What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Jonas Gray (RB - New England) (1 Viewer)

iirc Jimmy actually cut a player for having Asthma or for sitting because he had asthma, can't remember. Tough SOB.

 
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ FOOTBALLGUYS VIEW ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

Hopefully you didn't drop Gray on the news of Blount's signing. Blount could have value if Gray goes down, but Gray is still the primary power back.
oof.

 
this is in regards to the big indy game

Brady's run checks: On a Jonas Gray 14-yard run in the third quarter (13:35), Belichick pointed out the defensive alignment and how if the run comes to the left side, where there are two defensive backs on that side that couldn't be accounted for, it would be a bad play. So quarterback Tom Brady checked the run to the other side, and there is success. Belichick later showed a similar play -- a 14-yard run by Gray in which Brady once again checked the run away from the side where the numbers weren't favorable.
I haven't watched the clip yet, but I think it might be referenced in belichick's breakdowns

 
I think Jonas Gray = Aaron Dobson. BB doesn't suffer bad behavior lightly. It might've been no big deal in the long run but with Blount back Gray likely is on the periphery now unless Blount can't behave either.
Not posting this to brag about the call but more to say that BB is pretty predictable only this regard. Gray put himself in the dog house and will stay there until there's a reason (Blount fumbles, misbehaves, or gets hurt).
Or is ineffective. Can't stress it enough that if the game was close, and Blount and Vereen were not getting it done, Gray would have gotten on the field. Otherwise he would have been deactivated.

People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
If Gray ran for 6.2 ypc, he would get all of those carries, Blount would have 0. Even though Blount only had the ball 12 times, he was gouging the vaulted Detroit defense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Jonas Gray = Aaron Dobson. BB doesn't suffer bad behavior lightly. It might've been no big deal in the long run but with Blount back Gray likely is on the periphery now unless Blount can't behave either.
Not posting this to brag about the call but more to say that BB is pretty predictable only this regard. Gray put himself in the dog house and will stay there until there's a reason (Blount fumbles, misbehaves, or gets hurt).
Or is ineffective. Can't stress it enough that if the game was close, and Blount and Vereen were not getting it done, Gray would have gotten on the field. Otherwise he would have been deactivated.

People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
If Gray ran for 6.2 ypc, he would get all of those carries, Blount would have 0. Even though Blount only had the ball 12 times, he was gouging the vaulted Detroit defense.
they're only vaulted when blount's runnin' against them

 
I have no clue how much Gray will be used going forward and how much Blount will be used.

What I do know if that for the vast majority of the Lions game neither one was used very much.

Blount got almost all his carries in what was in essence garbage time.

With 6:23 left in the 4th Quarter, Blount had 4 carries for 29 yards.

On the last drive when the Lions looked completely defeated as a team, Blount got 8 carries 49 carries, 33 yards on one play. Also, Blount had 2 nice carries in the game of 33 yards and 23 yards. His other 10 carries went for 22 yards. Let's not overestimate how good a day Blount had.

I would guess Blount has the edge for more carries down the stretch but with BB involved I don't have much confidence in that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
RB81 in the top 200 forward?

So we can drop this guy? I'm having a hard time buying into that...

 
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.
Blount ran for over 160 yards on 20 carries last year against Indy in the playoffs. Belichick knows he has some skills. Face it Gray probably isn't that good. That is the most likely reason he never had an NFL carry before this season. He probably makes a team next year, but I bet he will never start for a team without an injury. Obviously none of us have seen enough go Gray to know, but that's my guess.

 
Bill Billicheck was making a point in this game to Gray. We can and will live without you if you don't walk the line. He's the best option on this team to run the ball but you can never tell either through game planning or game flow when the plug is going to be pulled on all NE RBs. They are fine for bye week fillers but you don't want to trust them down the playoff stretch.

 
Bill Billicheck was making a point in this game to Gray. We can and will live without you if you don't walk the line. He's the best option on this team to run the ball but you can never tell either through game planning or game flow when the plug is going to be pulled on all NE RBs. They are fine for bye week fillers but you don't want to trust them down the playoff stretch.
Maybe that was true before they signed Blount; I don't know if that is completely accurate anymore.

 
Teddy Bruschi on WEEI right now just said that in his opinion the benching was entirely disciplinary. He said that BB probably used this opportunity to drive home with the rest of the team that tardiness will not be tolerated.

