Names that stick out: Barr, Lee, Powell, Exum, Eagles have had all of them in or were at their pro days I think.It would have been nice to have this when the Manziel rumors we at their peak. Here's a list of prospects Chip offered scholarships to while he was at Oregon.
I have seen Barr's name all over the place lately. He's been in for multiple visits I believe, Howie went to their practice after the Oakland game and it's a poistion of need. I'm wondering if he's the guy they want and are willing to go get if the price is right.Names that stick out: Barr, Lee, Powell, Exum, Eagles have had all of them in or were at their pro days I think.It would have been nice to have this when the Manziel rumors we at their peak. Here's a list of prospects Chip offered scholarships to while he was at Oregon.
They've been looking at him quite a bit. Usually you don't play favorites but I'd think if he dropped below 15 they'd start thinking about trading up for him.I have seen Barr's name all over the place lately. He's been in for multiple visits I believe, Howie went to their practice after the Oakland game and it's a poistion of need. I'm wondering if he's the guy they want and are willing to go get if the price is right.Names that stick out: Barr, Lee, Powell, Exum, Eagles have had all of them in or were at their pro days I think.It would have been nice to have this when the Manziel rumors we at their peak. Here's a list of prospects Chip offered scholarships to while he was at Oregon.
First his legal trouble needs to be resolved before he goes to any team, and I doubt that goes away quickly. Reading through that thread, he's been in a lot of trouble before this. I think Goodell comes down hard. Once that's all cleared up...Not a chance I want to see him on the Eagles.The Desean Jackson thread may break but I just saw that Aldon Smith may get cut....if so, are you in?
Agreed, they've done free agency properly the last couple of years, to fill holes with mid level players.The biggest problem I have is there are no real glaring holes on the team now.
Hope so, but they can afford to add another guy here if there's somebody appealing available. Nate Allen is only a fallback if Wolff doesn't develop as hoped.I think there is more to Earl Wolff, a lot more. UDFA Keeland Johnson isn't a player to look past either.
Agree here for sure. Mathis is still playing at a high level, but he's 32. Heremanns is clearly fading and I wouldn't be surprised if they gave him some competition from Babre or somebody else in camp. I think Peters will actually be here now until he clearly falls off performance wise. The OT depth isn't bad between Babre and Kelly.We have 3 OL that are 30+. That might be of concern to the team. We'll see. Someone like Joel Bitonio could be a nice pick if the Mathis rumors are true. He can be a OG short term and RT once Lane Johnson moves to LT post-Peters.
I agree on the WRs to a point, there are guys outside that first tier I like, Matthews, Allen Robinson etc. Our WR group as it stands is a little underpowered but has zero depth. There's also still the question of whether Maclin comes back next year. Doesn't have to be 1st round, but I do think they need to draft a WR early, if the value's there of course which in this draft it should be. My prediction of WR/CB is mostly just where I expect the value to line up with what I see as needs.There is no need to chase WRs in this class. It's a buyers market and Howie seems to think so. Mainstream is running with the idea that we will draft a WR high, but we won't have to count on a rookie to produce to have a high powered offense. As long as we have captain efficiency at QB the ball will move. At pick #22 the best case to land an instant impact player who can be the best WR on the team immediately is maybe Cooks or Jordan Mathews. Then we can all chip in and get Insein a Cooks jersey to replace his DJax one. He won't notice the difference.
Who are the pass rushers you like? Don't see the buyers market, at least for the 3-4 OLBs we need. There was zero available in FA. The Big 3 will likely be long gone for us, I like Marcus Smith, but who else do you see as a fit?It's a buyers market for pass rushers too. Maybe with the added help to the secondary we can be more aggressive up front with the play calling. I'll still remain stubborn about using B. Graham if rushing the passer is such a need. Sending Kendricks every once in awhile wouldn't hurt either.
After reading Ash's post I was going to post something similar to this. I think it's very possible that we may just been a year to early for Graham. Everyone seemed to make a pretty easy transition to the 3-4 but a guy like Graham may just take a little more time to adapt to the position. IMO while it would be great to have an elite pass-rusher on the outside I don't believe it's necessary. We just need a situational guy who can get pressure on the QB's on obvious passing downs. Graham or a guy like Dee Ford would be perfect IMO. If we get that the DB's will look that much better.I'll still remain stubborn about using B. Graham if rushing the passer is such a need.
