Justloveit
Footballguy
Apparently he hyperextended his knee and is out between 2-4 weeks.
http://www.nj.com/jets/ledger/index.ssf?/b....xml&coll=1
http://www.nj.com/jets/ledger/index.ssf?/b....xml&coll=1
Picked up Washington purely on spec. Is that many carries realistic? Not doubting. I'm just curious where you pulled the number from.Looks like we'll get to see more of the Leon Washington experiment. Guessing 15-18 carries for 80 yds and maybe a score vs. JAX. Throw in a couple catches and he might be a decent bye week filler if needed. JAX has a good defense, but the skins ran pretty well vs. them last week.
C. Houston 12 49 0 13 K. Barlow 13 35 2 8 L. Washington 9 33 0 7 B. Smith 1 8 0 8 B. Askew 1 5 0 5 C. Pennington 1 5 0 No science just from last week's game FWIW. Gave LW 7-8 of Houston's carries and he's proven to be part of the passing game already (as a 3rd down back type player). Barlow's been decent and good around the goal line, but really hasn't done anything to take the job. And Mangini seems to like Leon (insert bud light joke here..)Picked up Washington purely on spec. Is that many carries realistic? Not doubting. I'm just curious where you pulled the number from.Looks like we'll get to see more of the Leon Washington experiment. Guessing 15-18 carries for 80 yds and maybe a score vs. JAX. Throw in a couple catches and he might be a decent bye week filler if needed. JAX has a good defense, but the skins ran pretty well vs. them last week.
Boy, against JAX, I'm thinking they're going to have to alot more throwing than running. I'd be surprised if they even get a rushing TD and 80 yards as a team against that line.
I totally agree. Barlow looks very good at the goaline - the only goaline carry he didn't get that I can remember was when Houston scored. Barlow had been in the game and came out at the very end of the drive b/c he hurt his foot. Other than that, Barlow has gotten the touches at the goaline and has done an excellent job converting.I think the coaching staff is aware that some of the running problems stem from the blocking and not from the running backs. Barlow has sometimes looked very good in shedding tacklers, but he usually has to evade the first one behind the line. I believe that the coaching staff will continue to give Barlow the majority of the carries.Interestingly, the injury to Houston is not entirely favorable to Washington. It means that Derrick Blaylock will be activated, and Blaylock is much more natural competition to Washington and the 3rd-down role than Houston was. In any case, based on how Houston performed, I suspect he'll get another opportunity when he returns.I am dumping him (had him as bye week fill last week) because Barlow came in to steal the goal line. He's not good enough to have that happen unless you have a deep bench, which I don't.
Does anyone think Cedric is a good pickup in dynasty? I thought he showed good moves/ability versus the Colts. Any chance he becomes the featured runner by the end of the year?
The Redskins success against the Jags run defense last week basically was built around running wide early to get that d-line winded, and then pounding the ball late. It worked to a charm. You may not want to take the time or bandwidth to look at it, but you can download the Direct TV video of that game with the commercials omitted from here (right click and hit "save as" on your computer). You can watch the entire game in 25 mins.Two things I've been saying for over a month now.... Barlow and Houston are similar RB's, but Houston is the better of the two. Blaylock and Washington are the same too, but Washington is CLEARLY better than Blaylock, in every aspect, except perhaps pass blocking, but Washington is improving. Washington is faster, better between the tackles and more elusive.
Having said all of that, here is why I think Washington may get many more touches than he has been getting: The RB in Schottenheimer's offense lines up very deep... about 7 yards behind the LOS. The O line can't sustain blocks for very long. Washington's much faster than any of the other RB's, and that speed means he gets to some of those holes before they close. His speed and pass catching ability is something the opposing D has to be prepared to defend against. I would not be surprised to see the Jets try a lot of outside running plays to negate the Jax powerful interior D line.
