Ron_Mexico
I Love Doggies
Mike Furrey
What kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey
One that you aren't in, which by default makes it a good one.What kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
just dropped him for Eric Johnson last week.Mike Furrey
i dropped him too.. for Doug Gabriel.just dropped him for Eric Johnson last week.Mike Furrey![]()
Turn the tool factor WAY down both here and in the PMs you send to members of this board if you want to keep posting.TIAJOne that you aren't in, which by default makes it a good one.What kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
I dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
And they get Matt Leinart this week. One other defense I am strongly thinking of is NO....they play against Gradkowski led BucsKC Defense/Special Teams.Maybe, just maybe there's a change of attitude there. I know it was the 49ers, but their offense HAD been moving the ball pretty well.They could be a pickup for situational/matchups.
When backups come in you always should look for guys that they're familiar with. With Leinart, I think Bergen has been starting for the Cards, so Leinart's probably been practicing with the second team = Leonard Pope and Bryant Johnson. In such a new role, security should not be underestimated. He may look to these two often.And they get Matt Leinart this week. One other defense I am strongly thinking of is NO....they play against Gradkowski led BucsKC Defense/Special Teams.Maybe, just maybe there's a change of attitude there. I know it was the 49ers, but their offense HAD been moving the ball pretty well.They could be a pickup for situational/matchups.
I'd like some more thoughts on Lloyd, actually.I watched him go to the WW in two leagues this past week - teams giving up on him. I need a fifth WR, and I'm deciding whether it is worth rostering someone like Lloyd or Jurevicius.Will Wash. throw enough to make Lloyd valuable?Will Edwards' and Winslow's progressions prevent Jurevicius from being valuable?It's looking more an dmore like I should re-acquire Bobby Engram as my WR5. Couldn't believe he survived into this week after I dropped him.How about Brandon Lloyd. Longshot, yes, but I'm guessing after the Jacksonville/Skins game, teams will be rolling a little more coverage over the way of one Santana Moss. Brunell seems to also be getting out of the funk.Chris Cooley also is avaliable in some of my leagues - he's been dropped out of frustration.
Furrey is owned in 7% of CBS leagues right now. Obviously that'll go up after this weekend, but he's certainly available in a lot of leagues for waiver claims this week.Turn the tool factor WAY down both here and in the PMs you send to members of this board if you want to keep posting.TIAJOne that you aren't in, which by default makes it a good one.What kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Marques Colston is still on the WW in our leagueI dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
He could be Brandon Stokely to Fitz and Boldin's Harrison and Wayne of 2004.How about BJohnson?Seems like a consistent 3-4 target a game guy, I am sure he's been working extensively with Leinert, and as insurance behind Fitz/Boldin, he seems to be a guy with nice upside.
+he was a first rounder, so he's got skillzHe could be Brandon Stokely to Fitz and Boldin's Harrison and Wayne of 2004.How about BJohnson?Seems like a consistent 3-4 target a game guy, I am sure he's been working extensively with Leinert, and as insurance behind Fitz/Boldin, he seems to be a guy with nice upside.
short benchWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Bears play AZ and SF in 2 of the next 3 weeks. Maybe they'll be a good play?Re: Furrey - I don't play in any leagues at CBS, but at six leagues that I monitor all FA in for my teams as well as a FA column, he is already gone in all of them - and only a one I believe was the pickup last week.As far as WR go Roscoe Parrish or Peerless Price in Buffalo both look like they will have some value especially as bye week fillins especially in Weeks 6 & 7 when people are most likely to have a need.The angle regarding KC DS could be applied to those rotating DS - whomever is going to playArizonaSan FranciscoTennesseeHouston
LOL - I took the NE/Mia combo as a good D combo to have. I am in complete agreement that a great play this week is NE's D against Miami.If NE's on the WW and you need a one-week filler, NE fits the bill.If you're in need of a DEF for week 5 pick-up the Patriots(who shut down the Bengals) against MIA this week who did NOTHING against the defensive likes of HOU and TEN 2 weeks in a row. Another option that might be available on the FA list are The Saints D/ST who play Tampa with Rookie QB Gradowski taking the wheel.