Who knows. It does at least have the appearance of inconsistent application of the rules. Belichik fascinates me like no other. Is he a great leader or a phoney? A stern disciplinarian looking out for the overall good of the team and his men, or a petulant bully? Probably a good conversation for another thread...
I agree. He's quite the enigma.

 
I like Gray, but given my other options at RB it is highly unlikely he cracks my lineup ROS. Question is whether I want to put him on the WW (to get a second D) and potentially have someone else start him against me in the playoffs.

 
I have no clue how much Gray will be used going forward and how much Blount will be used.

What I do know if that for the vast majority of the Lions game neither one was used very much.

Blount got almost all his carries in what was in essence garbage time.

With 6:23 left in the 4th Quarter, Blount had 4 carries for 29 yards.

On the last drive when the Lions looked completely defeated as a team, Blount got 8 carries 49 carries, 33 yards on one play. Also, Blount had 2 nice carries in the game of 33 yards and 23 yards. His other 10 carries went for 22 yards. Let's not overestimate how good a day Blount had.

I would guess Blount has the edge for more carries down the stretch but with BB involved I don't have much confidence in that.
That's pretty much how NE does it though in many games. I owned Ridley for years and some games they would feed him and others it was all about short quick passes and then in the 4th he'd get 15 carries to grind out the clock and put up numbers like Blount did on Sunday.

 
I think Jonas Gray = Aaron Dobson. BB doesn't suffer bad behavior lightly. It might've been no big deal in the long run but with Blount back Gray likely is on the periphery now unless Blount can't behave either.
Not posting this to brag about the call but more to say that BB is pretty predictable only this regard. Gray put himself in the dog house and will stay there until there's a reason (Blount fumbles, misbehaves, or gets hurt).
Or is ineffective. Can't stress it enough that if the game was close, and Blount and Vereen were not getting it done, Gray would have gotten on the field. Otherwise he would have been deactivated.

People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
If Gray ran for 6.2 ypc, he would get all of those carries, Blount would have 0. Even though Blount only had the ball 12 times, he was gouging the vaulted vaunted Detroit defense.
Fixed.

 
Gray would be a 3rd stringer had Blount not leave and Ridley not got hurt. Gray is not ever going to be even close to Blount in terms of talent and skill. Blount will probably be good rb2 going forward as I see NE pounding the ball like the 2nd half of last year. Wouldn't shock me if Blount scores again this weekend.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bill Billicheck was making a point in this game to Gray. We can and will live without you if you don't walk the line. He's the best option on this team to run the ball but you can never tell either through game planning or game flow when the plug is going to be pulled on all NE RBs. They are fine for bye week fillers but you don't want to trust them down the playoff stretch.
Think BB's really making the point to his team since every word anyone's ever said about Gray is that he's a great kid, works like a dog and has never been in trouble.

 
Pats can run the ball when they want. They have two different types of backs, one who is typical of a passing offense and two that are typical of a power run game. It's anyone's guess why BB does what he does regarding player discipline, but what we know is BB does what he wants and he's never going to let on why or give anyone, certainly not the media, any real info that could be perceived as useful. One might be able to predict which back will be more prevalent based on an outsiders perspective of the matchup, but nobody knows how the Pats truly perceive the matchup.

 
RB81 in the top 200 forward?

So we can drop this guy? I'm having a hard time buying into that...
I'm starting to think the shark move is to drop this guy and let somebody else pick him up. They will end up chasing points when this really is a 3 headed RBBC, and Blount may have the gig after last week...

 
BB could have Barry Sanders and he'd still rotate his backs every other week. Not worth the headache.

 
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.
Blount ran for over 160 yards on 20 carries last year against Indy in the playoffs. Belichick knows he has some skills. Face it Gray probably isn't that good. That is the most likely reason he never had an NFL carry before this season. He probably makes a team next year, but I bet he will never start for a team without an injury. Obviously none of us have seen enough go Gray to know, but that's my guess.
one thing Gray does well is that he runs where the play is designed to go. His running is disciplined. I think he'll get another shot as a complement to the other two guys.

 
IMO Gray is droppable at this point in redraft if you're making moves for the playoffs.

His upside appears to be a 50/50 split of "power-back" touches with Blount, which on a typical good day would be 8-10. Blount not only appears to be the more talented runner, but also appears to have BB's trust. So Gray's downside would be somewhere between relegated to the bench entirely and maybe 3-4 touches / game to give Blount a breather.

