What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jake Plummer hate (1 Viewer)

Assani Fisher

Footballguy
Didn't want to hijack the other thread, but I was going to respond to this:

BoulderBob said:
rupricht said:
The context was that Irvin was ragging on Plummer saying that after witnessing tonight's game Denver had no chance of getting to the Superbowl.Ridiculous statement since Plummer basically won this game for Denver against perhaps the best D in the game. I'm glad Young set him right.
Not ridiculous, but correct. Jake Plummer will not lead this Bronco team to the SuperBowl, he simply isn't good enough, and too mistake prone.
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
he had a nice 2005 season. no question.

but he looks terrible THIS year, and in his CAREER he's had as many TDs as he had INTs.

soooo thats where the hate comes from.

 
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
The perception is that Plummer can be a good quarterback when the run game is efficiently churning along and Denver is building a lead. If Plummer has to play catch up, or if the run game isn't working, he'll make costly mistakes. Last year's playoff loss against Pittsburg is a good example. Fair or not, that's the knock on him.If Denver was content with what they had in Plummer, they wouldn't have went after Cutler.
 
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....

wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?

Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.

IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?

ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
The perception is that Plummer can be a good quarterback when the run game is efficiently churning along and Denver is building a lead. If Plummer has to play catch up, or if the run game isn't working, he'll make costly mistakes. Last year's playoff loss against Pittsburg is a good example. Fair or not, that's the knock on him.If Denver was content with what they had in Plummer Van Pelt, they wouldn't have went after Cutler.
fixedClearly they're content with what they have in Plummer, hence he's still starting. This has been discussed to death. The Cutler pick was about building for their future (and it showed how little faith they have in BVP, both as a backup and as the future starter).

Does it mean that Plummer's stay in Denver may be shorter than expected? Probably. But that's the nature of the game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's definitely worthy of FF hate this season.
Whether or not Plummer is good enough to lead the Broncos is debatable. This point however is spot on. The guy may win games, but he can't score for #### and is constantly throwing picks. Say what you want about his moxie, but his numbers this year are hideous and there's no debating that.
 
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
The perception is that Plummer can be a good quarterback when the run game is efficiently churning along and Denver is building a lead. If Plummer has to play catch up, or if the run game isn't working, he'll make costly mistakes. Last year's playoff loss against Pittsburg is a good example. Fair or not, that's the knock on him.If Denver was content with what they had in Plummer, they wouldn't have went after Cutler.
So how do you explain then that he has the third most victories in games decided by 3 points or less OF ALL TIME? In college, wasn't he known as a great clutch QB? And in Arizona, Plummer certainly wasn't just a game manager like you say- he willed them to that playoff win.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clearly they're content with what they have in Plummer, hence he's still starting. This has been discussed to death. The Cutler pick was about building for their future (and it showed how little faith they have in BVP, both as a backup and as the future starter). Does it mean that Plummer's stay in Denver may be shorter than expected? Probably. But that's the nature of the game.
The Cutler pick was about building for their future in that Plummer is on his way out, both due to age and skill degredation. Cutler will be starting at some point next year without question. It may be this year if Plummer continues to play poorly AND the Broncos start losing. Honestly, the only positive for Plummer this year is that the Broncos are winning. Arguably the most important stat, but he's not playing well period.
 
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....

wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?

Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.

IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?

ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
The perception is that Plummer can be a good quarterback when the run game is efficiently churning along and Denver is building a lead. If Plummer has to play catch up, or if the run game isn't working, he'll make costly mistakes. Last year's playoff loss against Pittsburg is a good example. Fair or not, that's the knock on him.If Denver was content with what they had in Plummer Van Pelt, they wouldn't have went after Cutler.
fixedClearly they're content with what they have in Plummer, hence he's still starting. This has been discussed to death. The Cutler pick was about building for their future (and it showed how little faith they have in BVP, both as a backup and as the future starter).

