What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

*** Official Thursday Night Clash with The Titans *** (1 Viewer)

JaxBill

Footballguy
That's right a Thursday night game so epic that it needs a thread 4 days early.

Titans at Jag-u-ars

Consider for a second just how monumental this game is

Chances of landing No. 1 pick, per http://numberFire.com : Jags: 31.6% Titans: 31.4% Bucs: 25.7% Raiders: 10.4% Redskins: 0.9% Jets: .02%
Also consider that rookie Blake Bortles will go into the game with more career starts(10) than his counterpart 32 year old Charlie Whitehurst (7)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Early lines show that the Jags are favored (by 3) for the first time in 43 games. (Thanks Gene Smith)

The over/under is a scintillating 41.

 
The Jags are going to win. They actually looked halfway decent against the Ravens everywhere except their offensive line. If a couple of WR drops hadn't happened, and the line was somewhere between pretty awful and really bad then they might have won yesterday. Instead their line was God-F***ing-Awful and Bortles had 0 chance most of the time.

 
Bortles sprained foot?

As the Jaguars’ rookie quarterback stood at a podium, a boot protected his sprained right foot, and he was asked about the team’s eight sacks allowed.

Moments earlier, in the moments after a 20-12 loss to the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium, Head Coach Gus Bradley had discussed the sacks, calling them “discouraging” and saying the situation wasn’t all on the offensive line.

“We have to slow this down,” Bradley said. “I know right away it’s quick to jump on the offensive line, but I don’t know … whatever the case is, we have to slow that down.

“To take eight sacks is not good football for us right now.”

Bortles agreed. Absolutely.

“They (the Ravens) were good up front – we knew that coming into the game,” Bortles said after completing 21 of 37 passes for 210 yards and no touchdowns with an interception, including eight of 16 passes for 61 yards and an interception in the second half.

“A lot of the sacks were on me holding the ball too long. There are easy ways to avoid it, whether it be throwing it away or throwing it at somebody’s feet.

“It’s something I’m working on that I’m going to have to get better at.”

Bortles played through the sprained foot and called the boot precautionary.

“It’s fine,” he said of the foot.
 
Grahamburn said:
Chances of landing No. 1 pick, per http://numberFire.com : Jags: 31.6% Titans: 31.4% Bucs: 25.7% Raiders: 10.4% Redskins: 0.9% Jets: .02%
Why are the Titans and Jags percentages so much higher than the Bucs?
Just a guess, but given the importance strength of schedule plays in draft-pick tiebreakers, I'm guessing it's because the AFC South had an easier schedule than the NFC South.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Serious question here: this is the second year in a row we've had a late-season TNF Toilet Bowl between Tenn-Jax. Is it possible the schedule makers did this on purpose to ensure maximum flexibility in terms of the SNF game? That is to say, bury the worst game on Thursday and then you can flex whichever Sunday game you want to nighttime.

It's probably just coincidence -- they have to cram every team into a TNF slot, and this year it has to be a division rival -- but it is amazing that we've had this dog of a match-up two Week 16s in a row.

 
Serious question here: this is the second year in a row we've had a late-season TNF Toilet Bowl between Tenn-Jax. Is it possible the schedule makers did this on purpose to ensure maximum flexibility in terms of the SNF game? That is to say, bury the worst game on Thursday and then you can flex whichever Sunday game you want to nighttime.

It's probably just coincidence -- they have to cram every team into a TNF slot, and this year it has to be a division rival -- but it is amazing that we've had this dog of a match-up two Week 16s in a row.
I don't think it's a coincidence they put Tenn-Jax on after NBC's slate of Thursdays was over.

 
Serious question here: this is the second year in a row we've had a late-season TNF Toilet Bowl between Tenn-Jax. Is it possible the schedule makers did this on purpose to ensure maximum flexibility in terms of the SNF game? That is to say, bury the worst game on Thursday and then you can flex whichever Sunday game you want to nighttime.