Obviously it would be best to wait a couple games to see exactly how this plays out. But for those up against trade deadlines or otherwise needing to make roster moves I'm just not seeing how Gray is anything more than a desperation play for the ROS.

 
I Blount not only appears to be the more talented runner,
Blount has played his way off of how many teams now?

If BB didn't believe LB was expendable, he wouldn't have been a Steeler....
I have no idea what this even means. Of course Blount is expendable. That doesn't mean he isn't the Patriots' best power back option ROS.
Is he though? Blount ran behind a better line last year and didn't get a 200 yd game....Seems by letting him walk, that BB thinks he not much more than JAG...

 
I Blount not only appears to be the more talented runner,
Blount has played his way off of how many teams now?

If BB didn't believe LB was expendable, he wouldn't have been a Steeler....
I have no idea what this even means. Of course Blount is expendable. That doesn't mean he isn't the Patriots' best power back option ROS.
Is he though? Blount ran behind a better line last year and didn't get a 200 yd game....Seems by letting him walk, that BB thinks he not much more than JAG...
Fair points both, and BB could certainly let Blount walk yet again after the end of this season. However, for rest of this season he is stuck with just Blount/Vereen/Gray.

While Blount did not have a 200 yd game last year, he did have 24/166/4 against Colts last year and it did take Gray 37 carries to get 200.

Plus Blount just put up 6.5 ypc against the best rush D in the NFL last week and from the eye test seems to have at least Gray's skills plus an explosiveness that Gray just hasn't shown yet.

I'm not saying Blount is a lock to totally displace Gray from the offense, but IMO that is much more a possibility that vice versa, therefore seriously capping Gray's upside.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IMO Gray is droppable at this point in redraft if you're making moves for the playoffs.

His upside appears to be a 50/50 split of "power-back" touches with Blount, which on a typical good day would be 8-10. Blount not only appears to be the more talented runner, but also appears to have BB's trust. So Gray's downside would be somewhere between relegated to the bench entirely and maybe 3-4 touches / game to give Blount a breather.

Obviously it would be best to wait a couple games to see exactly how this plays out. But for those up against trade deadlines or otherwise needing to make roster moves I'm just not seeing how Gray is anything more than a desperation play for the ROS.
I actually decided it was better to drop him now, before the final week of the regular season. Aside from the fact that I wanted the roster spot for a second D, I figured this way he's more likely to end up on a non-playoff team and not come back and haunt me in the event that he puts up another 38/201/4 line in Week 16.

 
This is just my feeling. Basing it on nothing else. But I think gray is back in the mix this week in a plus matchup for ne RBS. Wouldn't be surprised to see both gray and Blount with 12-15 carries and a TD each

 
I'm benching Vereen in a must-win week, for a scrub like Asiata or DMartin, because I see NE going power all day today. I would claim Gray in an instant if anyone dropped him in my league.

 
I'm benching Vereen in a must-win week, for a scrub like Asiata or DMartin, because I see NE going power all day today. I would claim Gray in an instant if anyone dropped him in my league.
Right. That is what I'm seeing as well.

Best way to beat the packers? Attack their weakness and keep their strength off the field.

They have a weak run d. Pound away with gray and Blount all day. Ball control. Slow, lumbering drives that take the sails out of the defense. Keep Rodgers cold on the sidelines helplessly watching.

I'd imagine belicheck takes the same approach he took that worked against Indy with a similar team.

Now the question is does he ride Blount or give gray another shot? That I have no idea but in a must win matchup against the best team in my league I'm going for upside.

So I'm benching Vereen and Ryan Mathews and taking a shot on gray in my flex. If I'm wrong it will cost me the playoffs In a season where my team sucks and probably wouldn't make much noise in the playoffs anyway. If I'm right I'll sneak in and then who knows?

 
Belidick hates Fantasy Football players and he was waiting for this day to get us back.

He's smiling big inside... He mind ####ed us, he mind ####ed us good.
Belichick loves this for a number of reasons1. shows up Pittsburgh for cutting Blount

2. Thumbs his nose and say that he basically grab a player off the street and beat you

3. Tells the world that he can bench a 200 yd back and still whip a good team
Doesn't matter, New England can't and won't win the Super Bowl unless they cheat.
Dat salt!