Does it mean that Plummer's stay in Denver may be shorter than expected? Probably. But that's the nature of the game.
Cutler is still a rookie, but the assumption is that he'll take over next season. Denver has a great window of opportunity for a bowl run right now. Why swap QB's when you're so close?
 
Clearly they're content with what they have in Plummer, hence he's still starting. This has been discussed to death. The Cutler pick was about building for their future (and it showed how little faith they have in BVP, both as a backup and as the future starter). Does it mean that Plummer's stay in Denver may be shorter than expected? Probably. But that's the nature of the game.
The Cutler pick was about building for their future in that Plummer is on his way out, both due to age and skill degredation. Cutler will be starting at some point next year without question. It may be this year if Plummer continues to play poorly AND the Broncos start losing. Honestly, the only positive for Plummer this year is that the Broncos are winning. Arguably the most important stat, but he's not playing well period.
The bottom line is Denver was extremely high on Cutler. They considered him the best QB from the draft class and most likely a top 5 prospect overall. Once he fell out of the top 10, they couldn't justify not trading up to get him. I doubt they went into the draft thinking, "We need to find a replacement for Plummer because he's old his skills have degraded." They went in with a draft board of player rankings. And when Cutler fell, he was too good to pass up. As I said, it's the nature of the game.
 
Didn't want to hijack the other thread, but I was going to respond to this:

BoulderBob said:
rupricht said:
The context was that Irvin was ragging on Plummer saying that after witnessing tonight's game Denver had no chance of getting to the Superbowl.Ridiculous statement since Plummer basically won this game for Denver against perhaps the best D in the game. I'm glad Young set him right.
Not ridiculous, but correct. Jake Plummer will not lead this Bronco team to the SuperBowl, he simply isn't good enough, and too mistake prone.
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
Perhaps you missed the AFC Championship game last year?
 
I believe it was Steve Young last night that explained Plummer in the following manner. If he is on a team that is capable of winning it all, he will go along with the ship. He isn't capable of leading a team to a championship. That is probably a fine line, but I would guess that most qb's would fall into that description.

 
Didn't want to hijack the other thread, but I was going to respond to this:

BoulderBob said:
rupricht said:
The context was that Irvin was ragging on Plummer saying that after witnessing tonight's game Denver had no chance of getting to the Superbowl.Ridiculous statement since Plummer basically won this game for Denver against perhaps the best D in the game. I'm glad Young set him right.
Not ridiculous, but correct. Jake Plummer will not lead this Bronco team to the SuperBowl, he simply isn't good enough, and too mistake prone.
Now I don't mean to single Bob out here, as I've heard this hate spewed by a ton of people regarding Jake, but I just don't get it....wasn't Jake Plummer an MVP candidate last year? When Trent Dilfer can win a SB or when Big Ben can have a QB rating of something like 30 in the SB and win, how can an MVP candidate who has the 3rd most wins in games decided by 3 points or less(behind only Marino and Elway) and who has a better record in Denver than John Elway not win?Jake Plummer was a great college QB. He was drafted by the Arizona freakin' Cardinals AND HE LED THEM TO A PLAYOFF WIN!!! Think about that for a second. Then he goes to Denver and puts up better winning percentage than Elway despite having Tatum Bell/Mike Anderson as his RBs and an again Rod Smith as his #1 WR(maybe Walker this year) and no Shannon Sharpe at all.IMO this guy is clearly a winner! What am I missing?ETA: Too mistake prone? Huh???? This guy only had 7 interceptions all of last year! Was Brett Favre too mistake prone to win a SB too?
Perhaps you missed the AFC Championship game last year?
So a guy that leads his team to the conference championship game and loses is automatically not a good QB? What do you think of Peyton Manning then
 
I believe it was Steve Young last night that explained Plummer in the following manner. If he is on a team that is capable of winning it all, he will go along with the ship. He isn't capable of leading a team to a championship. That is probably a fine line, but I would guess that most qb's would fall into that description.
Your last sentence says it perfectly....there are only 3 or so QBs in the league that can take an average team to SB contention. That doesn't mean Jake can't win a SB or isn't a very good QB!
 