If someone like Zach Martin dropped to 22 I'd be absolutely fine with taking him.After reading Ash's post I was going to post something similar to this. I think it's very possible that we may just been a year to early for Graham. Everyone seemed to make a pretty easy transition to the 3-4 but a guy like Graham may just take a little more time to adapt to the position. IMO while it would be great to have an elite pass-rusher on the outside I don't believe it's necessary. We just need a situational guy who can get pressure on the QB's on obvious passing downs. Graham or a guy like Dee Ford would be perfect IMO. If we get that the DB's will look that much better.I'll still remain stubborn about using B. Graham if rushing the passer is such a need.
As far as OL goes I'm of the belief you can never have enough of them. If they go OL at 22 that's fine with me.
Well if he takes #10 then I have some duct tape and a sharpie.Nice post Ash. I'm acting as the Eagles GM in the SP mock draft. The biggest problem I have is there are no real glaring holes on the team now. Yea you might want to upgrade here and there, but I can't say there isn't starter level talent already in place considering the coaching philosophies. We don't have to count on any rookie to come in and produce right away like Lane Johnson did for example. It's all about BPA and depth, which will build for the future.
I think there is more to Earl Wolff, a lot more. UDFA Keeland Johnson isn't a player to look past either. We didn't chase the big names in FAs and we probably won't in the draft either. I wouldn't mind Bucannon at his price tag though..
We have 3 OL that are 30+. That might be of concern to the team. We'll see. Someone like Joel Bitonio could be a nice pick if the Mathis rumors are true. He can be a OG short term and RT once Lane Johnson moves to LT post-Peters.
There is no need to chase WRs in this class. It's a buyers market and Howie seems to think so. Mainstream is running with the idea that we will draft a WR high, but we won't have to count on a rookie to produce to have a high powered offense. As long as we have captain efficiency at QB the ball will move. At pick #22 the best case to land an instant impact player who can be the best WR on the team immediately is maybe Cooks or Jordan Mathews. Then we can all chip in and get Insein a Cooks jersey to replace his DJax one. He won't notice the difference.
It's a buyers market for pass rushers too. Maybe with the added help to the secondary we can be more aggressive up front with the play calling. I'll still remain stubborn about using B. Graham if rushing the passer is such a need. Sending Kendricks every once in awhile wouldn't hurt either.
Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
He'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
Who are the pass rushers you like? Don't see the buyers market, at least for the 3-4 OLBs we need. There was zero available in FA. The Big 3 will likely be long gone for us, I like Marcus Smith, but who else do you see as a fit?It's a buyers market for pass rushers too. Maybe with the added help to the secondary we can be more aggressive up front with the play calling. I'll still remain stubborn about using B. Graham if rushing the passer is such a need. Sending Kendricks every once in awhile wouldn't hurt either.
I don't think he fits the size they want for an outside linebacker. They brought in Barwin (6'5"), Braman (6'5"), and reportedly tried to trade for Dion Jordan (6'6"). I don't think he fits the mold of what they want. They've been very specific about the types of players they want to fit in specific roles for this team and I don't think they make sacrifices with their first round pick in this draft. They'll probably make compromises on the types of players they want in the fourth round and on, but not with the first pick. I'm leaning more and more towards cornerback or safety with pick #1. There was even a post the other day by some reporter than had them considering Buchannon with their first pick. Seems high for him, but crazier things have happened.He'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
I think Jordan Tripp fits the mold of what they're trying to do with the OLB position. I can't rule out Shazier because last year, they met with all of our first four or five picks before the draft, and they did meet with Shazier already - so he's on their radar. I just don't feel like he's an ideal fit for the scheme they want to run.Who are the pass rushers you like? Don't see the buyers market, at least for the 3-4 OLBs we need. There was zero available in FA. The Big 3 will likely be long gone for us, I like Marcus Smith, but who else do you see as a fit?It's a buyers market for pass rushers too. Maybe with the added help to the secondary we can be more aggressive up front with the play calling. I'll still remain stubborn about using B. Graham if rushing the passer is such a need. Sending Kendricks every once in awhile wouldn't hurt either.
This is one of my big problems with the 3-4 shift. We have a bunch of guys who suit the 4-3, we (so far) can't find the right guys for the new scheme but we're running it anyway and can't find a pass rush because of it.
Trent Murphy can be a better Rob Ninkovich with OLB/DE/ILB versatility.
I just pick Jackson Jeffcoat. He has the skillset to be like Trent Cole.
Shazier can do it all.
I'm not mentioning Mack- Barr- Clowney.
There is options in the draft. And if you're into PFF stats then Graham isn't being used properly.