 
People might be overlooking the fact that the Patriots only rushed 20 times as a team: 12 for Blount, 8 for Vereen. Last week the plan was smash mouth football because they knew the Colts couldn't handle it. This week, against that Detroit front 7, the plan switched completely to spread-em-out football. It's what Belichick does.

So yeah "OMG Gray didn't play a single snap" sounds huge, but Blount only ran the ball 12 times. Overwhelmingly the RB on the field was Vereen. What would Gray have gotten had he not overslept? Half of Blount's workload? 4 carries?
A chance to prove he could still be productive despite a tough match-up. A chance to prove he was better than Blount and the better inside runner. An chance to limit Blount's opportunities and in turn not let Blount flash his skills (he looked good on his 12 touches). Essentially, oversleeping put his very livelihood in legitimate jeopardy. Saying "Oh, it's not some huge loss." is ridiculous haha.
Blount ran for over 160 yards on 20 carries last year against Indy in the playoffs. Belichick knows he has some skills. Face it Gray probably isn't that good. That is the most likely reason he never had an NFL carry before this season. He probably makes a team next year, but I bet he will never start for a team without an injury. Obviously none of us have seen enough go Gray to know, but that's my guess.
one thing Gray does well is that he runs where the play is designed to go. His running is disciplined. I think he'll get another shot as a complement to the other two guys.
I know the announcers were in love with that. And it works great when the oline is winning the battles. It's not so great when the oline isn't. Then it helps to be more versatile since you don't have a giant hole every play.

I'm not sure why running to the designed hole is good honestly. I'd think it's more a crutch if you don't have good vision.

 
This is just my feeling. Basing it on nothing else. But I think gray is back in the mix this week in a plus matchup for ne RBS. Wouldn't be surprised to see both gray and Blount with 12-15 carries and a TD each
I agree with this. Starting Gray tomorrow. I think Belichik goes ball control and rides Gray this week. Just a hunch, but I'm running with it.
 
Why didnt NE resign Blount last year?
Because they didn't think he was worth the money he would cost. When they could grab him cheap they did. They have done that for years.

What does that have to do with Jonas Gray? I understand Blount isn't a star, but the Pats clearly like him. I'm not sure Gray is more than a 3rd or 4th string type guy. Blount is a good 2nd stringer and has proven that for years. We might know more about Gray in a few weeks of course.

 
Why didnt NE resign Blount last year?
they still had ridley + vereen on rookie deals, had signed gray for peanuts, and were maybe even looking at drafting a back, as ridley + vereen are on their last year.

they were a little tight on cap, and I think they just didn't want to match pitt's 2y/4m deal at that position.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld (some reporter actually) says expect a spilt unless one gets a hot hand and that they do expect to pound the rock tmrw. I'm on my phone and can't post the link.

 
Rotoworld (some reporter actually) says expect a spilt unless one gets a hot hand and that they do expect to pound the rock tmrw. I'm on my phone and can't post the link.
it was speculation from mike reiss

edit: mike reiss has been a pats beat guy for quite some time

Return of the power running game with Blount and Gray: The Packers have made a fundamental shift defensively, going away from a big-bodied three-man line to lighter, longer, more agile players. While that has improved the pass rush at times, it has compromised their stoutness against the run in certain situations, as evidenced by their No. 30 ranking in rushing yards allowed per game (136.7) and No. 27 ranking in average yards allowed per rush (4.5). As a game-plan offense that looks to exploit the weakness of the opponent by morphing into something new each week, this sets up a possible return to the power running game Sunday. That would likely mean a time-share situation for LeGarrette Blount (6-0, 250) and Jonas Gray (5-10, 230), and a possible heavier focus of using a sixth offensive lineman, similar to what we saw in Indianapolis on Nov. 16.
pretty similar to speculation on this board from the fans.

however, he also speculates that cam fleming will be inactive ---- he would most likely be the 6th lineman, although you might have other guys spot fill.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am starting Gray and I would start Blount too if I had him. I think both will get plenty of attempts and could both score. I see a split in carries.

 
I'm benching Vereen in a must-win week, for a scrub like Asiata or DMartin, because I see NE going power all day today. I would claim Gray in an instant if anyone dropped him in my league.
Right. That is what I'm seeing as well.

Best way to beat the packers? Attack their weakness and keep their strength off the field.

They have a weak run d. Pound away with gray and Blount all day. Ball control. Slow, lumbering drives that take the sails out of the defense. Keep Rodgers cold on the sidelines helplessly watching.