Roethlisberger's TEAM won a superbowl DESPITE HIM
Yeah Roethlisberger had a terrible postseason. I'm not sure why he even bothered to show up against Cincy, Indy, and Denver. Get a clue genius.......
:goodposting: Some people forget he averaged around 225 yards passing and had 7 TDs and 1 INT as well as 1 rushing TD in 3 games ON THE ROAD in Cincy, Indy and Denver. Yes, he had an awful Super Bowl, but he pretty much was the main reason that they even got there. No one other individual on the Steelers had as much to do with all three road playoff wins as him.Believe me, I own Parker and it sucked to watch Ben throw away the game and only have 4 rushes for Parker in the second half when Pitt had a lead at half time. Also, look at his actual stats from his first two years and you won't see very many QBs in NFL history that did as well in their rookie and second years. He sucks in 2006, but based on 2004 & 2005, I think it is very clear he came back to early, alah Culpepper.
 
why are people ignoring his career numbers.

AS MANY INTS AS TDS

medioce QB at best who had an awesome 2005 campaign who is back to being mediocre at best this season

 
Plummer will make the terrible throw that will kill a team in the playoffs. He is an average NFL QB that will never lead his team to the Super Bowl, hence the drafting of Cutler. His career completion % is 57%, and he has 153 interceptions to go along with 153 TD's. In the playoffs, he has 10 INT's v.s 7 TD's. I don't hate the guy, I just don't believe he has what it takes to lead a team without a dominant offense/defense to a SuperBowl. If you asked 100 NFL scouts, I'd be very surprised if more than a handful disagreed with me. Of course if you put the guy on the '00 Ravens, or the '85 Bears, his team still takes the title, but his team isn't good enough to overcome a QB with questionable accuracy and poise.

If he proves me wrong, good for Jake, but I believe the people calling me an idiot for stating this opinion should look in the mirror. He still has a few years to prove his doubters wrong, but the writing is on the wall for him in Denver, and well, his career is on the downswing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
he had a nice 2005 season. no question.but he looks terrible THIS year, and in his CAREER he's had as many TDs as he had INTs. soooo thats where the hate comes from.
Jake Plummer is clearly a tale of two cities.Denver Jake: 35-12 (74.5%)Arizona Jake: 30-52 (36.6%)Denver Jake: 63:39 TD:Int (1.6:1)Arizona Jake: 90:114 TD:Int (1:1.3)Denver Jake: 7.42 ypaArizona Jake: 6.40 ypaI don't get why people have such a hard time seeing that Plummer really isn't anywhere near as bad as he looked in Arizona. In Denver, he has better than double the winning percentage, better than double the TD:INT ratio, and over a full yard more per attempt. Continuing to penalize Jake for what he did in Arizona, at this point, is beyond absurd... it's asinine.
The perception is that Plummer can be a good quarterback when the run game is efficiently churning along and Denver is building a lead. If Plummer has to play catch up, or if the run game isn't working, he'll make costly mistakes. Last year's playoff loss against Pittsburg is a good example. Fair or not, that's the knock on him.If Denver was content with what they had in Plummer, they wouldn't have went after Cutler.
Denver had three former 1,000 yard rushers on their roster when they drafted Clinton Portis. How'd that wind up working out for them?Lots of teams say that they draft "best player available", but few actually do. Lots of fans say that their team should draft BPA, but few actually mean it. Denver is one of the very few teams that actually *DOES* draft based on BPA rather than need, and the reaction to that sort of illustrates why.Sportswriters keep asking why Denver "wasted" a 1st overall on a guy who wasn't ready to compete immediately when they were so close to the superbowl, and yet lambasted teams like Buffalo and Washington for repeatedly reaching based on need. Denver has had one losing season under the Shanahan era, and they drafted Cutler because they want it to stay that way. Sooner or later, Jake will be gone, and Denver's window will be open a heck of a lot longer if they have a seasoned replacement on hand when that day comes, rather than having to go like Arizona and try to scramble to field some veteran QB journeyman for a year or two before throwing a rookie into the fire and struggling through the growing pains.Heck, you could ask the same thing about Pittsburgh in 2004. Tommy Maddox was just a season removed from a HUGE year, and Pittsburgh fancied itself a championship team... but rather than drafting an "immediate contributer", they drafted a franchise-type QB. How'd that wind up working out again?
why are people ignoring his career numbers.AS MANY INTS AS TDSmedioce QB at best who had an awesome 2005 campaign who is back to being mediocre at best this season
According to Football Outsiders' advanced statistics, only three QBs ranked in the top 12 in 2005, 2004, and 2003 on a per-play basis. There was Peyton Manning (1st, 1st, 2nd), Trent Green (7th, 9th, 5th), and Jake Plummer (5th, 12th, 6th). Last season was not a fluke- it was pretty much in line with Jake's entire career to date in Denver.
 
