They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
Hoyer was awful for several games. The games they won were largely in spite of him. They would've beaten the Colts last week had they gotten competent QB play from Hoyer. Manziel was pathetic yesterday but that doesn't change the fact Hoyer played his way right out of the starting job.I think veterans on this team must have been extremely upset they made the change at QB. They got to this point with Hoyer leading them. I can't imagine that locker room after that 30-0 drubbing at home.
I am not saying Hoyer was anything great. In fact he was below average before he got benched. But he had this team behind him. The HC knows the pulse of the team (unless your Joe Philbin) and I gotta believe he waned to stick with Hoyer this season till the end. Pressure came from above. No doubt in my mind about that.They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
I get that. I just think they don't have other options....as evidenced by yesterdays dreadful performance. I think they knew this (coaching staff) but got pressure from above. So you have to do what the guys who pay you say. I get it. I still think the players did not like the decision though. That is my main point.Hoyer was awful for several games. The games they won were largely in spite of him. They would've beaten the Colts last week had they gotten competent QB play from Hoyer. Manziel was pathetic yesterday but that doesn't change the fact Hoyer played his way right out of the starting job.I think veterans on this team must have been extremely upset they made the change at QB. They got to this point with Hoyer leading them. I can't imagine that locker room after that 30-0 drubbing at home.
I don't think the team had any choice. Hoyer stunk and Manziel's a first-round pick. They had to give him a shot. If he was stinking it up that badly at practice you'd think someone would've leaked that but I don't recall seeing any stories like that last week. It's possible some/many/all the players knew Manziel would struggle but I'm not sure any of them thought it would be the total train wreck it was.I get that. I just think they don't have other options....as evidenced by yesterdays dreadful performance. I think they knew this (coaching staff) but got pressure from above. So you have to do what the guys who pay you say. I get it. I still think the players did not like the decision though. That is my main point.Hoyer was awful for several games. The games they won were largely in spite of him. They would've beaten the Colts last week had they gotten competent QB play from Hoyer. Manziel was pathetic yesterday but that doesn't change the fact Hoyer played his way right out of the starting job.I think veterans on this team must have been extremely upset they made the change at QB. They got to this point with Hoyer leading them. I can't imagine that locker room after that 30-0 drubbing at home.
If Manziel comes out next week and light's it up. Awesome for the Browns.
I felt this way. Glad they didn't though.This they should have started Hoyer narrative some of you guys are trying to push, it needs to stop.
It definitely does matter. Especially if Manziel looked this awful in practice. The players and coaches know if a guy is ready or not. This move clearly came from the owner's box. Pettine had stuck with Hoyer this entire time because he knew Manziel wasn't ready.They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
hoyer had like one of the worst 5 games stretches of all time. he threw 1 td and 8 ints on less than 50% passing. he had every chance to show he could lead this team and he failed miserably. if the veterans actually quit on the team, then that is completely on them. why cater to the veterans on this team anyway? these guys have been nfl losers for their entire career. the browns have been a talent starved dysfunctional franchise with these veterans for years.I think veterans on this team must have been extremely upset they made the change at QB. They got to this point with Hoyer leading them. I can't imagine that locker room after that 30-0 drubbing at home.
A great way for the HC to lose his team. I think the moment he announced Manziel as the starter he lost that locker room. The next two weeks will either confirm that or they turn it around and this over matched kid shows something. But he looks totally over matched and in way over his head. He does not pass the sniff test so far as being a legit NFL QB.
hoyer had like one of the worst 5 games stretches of all time. he threw 1 td and 8 ints on less than 50% passing. he had every chance to show he could lead this team and he failed miserably. if the veterans actually quit on the team, then that is completely on them. why cater to the veterans on this team anyway? these guys have been nfl losers for their entire career. the browns have been a talent starved dysfunctional franchise with these veterans for years.I think veterans on this team must have been extremely upset they made the change at QB. They got to this point with Hoyer leading them. I can't imagine that locker room after that 30-0 drubbing at home.