It's probably just coincidence -- they have to cram every team into a TNF slot, and this year it has to be a division rival -- but it is amazing that we've had this dog of a match-up two Week 16s in a row.
BTW, I checked the schedule and I had the wrong toilet bowl. Last year Houston and Jax faced each other on TNF in Week 14 (Tenn-Jax did play in Week 16, but it was on Sunday; in fact, there was no TNF that week).

 
Gonna be a game for the ages. People are going to have a hard time sleeping between now and Thursday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't believe I am playing Jax D in my finals....nothing else out there for a streamer. At least they are at home against a 3rd string QB.

 
Hoping the Titans play the younger backs this week....significantly

Kendall wright offers there only offensive hope of winning. I wonder if he'll play.

Lewan and he were "sore" and didn't play Sunday. It would be a completely different game if those two can play. Stingley is capable of moving inside and big giant Terren is a big obstacle which makes him better than their old guy from the pats.

Its probably going to come down to the points scored off INTs since both are likely to throw a few. The titans should show some CB depth this game and I actually like their backups for effort more than their starters who just watch the game.

The titans DO have an excellent DT playing DE backed by a DE playing OLB. Everywhere else, jags can run free but they seem to run right at em' where ya marvel at the idiocy of the playcall.

 
Grahamburn said:
Chances of landing No. 1 pick, per http://numberFire.com : Jags: 31.6% Titans: 31.4% Bucs: 25.7% Raiders: 10.4% Redskins: 0.9% Jets: .02%
Why are the Titans and Jags percentages so much higher than the Bucs?
Just a guess, but given the importance strength of schedule plays in draft-pick tiebreakers, I'm guessing it's because the AFC South had an easier schedule than the NFC South.
Seems dubious, considering those two teams play each other this week in an epic clash, that both of them would have a better chance of losing their final two games than the Bucs.

 
FWIW....I think Kendall is going to play. Whisenhunt's pressers on titansonline, the interview with Kendall....I think so.
They're saying they'll wait til tmrw to decide, but they have a minimal practice tomorrow.

Guess for yourself, I think he will.

I'm hopeful he'll play very well and get some exposure. It seems to me he ils so underappreciated

 
I think I heard them say this on the radio- statistically, it's more likely jordan palmer both finish and perform better than charlie whitehurst this week.

Titans injuries at QB over and over this year....that true?

 
How's the Jags run D? May use them we get 5 points if the opposing team doesn't run for 100 yards
The run defense is decent except they're usually out there a long time and get tired then give up the big play.

Last time the Jags played the Titans, the Titans leading rusher was Sankey 18/61 and Titans as a team rushed for 70.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=400554222

Jaguars' recurring defensive problem is opposing TE against the LB.

 
I can't believe I am playing Jax D in my finals....nothing else out there for a streamer. At least they are at home against a 3rd string QB.
same here.

It's a weird feeling to not only hope your favorite team loses but does so spectacularly.

 
How's the Jags run D? May use them we get 5 points if the opposing team doesn't run for 100 yards
The run defense is decent except they're usually out there a long time and get tired then give up the big play.

Last time the Jags played the Titans, the Titans leading rusher was Sankey 18/61 and Titans as a team rushed for 70.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=400554222

Jaguars' recurring defensive problem is opposing TE against the LB.
Interesting, and how's the pass rush? is that stadium louder during night games? I recall a Thursday night game years ago against the Colts. and the atmosphere was great but will it in this clunker? Trying to get as much info as possible to justify picking Jacksonville over Carolina in my weird DST scoring.

 
Chances of landing No. 1 pick, per http://numberFire.com : Jags: 31.6% Titans: 31.4% Bucs: 25.7% Raiders: 10.4% Redskins: 0.9% Jets: .02%
Why are the Titans and Jags percentages so much higher than the Bucs?
Just a guess, but given the importance strength of schedule plays in draft-pick tiebreakers, I'm guessing it's because the AFC South had an easier schedule than the NFC South.
Seems dubious, considering those two teams play each other this week in an epic clash, that both of them would have a better chance of losing their final two games than the Bucs.
Why is that dubious? The point is that, if they end up with the same number of losses, the AFC South team probably gets the pick because they did it against an easier schedule (which means they had a worse year). Assume each team's chances tonight are 50/50. That presumably means that tonight's loser will see their odds rise to 60%, while the winner's will drop close to zero. But as of right now, it's a coin flip as to which team will have each role.