SSOG, great post, and I appriciate the insight. I actually quoted your post on Champ Bailey in another forum recently.

Since you seem to know a ton about your team, let me ask you this: Its clear that you're higher than most on Plummer and Bailey. Which players on the Broncos do you think are overrated by the general public and why?

 
SSOG, great post, and I appriciate the insight. I actually quoted your post on Champ Bailey in another forum recently.

Since you seem to know a ton about your team, let me ask you this: Its clear that you're higher than most on Plummer and Bailey. Which players on the Broncos do you think are overrated by the general public and why?
Overrated-Tatum Bell. People have been saying for years that he was the most talented back on Denver's roster, when in reality he was probably the worst "Denver Back" since Olandis Gary. I think he'd look pretty good in another uniform, but Anderson and Droughns started over him for a reason, and Dayne/MBell were listed ahead of him for a reason. I'm still reserving judgement on him this season- supposedly he's improved, but he's been pretty much the same TB as always so far (money on 2nd and 3rd down, but very inconsistant on 1st down). Of course, that's come against two defenses that normally give Denver fits, so I'm giving him a pass in both games and am eagerly awaiting seeing him in action against Oakland. Don't get me wrong- TBell is incredibly talented... he's just not the best of fits for Denver's system.

Javon Walker. Sure, he's flashed some big-play ability so far, but he's also shown a lot of big drops so far. It might just be rust and all that, and he's looked a lot better in the last two games than he did in the first two games, but I'm not ready to start calling him an elite WR until he starts showing me that he can hang on to the ball. People like to ooh and ahh about the big plays, but Denver's offense is all predicated on consistantly moving the chains. Drops are not a good way to consistantly move the chains. Still, he missed all of last year, so I'm giving him a pass so far.

Brandon Marshall. Darius Watts, Adrian Madise, Kevin Kasper, Scottie Montgomery, and Chris Cole have three things in common. 1) They were all, at one point this century, potential WR3s for the Denver Broncos. 2) They were all absolute media darlings during training camps with countless fluff pieces written about them. 3) A couple from years from now, they'll all cause you to scratch your head, furrow your brow, and say "Who???". Let's see Marshall do something on the field before we start comparing him to Rod Smith, kay?

Tony Scheffler. Good camps are one thing, but he's looked positively BRUTAL on the field. Had a pass hit him in the freakin' helmet. He's only caught 10% of the balls that have been thrown his way. He may one day be a good TE, but anyone thinking that that day might come this year has another think coming.

Steven Alexander. Some people think he's a low starter-caliber TE. Those people, I would contend, are mistaken.

John Lynch. People say that he always was a liability in coverage, but he actually went something like 8 years without a TE catching a single pass on him. It's only recently that he's become a liability in coverage. He's a smart guy and makes some smart plays, but he's a pretty average safety at this point in his career, and Ferguson is a lot better.

D.J. Williams. He's a man among boys and a real disruptive force, but the reality is he's only the third-best LB on his own team. Granted, he could be the first-best LB on a lot of other teams...