A great way for the HC to lose his team. I think the moment he announced Manziel as the starter he lost that locker room. The next two weeks will either confirm that or they turn it around and this over matched kid shows something. But he looks totally over matched and in way over his head. He does not pass the sniff test so far as being a legit NFL QB.
Bravo cvnpoka. Well said.matuski said:cvnpoka said:hoyer had like one of the worst 5 games stretches of all time. he threw 1 td and 8 ints on less than 50% passing. he had every chance to show he could lead this team and he failed miserably. if the veterans actually quit on the team, then that is completely on them. why cater to the veterans on this team anyway? these guys have been nfl losers for their entire career. the browns have been a talent starved dysfunctional franchise with these veterans for years.Todem said:I think veterans on this team must have been extremely upset they made the change at QB. They got to this point with Hoyer leading them. I can't imagine that locker room after that 30-0 drubbing at home.
A great way for the HC to lose his team. I think the moment he announced Manziel as the starter he lost that locker room. The next two weeks will either confirm that or they turn it around and this over matched kid shows something. But he looks totally over matched and in way over his head. He does not pass the sniff test so far as being a legit NFL QB.
I saw a lot of quitters out there.
On why he thinks Manziel gives the Browns the best chance to win in the last two weeks of the season: “That we know we’ll get better. A big part of it too is, as we’ve said all along, we have to play better around him. The unfortunate thing of yesterday, we had some guys that played well, but the mistakes they made were at critical times. We had guys that graded out high and maybe made three or four mistakes. Well, those mistakes were on a third down. They were on a goal line play. They were in the red zone. They were on a critical, like I said, a critical third down or a critical point in the game. That’s unfortunate because hidden within yesterday were some pretty good performances. Johnny showed some flashes of what he’s capable of, and we had some chances to turn those plays into some real positive ones. The one that ‘Hawk’ (WR Andrew Hawkins) got hit on and ultimately dropped it on the third down. (TE) Jim Dray mistimed a jump a little bit. I thought those were both plays where he showed his escape ability and made a good throw. It’s just across the board. We have to find a way. We’ve lost something, and we need to take this week and find it.”
http://www.ohio.com/blogs/cleveland-browns/cleveland-browns-1.270107/here-s-what-coach-mike-pettine-is-saying-about-the-browns-today-1.550026On if he genuinely believes that Manziel gives the Browns the best chance to win this week or if it’s just more important to evaluate him over the last two games: “We’re going to move forward with him as our quarterback. We feel he gives is an opportunity to win, but I think we’re hanging too much on the quarterback position. We haven’t played well enough around him, and it showed. I think we could have played Brian Sipe at quarterback yesterday, and I don’t think the outcome would have been much different.”
Well said and that's the bottom Line for the "they should have started him" crowdGrahamburn said:It definitely does matter. Especially if Manziel looked this awful in practice. The players and coaches know if a guy is ready or not. This move clearly came from the owner's box. Pettine had stuck with Hoyer this entire time because he knew Manziel wasn't ready.Dizzy said:They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Todem said:Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
The Browns have shown they don't mind cutting their losses on a player if they think he can't get it done. I even suggested they trade him to the Bucs for a 2nd round pick just a couple pages ago. There's no way I'd do that now after watching him in this game. They basically tanked any trade value he might have had by starting him.
Did you see one, just one play where you thought "man that kid is the real deal" ?Whew! The hate is strong with this one.
It was one game.
there will be two more.Whew! The hate is strong with this one.
It was one game.
I'm not sure I saw one where I thought, "Man, this kid wouldn't be entirely hopeless as a backup."Did you see one, just one play where you thought "man that kid is the real deal" ?Whew! The hate is strong with this one.
It was one game.
Yup. How quick people forget what Hoyer was as the starter the past few weeks. So, JF turned out to be even worse for a game. They still had to start him. They now have to roll with him and hope he improves. I've never been a JF fan, but this Hoyer should have stared narrative is ridiculous. Had they started Hoyer maybe the lose 30-10 or 30-13. They still lose.MAC_32 said:This they should have started Hoyer narrative some of you guys are trying to push, it needs to stop.
