorsement. I haven't seen "Contraband" so only assuming it's schlock and it's a Mark Wahlberg action flick so I'm not sure how great it could be to begin with. The bar is set higher than that for a Tarantino film and I think "Death Proof" falls considerably short of expectations. The only thing Tarantino did right in that film was cast Kurt Russell, who was great. But it's a paper thin plot with uninteresting characters (save Russell's). It's a pretty huge disappointment for a director of Tarantino's caliber.
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
Who cares?
:lmao:

Excellent point.
Well, putting one of any Soderbergh's Ocean's movies on that list may have made your same point.
Thanks for the advice. I was dying to know what you thought of me.
Looks more like you're always dying to know what others think of Tarantino so you can defend him, like that was your cause in life.

 
The tavern scene in IB is pure greatness. There isn't a single scene in Django in my opinion which comes close to it. There are other reasons I like IB more but that scene alone would be enough.

 
jwb said:
Mr. Mojo said:
packersfan said:
Death Proof is terrible.
If "Death Proof" was made by an unknown director I think it would be universally mocked. Because it's a Tarantino film people hold it in higher esteem than it deserves in my opinion. I understand the point of the "Grindhouse" films but that doesn't mean you still can't make a good film. Rodriguez did with "Planet Terror." Tarantino pretty much fails completely with "Death Proof" (although as I posted at the start of this thread I did think Kurt Russell was very good in it).
QT should be embarrassed for Death Proof. It was one of the worst movies of recent years.
Very painful first half that just drags on and on...

But that second half car chase alone is worth the price of admission.
It starts off great but even the car chase becomes derivative and boring. I give Zoe Bell massive props for performing and incredible stunt but it's the same shots over and over and then they step Kurt Russel's head. Bad film.

 
jdoggydogg said:
Mr. Mojo said:
jdoggydogg said:
Mr. Mojo said:
QT should be embarrassed for Death Proof. It was one of the worst movies of recent years.
You need to see more movies.
I watch 'em all the time. And it was that bad. I probably had higher than normal expectations from a strong director like QT.
If you watch movies all the time, then you know that a QT failure is still better than most movies.
Death Proof is empirically bad.

 
jdoggydogg said:
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
I really liked Ghost Dog. Death Proof is turrible.

 
jdoggydogg said:
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
I really liked Ghost Dog. Death Proof is turrible.
Drummer's annoyed that I am defending the movie. So I'll stop just for him.

 
"The Girlfriend Experience" was turrible. I like some of Sasha Grey's "other" work but that was a really bad film. I'll give "Death Proof" the nod over it but that's hardly a rousing endorsement.

 
jdoggydogg said:
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
I really liked Ghost Dog. Death Proof is turrible.
Drummer's annoyed that I am defending the movie. So I'll stop just for him.
No worries. You and I have talked about Death Proof in the "Recently viewed..." thread. My comment illustrates the 'different strokes for different folks" factor that comes with things like movie appreciation.

In this case you're wrong and I'm right but that's okay.

 
jdoggydogg said:
I'd watch Deathproof 10 times rather than see one of these movies again:

Tetro - Francis Ford Coppola

Bringing Out the Dead - Martin Scorsese

The Girlfriend Experience - Steven Soderbergh

The Terminal - Steven Spielberg

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai - Jim Jarmusch
I really liked Ghost Dog. Death Proof is turrible.
Drummer's annoyed that I am defending the movie. So I'll stop just for him.
No worries. You and I have talked about Death Proof in the "Recently viewed..." thread. My comment illustrates the 'different strokes for different folks" factor that comes with things like movie appreciation.

In this case you're wrong and I'm right but that's okay.
Yes, different strokes. In this case, "different" being you, and "strokes" being how wrong you are ;)

 
Finally got a chance to watch this. I was underwhelmed. I thought it dragged and dragged and dragged some more. IMO, QT could have cut 45 minutes to an hour and left the core of the movie the same. The set up to each scene, the scenery, the travel by horseback, etc. did not add all that much and just made the movie longer not better. I also think they could have shaved off some of the dialogue to tighten up scenes.

The build up to the shoot out at the plantation was fine, but to continue on after that didn't make much sense to me. They could have modified the shootout scene and ended it there. The scenes after that and the return back to the house seemed anticlimactic, especially given that two of the main characters were already dead.
 
Finally got a chance to watch this. I was underwhelmed. I thought it dragged and dragged and dragged some more. IMO, QT could have cut 45 minutes to an hour and left the core of the movie the same. The set up to each scene, the scenery, the travel by horseback, etc. did not add all that much and just made the movie longer not better. I also think they could have shaved off some of the dialogue to tighten up scenes.

The build up to the shoot out at the plantation was fine, but to continue on after that didn't make much sense to me. They could have modified the shootout scene and ended it there. The scenes after that and the return back to the house seemed anticlimactic, especially given that two of the main characters were already dead.
Agree with most of this.

 
This movie finally hit Cinemax. I gotta say, I think it was great. Jamie Foxx and Christopher Waltz were excellent. I think more of Don Johnson would have helped. DiCaprio, who I usually think is great, was just OK. Sam Jackson didn't make sense in his role. But overall this was a totally enjoyable flick. I didn't mind all the violence, racial slurs and other stuff many seemed too. While it is overplayed, I'm sure there were patches of the country were it wasn't too far from the truth. 4.2 stars.

I have a love/hate relationship with QT movies. I loved Resevoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction. Not so much on Kill Bill or Natural Born Killers. Django Unchained goes in the good category.

 
I have a love/hate relationship with QT movies. I loved Resevoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction. Not so much on Kill Bill or Natural Born Killers. Django Unchained goes in the good category.
NBK isn't a Tarantino movie, Oliver Stone directed it (QT wrote the story but not the screenplay).
 
I saw this a few weeks ago and enjoyed it very much as well. It did feel really long but all the cameos kept things fresh.

 
Finally saw this.

Pretty awesome. The first scene with SLJ had me in stitches - so horrible, yet so funny. Waltz was fantastic, and the early scene where he killed the sheriff was awesome ("You can get the marshall now." :lol: ). DiCaprio was also great as always, and Foxx did a good job with the Django character. I can't say this is as good as Pulp Fiction or the Basterds, but it's a mark of how great QT is when his non-best films are still this great.

:thumbup: :thumbup:

 
I gues everyone is finally seeing this on cable.

Waltz is awesome, he makes the movie, Foxx too.

DiCaprio - this is a guy who it totally depends on the role. Sometimes he's believable, sometimes he's not. He never seemed believable to me in this role, seemed absurd and the accent was horrible.

Sam L. Jackson - the man just chews scenes. Can't quite decide if what his character did made sense or not. Fascinating seeing him in such a turncoat role.

 
I think it was already said in this thread, but it's amazing how QT always gets the best performances out of Jackson.

Also, I chuckled at Waltz's character using the expression "no worries" once near the beginning of the film. Isn't that a phrase that was non-existent until the last 15 years or so?

 
I gues everyone is finally seeing this on cable.

Waltz is awesome, he makes the movie, Foxx too.

DiCaprio - this is a guy who it totally depends on the role. Sometimes he's believable, sometimes he's not. He never seemed believable to me in this role, seemed absurd and the accent was horrible.

Sam L. Jackson - the man just chews scenes. Can't quite decide if what his character did made sense or not. Fascinating seeing him in such a turncoat role.
Don't know if you're aware or not but DiCaprio actually cut his hand wide open in the dining room scene,kept filming, and ad libbed the smeared blood on Kerry Washington's face so that he could stay in character
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top