George Foster. Perception is that he's pretty good. Reality is that he's probably the weak link on the line, and might get benched later on this season if Adam Meadows shows anything. He's very quietly being outplayed by unheralded who-dat Cooper Carlisle, who waited 6 years before he got his first career NFL start.

Accurately Rated

Champ Bailey. He's the consensus best CB in the league. That's pretty accurate. People tend to underrate CBs in general, but they understand where Champ falls in the list of CBs.

Al Wilson. Again, considered one of the best at MLB in the league. Columnists call him underrated a lot, and he doesn't get the pub of an Urlacher/Thomas/Lewis, but I believe that if people call you underrated often enough, you aren't underrated anymore. Still, his coverage skills are definitely underappreciated, and a lot of people see his low tackle numbers and think he's overrated, so let's call it all a wash.

Lang/Brown/Ekuban/Myers. Generally viewed as players who came over from Cleveland and played solidly. Seems like a pretty fair assessment, personally.

Rod Smith. Reliable veteran on the downside of his career who is still a tremendous worker, player, and leader. Check, check, and check.

Darrent Williams/Dominique Foxworth. Great rookie DBs who are entering their sophomore campaign and who get picked on a lot as opponents avoid Champ.

Cooper Carlisle. Not great, not terrible, just solid. He doesn't do a lot worth mentioning, and he doesn't get mentioned a lot, but he's reliable.

Underrated-

Jake Plummer. Not this year, mind you, but in general. Since he's come to Denver, he's consistantly been a top-10 QB. People saying that Denver can't win with Jake is ludicrous, seeing as Denver *HAS* won with Jake a remarkable 75% of the time. Also, he got lambasted for his 20-INT season, but meanwhile Trent Green has a 17-int campaign the same year and people talk about how underrated he is? Trent Green threw a left-handed INT that year, too, but somehow everybody remembers Jake's lefty and not Trent's. I don't get it. People hold his time in Arizona against him too much, yet for some reason give Archie Manning a pass for posting worse stats in New Orleans, saying "his team was horrible" and calling Archie the best QB ever on a bad team.

Ian Gold. Really, really, really disruptive. Second most likely guy, outside of Champ Bailey, to absolutely destroy a play that the offense executed to perfection.

Gerard "Big Money" Warren. Only Bailey and Wilson are more important to the defense than Big Money, and even Al Wilson is possibly arguable.

Nick Fergeson. I'll agree that a Denver safety deserved a trip to the pro bowl last year. I'll disagree that Lynch was that safety. Nick Ferguson didn't miss a tackle until something like week 10 last year. That's ridiculous. He's also better in coverage than Lynch is (although he's definitely more of an in-the-box safety).

Ben Hamilton. According to Dr. Z, the third best guard in the league last year. Hamilton is an absolute mauler, can play guard and center equally well, and has a good 6+ years left in his career.

Tom Nalen. If there's any justice in the world, Nalen is a first-ballot HoFer. The most dominant center of his era, with a pedigree like no one else in history, in his 12th season and still playing at a pro-bowl level. According to Dr. Z, who charted every play by the elite centers, nobody in the league was better than Tom Nalen last year... which is saying something, given that Dr. Z doesn't like Tom Nalen.

Matt Lepsis. The most underrated player on the entire squad. According to Dr. Z again, Lepsis was the #1 tackle in the entire NFL last year (yes, better than Walter Jones, Pace, Ogden, or either of the Cincinatti tandem)... yet Lepsis has never been to as much as a single pro-bowl. If you aren't drafted high as an OL, you pretty much never get any recognition (Lepsis was undrafted), but Lepsis is clearly one of the elite tackles in the entire NFL- and the contract he signed last year proves it.

 
What a hell of a homer. Wow.

As far as the difference between Trent Dilfer and Plummer, it's clear. Dilfer helped his team directly a little less, but didn't hurt them nearly as much. Overall, he helped his team more by not hurting it as much.

Plummer will never lead the Broncos to a Super Bowl.