Good point SC.He snuck back in pretty quietly.This is the kind of info these threads are good for.Joe Jurevicius. He was targeted in the redzone, and Braylon Edwards and KWII are getting a lot of attention. A young qb like Frye may look to a veteran that he can trust, and the Browns seem to like getting behind and then have to play playground football.Many teams dropped him because of the rib injury.
Turn the tool factor WAY down both here and in the PMs you send to members of this board if you want to keep posting.TIAJOne that you aren't in, which by default makes it a good one.What kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
KC Defense/Special Teams.Maybe, just maybe there's a change of attitude there. I know it was the 49ers, but their offense HAD been moving the ball pretty well.They could be a pickup for situational/matchups.
Joe,:related topic:In a way, I gotta agree. Your waiver wire report seems geared for 10 team Yahoo! re-draft leagues and it's a week plus behind the times. I hardly ever read it anymore because that.Maybe you oughta consider adding a "Diamond in the rough" waiver wire report, where your boys do a little more digging for the hidden gems.Just my opinion, JB.I dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Furrey and Gabriel are both available in my league (12 teams but very tight roster limits). But I can guarantee at least one of them won't be available after this week because I'm first on the WW list and I'm looking for a WR. I think both of them can fill a WR3 role going forward.Furrey is owned in 7% of CBS leagues right now. Obviously that'll go up after this weekend, but he's certainly available in a lot of leagues for waiver claims this week.Turn the tool factor WAY down both here and in the PMs you send to members of this board if you want to keep posting.TIAJOne that you aren't in, which by default makes it a good one.What kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
After realizing that both my D's wre on the same bye week I just picked up KC "D" for next week. They seem like the real deal. JimKC Defense/Special Teams.Maybe, just maybe there's a change of attitude there. I know it was the 49ers, but their offense HAD been moving the ball pretty well.They could be a pickup for situational/matchups.
In a highly competitive 14-team league, Furrey is still available.Joe,:related topic:In a way, I gotta agree. Your waiver wire report seems geared for 10 team Yahoo! re-draft leagues and it's a week plus behind the times. I hardly ever read it anymore because that.Maybe you oughta consider adding a "Diamond in the rough" waiver wire report, where your boys do a little more digging for the hidden gems.Just my opinion, JB.I dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Joe,:related topic:In a way, I gotta agree. Your waiver wire report seems geared for 10 team Yahoo! re-draft leagues and it's a week plus behind the times. I hardly ever read it anymore because that.Maybe you oughta consider adding a "Diamond in the rough" waiver wire report, where your boys do a little more digging for the hidden gems.Just my opinion, JB.I dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Jerious Norwood. Maurice Drew. Laurence Maroney. Michael Robinson is a goal line hog. I forget his name, but that huge Philadelphia FB. Bernard Berrian. For the love of god, if he's in the FA Pool, get Heath Miller. That kid is annoyingly good. Drew Brees is rarely drafted in smaller drafts. Atlanta's D/ST is a great one. Ashley Lelie is usually good for at least one big play a game. So is Randle El. Buffalo's D/ST, if you need it. Jericho Cotchery. In IDP leagues, Donte Whitner, Kamerion Wimbley, and Pacman Jones.
Scratch that and reverse it - Brown's in the dog house.Lendale White
Chris Brown is hurting, Travis Henry is in the doghouse,
I had Lloyd in every one of my leagues prior to friday and right now I've only got him left on one team and this is 12 team, 20 roster spots, PPR league so pretty deep leagues.The reason I targeted Lloyd, albeit always past the 10th round, is I recall his hot start last year before Alex Smith basically came in and killed the fantasy value for everyone on that team. Than when I figured in the fact Washington gave up a decent draft pick for him and Lloyd raved about the fact he was in an offense he loves I tought he could put up decent numbers. I've only started him in one game in one league but I've watched him closely and there is just not much to like, which is why he is only left on one team of mine. After 4 games he has done next to nothing, the Redskins run the ball a lot, and when they do pass Lloyd is option 3A or 3B with ARE and after Moss and Cooley. My guess is he'll eventually find the endzone but he won't be a consistent guy you will ever want in your lineup and even when the Redskins were having the tar beaten out of them by the Cowboys and forced to air it out he still did little.I'd like some more thoughts on Lloyd, actually.I watched him go to the WW in two leagues this past week - teams giving up on him. I need a fifth WR, and I'm deciding whether it is worth rostering someone like Lloyd or Jurevicius.Will Wash. throw enough to make Lloyd valuable?Will Edwards' and Winslow's progressions prevent Jurevicius from being valuable?It's looking more an dmore like I should re-acquire Bobby Engram as my WR5. Couldn't believe he survived into this week after I dropped him.How about Brandon Lloyd. Longshot, yes, but I'm guessing after the Jacksonville/Skins game, teams will be rolling a little more coverage over the way of one Santana Moss. Brunell seems to also be getting out of the funk.Chris Cooley also is avaliable in some of my leagues - he's been dropped out of frustration.
