Yes, that safety is going to be huge for me too. It shows on his player page, but not in the live scoring.MFL can't decide if they are going to give him credit for the safety. They didn't initially, then they had him for it for a few hours after the game. Now it got taken away sometime recently. He still has credit for the 1/2 sack from the play, not sure why he wouldn't get safety credit.
Still had almost twice as many tackles as anybody else on team. I see your point but he did capitalize on opportunity.not trying to pee on anybody's parade, but just bear in mind going fwd that kc backs touched the ball ~45x in that game
I checked, it was awarded to the team. From a fantasy perspective, makes no sense... What can you do...TheBottomLine said:Well no credit for his safety.
I didn't get to watch the game, but can only go by the numbers. Only 5 defenders played more snaps in the blowout, and only one LB played more.He was not on the field in some subpackages (Wheeler stayed in). Was this due to injury or should we move on at this point?
Thanks for the analysis.I didn't get to watch the game, but can only go by the numbers. Only 5 defenders played more snaps in the blowout, and only one LB played more.He was not on the field in some subpackages (Wheeler stayed in). Was this due to injury or should we move on at this point?
Wheeler 56/67 (17run - 6rush - 33coverage)
Jenkins 47/67 (15-3-29)
Looks like they both dropped into coverage about the same amount. Trusnik only played 35 snaps (17cov). It looks like a lot of bench LBs got playing time in the blowout, with 16 combined snaps for bench players.
I'm going to go ahead and assume that a fair amount of his lower snap total was due to the combined blowout and injury; and coaches erring on caution while up by 50 points.