42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers. He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or SHe'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
It wont be in a 3-4 if he is IMO42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers.He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or SHe'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
I like him more as a 3-4 OLB. He works either way.If that fails, he fits the profile of a S. He's going to be a monster.It wont be in a 3-4 if he is IMO42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers.He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or SHe'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
I only watched a little bit of Shazier but he seemed more like an ILB for our system to me. I actually thought he was a guy you'd get to replace Kendricks if that's what they wanted to do. The coverage skills I think are actually more important for the inside guys they way we seem to use our LBs as well. The OLBs tend to drop to the flat or they use Barwin to mug guys at the line. The ILBs cover man or over the middle.ShaHBucks said:42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers.He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or SBigboy10182000 said:He'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.ShaHBucks said:Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
I don't think he will be a MLB in the NFL. You have to watch the tape and picture him at OLB or S while doing what he does. A part of the reason I'm so high on him is the fact that you can almost try him anywhere. He'd be the most athletic RB in this class for crying out loud. I know from all the Eagles moves that versatility is at least as important as ideal size. Shazier is a swiss-army knife and a bargain in the 20s.I only watched a little bit of Shazier but he seemed more like an ILB for our system to me. I actually thought he was a guy you'd get to replace Kendricks if that's what they wanted to do. The coverage skills I think are actually more important for the inside guys they way we seem to use our LBs as well. The OLBs tend to drop to the flat or they use Barwin to mug guys at the line. The ILBs cover man or over the middle.ShaHBucks said:42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers.He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or SBigboy10182000 said:He'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.ShaHBucks said:Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
If the Eagles thought the vertical was a substitute for height then Boykin would be playing outside. I like Shazier as a player, just don't think he's what the Eagles would target as an OLB.
ETA: I like the discussion though, keep it coming
Alright, I'll watch a bit more. I was only saying ILB for us, not a 4-3 MLB. Like Kendricks I think his best NFL position based on what I've seen so far would be 4-3 WLB. For a 3-4 OLB, here's what I'm looking for:I don't think he will be a MLB in the NFL. You have to watch the tape and picture him at OLB or S while doing what he does. A part of the reason I'm so high on him is the fact that you can almost try him anywhere. He'd be the most athletic RB in this class for crying out loud. I know from all the Eagles moves that versatility is at least as important as ideal size. Shazier is a swiss-army knife and a bargain in the 20s.
11.6 total tackles, 8.2 solo tackles, 1.8 TFLs, 0.6 sacks per game = His numbers when you toss out the soft games in the schedule(Buff, SD, Fla A&M)
Those are sick totals for someone his size playing MLB and OLB. Show me a better performer or athlete on paper and I'll agree with you guys. Give me talent over some system any Sunday.
He has the athleticism to cover Slot WRs, TEs and RBs in this passing league. I don't know what else you'd need height for. He can chase ball carriers and get into the backfield. And he hits like a FS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwQzkshFkaM
Agree wholeheartedly, but left DE in a 4-3 isn't a position we seem to have. I think they're wasting Fletcher Cox having him play 2-gap as well. I think last year's D would have been better as a 4-3 and the same will probably be true of this year's too. Frustrating to see teams constantly convert 3rd downs with no pass rush while Graham and now Curry sit on the bench or play out of position.then Graham isn't being used properly.
Came in to post about the bold. I don't know who the Eagles have dirty pictures of in the league office, but for the Seahawks being a home game after extended rest from playing Dallas on Thanksgiving. Would be so awesome to win in Jerruh-world on Thanksgiving Day for a National audience.Figured there'd be more on the schedule in here by now. Few quick thoughts.
1. Tough start. There's a possibility we could be 1-3, and I'd be happy with 2-2.
2. Bye week is earlier then I'd like it.
3. Fairly difficult middle of the schedule, but at least its right after our bye so hopefully we're rested and ready for 3 or the next 4 on the road. Some good teams in that stretch too.
4, YES! THANKSGIVING GAME!
5. Love that we get our seahawks game
a: At Home
b: After 10 days rest.
I think we're gonna take them that game.
6: Cowboys twice in 3 weeks. Sandwiched by the Seahawks. Make or break our season right there.
7. End with three straight div games. Last two games of the year are both on the road vs div rivals.
8. It's nice that our only two back to back road games, give us the Texans and Giants as the 2nd game which is generally tough for the visiting team.
Haven't looked at the "how many times we play a team fresh off their bye" yet, but would love to see the stats on that. 2 years ago was a nightmare for that.
Looks like a SUPER entertaining schedule with plenty of storylines and big matchups throughout the year.