Thanks Guys.You both illustrate a great point. For a lot of our readers (our guys are more competitive than the CBS system as a whole where he's avaiable in 93% of leagues) a note to pickup Mike Furrey drawsJoe,:related topic:In a way, I gotta agree. Your waiver wire report seems geared for 10 team Yahoo! re-draft leagues and it's a week plus behind the times. I hardly ever read it anymore because that.Maybe you oughta consider adding a "Diamond in the rough" waiver wire report, where your boys do a little more digging for the hidden gems.Just my opinion, JB.I dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Totally disagree. The early waiver wire reports called out Cochery and Colston;both of which have bolstered my record and PF.
FBG still puts out the best and most helpful reports out there,regardless of league format.
ointstotopic:I don't know if this counts as a diamond in the rough, but DavidKircus is poised to do some good things in Denver. A lot morethan what he did in Detroit. And I like the potential last stand and/orblaze of glory for Koren Robinson.
IMO, there's nothing to work out. You guys do a great job, and it's not hard to just ignore the names which are already rostered. The human mind is good at filtering out that kind of info.And this site (don't remember if it was subscription content or not) helped me pick up Willie Parker (dynasty) early in the 2004 season, so diamonds in the rough are duly noted.You both illustrate a great point. For a lot of our readers (our guys are more competitive than the CBS system as a whole where he's avaiable in 93% of leagues) a note to pickup Mike Furrey drawsas he was drafted on day 1. In lots of other leagues, he'll be available and is the kind of info the guy wants. It's a balance and we'll continue to try and work it out.J
This is a lock to happen :homerOct 17: Curtis Martin is eligble to come off the PUPLeon Washington. Barlow remains the Jerome Bettis of the offense, but with an injury to Houston and Blaylock not getting many looks, Washington might be in line to get more touches.
That balance is what any FF site must strive for - I've seen ones that do it well and do it badly. You need to cater to a wide variety of people weekly. Sharks and guppies alike. I think you guys do ok. I usually read the whoile thing - even if I know aboutthe guy I like a perspective other than my own -- gives me food for thought.Thanks Guys.You both illustrate a great point. For a lot of our readers (our guys are more competitive than the CBS system as a whole where he's avaiable in 93% of leagues) a note to pickup Mike Furrey drawsJoe,:related topic:In a way, I gotta agree. Your waiver wire report seems geared for 10 team Yahoo! re-draft leagues and it's a week plus behind the times. I hardly ever read it anymore because that.Maybe you oughta consider adding a "Diamond in the rough" waiver wire report, where your boys do a little more digging for the hidden gems.Just my opinion, JB.I dunno. He might be available in some leagues. But for a bigger picture, I always look at these things in more of a "which players are rising in value?" sort of way.Whether it's pick off the waiver wire, or make a trade for the guy. It's a good angle.JWhat kind of league could you find where he is still available on the FA pile?Mike Furrey![]()
Totally disagree. The early waiver wire reports called out Cochery and Colston;both of which have bolstered my record and PF.
FBG still puts out the best and most helpful reports out there,regardless of league format.
ointstotopic:I don't know if this counts as a diamond in the rough, but DavidKircus is poised to do some good things in Denver. A lot morethan what he did in Detroit. And I like the potential last stand and/orblaze of glory for Koren Robinson.
as he was drafted on day 1. In lots of other leagues, he'll be available and is the kind of info the guy wants. It's a balance and we'll continue to try and work it out.J