 
What a hell of a homer. Wow.As far as the difference between Trent Dilfer and Plummer, it's clear. Dilfer helped his team directly a little less, but didn't hurt them nearly as much. Overall, he helped his team more by not hurting it as much.Plummer will never lead the Broncos to a Super Bowl.
Trent Dilfer threw an INT once every 20.45 pass attempts with Baltimore.Jake Plummer has thrown an INT once every 35.62 pass attempts with Denver.Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
 
What a hell of a homer. Wow.As far as the difference between Trent Dilfer and Plummer, it's clear. Dilfer helped his team directly a little less, but didn't hurt them nearly as much. Overall, he helped his team more by not hurting it as much.Plummer will never lead the Broncos to a Super Bowl.
Trent Dilfer threw an INT once every 20.45 pass attempts with Baltimore.Jake Plummer has thrown an INT once every 35.62 pass attempts with Denver.Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
Hahah nice 1PS:Chargers > Broncos (really looking forward to both games already
 
Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
If you think the only way to hurt your team is by throwing an INT, you need to watch your golden boys a little bit more.(Ignoring the fact that your contention is so utterly ridiculous and narrow-minded that I'd love to call you on it. I mean, what Plummer has done in previous years where the Broncos choked really matters, right?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excellent work, SSOG. Us Broncos fans owe you a debt of gratitude for sharing your knowledge and insight. PM forthcoming.

 
What a hell of a homer. Wow.

As far as the difference between Trent Dilfer and Plummer, it's clear. Dilfer helped his team directly a little less, but didn't hurt them nearly as much. Overall, he helped his team more by not hurting it as much.

Plummer will never lead the Broncos to a Super Bowl.
Trent Dilfer threw an INT once every 20.45 pass attempts with Baltimore.Jake Plummer has thrown an INT once every 35.62 pass attempts with Denver.

Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
Hahah nice 1PS:

Chargers > Broncos (really looking forward to both games already
Not according to Baltimore. :D :boxing:
Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
If you think the only way to hurt your team is by throwing an INT, you need to watch your golden boys a little bit more.(Ignoring the fact that your contention is so utterly ridiculous and narrow-minded that I'd love to call you on it. I mean, what Plummer has done in previous years where the Broncos choked really matters, right?)
Oh, you're absolutely right. There are more ways to hurt your team than by throwing INTs.For instance, you could also take sacks.

Trent Dilfer was sacked once every 9.83 pass attempts in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has been sacked once every 24.80 pass attempts in Denver.

Another way to hurt your team would be to fumble the ball.

Trent Dilfer fumbled once every 28.25 pass attempts in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has fumbled once every 99.21 pass attempts in Denver.

Then again, I suppose fumbles aren't that bad if they get recovered.

Trent Dilfer lost a fumble once every 113.0 pass attempts in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has lost a fumble once every 231.5 pass attempts in Denver.

Another way to hurt your team is by being at your worst late in the game.

Trent Dilfer had a QB rating 57.6 in the 4th quarter in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has a QB rating of 75.1 in the 4th quarter in Denver.

Another good way to hurt your team is by being at your worst when your team is trailing.

Trent Dilfer had a QB rating of 45.6 when he was trailing in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has a QB rating of 69.8 when he is trailing in Denver.

Perhaps the best way to hurt your team, though, is to really just blow in "Late and Close" situations.

Trent Dilfer had a 52.7 QB rating in "late and close" situations in Baltimore (4th quarter, game within 7).

Jake Plummer has a 79.6 QB rating in "late and close" situations in Denver.

Once again, would you care to revise your opinion of which QB didn't hurt his team as much? Because I can keep going all day long if you want me to.

 
SSOG, great post, and I appriciate the insight. I actually quoted your post on Champ Bailey in another forum recently.

