What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Illegal Immigrant sues firefighters who saved his life (1 Viewer)

Probably shouldn't have even been on the road. As someone who lives in boulder country there was nowhere to go. Every river,creek and drainage ditch were out of their banks and over the roads every where.

People with any sense stayed off the roads like they were asked to do.

 
Cool. Arrest him when he shows up for court and deport him. We ain't got time for this.
Roy Ortiz has every right, if not MORE right than YOU, to be in this country. AND he expects his life to be saved in a timely manner by rescuers, regardless of how dangerous the flood was to the incompetent negligent firefighters. [/Tim]

 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally. The divers obviously did their best to help him regardless, but I don't believe he should be entitled to sue.I imagine this is a point of contention with those that feel illegal immigrants should be considered legal for all intents and purposes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Absolutely nothing.
Everything---you don't get the rights the American Judicial system affords if you are not here legally.

Sorry with rights come responsibilities.

It very much like the people that file motions to appear by phone in civil lawsuits because they know they have bench warrants for their arrest in criminal cases and they know if they show up, they will be remanded. Guess what? Motion denied!! You don't get the benefit of suing someone if you are a fugitive and that applies to American citizens.

 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
What?? So you honestly believe the first responders knew his status and that is why they delayed getting him?

Or is it more likely it was such a dangerous situation, they couldn't get to him in a timely, safe manner? As one of the earlier people posted, the roads were all closed and driving was discouraged. He put himself at risk choosing to ignore the warnings to not drive.

 
His lawyer became irritated and didn't give a straight answer to Gretchen Carlson when she asked if he was illegal!! He doesn't think it even matters. But then he told her SECRETLY during a commercial break that it was true. What a jerk!

He's suing because he needs money to pay his bills. WHAT?! I pay MY bills and I don't have to sue firefighters to do it!!!

OMG I'm so worked up over this

 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.

 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.
He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.
 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
He's the one who was negligence. If you got trapped by the floods on 287 that would mean you choose to drive through raging water flowing over the highway.
 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Absolutely nothing.
Everything---you don't get the rights the American Judicial system affords if you are not here legally.

Sorry with rights come responsibilities.

It very much like the people that file motions to appear by phone in civil lawsuits because they know they have bench warrants for their arrest in criminal cases and they know if they show up, they will be remanded. Guess what? Motion denied!! You don't get the benefit of suing someone if you are a fugitive and that applies to American citizens.
Not entirely true:

http://immigration.lawyers.com/immigration/legal-rights-of-illegal-immigrants.html

Legal Rights of Illegal Immigrants

Illegal immigrants living and often working in the United States have some rights under the U.S. Constitution, despite their immigration status. Aspects of the Constitution that address human rights apply to everyone, even those without proper documentation. Some states grant illegal immigrants certain rights as well.

Constitutional Rights

Even if you're in the country illegally, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution apply to you. This means that if someone sues you, you have the right to receive notice and to defend yourself. The Fourth Amendment also protects your rights just as it protects those of legal citizens. Law enforcement can't seize and search your property without probable cause. Illegal immigrants have the right to file lawsuits, such as discrimination suits, in federal court. State laws vary, but some jurisdictions give you the right to sue in state court as well.
 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.
He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.
No he shouldn't.

 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.
He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.
We disagree. I don't believe he should be able to sue over that.

 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
He's the one who was negligence. If you got trapped by the floods on 287 that would mean you choose to drive through raging water flowing over the highway.
I don't disagree. But we could be wrong. Court will decide. His immigration status doesn't play a role here.
 
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.
He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.
We disagree. I don't believe he should be able to sue over that.
Barring persons from suing agencies over negligence if they're illegal would set an extremely bad precedent, imo.
 
no duty to rescue, but duty to pursue rescue reasonably and to not abandon it unreasonably ounce undertaken.

Government Immunity in Colorado. Section 24-10-101 et. seq. C.R.S.

Dive team is likely multi-agency and to include volunteers.

Castle Rock v. Gonzales

Suit is frivolous. Attorney should be sanctioned. Attorney and client both should catch a beat down. Even frivolous suits have tremendous costs to those involved, both financial and emotional. It is not unlikely that this suit will endanger others as well as many swift water rescue, and high altitude rescue teams in Colorado rely on volunteers. Some of those volunteers may reconsider their efforts given this suit, even though Section 24-10-106 C.R.S. will protect them. I mean who needs the aggravation. Well I can tell you that rescue resources are already underfunded and understaffed in this state. What we don't need is avalanche victims, lightening victims, climbing victims and drowning victims having less rescue options.

