Probably felt like longer because he was trapped upside-down in a car for two hours in a flood.
something, something ******* jokeProbably felt like longer because he was trapped upside-down in a car for two hours in a flood.
Absolutely nothing.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Exactly. Disgusting display of "journalism" from Fox News. Par for the course, I suppose.Absolutely nothing.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Roy Ortiz has every right, if not MORE right than YOU, to be in this country. AND he expects his life to be saved in a timely manner by rescuers, regardless of how dangerous the flood was to the incompetent negligent firefighters. [/Tim]Cool. Arrest him when he shows up for court and deport him. We ain't got time for this.
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally. The divers obviously did their best to help him regardless, but I don't believe he should be entitled to sue.I imagine this is a point of contention with those that feel illegal immigrants should be considered legal for all intents and purposes.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
He wouldn't have needed to be rescued if he wasn't there. I say we give him 500 pesos and a free trip home.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Everything---you don't get the rights the American Judicial system affords if you are not here legally.Absolutely nothing.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
What?? So you honestly believe the first responders knew his status and that is why they delayed getting him?Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
He's the one who was negligence. If you got trapped by the floods on 287 that would mean you choose to drive through raging water flowing over the highway.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Not entirely true:Everything---you don't get the rights the American Judicial system affords if you are not here legally.Absolutely nothing.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Sorry with rights come responsibilities.
It very much like the people that file motions to appear by phone in civil lawsuits because they know they have bench warrants for their arrest in criminal cases and they know if they show up, they will be remanded. Guess what? Motion denied!! You don't get the benefit of suing someone if you are a fugitive and that applies to American citizens.
Legal Rights of Illegal Immigrants
Illegal immigrants living and often working in the United States have some rights under the U.S. Constitution, despite their immigration status. Aspects of the Constitution that address human rights apply to everyone, even those without proper documentation. Some states grant illegal immigrants certain rights as well.
Constitutional Rights
Even if you're in the country illegally, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution apply to you. This means that if someone sues you, you have the right to receive notice and to defend yourself. The Fourth Amendment also protects your rights just as it protects those of legal citizens. Law enforcement can't seize and search your property without probable cause. Illegal immigrants have the right to file lawsuits, such as discrimination suits, in federal court. State laws vary, but some jurisdictions give you the right to sue in state court as well.
No he shouldn't.He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
We disagree. I don't believe he should be able to sue over that.He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
I don't disagree. But we could be wrong. Court will decide. His immigration status doesn't play a role here.He's the one who was negligence. If you got trapped by the floods on 287 that would mean you choose to drive through raging water flowing over the highway.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Barring persons from suing agencies over negligence if they're illegal would set an extremely bad precedent, imo.We disagree. I don't believe he should be able to sue over that.He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Exactly. Disgusting display of "journalism" from Fox News. Par for the course, I suppose.Absolutely nothing.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
No, I think that's him. And I think the attorney's argument is that they didn't properly or reasonably undertake the rescue, and that's why they missed him. Once the divers had a look and said "nobody here!" He lost any chance of anyone trying to rescue him until they came back after 2 hours in the vehicle.If I recall his story correctly his vehicle was subject to cursory examination. They missed seeing him. They went on to other high priority rescues and then got around to him on a discount double check, at which time they saw him and rescued him. Perhaps I am thinking of somebody else.
Exactly. Disgusting display of "journalism" from Fox News. Par for the course, I suppose.Absolutely nothing.What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
just send him a bill for the rescue services.. a big one
What ticked me off about the article was not that it was about an illegal alien, but just that some schmuck was suing the FD. Who cares about his citizenship? Why should anyone be able to sue the FD? It was a FLOOD! They might have been a bit busy!!!jonessed said:It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally. The divers obviously did their best to help him regardless, but I don't believe he should be entitled to sue.I imagine this is a point of contention with those that feel illegal immigrants should be considered legal for all intents and purposes.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
So basically you are saying that even if he was a legal american citizen he would be just as big of a pile of crap.timschochet said:Absolutely nothing.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Yep.So basically you are saying that even if he was a legal american citizen he would be just as big of a pile of crap.timschochet said:Absolutely nothing.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
You'[[re absolutely right, jonessed. But where were you in post #10, when EY Live did the exact same thing to me? You've responded to several posts in this thread, but on that one you were strangely silent.jonessed said:Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Hilts said:Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.jonessed said:It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
You'[[re absolutely right, jonessed. But where were you in post #10, when EY Live did the exact same thing to me? You've responded to several posts in this thread, but on that one you were strangely silent.jonessed said:Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Hilts said:Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.jonessed said:It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
I see. You're right. I apologize.You'[[re absolutely right, jonessed. But where were you in post #10, when EY Live did the exact same thing to me? You've responded to several posts in this thread, but on that one you were strangely silent.jonessed said:Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Hilts said:Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.jonessed said:It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
I obviously commented because he parsed my post. I would expect you to comment if someone parses your post.
He should have the right to sue. The US govt. should also deport him when he shows up to court. He can sue from Mexico.Hilts said:Barring persons from suing agencies over negligence if they're illegal would set an extremely bad precedent, imo.jonessed said:We disagree. I don't believe he should be able to sue over that.Hilts said:He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.jonessed said:The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.Hilts said:Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?jonessed said:Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.Hilts said:Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.jonessed said:It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.Hilts said:What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
His legal status matters. Kind of like how we wouldn't hold a driver at fault for hitting a pedestrian crossing the freeway at night.Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.
And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
And not in a Christo way either. I'm actually laughing at you.Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.
And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
Do you mean his illegal status? The status of being illegal? As in not legal?Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.
And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
Yes.Do you mean his illegal status? The status of being illegal? As in not legal?Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.
And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
That doesn't surprise me, given how you foolishly attempted to interpret my thoughts before. People often laugh to hide their own embarrassment.And not in a Christo way either. I'm actually laughing at you.Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.
And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.