Since you seem to know a ton about your team, let me ask you this: Its clear that you're higher than most on Plummer and Bailey. Which players on the Broncos do you think are overrated by the general public and why?
Overrated-Tatum Bell. People have been saying for years that he was the most talented back on Denver's roster, when in reality he was probably the worst "Denver Back" since Olandis Gary. I think he'd look pretty good in another uniform, but Anderson and Droughns started over him for a reason, and Dayne/MBell were listed ahead of him for a reason. I'm still reserving judgement on him this season- supposedly he's improved, but he's been pretty much the same TB as always so far (money on 2nd and 3rd down, but very inconsistant on 1st down). Of course, that's come against two defenses that normally give Denver fits, so I'm giving him a pass in both games and am eagerly awaiting seeing him in action against Oakland. Don't get me wrong- TBell is incredibly talented... he's just not the best of fits for Denver's system.

Javon Walker. Sure, he's flashed some big-play ability so far, but he's also shown a lot of big drops so far. It might just be rust and all that, and he's looked a lot better in the last two games than he did in the first two games, but I'm not ready to start calling him an elite WR until he starts showing me that he can hang on to the ball. People like to ooh and ahh about the big plays, but Denver's offense is all predicated on consistantly moving the chains. Drops are not a good way to consistantly move the chains. Still, he missed all of last year, so I'm giving him a pass so far.
You say in another thread that Tatum is a different runner this season. Now you say he's the same old Tatum. I realize you may be saying two different things... maybe you're saying that the numbers suggest Tatum is the same old Tatum, but when you watch him, he appears to run stronger, and as I believe you put it, he's getting lower. Either way, I think you need to be more consistent. Is he, or isn't he, the same Tatum?As for Walker, perhaps I'm just not watching closely (I've been to both home games, so have a tendency to miss a few plays here and there), but I don't recall any major drops since week 1. He has bailed Plummer out a few times with great catches. He's the real deal.

 
SSOG said:
Trent Dilfer threw an INT once every 20.45 pass attempts with Baltimore.Jake Plummer has thrown an INT once every 35.62 pass attempts with Denver.Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
Going along with my "Jake Plummer is good when the run game is working and Denver is building a lead" theory. These are Jakes stats when Denver is behind by 1 or more points:His Int/Pass Attempt ratio drops to 25.79. His Int/Completions ratio drops to 14.05. When Denver was down, Jake has thrown 14 tds to 19 picks. His passing percentage drops from 59.4 % to 54.5%.From a non statistical view, when Jake needs to play catchup, he seems to force bad throws. I'm not a plummer 'hater', but I'm not a fan of his either.add: I do think Plummer is good enough to be in a superbowl with Denver.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Roethlisberger's TEAM won a superbowl DESPITE HIM
yeah Pittsburgh had a great team before Ben took over a led them to a 15-1 record in his first season and the SB in his next. :sarcasm:
Cmon now. You know Pitt had a great defense and was the runningest team in the nfl when Ben arrived.Not saying he sucks. But saying he was the reason they won the SB is a bit much, especially since he had a 30 QB rating in the big game.
 
thatguy said:
You say in another thread that Tatum is a different runner this season. Now you say he's the same old Tatum. I realize you may be saying two different things... maybe you're saying that the numbers suggest Tatum is the same old Tatum, but when you watch him, he appears to run stronger, and as I believe you put it, he's getting lower. Either way, I think you need to be more consistent. Is he, or isn't he, the same Tatum?
He's LOOKED a lot better running the ball (he looks like he's getting better yards after first contact, for instance), but he's still getting the same RESULTS he always had (his success rate keeps hovering right around the mid-40% range, like it was last year). That's the distinction.At this point, I'm chalking it up to the defenses he's faced (i.e. Tatum Bell's probably improved from last year, it just hasn't showed up in the results because he's been facing really stingy defenses), I'm just leaving open the possibility that he's still going to remain inconsistant on 1st down for the rest of the season. Then again, it might be that the first time he faces a soft D he absolutely tears them to shreds. I suppose we'll know for sure in a couple of weeks.
 
