What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Bill Belichick on Wes Welkers hit on Aqib Talib (1 Viewer)

dansav

Footballguy
"Deliberate play by the receiver to take out Talib. No attempt to get open"

"One if the worst plays I've seen"

This is a little out if character for BB to single out a player.

 
Its been pretty obvious for years that he and Welker don't really like each other. And i agree that it was a cheap play and a flag most definitely should have been thrown.

 
"Deliberate play by the receiver to take out Talib. No attempt to get open"

"One if the worst plays I've seen"

This is a little out if character for BB to single out a player.
I wonder if there is any history between these two?

 
I think he's saying it was a pick play -- not that Welker was trying to injure Talib. I thought it should have been a flag too.

 
Belichick let Welker go and signed a lesser player (Amendola) for more money. That tell you all you need to know about how much Belichick dislikes Welker. I bet Welker is laughing his ### off.

 
Belichick let Welker go and signed a lesser player (Amendola) for more money. That tell you all you need to know about how much Belichick dislikes Welker. I bet Welker is laughing his ### off.
If he is it's concussion related. Players and coaches respect rings. Welker may have a wedding band.

 
The series before, the pats got flagged for a similar play on hoomanawanui. I think most coached get frustrated when a game isn't called consistently.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not a Brady or Pats hater but I do like when BB loses especially in a big game. I'm not going to say its Karma but he hasn't won since spy gate and its not going to get easier the older Brady gets.

 
I'm not a Brady or Pats hater but I do like when BB loses especially in a big game. I'm not going to say its Karma but he hasn't won since spy gate and its not going to get easier the older Brady gets.
I am. It's the passive-aggressiveness that makes Belichick's sore losing so exceptionally comical, tedious, and reinforces why I do hate the Pats.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its been pretty obvious for years that he and Welker don't really like each other. And i agree that it was a cheap play and a flag most definitely should have been thrown.
what was cheap about it? NE runs rub routes too. if Denver was looking to make a hit on Talib why would they choose a 5'9" WR coming off 2 concussions?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:cry:

If Belichick doesn't want a physical game then maybe his corners shouldn't hold on every play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am pretty sure I saw Welker's deliver legal pick plays like that all of the time when he was a Patriot, so Belichick crying about it now, because the hit injured his injury-prone corner, is freaking rich.

 
Judge for yourself:

http://www.nepatriotslife.com/2014/01/video-wes-welkers-hit-knocks-aqib-talib.html

It was a block. There was no route being run here. Whether Welker threw a block/pick or ran a route does not matter because D Thomas touched the ball at the same time as the Welker/Talib impact. No reason for flags on a legal downfield block. It was a great play by Denver if that's indeed what they planned.

Stop crying, #####es.
Talb was Thomas's defender. It was an illegal pick because Welker impeded him way before the ball got there.

 
Its been pretty obvious for years that he and Welker don't really like each other. And i agree that it was a cheap play and a flag most definitely should have been thrown.
what was cheap about it? NE runs rub routes too. if Denver was looking to make a hit on Talib why would they choose a 5'9" WR coming off 2 concussions?
I didn't say anything about Denver trying to injure Talib. He prolly would have done that on his own within a few plays anyways. Cheap play in that it was clear offensive interference and a flag should have been thrown.

 
I'm kind of surprised by people saying this was a cheap hit. He was a split second too early. The timing was a little off. He didn't hit him in an illegal way and Talib clearly saw him coming. Yes, after slowing it down frame by frame, you can see he's one frame early, but in game speed it's really difficult to make that call.

http://i.imgur.com/NKqE6g4.jpg

 
Judge for yourself:

http://www.nepatriotslife.com/2014/01/video-wes-welkers-hit-knocks-aqib-talib.html

It was a block. There was no route being run here. Whether Welker threw a block/pick or ran a route does not matter because D Thomas touched the ball at the same time as the Welker/Talib impact. No reason for flags on a legal downfield block. It was a great play by Denver if that's indeed what they planned.

Stop crying, #####es.
Talb was Thomas's defender. It was an illegal pick because Welker impeded him way before the ball got there.
I'm not sure Welker touched Talib before the ball got there, but he certainly didn't do so WAY before the ball got there. Contact looks simultaneous to me. Feel free to watch that replay and judge for yourself.

 
I'm kind of surprised by people saying this was a cheap hit. He was a split second too early. The timing was a little off. He didn't hit him in an illegal way and Talib clearly saw him coming. Yes, after slowing it down frame by frame, you can see he's one frame early, but in game speed it's really difficult to make that call.

http://i.imgur.com/NKqE6g4.jpg
Thanks for the freeze-frame. Definitely early with the contact, but extremely close. Both of these offenses get away with much, much more flagrant OPI a half dozen times a game. Nobody runs the pick play better or more often than the Broncos and the Patriots.

 
Judge for yourself:

http://www.nepatriotslife.com/2014/01/video-wes-welkers-hit-knocks-aqib-talib.html

It was a block. There was no route being run here. Whether Welker threw a block/pick or ran a route does not matter because D Thomas touched the ball at the same time as the Welker/Talib impact. No reason for flags on a legal downfield block. It was a great play by Denver if that's indeed what they planned.

Stop crying, #####es.
Talb was Thomas's defender. It was an illegal pick because Welker impeded him way before the ball got there.
I agree with you if by "way before the ball got there" is the same as "at the same time".

 
Welker impeded him way before the ball got there.
:goodposting:

There's a difference between hitting him too early (barely) and picking him (not barely -- he ran straight at Talib while he was in coverage).
There's no rule against running straight at a guy. All that matters is when they hit. The hit was made a split second before the ball touched DT's hands. I don't see how this is debatable? Watch the gif and look at the freeze frame I just posted.

 
Welker impeded him way before the ball got there.
:goodposting:

There's a difference between hitting him too early (barely) and picking him (not barely -- he ran straight at Talib while he was in coverage).
There's no rule against running straight at a guy. All that matters is when they hit. The hit was made a split second before the ball touched DT's hands. I don't see how this is debatable? Watch the gif and look at the freeze frame I just posted.
Thanks. I was gonna do it and I'm glad someone else did first!

Considering that ball is probably going about 40 mph and in that frame the ball is about 1.5 feet from D Thomas, Welker hit Talib (presumably) about .025 seconds early.

 
Sour grapes. And, BB's dislike of Welker, which makes makes Belichick seem like a petulant child. Technically, Welker hit him an instant too early, but at game speed your really can't say anything but that those things happen. There was nothing dirty about the hit itself, and if Talik doesn't get injured it would have been a non-issue. BB needs to grow up and take it like a man.

 
If the Broncos win the Super Bowl, Seller should mail BB a picture of himself holding the Lombardi trophy with the caption "Didn't Cheat" on it.

 
Welker impeded him way before the ball got there.
:goodposting:

There's a difference between hitting him too early (barely) and picking him (not barely -- he ran straight at Talib while he was in coverage).
There's no rule against running straight at a guy. All that matters is when they hit. The hit was made a split second before the ball touched DT's hands. I don't see how this is debatable? Watch the gif and look at the freeze frame I just posted.
Sure there is. If you run at him with no intention of catching a pass and force him to go around you (like, say, a pick in basketball) it's a (oddly enough) pick play. He doesn't have to plow through you to get the penalty if you're setting the pick intentionally.

Talib had clearly slowed up well in advance of the contact, which forced him out of coverage. (He wasn't going to make the play, but he was still picked.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You'd think that BB might have an internal filter before he makes statements like this...like...

"Uhhh, I better not say this. Due to...

Pretty much SOP for us over the years and it may also come off as sour grapes..."