 
Chances of landing No. 1 pick, per http://numberFire.com : Jags: 31.6% Titans: 31.4% Bucs: 25.7% Raiders: 10.4% Redskins: 0.9% Jets: .02%
Why are the Titans and Jags percentages so much higher than the Bucs?
Just a guess, but given the importance strength of schedule plays in draft-pick tiebreakers, I'm guessing it's because the AFC South had an easier schedule than the NFC South.
Seems dubious, considering those two teams play each other this week in an epic clash, that both of them would have a better chance of losing their final two games than the Bucs.
Why is that dubious? The point is that, if they end up with the same number of losses, the AFC South team probably gets the pick because they did it against an easier schedule (which means they had a worse year). Assume each team's chances tonight are 50/50. That presumably means that tonight's loser will see their odds rise to 60%, while the winner's will drop close to zero. But as of right now, it's a coin flip as to which team will have each role.
I'm with you. Still predicting a tie.

 
Kendall didn't wear the splint during practice.

Still not seeing a report that he's playing, but that's gotta be progress

 
I have 3 choices

  • Watch the game
  • Remodel my bathroom (I have zero skills in this area)
  • Stick needles into my eyes while re-reading the entire Josh Gordon thread
I am going to buy the needles right now
"Dad, where were you for that epic game at Everbank Field in December of '14?"

"Shut up, son. I'm still not talking to you after you made me read the waffle iron again."

 
There's more than just draft order at stake tonight, bub:

The game against the Titans will likely determine their other two games.

The loser of the game will probably be the fourth place finisher in the AFC South will play the fourth place finishers in the AFC West and North. That means a home game against Oakland and a road game against Cleveland.

The winner will finish third and host Cincinnati, Pittsburgh or Baltimore. Those three teams are bunched together with Cincinnati at 9-4-1 and the Steelers and Ravens at 9-5. The third place finisher in the West will be Kansas City or San Diego. They’re currently tied at 8-6.

The Jaguars want to finish their home schedule with a victory over the Titans. But a victory likely means two more difficult games next year instead of games against the Raiders and Browns.
http://jacksonville.com/opinion/blog/513351/vito-stellino/2014-12-18/jaguars-finish-their-home-schedule-thursday-night-dave

 
Chances of landing No. 1 pick, per http://numberFire.com : Jags: 31.6% Titans: 31.4% Bucs: 25.7% Raiders: 10.4% Redskins: 0.9% Jets: .02%
Why are the Titans and Jags percentages so much higher than the Bucs?
Just a guess, but given the importance strength of schedule plays in draft-pick tiebreakers, I'm guessing it's because the AFC South had an easier schedule than the NFC South.
Seems dubious, considering those two teams play each other this week in an epic clash, that both of them would have a better chance of losing their final two games than the Bucs.
Why is that dubious? The point is that, if they end up with the same number of losses, the AFC South team probably gets the pick because they did it against an easier schedule (which means they had a worse year). Assume each team's chances tonight are 50/50. That presumably means that tonight's loser will see their odds rise to 60%, while the winner's will drop close to zero. But as of right now, it's a coin flip as to which team will have each role.
I'm with you. Still predicting a tie.
Such an optimist! I just flew to Vegas and put down $500 on both teams losing.

 
TNF Drinking Game

- Drink every time they mention Marcus Mariota or Jameis Winston

- Drink every time draft order is mentioned.

- If they show a draft order graphic, drink for the duration it is shown.

- Drink every time they show Shad Khan

- Drink every time they talk about the pools

- Drink if they mention "a young team"

 
Who should Skins fans pull for so we get a better draft pick? Tie??
Jags had a harder strength of schedule than Titans so if you have 2 wins, you want the Titans to win and if you have 3 wins like Redskins you want the Jaguars

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top