SSOG said:
Trent Dilfer threw an INT once every 20.45 pass attempts with Baltimore.Jake Plummer has thrown an INT once every 35.62 pass attempts with Denver.Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
Going along with my "Jake Plummer is good when the run game is working and Denver is building a lead theory." These are Jake's stat's when Denver is behind by 1 or more points:His Int/Pass Attempt ratio drops to 25.79. His Int/Completions ratio drops to 14.05. When Denver was down, Jake has thrown 14 tds to 19 picks. His passing percentage drops from 59.4 % to 54.5.From a non statistical view, when Jake needs to play catchup, he seems to force bad throws. I'm not a plummer 'hater', but I'm not a fan of his either.
I'll agree- all the numbers clearly say that Plummer has been noticably worse when trailing over the past 3 years than he has been while leading. The point I'm making is that Trent Dilfer was worse when trailing, too- and Trent Dilfer's bad was a heckuvalot worse than Jake Plummer's bad. No matter WHAT the situation is (leading, trailing, early in the game, late in the game), Jake Plummer still performs better and commits fewer damaging mistakes than Trent Dilfer in pretty much every way possible. This whole assertion that Denver couldn't win the superbowl with Plummer is absolutely ludicrous.Also, oddly enough, Jake Plummer's stats were exactly the opposite in his first year in Denver. He had a 82.5 passer rating when leading, and a 100.6 passer rating when trailing, and he didn't have a single turnover of any kind all season long when Denver was trailing.
 
SSOG said:
Gold Plated Nails said:
SSOG said:
The Jacket said:
What a hell of a homer. Wow.

As far as the difference between Trent Dilfer and Plummer, it's clear. Dilfer helped his team directly a little less, but didn't hurt them nearly as much. Overall, he helped his team more by not hurting it as much.

Plummer will never lead the Broncos to a Super Bowl.
Trent Dilfer threw an INT once every 20.45 pass attempts with Baltimore.Jake Plummer has thrown an INT once every 35.62 pass attempts with Denver.

Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
Hahah nice 1PS:

Chargers > Broncos (really looking forward to both games already
Not according to Baltimore. :D :boxing:
The Jacket said:
SSOG said:
Care to revise your opinion about which QB didn't hurt his team as much?
If you think the only way to hurt your team is by throwing an INT, you need to watch your golden boys a little bit more.(Ignoring the fact that your contention is so utterly ridiculous and narrow-minded that I'd love to call you on it. I mean, what Plummer has done in previous years where the Broncos choked really matters, right?)
Oh, you're absolutely right. There are more ways to hurt your team than by throwing INTs.For instance, you could also take sacks.

Trent Dilfer was sacked once every 9.83 pass attempts in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has been sacked once every 24.80 pass attempts in Denver.

Another way to hurt your team would be to fumble the ball.

Trent Dilfer fumbled once every 28.25 pass attempts in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has fumbled once every 99.21 pass attempts in Denver.

Then again, I suppose fumbles aren't that bad if they get recovered.

Trent Dilfer lost a fumble once every 113.0 pass attempts in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has lost a fumble once every 231.5 pass attempts in Denver.

Another way to hurt your team is by being at your worst late in the game.

Trent Dilfer had a QB rating 57.6 in the 4th quarter in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has a QB rating of 75.1 in the 4th quarter in Denver.

Another good way to hurt your team is by being at your worst when your team is trailing.

Trent Dilfer had a QB rating of 45.6 when he was trailing in Baltimore.

Jake Plummer has a QB rating of 69.8 when he is trailing in Denver.

Perhaps the best way to hurt your team, though, is to really just blow in "Late and Close" situations.

Trent Dilfer had a 52.7 QB rating in "late and close" situations in Baltimore (4th quarter, game within 7).

Jake Plummer has a 79.6 QB rating in "late and close" situations in Denver.

Once again, would you care to revise your opinion of which QB didn't hurt his team as much? Because I can keep going all day long if you want me to.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Easily one of the fiercest, funniest smack-downs I've seen on this board. It's fact versus half-assed observational opinion. :bye:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top