SCRG

GCSAR

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I recall his story correctly his vehicle was subject to cursory examination. They missed seeing him. They went on to other high priority rescues and then got around to him on a discount double check, at which time they saw him and rescued him. Perhaps I am thinking of somebody else.

 
If I recall his story correctly his vehicle was subject to cursory examination. They missed seeing him. They went on to other high priority rescues and then got around to him on a discount double check, at which time they saw him and rescued him. Perhaps I am thinking of somebody else.
No, I think that's him. And I think the attorney's argument is that they didn't properly or reasonably undertake the rescue, and that's why they missed him. Once the divers had a look and said "nobody here!" He lost any chance of anyone trying to rescue him until they came back after 2 hours in the vehicle.
 
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally. The divers obviously did their best to help him regardless, but I don't believe he should be entitled to sue.I imagine this is a point of contention with those that feel illegal immigrants should be considered legal for all intents and purposes.
What ticked me off about the article was not that it was about an illegal alien, but just that some schmuck was suing the FD. Who cares about his citizenship? Why should anyone be able to sue the FD? It was a FLOOD! They might have been a bit busy!!!

/rant

Of course the only reason to include his citizenship status was to increase readership.

 
timschochet said:
Hilts said:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
Absolutely nothing.
So basically you are saying that even if he was a legal american citizen he would be just as big of a pile of crap.
Yep.

Unless there is something really shocking that we don't know, I hate these type of lawsuits. Firefighters and police work hard to save peoples' lives, and this is what they get? It's disgusting. It's beyond disgusting, and the guy suing is an ####### or an idiot or both. And his lawyer is even worse of a scumbag.

But- the fact that he's an illegal immigrant is immaterial and it sucks to me that people focus on it as if it mattered.

 
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
You'[[re absolutely right, jonessed. But where were you in post #10, when EY Live did the exact same thing to me? You've responded to several posts in this thread, but on that one you were strangely silent.

 
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
You'[[re absolutely right, jonessed. But where were you in post #10, when EY Live did the exact same thing to me? You've responded to several posts in this thread, but on that one you were strangely silent.
:confused:

I obviously commented because he parsed my post. I would expect you to comment if someone parses your post.

 
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
You'[[re absolutely right, jonessed. But where were you in post #10, when EY Live did the exact same thing to me? You've responded to several posts in this thread, but on that one you were strangely silent.
:confused:

I obviously commented because he parsed my post. I would expect you to comment if someone parses your post.
I see. You're right. I apologize.

 
The fact he's suing for this is annoying. That he's an illegal immigrant makes it even more so.

This case will be thrown out.

 
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
jonessed said:
Hilts said:
What does his immigration status have to do with anything?
It depends on your position with regard to illegal immigration. I don't think we should be obligated to provide the same level of services to people who are here illegally that we provide to those who are here legally.
Good point. They should have left him there until he was able to prove his immigration status.
Don't start parsing statements to misrepresent people. That's lowbrow crap.
Which services do you feel he should be denied, being rescued in an emergency situation or the ability to sue for negligence?
The ability to sue a municipality because a service they provided didn't meet his standards.
He believes it was negligence which caused his delayed rescue. He should be able to sue over that. It's up to the courts to determine the validity of his claim.
We disagree. I don't believe he should be able to sue over that.
Barring persons from suing agencies over negligence if they're illegal would set an extremely bad precedent, imo.
He should have the right to sue. The US govt. should also deport him when he shows up to court. He can sue from Mexico.

 
Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.

And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.

 
Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.

And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
His legal status matters. Kind of like how we wouldn't hold a driver at fault for hitting a pedestrian crossing the freeway at night.

 
Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.

And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
:lmao: And not in a Christo way either. I'm actually laughing at you.

 
Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.

And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
Do you mean his illegal status? The status of being illegal? As in not legal?

 
Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.

And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
Do you mean his illegal status? The status of being illegal? As in not legal?
Yes.

 
Sand, nowhere in that article does it state that Ortiz is from Mexico.

And it doesn't matter. It's completely irrelevant how he got here. Now that he's here, he has every right to sue, and NOT to be deported. (We shouldn't deport anyone except those who have committed felonies). If he wants to be a scumbag and sue the fire department, that's his business. I hope he loses, badly. I wish he and his attorney would have to pay a fine for suing in the first place. But let's stop bringing up his legal status.
:lmao: And not in a Christo way either. I'm actually laughing at you.
That doesn't surprise me, given how you foolishly attempted to interpret my thoughts before. People often laugh to hide their own embarrassment.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top