Sad commentary on life as a Brown's fan.Grahamburn said:It definitely does matter. Especially if Manziel looked this awful in practice. The players and coaches know if a guy is ready or not. This move clearly came from the owner's box. Pettine had stuck with Hoyer this entire time because he knew Manziel wasn't ready.Dizzy said:They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Todem said:Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
The Browns have shown they don't mind cutting their losses on a player if they think he can't get it done. I even suggested they trade him to the Bucs for a 2nd round pick just a couple pages ago. There's no way I'd do that now after watching him in this game. They basically tanked any trade value he might have had by starting him.
Was he even worse than Hoyer has been? 1A and 1B of suckdom.Yup. How quick people forget what Hoyer was as the starter the past few weeks. So, JF turned out to be even worse for a game. They still had to start him. They now have to roll with him and hope he improves.I've never been a JF fan, but this Hoyer should have stared narrative is ridiculous. Had they started Hoyer maybe the lose 30-10 or 30-13. They still lose.MAC_32 said:This they should have started Hoyer narrative some of you guys are trying to push, it needs to stop.
Manziel is bad, but Whatever Hoge says isn't "news". He just caters to Steelers fans who hate the Browns.Merril Hoge: Whoever drafted Johnny Manziel should be fired
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24891669/merril-hoge-whoever-drafted-johnny-manziel-should-be-fired
Just me, but I'm thinking that the Browns are down on the list of teams that a Steeler fan would hate.Manziel is bad, but Whatever Hoge says isn't "news". He just caters to Steelers fans who hate the Browns.Merril Hoge: Whoever drafted Johnny Manziel should be fired
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24891669/merril-hoge-whoever-drafted-johnny-manziel-should-be-fired
The Browns were in a no-win situation. Hoyer was not playing well and there had to be a ton of pressure from above to play their savior. I never got the hype for Manziel and was just thankful that my team passed on him. Manziel does not seem like he can play in a system. Running around and throwing the ball up like your in the backyard is not going to work in the NFL. I highly doubt Johnny is going to turn things around but it was only one game.Disagree. You don't do that until you are out of the playoffs. The Browns would be right in the thick of it with a win yesterday. Playing Manziel made that an impossibility. I would be pissed if I were a Browns fan.It looked rough but the Browns have to see what they have in him. The next 2 weeks are going to be entertaining for everyone but the Browns and their fans.
Maybe I should have said "make fun of" instead of hate.Just me, but I'm thinking that the Browns are down on the list of teams that a Steeler fan would hate.Manziel is bad, but Whatever Hoge says isn't "news". He just caters to Steelers fans who hate the Browns.Merril Hoge: Whoever drafted Johnny Manziel should be firedhttp://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24891669/merril-hoge-whoever-drafted-johnny-manziel-should-be-fired
I'm a Bucs' fan. I made the post, which was kind of tongue in cheek, after Manziel's most recent indiscretion of being "late." If Manziel looked like he did on Sunday in practice the Browns knew what they invested in. I can't imagine he was lighting it up in practice or he would have been the starter several weeks ago. My point was they could have flipped him to an unsuspecting team who didn't have any NFL tape on him yet and sold it as a "we can't deal with him anymore" while knowing the guy can't get it done.Sad commentary on life as a Brown's fan.Grahamburn said:It definitely does matter. Especially if Manziel looked this awful in practice. The players and coaches know if a guy is ready or not. This move clearly came from the owner's box. Pettine had stuck with Hoyer this entire time because he knew Manziel wasn't ready.Dizzy said:They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Todem said:Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
The Browns have shown they don't mind cutting their losses on a player if they think he can't get it done. I even suggested they trade him to the Bucs for a 2nd round pick just a couple pages ago. There's no way I'd do that now after watching him in this game. They basically tanked any trade value he might have had by starting him.
