[Tony Montana Voice]"Iss okay, he'll be back."[/Tony Montana Voice]I just can't get -fish- to bite.
I keep hearing people say this. 76-86 is not 10 games under .500Sure, Bochy has won 3 of the last 5 World Series, but the Giants finished ten games under last season.
Move over Rover and let Bochy take over.Rover in 1905:: Einstein sucks at physics.
They lost 10 more than they won. Seems close enough.I keep hearing people say this. 76-86 is not 10 games under .500Sure, Bochy has won 3 of the last 5 World Series, but the Giants finished ten games under last season.
Saying the bolded is true and acccurate. Saying they finished "10 games under .500" is not.They lost 10 more than they won. Seems close enough.I keep hearing people say this. 76-86 is not 10 games under .500Sure, Bochy has won 3 of the last 5 World Series, but the Giants finished ten games under last season.
You must not be familiar with the work of RNJust short of an 8 year bump, this has to be close to a record.
How many games would they have to win to get to .500?Saying the bolded is true and acccurate. Saying they finished "10 games under .500" is not.They lost 10 more than they won. Seems close enough.I keep hearing people say this. 76-86 is not 10 games under .500Sure, Bochy has won 3 of the last 5 World Series, but the Giants finished ten games under last season.
Saying the bolded is true and acccurate. Saying they finished "10 games under .500" is not.They lost 10 more than they won. Seems close enough.I keep hearing people say this. 76-86 is not 10 games under .500Sure, Bochy has won 3 of the last 5 World Series, but the Giants finished ten games under last season.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Games_behindThe "games behind" number is sometimes made in reference to ".500" (even in wins and losses) although in this particular context, the word "behind" is replaced by "under" or "below". In making this calculation, however, the division by two is not done. For example, a team with a record of 19 wins and 20 losses is considered as being "one game under .500", in contrast to being "one-half game behind" a team with a ".500" record of 20 wins and 20 losses.
lolSince it seems like the OP is no longer around to take his lumps, lets call out the 5 people who liked the post.
oh, he's around.Since it seems like the OP is no longer around to take his lumps, lets call out the 5 people who liked the post.
I liked the post today, Jeffro.Since it seems like the OP is no longer around to take his lumps, lets call out the 5 people who liked the post.
And yet it turned out OK, Sparky.Nobody warming up in the 9th? Seems odd.
Pretty much sums up the post-Bonds era for SF.And yet it turned out OK, Sparky.Nobody warming up in the 9th? Seems odd.