I'm not all to concern with schemes. If you can get to the QB then you can get to the QB provided the opportunity. It's all the same thing, just different alignments and different personal to make us look like we don't know whats going on.Agree wholeheartedly, but left DE in a 4-3 isn't a position we seem to have. I think they're wasting Fletcher Cox having him play 2-gap as well. I think last year's D would have been better as a 4-3 and the same will probably be true of this year's too. Frustrating to see teams constantly convert 3rd downs with no pass rush while Graham and now Curry sit on the bench or play out of position.then Graham isn't being used properly.
What do I know though, I'm just some **** on the internet.
ETA: Wait, we can say **** now? Should I transcribe that scene from Reservoir Dogs?
NICE!ONly once playing a team coming off a bye. Forget who it was, but it was a weaker team.
The Rams home game is where they're coming off the bye.ONly once playing a team coming off a bye. Forget who it was, but it was a weaker team.
ah ####, didn't realize seattle had a thanksgiving game too. Dammit!Came in to post about the bold. I don't know who the Eagles have dirty pictures of in the league office, but for the Seahawks being a home game after extended rest from playing Dallas on Thanksgiving. Would be so awesome to win in Jerruh-world on Thanksgiving Day for a National audience.Figured there'd be more on the schedule in here by now. Few quick thoughts.
1. Tough start. There's a possibility we could be 1-3, and I'd be happy with 2-2.
2. Bye week is earlier then I'd like it.
3. Fairly difficult middle of the schedule, but at least its right after our bye so hopefully we're rested and ready for 3 or the next 4 on the road. Some good teams in that stretch too.
4, YES! THANKSGIVING GAME!
5. Love that we get our seahawks game
a: At Home
b: After 10 days rest.
I think we're gonna take them that game.
6: Cowboys twice in 3 weeks. Sandwiched by the Seahawks. Make or break our season right there.
7. End with three straight div games. Last two games of the year are both on the road vs div rivals.
8. It's nice that our only two back to back road games, give us the Texans and Giants as the 2nd game which is generally tough for the visiting team.
Haven't looked at the "how many times we play a team fresh off their bye" yet, but would love to see the stats on that. 2 years ago was a nightmare for that.
Looks like a SUPER entertaining schedule with plenty of storylines and big matchups throughout the year.
I'm thinking 10-6/11-5Eagles 2014 Schedule
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars
2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night)
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins
4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers
5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams
6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night)
7 - Bye Week
8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals
9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans
10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night)
11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers
12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans
13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon)
14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks
15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night)
16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon)
17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants
Every year is a crap shoot.FYI....Last year if you faced Atlanta or Houston that was considered 'tough' as well and teams like us and KC were considered easy
I got 9-7. Splitting WAS and DAL and beating NYG twice in the division. I know many will have ARI as a win, but Philly notoriously doesn't travel well to the left coast. Even the HOU scares me a bit as they aren't as bad as they looked last year, plus they'll boost the D-line with Clowney.I'm thinking 10-6/11-5Eagles 2014 Schedule
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars Win
2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) Loss
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins Win
4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers Loss
5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams Win
6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) Win
7 - Bye Week
8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals Loss
9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans Win
10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) Win
11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers Loss
12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans Win
13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) Loss
14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks Loss
15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) Win
16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) Loss
17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants Win
I agree but after the bye I have to think win.I got 9-7. Splitting WAS and DAL and beating NYG twice in the division. I know many will have ARI as a win, but Philly notoriously doesn't travel well to the left coast. Even the HOU scares me a bit as they aren't as bad as they looked last year, plus they'll boost the D-line with Clowney.I'm thinking 10-6/11-5Eagles 2014 Schedule
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars Win
2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) Loss
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins Win
4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers Loss
5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams Win
6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) Win
7 - Bye Week
8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals Loss
9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans Win
10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) Win
11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers Loss
12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans Win
13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) Loss
14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks Loss
15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) Win
16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) Loss
17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants Win
hahah no chance we start 8-1. none.1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars-W (1-0)
2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) W (2-0)
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins W (3-0!)
4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers L (3-1)
5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams W (4-1)
6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) W (5-1)
7 - Bye Week
8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals W (6-1)
9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans W (7-1)
10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) W (8-1) At this point local Radio Stations officially explode with talk of SB
11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers L (8-2)
12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans W (9-2)
13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) L (9-3)
14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks L (9-4)
15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) W (10-4)
16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) L (10-5) Let down game with short rest and coming off big win against 'girls.
17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants W (11-5)