I'd imagine belicheck takes the same approach he took that worked against Indy with a similar team.

Now the question is does he ride Blount or give gray another shot? That I have no idea but in a must win matchup against the best team in my league I'm going for upside.

So I'm benching Vereen and Ryan Mathews and taking a shot on gray in my flex. If I'm wrong it will cost me the playoffs In a season where my team sucks and probably wouldn't make much noise in the playoffs anyway. If I'm right I'll sneak in and then who knows?

NE pounding the ball all day makes a lot of sense. But, if GB gets off to a big lead, which is quite possible at home, Vereen would likely see more playing time. That's why I'm afraid to bench Vereen this week.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is just my feeling. Basing it on nothing else. But I think gray is back in the mix this week in a plus matchup for ne RBS. Wouldn't be surprised to see both gray and Blount with 12-15 carries and a TD each
I agree with this. Starting Gray tomorrow. I think Belichik goes ball control and rides Gray this week. Just a hunch, but I'm running with it.
This game has shoot-out written all over it. Vegas is usually on the right path and they have the over/under at 58, highest of the week. Only two more games are even above 50.

Both NE and GB are bad against the run but there's no way both teams come out pounding the ball when they have Brady and Rodgers playing at elite levels. I would be shocked if there weren't a minimum of 6 pass TDs in this game. That's not going to leave much over for split carries between power backs. I have Blount and Gray in misc leagues and am not playing either.

Tim Wright is still available in a lot of leagues. Get him in your lineup and forget about Gray/Blount this week.

 
This is just my feeling. Basing it on nothing else. But I think gray is back in the mix this week in a plus matchup for ne RBS. Wouldn't be surprised to see both gray and Blount with 12-15 carries and a TD each
I agree with this. Starting Gray tomorrow. I think Belichik goes ball control and rides Gray this week. Just a hunch, but I'm running with it.
This game has shoot-out written all over it. Vegas is usually on the right path and they have the over/under at 58, highest of the week. Only two more games are even above 50.

Both NE and GB are bad against the run but there's no way both teams come out pounding the ball when they have Brady and Rodgers playing at elite levels. I would be shocked if there weren't a minimum of 6 pass TDs in this game. That's not going to leave much over for split carries between power backs. I have Blount and Gray in misc leagues and am not playing either.

Tim Wright is still available in a lot of leagues. Get him in your lineup and forget about Gray/Blount this week.
Vegas sets the line at 58 because they know the public will think exactly like the thinking in this post.

 
This is just my feeling. Basing it on nothing else. But I think gray is back in the mix this week in a plus matchup for ne RBS. Wouldn't be surprised to see both gray and Blount with 12-15 carries and a TD each
I agree with this. Starting Gray tomorrow. I think Belichik goes ball control and rides Gray this week. Just a hunch, but I'm running with it.
This game has shoot-out written all over it. Vegas is usually on the right path and they have the over/under at 58, highest of the week. Only two more games are even above 50.

Both NE and GB are bad against the run but there's no way both teams come out pounding the ball when they have Brady and Rodgers playing at elite levels. I would be shocked if there weren't a minimum of 6 pass TDs in this game. That's not going to leave much over for split carries between power backs. I have Blount and Gray in misc leagues and am not playing either.

Tim Wright is still available in a lot of leagues. Get him in your lineup and forget about Gray/Blount this week.
:shrug:

NE and Indy put up 62 points. Good luck using that metric as a gauge for RB usage.

 
He was available in my league so I picked him up while dropping Bryce Brown. He has upside, but I still don't trust starting him. Starting Herron instead.

 
starting Gray this week. Just have good feeling. Would be typical B. Belichik.
The way I look at it is that gray did the crime and did the time. He missed a day of practice so he didn't get to play In week 12.

He should be back in action for week 13 although splitting reps/series with Blount.

I'll tell you what I'm curious about and I couldn't find this anywhere: who was taking the 1st team reps in practice this week? That's a good indicator for who will see playing time today. My guess is that they split -at team reps which is what les mike Reiss to think they will split carries today in the game.

 
If NE can run block against gb the way they did against Indy 2 weeks ago I'll take gray getting12-15 carries over a lot of other rb2s and rb3s today.

Definitely over vereen and mathews. Definitely over miller, and maybe even over ellington (in standards scoring).

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top