Did you really suggest that they trade him? Did you contact the Browns about this? Dude, you blew it... you killed the Browns.
It's true. No hard feelings towards the Browns organization. Now, the cities of Cleveland and Pittsburgh may hate each other.Just me, but I'm thinking that the Browns are down on the list of teams that a Steeler fan would hate.Manziel is bad, but Whatever Hoge says isn't "news". He just caters to Steelers fans who hate the Browns.Merril Hoge: Whoever drafted Johnny Manziel should be fired
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24891669/merril-hoge-whoever-drafted-johnny-manziel-should-be-fired
CLE knew that from the jump, this is not a surprise. He's not a pocket QB and the recent run option gimmick was figured out and would get him planted. They can slide the pocket, but it's lipstick on a pig and he's still no better. That INT where he heaved it towards the end zone was a dumpster fire.I'm a Bucs' fan. I made the post, which was kind of tongue in cheek, after Manziel's most recent indiscretion of being "late." If Manziel looked like he did on Sunday in practice the Browns knew what they invested in. I can't imagine he was lighting it up in practice or he would have been the starter several weeks ago. My point was they could have flipped him to an unsuspecting team who didn't have any NFL tape on him yet and sold it as a "we can't deal with him anymore" while knowing the guy can't get it done.Sad commentary on life as a Brown's fan.It definitely does matter. Especially if Manziel looked this awful in practice. The players and coaches know if a guy is ready or not. This move clearly came from the owner's box. Pettine had stuck with Hoyer this entire time because he knew Manziel wasn't ready.They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
The Browns have shown they don't mind cutting their losses on a player if they think he can't get it done. I even suggested they trade him to the Bucs for a 2nd round pick just a couple pages ago. There's no way I'd do that now after watching him in this game. They basically tanked any trade value he might have had by starting him.
Did you really suggest that they trade him? Did you contact the Browns about this? Dude, you blew it... you killed the Browns.
They're basically stuck with him now. Hyped fan favorite who can't play.
Trading him would've been a long shot. NFL teams are not comprised of idiots. Oh wait...I'm a Bucs' fan. I made the post, which was kind of tongue in cheek, after Manziel's most recent indiscretion of being "late." If Manziel looked like he did on Sunday in practice the Browns knew what they invested in. I can't imagine he was lighting it up in practice or he would have been the starter several weeks ago. My point was they could have flipped him to an unsuspecting team who didn't have any NFL tape on him yet and sold it as a "we can't deal with him anymore" while knowing the guy can't get it done.Sad commentary on life as a Brown's fan.It definitely does matter. Especially if Manziel looked this awful in practice. The players and coaches know if a guy is ready or not. This move clearly came from the owner's box. Pettine had stuck with Hoyer this entire time because he knew Manziel wasn't ready.They were losing with Hoyer. He was terrible... awful... and getting worse. It was mentioned on one of the sportstalk shows (morning show out of DC) that his QB rating had dropped below that of Geno Smith. Once they lost to Indy they were cooked. Play-off teams typically starting winning to close the season.Agreed. I am very curious what conversation took place that led to this decision. Ownership/GM pressure? That is the only thing I can think of. I was sure he would not sniff the field the way the team was playing...despite the bump in the road they recently hit. Hoyer had that team behind him.
Manziel does not.
I said it before, does it really matter if they lose 30-0 with Manziel, or 30-10 (assuming a defensive score) with Hoyer?
The Browns have shown they don't mind cutting their losses on a player if they think he can't get it done. I even suggested they trade him to the Bucs for a 2nd round pick just a couple pages ago. There's no way I'd do that now after watching him in this game. They basically tanked any trade value he might have had by starting him.
Did you really suggest that they trade him? Did you contact the Browns about this? Dude, you blew it... you killed the Browns.
They're basically stuck with him now. Hyped fan favorite who can't play.
