Has a random fantasy football website CheatSheet Editor lost his or he (1 Viewer)

fenwah · Sep 8, 2006

I've been a subscriber to a wildly popular fantasy football site for four years now...and love it dearly. However, after looking at this week's cheatsheets, I am left scratching my head?

Six of the top seven WRs are coming from three teams (Cincy, Indy, and Arizona). Randy Moss is the other. Are they really suggesting that all three #2 WRs from Cincy, Indy, and Arizona are higher ranked than 28 other team's #1 WRs?

Since I'm a Cincy homer, I like to see both Johnson and Who's Your Daddy in the top seven. I just find this hard to digest though.

redman · Sep 8, 2006

I think you should use the "rhymes with" approach to avoid explicitly disclosing subscriber content. :mellow:

diesel7982 · Sep 8, 2006

I think Housh is the only one who doesnt belong there. Doesnt even sound like hes likely to play.

mojorizin · Sep 8, 2006

Dodds knows someone will leak his brilliant rankings. Thus, he puts out a bogus Top 20 across all categories each week and changes them at the last minute to foil the leakers and no-subscribers. REche Caldwell will be back on top at 12:30 Sunday afternoon.

Legion of Doom · Sep 8, 2006

redman said:
I think you should use the "rhymes with" approach to avoid explicitly disclosing subscriber content.

It's not like most sites dont have them ranked the same way

fenwah · Sep 8, 2006

redman said:
I think you should use the "rhymes with" approach to avoid explicitly disclosing subscriber content.

Duely noted to please the anal.

Legion of Doom · Sep 8, 2006

LOL on the edit! :lmao:

ShaqAttaq · Sep 8, 2006

fenwah said:
Duely noted to please the anal.

that kind of talk belongs in the Cage.

redman · Sep 8, 2006

fenwah said:
redman said:

I think you should use the "rhymes with" approach to avoid explicitly disclosing subscriber content.

Click to expand...

Duely noted to please the anal.

We're not fighting here, guy. Besides, my original post was :sarcasm:

I truly don't care one way or the other.

fenwah · Sep 8, 2006

redman said:
fenwah said:

redman said:

I think you should use the "rhymes with" approach to avoid explicitly disclosing subscriber content.

Click to expand...

Duely noted to please the anal.

Click to expand...

We're not fighting here, guy. Besides, my original post was I truly don't care one way or the other.

It's hard to portray sarcasm on these boards...mine was sarcastic as well...just enjoying my lunch in my small cube at lunch. Hitting the golf course in T-Minus three hours.

Search

Search

Has a random fantasy football website CheatSheet Editor lost his or he (1 Viewer)

fenwah

Footballguy

redman

Footballguy

diesel7982

Footballguy

mojorizin

Guest

Legion of Doom

Footballguy

fenwah

Footballguy

Legion of Doom

Footballguy

ShaqAttaq

Morally Ambiguous

redman

Footballguy

fenwah

Footballguy

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread