Assuming LJ, SA, LT2 and Portis are the first 4 to go, is Tiki really the guy to grab at 5? I know Tiki's history and how under estimated hes been every year. This year is different and he wont fly under the radar, he's also the dreadful 31 years of age at RB, hes playing in a tough division and has a possible TD vulture behind him!
Now assuming he can shake of the age question (which I think is a big concern), he should be able to put up great yardage numbers, we know this. TD's will be down though, I say from the 7-10 range is where he'll total. Therefore would he really at years end be the 5th best RB?!?! 2005 was his "career year" and his absolute ceiling IMO! At a spot like pick # 5, with the risk is it worth it to take this guy. Other Rb's to consider are guys like Edge, SJax, Caddy, Brown, Jordan and maybe Rudi. Each of all those RB's have their own question marks as well. So basically after those top 4, do you have to take Tiki, or would it be crazy to go a different route????
Now assuming he can shake of the age question (which I think is a big concern), he should be able to put up great yardage numbers, we know this. TD's will be down though, I say from the 7-10 range is where he'll total. Therefore would he really at years end be the 5th best RB?!?! 2005 was his "career year" and his absolute ceiling IMO! At a spot like pick # 5, with the risk is it worth it to take this guy. Other Rb's to consider are guys like Edge, SJax, Caddy, Brown, Jordan and maybe Rudi. Each of all those RB's have their own question marks as well. So basically after those top 4, do you have to take Tiki, or would it be crazy to go a different route????