Said this a while back and it seems to be even worse than expected. Cinci stole the game plan to kill JF from LSU... Go figure.Greg Cosell: Johnny Manziel has almost no pocket skills
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000444962/article/greg-cosell-johnny-manziel-has-almost-no-pocket-skills
Correct. My point is that team laid down behind a guy they don't believe in. At least when Hoyer was in there (and again he is sub par) they played hard for him almost the entire season (every team has some stinkers) and he had command of his huddle and the players behind him. It's a locker room thing.The Browns were in a no-win situation. Hoyer was not playing well and there had to be a ton of pressure from above to play their savior. I never got the hype for Manziel and was just thankful that my team passed on him. Manziel does not seem like he can play in a system. Running around and throwing the ball up like your in the backyard is not going to work in the NFL. I highly doubt Johnny is going to turn things around but it was only one game.Disagree. You don't do that until you are out of the playoffs. The Browns would be right in the thick of it with a win yesterday. Playing Manziel made that an impossibility. I would be pissed if I were a Browns fan.It looked rough but the Browns have to see what they have in him. The next 2 weeks are going to be entertaining for everyone but the Browns and their fans.
The worst sign for the Browns is that the entire team must have known that Manziel is awful. The team never showed up. That D laid down. Cleveland has bigger issues than just Manziel. The team is lost and they do not have a QB still. Hoyer and Manziel are not the answer.
Jesus.Correct. My point is that team laid down behind a guy they don't believe in. At least when Hoyer was in there (and again he is sub par) they played hard for him almost the entire season (every team has some stinkers) and he had command of his huddle and the players behind him. It's a locker room thing.The Browns are the Browns. But they had a smidgen of a shot. They threw it all out the window trotting out that little punk who will be out of the league in a few years...or scrambling for a third string job. He better invest his money well. He is a fraud in the NFL as a QB. Total fraud.The Browns were in a no-win situation. Hoyer was not playing well and there had to be a ton of pressure from above to play their savior. I never got the hype for Manziel and was just thankful that my team passed on him. Manziel does not seem like he can play in a system. Running around and throwing the ball up like your in the backyard is not going to work in the NFL. I highly doubt Johnny is going to turn things around but it was only one game. The worst sign for the Browns is that the entire team must have known that Manziel is awful. The team never showed up. That D laid down. Cleveland has bigger issues than just Manziel. The team is lost and they do not have a QB still. Hoyer and Manziel are not the answer.Disagree. You don't do that until you are out of the playoffs. The Browns would be right in the thick of it with a win yesterday. Playing Manziel made that an impossibility. I would be pissed if I were a Browns fan.It looked rough but the Browns have to see what they have in him. The next 2 weeks are going to be entertaining for everyone but the Browns and their fans.
LOL...he stinks give me a break. Kid will get destroyed in this league. He will not hold up.Jesus.Correct. My point is that team laid down behind a guy they don't believe in. At least when Hoyer was in there (and again he is sub par) they played hard for him almost the entire season (every team has some stinkers) and he had command of his huddle and the players behind him. It's a locker room thing.The Browns are the Browns. But they had a smidgen of a shot. They threw it all out the window trotting out that little punk who will be out of the league in a few years...or scrambling for a third string job. He better invest his money well. He is a fraud in the NFL as a QB. Total fraud.The Browns were in a no-win situation. Hoyer was not playing well and there had to be a ton of pressure from above to play their savior. I never got the hype for Manziel and was just thankful that my team passed on him. Manziel does not seem like he can play in a system. Running around and throwing the ball up like your in the backyard is not going to work in the NFL. I highly doubt Johnny is going to turn things around but it was only one game. The worst sign for the Browns is that the entire team must have known that Manziel is awful. The team never showed up. That D laid down. Cleveland has bigger issues than just Manziel. The team is lost and they do not have a QB still. Hoyer and Manziel are not the answer.Disagree. You don't do that until you are out of the playoffs. The Browns would be right in the thick of it with a win yesterday. Playing Manziel made that an impossibility. I would be pissed if I were a Browns fan.It looked rough but the Browns have to see what they have in him. The next 2 weeks are going to be entertaining for everyone but the Browns and their fans.