 
Sour grapes. And, BB's dislike of Welker, which makes makes Belichick seem like a petulant child. Technically, Welker hit him an instant too early, but at game speed your really can't say anything but that those things happen. There was nothing dirty about the hit itself, and if Talik doesn't get injured it would have been a non-issue. BB needs to grow up and take it like a man.
I'll have to correct myself, because it isn't really sour grapes--that's a different sort of reaction to a loss. What it is is a Loser's Whine. (Do you get this whine from fermented sour grapes :) ?

 
Both the video and the screenshot make it pretty clear that Talib was not in position to make a play on the ball.

There is no defensive PI on an uncatchable ball. Seems like the same principle ought to apply to the defender w/r/t offensive PI.

 
Its no surprise that it was a pick play, Denver could get flagged every other throw for that. But that particular play eas not a penalty... Cant say interference if he arrives the same time the ball is going to be caught... Or dropped for that matter.

 
Was it illegal....absolutely

Was it intended to injure.....who knows but the accusation comes across as someone with an axe to grind.

The irony lies in that this play has been a staple of the Pats passing game for years and it looks foolish to make such an assertion based upon nothing but an opinion.

Didn't think, of all things, that BB was such a crybaby. That's new and doesn't reflect favorably on his public perception.

 
Both the video and the screenshot make it pretty clear that Talib was not in position to make a play on the ball.

There is no defensive PI on an uncatchable ball. Seems like the same principle ought to apply to the defender w/r/t offensive PI.
Part of the reason why they don't allow picks or blocks before the receivers gets the ball is not so much that the defender could have made a play on the ball . . . it's the 80 yard scamper after the catch that becomes the problem.

In this case, IMO there should have been a flag just like they called NE for the series before. It sucks to be NE that Talib got hurt on the play, but I don't think Welker did it with an intent to injure Talib. And as others have said, it's not like Welker did it 3 seconds before the ball got there. People get hurt all the time on plays that could have been flagged. It's not like the Pats haven't done similar things before where guys ended up getting hurt.

 
Mike Pereira on Twatter...

Code:
People asking about thej hit on Talib. That is not a foul. Ball was touched by 88 about the same time as contact, Can't be OPI.
 
It was a nasty, dirty hit. Borderline illegal, but dirt nonetheless. There are pick plays, and then there is blowing up a team's best player. I'm not a big Belichek fan but I think he and the Pats got hosed on that play. It certainly changed the game dramatically.

 
Mike Pereira on Twatter...

People asking about thej hit on Talib. That is not a foul. Ball was touched by 88 about the same time as contact, Can't be OPI.
There was an ex nfl ref on weei earlier saying the exact opposite. Should have been called, welker impeded his progress even before they collided, etc. Half the problem with the NFL these days. Even the refs don't really know what the rules are and how to interpret them.

 
It was a nasty, dirty hit. Borderline illegal, but dirt nonetheless. There are pick plays, and then there is blowing up a team's best player. I'm not a big Belichek fan but I think he and the Pats got hosed on that play. It certainly changed the game dramatically.
That is a pretty stupid post. Welker comes at him from in front, so Aqib can see him coming, and hits him shoulder to shoulder. Same as hundreds of other hits in the NFL. The fact that Aquib was injured was incidental; it could have just as easily been Welker.

 
It was a nasty, dirty hit. Borderline illegal, but dirt nonetheless. There are pick plays, and then there is blowing up a team's best player. I'm not a big Belichek fan but I think he and the Pats got hosed on that play. It certainly changed the game dramatically.
I'm not sure we're talking about the same play here?

The Pats and Broncos both run this play all the time. Only difference here is that Welker was a split second too early this time and Talib (probably coincidence) got hurt. How does that make it a nast, dirty hit?

 
Yeah, the smallest guy on the field who has a propensity for concussions is going to purposefully injure a guy that may end up costing his own career.

Dirty, hell no. Was it illegal, not even refs can agree on that. Should Bill focus on improving his cheating techniques instead of #####ing about this, undoubtedly.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top