Schottenheimer has so far been pretty creative in trying to create mismatches and force teams to adjust so far. I think he'll attempt to use Washington's speed to run away from the Jaguars strength.... that D line. Make those guys persue, get them tired. Then later in the game, maybe try Barlow between the tackles. I think we'll see a lot of Washington in the first half against the Jags.
LOL.... didn't know that redman.... maybe I should be an OC! Barlow is the slowest of Blaylock, Washington and even Houston. I don't see him being successful running outside, which is why I still think Washington could be very active in the first half. On the other hand, Jax may be prepared for that, and have the DE's penetrate off the snap to stop the outside run, given that the Skins did that with good results last Sunday. But.... even if that is what the Jags do, Washington is still the better choice IMO. He can turn upfield better than Barlow, and despite his size, still has some inside running power.redman said:The Redskins success against the Jags run defense last week basically was built around running wide early to get that d-line winded, and then pounding the ball late. It worked to a charm. You may not want to take the time or bandwidth to look at it, but you can download the Direct TV video of that game with the commercials omitted from here (right click and hit "save as" on your computer). You can watch the entire game in 25 mins.Rovers said:Two things I've been saying for over a month now.... Barlow and Houston are similar RB's, but Houston is the better of the two. Blaylock and Washington are the same too, but Washington is CLEARLY better than Blaylock, in every aspect, except perhaps pass blocking, but Washington is improving. Washington is faster, better between the tackles and more elusive.
Having said all of that, here is why I think Washington may get many more touches than he has been getting: The RB in Schottenheimer's offense lines up very deep... about 7 yards behind the LOS. The O line can't sustain blocks for very long. Washington's much faster than any of the other RB's, and that speed means he gets to some of those holes before they close. His speed and pass catching ability is something the opposing D has to be prepared to defend against. I would not be surprised to see the Jets try a lot of outside running plays to negate the Jax powerful interior D line.
Schottenheimer has so far been pretty creative in trying to create mismatches and force teams to adjust so far. I think he'll attempt to use Washington's speed to run away from the Jaguars strength.... that D line. Make those guys persue, get them tired. Then later in the game, maybe try Barlow between the tackles. I think we'll see a lot of Washington in the first half against the Jags.If Barlow can get wide, then maybe they'll try that with him, but I'd expect that the quickness of Blaylock and Washington will mean that those will be their choices to handle that duty.
Barlow is certainly faster than Houston. He was clocked faster than Houston and he looks faster on the field. Barlow has been fairly succesful running to the outside - all of his runs for 10+ have been to the outside. I think that nothing changes - Barlow will get the majority of the carries, followed by Washington, and Blaylock will get a few plays to try and show that he's better than we think.LOL.... didn't know that redman.... maybe I should be an OC! Barlow is the slowest of Blaylock, Washington and even Houston. I don't see him being successful running outside, which is why I still think Washington could be very active in the first half.redman said:The Redskins success against the Jags run defense last week basically was built around running wide early to get that d-line winded, and then pounding the ball late. It worked to a charm. You may not want to take the time or bandwidth to look at it, but you can download the Direct TV video of that game with the commercials omitted from here (right click and hit "save as" on your computer). You can watch the entire game in 25 mins.Rovers said:Two things I've been saying for over a month now.... Barlow and Houston are similar RB's, but Houston is the better of the two. Blaylock and Washington are the same too, but Washington is CLEARLY better than Blaylock, in every aspect, except perhaps pass blocking, but Washington is improving. Washington is faster, better between the tackles and more elusive.
Having said all of that, here is why I think Washington may get many more touches than he has been getting: The RB in Schottenheimer's offense lines up very deep... about 7 yards behind the LOS. The O line can't sustain blocks for very long. Washington's much faster than any of the other RB's, and that speed means he gets to some of those holes before they close. His speed and pass catching ability is something the opposing D has to be prepared to defend against. I would not be surprised to see the Jets try a lot of outside running plays to negate the Jax powerful interior D line.