Somehow I can't help but think this has something to do with LeBron going back to Cleveland. Get over it bro.LOL...he stinks give me a break. Kid will get destroyed in this league. He will not hold up.He is a child out there playing against giants. It will be a short lived career.Jesus.Correct. My point is that team laid down behind a guy they don't believe in. At least when Hoyer was in there (and again he is sub par) they played hard for him almost the entire season (every team has some stinkers) and he had command of his huddle and the players behind him. It's a locker room thing.The Browns are the Browns. But they had a smidgen of a shot. They threw it all out the window trotting out that little punk who will be out of the league in a few years...or scrambling for a third string job. He better invest his money well. He is a fraud in the NFL as a QB. Total fraud.The Browns were in a no-win situation. Hoyer was not playing well and there had to be a ton of pressure from above to play their savior. I never got the hype for Manziel and was just thankful that my team passed on him. Manziel does not seem like he can play in a system. Running around and throwing the ball up like your in the backyard is not going to work in the NFL. I highly doubt Johnny is going to turn things around but it was only one game. The worst sign for the Browns is that the entire team must have known that Manziel is awful. The team never showed up. That D laid down. Cleveland has bigger issues than just Manziel. The team is lost and they do not have a QB still. Hoyer and Manziel are not the answer.Disagree. You don't do that until you are out of the playoffs. The Browns would be right in the thick of it with a win yesterday. Playing Manziel made that an impossibility. I would be pissed if I were a Browns fan.It looked rough but the Browns have to see what they have in him. The next 2 weeks are going to be entertaining for everyone but the Browns and their fans.
that doesnt even make any senseSomehow I can't help but think this has something to do with LeBron going back to Cleveland. Get over it bro.LOL...he stinks give me a break. Kid will get destroyed in this league. He will not hold up.He is a child out there playing against giants. It will be a short lived career.Jesus.Correct. My point is that team laid down behind a guy they don't believe in. At least when Hoyer was in there (and again he is sub par) they played hard for him almost the entire season (every team has some stinkers) and he had command of his huddle and the players behind him. It's a locker room thing.The Browns are the Browns. But they had a smidgen of a shot. They threw it all out the window trotting out that little punk who will be out of the league in a few years...or scrambling for a third string job. He better invest his money well. He is a fraud in the NFL as a QB. Total fraud.The Browns were in a no-win situation. Hoyer was not playing well and there had to be a ton of pressure from above to play their savior. I never got the hype for Manziel and was just thankful that my team passed on him. Manziel does not seem like he can play in a system. Running around and throwing the ball up like your in the backyard is not going to work in the NFL. I highly doubt Johnny is going to turn things around but it was only one game. The worst sign for the Browns is that the entire team must have known that Manziel is awful. The team never showed up. That D laid down. Cleveland has bigger issues than just Manziel. The team is lost and they do not have a QB still. Hoyer and Manziel are not the answer.Disagree. You don't do that until you are out of the playoffs. The Browns would be right in the thick of it with a win yesterday. Playing Manziel made that an impossibility. I would be pissed if I were a Browns fan.It looked rough but the Browns have to see what they have in him. The next 2 weeks are going to be entertaining for everyone but the Browns and their fans.
So, if he doesn't ever make it to a Super Bowl, then you will "eat all the crow". Really going out on a limb there.WTF does Johhny Football have to do with Lebron.....and I got over that a long time ago.
He stinks. Realize you wasted a 1st rounder on a dud now so you can look for another QB. He is not ever going to lead this or any other team to a Super Bowl.
If he does....I will eat all the crow.
He won't ever lead them to the post season either....better? LOL.So, if he doesn't ever make it to a Super Bowl, then you will "eat all the crow". Really going out on a limb there.WTF does Johhny Football have to do with Lebron.....and I got over that a long time ago.
He stinks. Realize you wasted a 1st rounder on a dud now so you can look for another QB. He is not ever going to lead this or any other team to a Super Bowl.
If he does....I will eat all the crow.