Schottenheimer has so far been pretty creative in trying to create mismatches and force teams to adjust so far. I think he'll attempt to use Washington's speed to run away from the Jaguars strength.... that D line. Make those guys persue, get them tired. Then later in the game, maybe try Barlow between the tackles. I think we'll see a lot of Washington in the first half against the Jags.If Barlow can get wide, then maybe they'll try that with him, but I'd expect that the quickness of Blaylock and Washington will mean that those will be their choices to handle that duty.
I disagree. Last year, with Houston still recovering from that thyroid problem and being out of shape and overweight, he was pretty slow. But, he came into camp at a very slimmed down 218 this year, and I saw both Barlow and Houston up close, in training camp. True, I only saw Barlow pratice once, but Houston to my eye is faster than Barlow. Houston's clocked times were done when he had the thyroid condition, which was only first discovered at the combine. Understandably, his times were slow. So, IMO, Houston is indeed faster than Barlow, and he keeps his legs going after first contact, something Barlow doesn't do. Once he gets wrapped up, he goes down.... Houston bulls for another yard or two. As for why Barlow's outside runs look better is because the Jets O line can't open, or at least sustain a running lane between the tackles, something I mentioned earlier. Given the fact that the Jets can't sustain blocks, and given Washington's clear edge in speed over all of the other RB's on the roster, and going against the Jax D line.... I still expect to see Leon get more touches than Barlow does THIS week, or at a minimum, in the first half.Barlow is certainly faster than Houston. He was clocked faster than Houston and he looks faster on the field. Barlow has been fairly succesful running to the outside - all of his runs for 10+ have been to the outside. I think that nothing changes - Barlow will get the majority of the carries, followed by Washington, and Blaylock will get a few plays to try and show that he's better than we think.LOL.... didn't know that redman.... maybe I should be an OC! Barlow is the slowest of Blaylock, Washington and even Houston. I don't see him being successful running outside, which is why I still think Washington could be very active in the first half.redman said:The Redskins success against the Jags run defense last week basically was built around running wide early to get that d-line winded, and then pounding the ball late. It worked to a charm. You may not want to take the time or bandwidth to look at it, but you can download the Direct TV video of that game with the commercials omitted from here (right click and hit "save as" on your computer). You can watch the entire game in 25 mins.Rovers said:Two things I've been saying for over a month now.... Barlow and Houston are similar RB's, but Houston is the better of the two. Blaylock and Washington are the same too, but Washington is CLEARLY better than Blaylock, in every aspect, except perhaps pass blocking, but Washington is improving. Washington is faster, better between the tackles and more elusive.
Having said all of that, here is why I think Washington may get many more touches than he has been getting: The RB in Schottenheimer's offense lines up very deep... about 7 yards behind the LOS. The O line can't sustain blocks for very long. Washington's much faster than any of the other RB's, and that speed means he gets to some of those holes before they close. His speed and pass catching ability is something the opposing D has to be prepared to defend against. I would not be surprised to see the Jets try a lot of outside running plays to negate the Jax powerful interior D line.
Schottenheimer has so far been pretty creative in trying to create mismatches and force teams to adjust so far. I think he'll attempt to use Washington's speed to run away from the Jaguars strength.... that D line. Make those guys persue, get them tired. Then later in the game, maybe try Barlow between the tackles. I think we'll see a lot of Washington in the first half against the Jags.If Barlow can get wide, then maybe they'll try that with him, but I'd expect that the quickness of Blaylock and Washington will mean that those will be their choices to handle that duty.
Mangini went with 2 backs last week, Brad Smith and Askew were considerred 3rd and 4th RBs or emergency fillins. So yeah he's got plenty of opportunity.I don't expect Mangini to change that til Martin comes back(... seems like LW is making the most of the opportunity.
He's good.Mangini went with 2 backs last week, Brad Smith and Askew were considerred 3rd and 4th RBs or emergency fillins. So yeah he's got plenty of opportunity.I don't expect Mangini to change that til Martin comes back(... seems like LW is making the most of the opportunity.)